A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation for Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Metastases

Radiofrequency Ablation for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Review of Literature from the Last Decade

This review summarizes the current findings on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from relevant literature published in the last decade. While most earlier studies included small populations and had short follow-up periods, more robust data have become available owing to prospective or large cohort studies. The reported overall survival rates after RFA for stage I NSCLC were 83-96%, 40-74%, and 23-61% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, in recent studies. Furthermore, many comparative studies on the outcomes of RFA and stereotactic body radiotherapy have been performed. Most of these studies report no significant difference in survival outcomes between the therapies. Currently, major guidelines define RFA as a reasonable alternative treatment for stage I NSCLC in non-surgical candidates.

Microwave Ablation in Primary Lung Malignancies

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Eighty-five percent of cases correspond to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pivotal nonsurgical options for early-stage disease include percutaneous ablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Microwave Ablation (MWA) is a locoregional treatment option that has many advantages over radiofrequency ablation and has been able to overcome the limitations of this technique in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC. In this review article, we highlight the current evidence supporting the use of MWA in patients with early-stage NSCLC and discuss the technical considerations of the procedure, including optimal patient selection and planning strategies, as well as the potential complications and reported outcomes. Finally, we mention future trends involving ablation in NSCLC, including its role in combination with SBRT in central tumors, management of post-SBRT local recurrence, and its potential as an adjuvant treatment option for patients with resistance to systemic therapy or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Real-time control of respiratory motion: Beyond radiation therapy

Motion management in radiation oncology is an important aspect of modern treatment planning and delivery. Special attention has been paid to control respiratory motion in recent years. However, other medical procedures related to both diagnosis and treatment are likely to benefit from the explicit control of breathing motion. Quantitative imaging - including increasingly important tools in radiology and nuclear medicine - is among the fields where a rapid development of motion control is most likely, due to the need for quantification accuracy. Emerging treatment modalities like focussed-ultrasound tumor ablation are also likely to benefit from a significant evolution of motion control in the near future. In the present article an overview of available respiratory motion systems along with ongoing research in this area is provided. Furthermore, an attempt is made to envision some of the most expected developments in this field in the near future.

Emerging medical applications based on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 10 THz

The potential for using non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF; at frequencies from 0 Hz up to the THz range) for medical purposes has been of interest since many decades. A number of established and familiar methods are in use all over the world. This review, however, provides an overview of applications that already play some clinical role or are in earlier stages of development. The covered methods include modalities used for bone healing, cancer treatment, neurological conditions, and diathermy. In addition, certain other potential clinical areas are touched upon. Most of the reviewed technologies deal with therapy, whereas just a few diagnostic approaches are mentioned. None of the discussed methods are having such a strong impact in their field of use that they would be expected to replace conventional methods. Partly this is due to a knowledge base that lacks mechanistic explanations for EMF effects at low-intensity levels, which often are used in the applications. Thus, the possible optimal use of EMF approaches is restricted. Other reasons for the limited impact include a scarcity of well-performed randomized clinical trials that convincingly show the efficacy of the methods and that standardized user protocols are mostly lacking. Presently, it seems that some EMF-based methods can have a niche role in treatment and diagnostics of certain conditions, mostly as a complement to or in combination with other, more established, methods. Further development and a stronger impact of these technologies need a better understanding of the interaction mechanisms between EMF and biological systems at lower intensity levels. The importance of the different physical parameters of the EMF exposure needs also further investigations.

Percutaneous thermal ablation of primary and secondary lung tumors: Comparison between microwave and radiofrequency ablation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency (RFA) ablation in the percutaneous treatment of primary and secondary lung tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 115 patients with a total of 160 lung tumors (primary, n=41; secondary, n=119) were retrospectively included. There were 56 men and 59 women with a mean age of 67.8±12.7 (SD) years (range: 42-89 years) who underwent either MWA (61 patients; 79 tumors) or RFA (54 patients; 81 tumors). The primary study endpoints were local recurrence during follow-up and the incidence of complications during and following thermal ablation. The MWA and RFA groups were compared in terms of treatment efficacy and complication rates.

RESULTS

Demographics were similar in the two groups. Mean tumor diameter was smaller in RFA group (13.1±5.1 [SD] mm; range: 4-27mm) than in MWA group (17.1±8.3 [SD] mm; range: 5-36mm) (P<0.001). Ablation volumes at one month were 24.1±21.7 (SD) cm³ (range: 2-97.8 cm³) in RFA group and 30.2±35.9 (SD) cm³ (range: 1.9-243.8 cm³) in MWA group (P=0.195). During a mean overall follow-up duration of 488±407 (SD) days (range: 30-1508 days), 9/160 tumors (5.6%) developed local recurrence: six (6/79; 7.6%) in the RFA group and three (3/81; 3.7%) in the MWA group (P=0.32). Pneumothoraces were more frequent in the RFA group (32/79; 40.5%) than in the MWA group (20/81; 24.7%) (P=0.049). The mean length of hospital stay was 4.5±3.7 (SD) days (range: 1-25 days) in the RFA group and 4.7±4.6 (SD) days (range: 2-25 days) in the MWA group (P=0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

MWA favorably compares with RFA and can be considered as an effective and safe thermal ablation technique for lung tumors, especially in situations where RFA has limited efficacy.