New classification of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices—2005

A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare the effects and outcomes of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices, 1.6% hyaluronic acid/4.0% chondroitin sulfate and 2.0% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, during phacoemulsification.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized clinical trial comprised 78 eyes (39 patients) that received phacoemulsification performed by the same surgeon using a standardized technique. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.6% hyaluronic acid/4.0% chondroitin sulfate or 2.0% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose on the first eye. The other eye was treated later and received the other viscoelastic agent. Preoperative and postoperative examinations (5, 24 and 48 hours; 7 and 14 days; 3 and 6 months) included measurements of the total volume of the ophthalmic viscosurgical device, ultrasound and washout times to completely remove the ophthalmic viscosurgical device, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness and best-corrected visual acuity. The corneal endothelial cell count was measured at baseline and at six months postoperatively. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01387620.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of cataract density or ultrasound time. However, it took longer to remove 2.0% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose than 1.6% hyaluronic acid/ 4.0% chondroitin sulfate, and the amount of viscoelastic material used was greater in the 2.0% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose group. In addition, the best-corrected visual acuity was significantly better in the hyaluronic acid/ chondroitin sulfate group, but this preferable outcome was only observed at 24 hours after the operation. There were no statistically significant differences between the two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices regarding the central corneal thickness or intraocular pressure measurements at any point in time. The corneal endothelial cell count was significantly higher in the hyaluronic acid/chondroitin sulfate group.

CONCLUSION

The ophthalmic viscosurgical device consisting of 1.6% hyaluronic acid/4.0% chondroitin sulfate was more efficient during phacoemulsification and was easier to remove after IOL implantation than 2.0% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. In addition, the corneal endothelial cell count was significantly higher following the use of hyaluronic acid/chondroitin sulfate than with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, which promoted an improved level of corneal endothelium protection.

Safety, efficacy, and intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc and Healon ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of DisCoVisc ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) with respect to a comparator, Healon OVD (Advanced Medical Optics, Inc).

Patients and methods

In this prospective study, patients with cataracts were randomized to an OVD, and then received phacoemulsification and injection of an intraocular lens. After each surgery, unmasked investigators completed subjective questionnaires about OVD characteristics during each stage of the procedure. Masked technicians evaluated objective safety parameters of intraocular pressure (IOP) and endothelial cell density, with 90 days of follow-up.

Results

The DisCoVisc OVD group (128 eyes) and the Healon OVD group (121 eyes) had statistically similar outcomes for IOP and for endothelial cell loss. Subjectively assessed viscosity was statistically different (P < 0.0001), with Healon OVD most often rated “cohesive” and DisCoVisc OVD most often rated “both dispersive and cohesive”. Workspace maintenance differed between groups (P < 0.0001), with workspace most frequently rated “full chamber maintained” when using DisCoVisc OVD and most frequently rated “workspace maintained” when using Healon OVD. “Flat” or “shallow” workspace ratings occurred only in the Healon OVD group.

Conclusion

DisCoVisc OVD had both cohesive and dispersive properties, and was safe and effective for every stage of cataract surgery.

Use of viscoelastic substance in ophthalmic surgery - focus on sodium hyaluronate

Among viscoelastic substances, sodium hyaluronate has become the most popular for intraocular surgeries since the introduction of Healon^® (sodium hyaluronate 1%, 4 × 10⁶ daltons) in 1979. This review focuses on the recent development of a new generation of sodium hyaluronate agents with new rheologic properties and the relevant new techniques used in cataract, glaucoma, corneal, and vitreoretinal surgeries. The introduction of sodium hyaluronate agents with different rheologic properties has improved the safety and reliability of intraocular surgeries. Although there have been numerous studies reporting the effectiveness of viscoelastic substances in intraocular surgeries, rigorous validation by multi-center randomized control trials is lacking in many cases. At present, no single viscoelastic agent is most suitable to all of the various intraocular surgical techniques. Therefore, ophthalmologic surgeons should keep up with recent developments of viscoelastic agents and relevant surgical techniques for better patient care.

Ionically cross-linked hyaluronic acid: wetting, lubrication, and viscoelasticity of a modified adhesion barrier gel

Hyaluronic acid (HA), in linear or cross-linked form, is a common component of cosmetics, personal care products, combination medical products, and medical devices. In all cases, the ability of the HA solution or gel to wet surfaces and/or disrupt and lubricate interfaces is a limiting feature of its mechanism of action. We synthesized ferric ion-cross-linked networks of HA based on an adhesion barrier, varied the degree of cross-linking, and performed wetting goniometry, viscometry, and dynamic mechanical analysis. As cross-linking increases, so do contact angle, viscosity, storage modulus, and loss modulus; thus, wetting and lubrication are compromised. These findings have implications in medical device materials, such as adhesion barriers and mucosal drug delivery vehicles.

Subjective evaluation of intraoperative performance of DisCoVisc in complex ocular environments

PURPOSE

To subjectively evaluate the intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc during phacoemulsification in complex ocular environments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, two experienced surgeons (ARV and CZ) performed phacoemulsification on 100 consecutive patients with cataract associated with complex ocular environments. Inclusion criteria were eyes with shallow anterior chambers (anterior chamber depth (ACD) of <2.1 mm), inadequate pupillary dilation (3 mm), dense cataract, and white mature cataract. The surgeons subjectively assessed the endpoints at each phase of phacoemulsification and various behavioural aspects of the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) were subsequently evaluated.

RESULTS

The distribution was as follows: eyes with white mature cataract (n=18), eyes with grades 4 and 5 cataract (n=56), eyes with co-existing shallow ACD <2 mm (n=24), and co-existing small pupil size <2 mm (n=18). DisCoVisc behaved like a moderately cohesive viscoelastic in 94% of the cases. Injection of viscoelastic was easy in 38 (38%) eyes and very easy in 62 (62%) eyes. Visualization after the viscoelastic injection was excellent in 74% of the eyes. During phacoemulsification, DisCoVisc was moderately dispersive at all the stages of emulsification. The bag maintenance during IOL implantation was excellent in 56% eyes; IOL implantation was easy in 26% of the eyes and difficult in 20% of the eyes. Surgeons found viscoelastic removal easy in 68% of the eyes. At the time of OVD removal, DisCoVisc behaved like both a dispersive and a cohesive viscoelastic in 96% of the eyes.

CONCLUSION

DisCoVisc provides both cohesive and dispersive properties. DisCoVisc alone, even in complex ocular environments, enabled the surgeon to achieve good intraoperative performance.

Adhesive retention of sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in an acrylic tube model and in porcine-eye corneal endothelium with different irrigation rates

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of irrigation rates on the adhesive retention of sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) by observation in an acrylic tube system designed to model the epithelial wall and in a porcine-eye experiment.

SETTING

Kohseichuo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

METHODS

Commercial sodium hyaluronate OVDs differing in molecular weight were visualized with fluorescein powder. Their adhesive and kinetic characteristics at 2 irrigation rates were visually observed in the acrylic tube model and in a porcine eye under phacoemulsification and aspiration.

RESULTS

In the acrylic tube model, the mean retention time of the low-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate increased from 2.3 seconds under 78 mL/min irrigation to 27.9 seconds under 45 mL/min irrigation. In the porcine eye, phacoemulsification retention of the same OVD on the corneal endothelial cells was also longer under the low irrigation rate of a 2.2 mm incision than under the higher rate of a 3.5 mm incision.

CONCLUSION

The stable retention of low-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate in the acrylic tube model at the low irrigation rate corresponded closely with that observed in the porcine eye. This indicates that low-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate with the low irrigation rates used in procedures such as microincision cataract surgery may effectively protect corneal endothelial cells against surgical risks.

Visco-shell technique with sodium hyaluronate 2.3% in phacoemulsification of Morgagnian cataract

We describe the visco-shell technique with sodium hyaluronate 2.3% (Healon5) to facilitate phacoemulsification in eyes with Morgagnian cataract. Because the entire nucleus is wrapped in a Healon5 visco-shell, phacoemulsification can be performed safely without damaging the corneal endothelium and the posterior capsule.

DisCoVisc versus the soft-shell technique using Viscoat and Provisc in phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the effects and outcomes of DisCoVisc (hyaluronic acid 1.6%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) with those of the soft-shell technique using Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) and Provisc (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) in phacoemulsification.

SETTING

Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.

METHODS

This prospective randomized clinical trial comprised 100 eyes having phacoemulsification by the same surgeon using a standardized technique. Eyes were randomly assigned to DisCoVisc (Group 1) or Viscoat and Provisc (Group 2). Preoperative and postoperative examinations included absolute change in pachymetry, percentage difference in endothelial cell density (ECD) and coefficient of variation (CV), and anterior segment inflammation.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) in Group 1 and Group 2 was 590.96+/-46.05 microm and 586.94+/-50.57 microm, respectively, at 1 day; 554.14+/-35.45 microm and 551.65+/-37.69 microm, respectively, at 7 days; and 533.74+/-29.12 microm and 536.44+/-35.59 microm, respectively, at 1 month. The between-group differences in CCT were not statistically significant. At 3 months, the mean ECD was 2427.06+/-243.26 cells/mm2 and 2475.30+/-222.83 cells/mm2, respectively, and the mean CV, 42.38+/-7.94 cells/mm2 and 41.66+/-7.71 cells/mm2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean ECD between preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively or in corneal thickness between preoperatively and 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

A single injection of DisCoVisc was effective, and its postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of combined Viscoat and Provisc.

The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: a prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics

PURPOSE

To compare the ability of cohesive and dispersive ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) to protect the corneal endothelium following in-the-bag phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

In a prospective single-masked randomized study, 60 eyes of 60 cataract patients were assigned to three groups of 20 patients each, according to which OVD was used: Celoftal, Vitrax or Healon. The corneal response to surgery was evaluated by measuring the endothelial cell loss, the variation in mean cell area of the endothelial cells (CV), the frequency of hexagonal cells, and the central corneal thickness. Data were recorded preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no significant difference was observed in cell count, CV, hexagonal pattern or pachymetry among groups. Postoperatively, all three groups had a significant decrease in cell count, but the decrease was significantly less in the Vitrax group (6.97%) than in the Celoftal (18.03%) and Healon groups (18.46%). No changes in CV, hexagonality or corneal thickness were observed within any of the three groups or among the groups. There was an equal and significant increase in visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber lens is known to affect the density and morphology of corneal endothelial cells. Viscoelastics facilitate cataract surgery and protect the corneal endothelium during the procedure. Choosing a dispersive hyaluronate OVD during the phaco procedure may allow for protection of the endothelial cells while suppressing the formation of free radicals. This may be the reason for the superior protective effect on the corneal endothelial cells of Vitrax compared with Celoftal and Healon.

Adjunct devices for managing challenging cases in cataract surgery: capsular staining and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cataract surgeons should employ all reasonable technology to facilitate safe and consistent outcomes. Knowledge of adjunct devices to enhance visualization of the capsular bag and appropriate use of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices allow for enhanced protection of intraocular structures and reduced rates of complication.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trypan blue is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for facilitating visualization of the anterior capsule. Animal data demonstrate Brilliant Blue G to be an effective capsular stain with a superior safety profile. Healon5 is a safe viscosurgical device that is particularly useful in children, poorly dilating pupils, intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome, and intumescent cataracts. The viscoadaptivity of Healon5 enables its utility throughout the procedure of cataract extraction. The recent literature on capsular dyes and advances in ophthalmic viscosurgical technology is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Inadequate capsular visualization and poor tissue stabilization/protection increase the chance of discontinuous capsulorhexis, retained nuclear material, vitreous loss and corneal decompensation. Utilization of adjunctive tools in the setting of challenging cataract cases can significantly limit adverse intraoperative outcomes and result in reproducible surgical success.

Modified SST–USST for tamsulosin-associated intraocular floppy-iris syndrome

I describe a technique using ophthalmic viscosurgical devices to perform cataract surgery in patients taking tamsulosin (Flomax). The 6-step method uses a combination variant of the soft-shell and ultimate soft-shell techniques and involves adjustments to flow parameters. It achieves satisfactory iris stability and permits uneventful surgery.