Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. The Use of an Intermaxillary Fixation Screw for Mandibular Setback Surgery.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;
65:1562-8. [PMID:
17656284 DOI:
10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.071]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2006] [Revised: 06/28/2006] [Accepted: 10/31/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To assess skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery with and without an intermaxillary fixation (IMF) screw.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The subjects were 40 patients with mandibular prognathism. The subjects underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy with titanium plate fixation and were divided into 2 groups, 1 with and 1 without an IMF screw. A lateral cephalogram was done preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The 2 groups were then compared statistically.
RESULTS
In the comparison of the time-course change between the 2 groups with repeated measure analysis of variance, there were significant differences in occlusal plane (between subjects, F = 2.517; df = 4; P = .0437) and convexity (between subjects, F = 4.048; df = 4; P = .0038). However, there was no significant difference in the other measurements.
CONCLUSION
This study suggested that in most measurements, there was no significant difference between 2 groups with and without an IMF screw in time-course skeletal change. However, use of IMF screws was helpful for orthognathic surgery as a rigid anchor of IMF.
Collapse