Long-term results of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia: Risk for ectasia

Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening

PURPOSE

To validate the Ectasia Risk Score System for identifying patients at high risk for developing ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Fifty eyes that developed ectasia and 50 control eyes with normal postoperative courses after LASIK were analyzed and compared using the previously described Ectasia Risk Score System, which assigns points in a weighted fashion to the following variables: topographic pattern, predicted residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness, age, preoperative corneal thickness (CT), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE).

RESULTS

In this series, 46 (92%) eyes with ectasia were correctly classified as being at high risk for the development of ectasia, while three (6%) controls were incorrectly classified as being at high risk for ectasia (P < 1 x 10(-10)). Significantly more eyes were classified as high risk by the ectasia risk score than by traditional screening parameters relying on abnormal topography or RSB thickness less than 250 micro (92% vs 50%; P < .00001). There was no difference in the sensitivity or specificity of the Ectasia Risk Score System in the population from which it was derived and this independent population of ectasia cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ectasia Risk Score System is a valid and effective method for detecting eyes at risk for ectasia after LASIK and represents a significant improvement over previously utilized screening strategies.

Analysis of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: Risk factors

PURPOSE

To examine a database of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures for preoperative and operative factors assumed to increase the risk for developing post-LASIK ectasia.

SETTING

Private clinical practice.

METHODS

A computer database was queried for eyes that had LASIK for myopic refractive errors with the following characteristics: preoperative corneal thickness 500 microm or less, mean keratometry greater than 47.0 diopters (D), patient age 25 years or younger, attempted correction greater than -8.0 D, refractive astigmatism not with-the-rule and greater than 2.0 D, and residual stromal bed thickness (RST) 250 microm or less. Flap thickness and RST were measured using ultrasound pachymetry. All recorded information was exported to MS Excel and analyzed for eyes that had ectasia.

RESULTS

Of the 9700 eyes in the database, none with the above characteristics developed ectasia over mean follow-up periods exceeding 2 years. Seven eyes had multiple risk factors without ectasia. Three eyes with abnormal preoperative topography developed ectasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual preoperative and operative factors did not in and of themselves increase the risk for ectasia. Unmeasured and unknown factors that affect the individual cornea's biomechanical stability, in combination with some suspected risk factors as well as the current inability to identify corneas at risk for developing ectatic disorders, probably account for most eyes that develop ectasia today.