Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

Watchful waiting care or early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Where we are

Aortic stenosis, the most common valvular heart disease in Western countries, affects predominantly older people. Prompt aortic valve replacement is undoubtedly indicated in symptomatic patients. Management of asymptomatic patients is nowadays shifting from a conservative approach to early aortic valve replacement, as multimodality imaging is increasingly available. However, multimodality imaging has led to multiple prognostic parameters and complex algorithms, as well as a new staging classification that has left patients and physicians somewhat puzzled. We highlight the value of thorough serial clinical examinations, Doppler echocardiography and exercise testing when caring for a growing aortic stenosis population, including that has no or limited access to multimodality imaging. Evidence for early aortic valve replacement versus conservative management in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis is biased by the lack of serial stress testing evaluation; 30% of so-called asymptomatic patients were in fact symptomatic, and thus were clear candidates for aortic valve replacement in the above-mentioned studies. Randomized trials of aortic valve replacement versus conservative management that include serial stress testing evaluation are needed to ascertain whether early aortic valve replacement actually improves clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis. Less interventional medicine and healthcare resource utilization can result in better health.

Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background

Risk stratification of patients with low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains challenging. We sought to evaluate the relationship between the dimensionless index (DI)—the ratio of the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral to that of the aortic valve jet—and mortality in these patients.

Methods

Seven hundred fifty-five patients with LG severe AS (defined by aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 or aortic valve area indexed to body surface area ≤0.6 cm 2 /m 2 and mean aortic pressure gradient <40 mm Hg) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were studied. Flow status was defined according to stroke volume index <35 mL/m 2 (low flow, LF) or ≥35 mL/m 2 (normal flow, NF).

Results

After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, history of hypertension, history of atrial fibrillation, AS-related symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, indexed left ventricular ventricular mass, aortic valve area, and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent covariate, patients with LG-LF and DI<0.25 exhibited a considerable increased risk of death compared with patients with LG-NF and DI≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.61–3.62]; P <0.001), LG-NF and DI<0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.24–2.73]; P =0.003), and LG-LF and D≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.42–3.63]; P <0.001). In contrast, patients with LG-LF and DI≥0.25, LG-NF and DI<0.25, and LG-NF and DI≥0.25 had similar outcome. DI<0.25 showed incremental prognostic value in patients with LG-LF severe AS but not in patients with LG-NF severe AS.

Conclusions

Among patients with LG severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased DI<0.25 is a reliable parameter in patients with LF to identify a subgroup of patients at higher risk of death who may derive benefit from aortic valve replacement.

Impact of Arterial Blood Pressure on Ultrasound Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment is based on several indices. Aortic valve area (AVA) is subject to inaccuracies inherent to the measurement method, while velocities and gradients depend on hemodynamic status. There is controversy as to whether blood pressure directly affects common indices of AS severity.

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to assess the effect of systolic blood pressure (SBP) variation on AS indices, in a clinical setting.

METHODS

A prospective, single-center study included 100 patients with at least moderately severe AS with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction. Patients underwent ultrasound examination during which AS severity indices were collected, with three hemodynamic conditions: (1) low SBP: <120 mm Hg; (2) intermediate SBP: between 120 and 150 mm Hg; (3) high SBP: ≥150 mm Hg. For each patient, SBP profiles were obtained by injection of isosorbide dinitrate or phenylephrine.

RESULTS

At baseline state, 59% presented a mean gradient (G_mean) ≥ 40 mm Hg, 44% a peak aortic jet velocity (V_peak) ≥4 m/sec, 66% a dimensionless index (DI) ≤0.25, and 87% an indexed AVA (AVAi) ≤ 0.6 cm²/m². Compared with intermediate and low SBP, high SBP induced a significant decrease in G_mean (39 ± 12 vs 43 ± 12 and 47 ± 12 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) and in V_peak (3.8 ± 0.6 vs 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.2 ± 0.6 mm Hg; P < .05). Compared with the baseline measures, in 16% of patients with an initial G_mean< 40 mm Hg, gradient rose above 40 mm Hg after optimization of the afterload (low SBP; P < .05). Conversely, DI and AVAi did not vary with changes in hemodynamic conditions. Flow rate, not stroke volume was found to impact G_mean and V_peak but not AVA and DI (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodynamic conditions may affect the AS ultrasound assessment. High SBP, or afterload, leads to an underestimation of AS severity when based on gradients and velocities. Systolic blood pressure monitoring and control are crucial during AS ultrasound assessment.

Discordant Echocardiographic Grading in Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis (DEGAS Study) From the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging Research Network: Rationale and Study Design

Background

Low-gradient aortic stenosis (LG-AS) is characterized by the combination of an aortic valve area compatible with severe stenosis and a low transvalvular mean gradient with low-flow state (i.e., indexed stroke volume <35 mL/m²) in the presence of reduced (classical low-flow AS) or preserved (paradoxical low-flow AS) ejection fraction. Furthermore, the occurrence of a normal-flow LG-AS is still advocated by many authors. Within this diagnostic complexity, the diagnosis of severe AS remains challenging.

Objective

The general objective of the Discordant Echocardiographic Grading in Low-gradient AS (DEGAS Study) study will be to assess the prevalence of true severe AS in this population and validate new parameters to improve the assessment and the clinical decision-making in patients with LG-AS.

Methods and Analyses

The DEGAS Study of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging is a prospective, multicenter, observational diagnostic study that will enroll consecutively adult patients with LG-AS over 2 years. AS severity will be ideally confirmed by a multimodality approach, but only the quantification of calcium score by multidetector computed tomography will be mandatory. The primary clinical outcome variable will be 12-month all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome variables will be (i) 30-day mortality (for patients treated by Surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVR); (ii) 12-month cardiovascular mortality; (iii) 12-month new major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular complications, and rehospitalization for heart failure; and (iv) composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure. Data collection will take place through a web platform (REDCap), absolutely secure based on current standards concerning the ethical requirements and data integrity.