Metabolic syndrome and liver transplantation: a review and guide to management

Are We Ready for Bariatric Surgery in a Liver Transplant Program? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity-related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are two main causes of end-stage liver disease requiring a liver transplantation. Studies exploring bariatric surgery in the liver transplantation setting have increased in recent years; however, a systematic analysis of the topic is lacking to date. This meta-analysis was conducted to explore the perioperative and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in obese patients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for studies reporting bariatric surgery in patients undergoing liver transplantation. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. We also extracted data about excess weight loss, body mass index, and improvement of comorbidities after bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients from 8 articles were included. Bariatric surgery-related morbidity and mortality rates were 37% (95% CI 0.27-0.47) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.02-0.13), respectively. Body mass index at 24 months was 31.02 (95% CI 25.96-36.09) with a percentage excess weight loss at 12 and 24 months of 44.08 (95% CI 27.90-60.26) and 49.2 (95% CI 31.89-66.66), respectively. After bariatric surgery, rates of improvement of arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus were 61% (95% CI 0.45-0.75) and 45% (95% CI 0.25-0.66), respectively. In most patients, bariatric surgery was performed after liver transplant and the most frequent technique was sleeve gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery can be performed safely in the setting of liver transplantation resulting in improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. The optimal timing and technique require further studies.

Metabolic Disorders After Liver Transplantation

Early after surgery, liver transplant (LT) recipients often develop weight gain due to an increase of caloric intake and fat mass (without recovery of muscle frame). This modification of body composition together with a negative metabolic impact of immunosuppressive drugs leads to a high prevalence of all the main metabolic disorders. Indeed, as expected, transplanted patients show a higher cardiovascular risk in comparison with general population. Notably, seeing the increase of mean age of transplanted population, metabolic disorders represent the true challenge for the transplant community. Considering the lack of evidences or clear indications about prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of metabolic disorders after LT, it would be mandatory to develop targeted further studies on this matter.

Approach to prevention of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) related cirrhosis is third common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Patients who have NASH related cirrhosis and are candidates for LT often have multiple comorbidities. These comorbidities need to be addressed before and after transplantation as it affects overall survival. Like hepatitis B, hepatitis C, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis which recurs after transplantation, NASH also recurs after transplant however the impact of the recurrence on allograft and patient outcomes is unclear. Limited data suggests that it does not affect graft and patient survival. De novo NAFLD which is defined as occurrence of fatty liver in a patient who did not have fatty liver prior to LT can also occur in the allograft of patients transplanted for non-NAFLD liver disease. Obesity, hyperlipidemia, diabetes as well as steroid dose and duration after LT are common predictors of recurrence of NAFLD after transplantation. Studies on prevention and treatment of NASH in post-transplant patients are lacking. Prevention of weight gain, regular exercises, weight reducing surgery, limited steroid use or steroid free regimen have been tried with varying success. Future studies for the prevention of NAFLD/NASH are required especially in post liver transplant patient.

NAFLD and liver transplantation: Disease burden, current management and future challenges

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), specifically its progressive form non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represents the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in Western countries. Diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity and cardiovascular disease are frequently present in patients with NAFLD who are candidates for liver transplantation. These factors require specific evaluation, including a detailed pre-surgical risk stratification, in order to improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Moreover, in the post-transplantation setting, the incidence of cardiovascular events and metabolic complications can be amplified by immunosuppressive therapy, which is a well-known driver of metabolic alterations. Indeed, patients with NASH are more prone to developing early post-transplant complications and, in the long-term, de novo malignancy and cardiovascular events, corresponding to higher mortality rates. Therefore, a tailored multidisciplinary approach is required for these patients, both before and after liver transplantation. Appropriate candidate selection, lifestyle modifications and specific assessment in the pre-transplant setting, as well as pharmacological strategies, adjustment of immunosuppression and a healthy lifestyle in the post-transplant setting, play a key role in correct management.

Changing trends of liver transplantation and mortality from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

The rising tide of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with the obesity epidemic is a major international health concern. NAFLD is the leading global cause of liver disease with an estimated prevalence of 25% and is the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). The presence and severity of liver fibrosis is the only histologic predictor of clinical outcomes in this group. NAFLD poses several challenges in the peri-transplant setting including the management of multiple metabolic co-morbidities, post-transplant obesity and cardiovascular risk. However, post-LT outcomes in well-selected NAFLD patients appear similar to non-NAFLD indications, including in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rising prevalence of NAFLD may impact potential liver graft donors, which may in-turn adversely affect post-LT outcomes. This review outlines the current epidemiology, natural history and outcomes of NAFLD with a focus on pre- and post-liver transplant settings.

Variation in Tacrolimus Trough Concentrations in Liver Transplant Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Retrospective, Observational Study

Objective

High variabilities in tacrolimus (TAC) exposure are still problems that confuse physicians. TAC trough levels (TAC C_min) fluctuated considerably after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment in several liver transplant (LT) patients. We aimed to investigate the variation regularity of TAC C_min post-ERCP and related factors.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, observational study conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University in China. From October 2017 to January 2019, 26 LT patients that received ERCP were included (73 TAC C_min measures). The absolute difference and the variation extent in TAC C_min pre- and post-ERCP were analyzed. Patients were divided into mild and obvious variation groups, and the differences were compared.

Results

The TAC C_min in LT patients significantly increased in the first three days post-ERCP (p<0.05) and increased by more than 20% in 18 out of 26 (69.2%) patients. The mean extent of variation in TAC C_min was 45.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.3–81.3%) and 31.4% (95% CI: 9.7–53.1%) on days 1 and 3 post-ERCP, respectively. The increasing TAC C_min gradually returned to baseline within a week (p>0.05). The daily TAC dose and total bile acid (TBA) level were significantly higher (p<0.05) in patients with obvious variation in TAC C_min. The differences in other demographics, clinical characteristics, variation in laboratory data, and serum amylase levels between the two groups were not significant.

Conclusion

The TAC C_min significantly increased in LT patients during the first three days after ERCP, and the level returned to baseline within a week. The daily TAC dose and TBA levels may be related to this increase. Frequent drug concentration monitoring should be executed in the early phase post-ERCP, especially in patients with related factors.

Cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the liver transplant recipient

Liver transplantation has led to great improvements in long-term survival in patients with decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-graft-related deaths and has increased prevalence in liver allograft recipients. This is partly secondary to higher post-transplant rates of metabolic risk factors-notably obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, which comprise metabolic syndrome. Post-transplantation metabolic syndrome is expected to be a growing factor in morbidity and mortality as transplant candidates trend older, the rates of metabolic risk factors in the general population increase, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis grows disproportionally as an indication for transplantation, and post-transplantation survival lengthens. This review discusses the incidence and contributory factors for post-transplant increases in metabolic disease, as well as the burden of cardiovascular disease in the liver allograft recipient. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes or obesity are at particularly high risk for post-transplant metabolic syndrome, and would likely benefit from closer surveillance and more aggressive medical management of risk factors. In metabolic disease resistant to initial medical therapies, tailoring of immunosuppressive regimens may further assist in minimizing long-term cardiovascular disease, although this must be done with caution to avoid worsening the risk of graft failure.

Pre-transplant diabetes predicts atherosclerotic vascular events and cardiovascular mortality in liver transplant recipients: a long-term follow-up study

Background Early after surgery, liver transplant (LT) recipients often develop weight gain. Metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease represent main drivers of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to identify predictors of atherosclerotic vascular events (AVE) and to assess the impact of AVE on the long-term outcome. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients transplanted between 2000 and 2005 and followed-up in five Italian transplant clinics. Cox Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of AVE, global mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results We analyzed data from 367 subjects during a median follow-up of 14 years. Thirty-seven post-LT AVE were registered. Patients with AVE more frequently showed pre-LT diabetes mellitus (DM) (48.6 vs 13.9%, p=0.000). In the post-LT period, patients with AVE satisfied criteria of metabolic syndrome in 83.8% vs. 36.7% of subjects without AVE (p=0.000). At multivariate analysis, pre-LT DM independently predicted AVE (HR 2.250, CI 4.848-10.440, p=0.038). Moreover, both pre-LT DM and AVE strongly predicted cardiovascular mortality (HR 5.418, CI 1.060-29.183, p=0.049, and HR 86.097, CI 9.510-779.480, p=0.000, respectively). Conclusions Pre-LT DM is the main risk factor for post-LT AVE. Pre-LT DM and post-LT AVE are strong, long-term predictors of cardiovascular mortality. Patients with pre-LT DM should obtain a personalized follow-up for prevention or early diagnosis of AVE.

Expert consensus on management of metabolic disease in Chinese liver transplant recipients

Metabolic disease, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and hyperuricemia, is a common complication after liver transplantation and a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death. The development of metabolic disease is closely related to the side effects of immunosuppressants. Therefore, optimization of the immunosuppressive regimen is very important for the prevention and treatment of metabolic disease. The Chinese Society of Organ Transplantation has developed an expert consensus on the management of metabolic diseases in Chinese liver transplant recipients based on recent studies. Emphasis is placed on the risk factors of metabolic diseases, the effect of immunosuppressants on metabolic disease, and the prevention and treatment of metabolic diseases.

Alcohol use disorder and liver transplant: new perspectives and critical issues

Alcoholic liver disease is a consolidated indication for liver transplantation, but many unsolved issues can be highlighted. Patients with alcohol use disorder develop peculiar comorbidities that can become contraindications for transplantation. Moreover, a number of social and psychological patterns should be evaluated to select candidates with a low risk of alcohol relapse and adequate post-transplant adherence. In this context, the 6-month rule is too rigid to be widely applied. A short period of abstinence (1 to 3 months) is useful to estimate recovery of liver function and, possibly to avoid transplant. Cardiovascular disorders and extra-hepatic malignancies represent the main clinical issues after transplant. Patients transplanted due to alcoholic disease are a major risk for other liver diseases. Severe corticosteroid-resistant alcoholic acute hepatitis is a debated indication for transplant. However, available data indicate that well-selected patients have excellent post-transplant outcomes. Behavioral therapy, continued psychological support and a multidisciplinary team are essential to achieve and maintain complete alcohol abstinence during the transplant process. Alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for a liver transplant but patients with alcohol use disorder deserve a personalized approach and dedicated resources.

Management of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk after liver transplantation

Cardiovascular events are the second most prevalent cause of non-hepatic mortality in liver transplant recipients. The incidence of these events is projected to rise because of the growing prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as a transplant indication and the ageing population of liver transplant recipients. Recipients with metabolic syndrome are up to four times more likely to have a cardiovascular event than recipients without, therefore prevention and optimal treatment of the components of metabolic syndrome are key in reducing the risk of these events. Although data on the treatment of metabolic comorbidities specifically in liver transplant recipients are scarce, there is detailed guidance from learned societies that mostly mirrors the guidance for patients at increased cardiovascular risk in the general population. In this Review, we discuss the management of the components of metabolic syndrome following liver transplantation and provide practical stepwise guidance. We also emphasise the need for adequately powered studies for the treatment of metabolic comorbidities in liver transplant recipients.

Medical management of metabolic and cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation represents the only curative option for patients with end-stage liver disease, fulminant hepatitis and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though major advances in transplantation in the last decades have achieved excellent survival rates in the early post-transplantation period, long-term survival is hampered by the lack of improvement in survival in the late post transplantation period (over 5 years after transplantation). The main etiologies for late mortality are malignancies and cardiovascular complications. The latter are increasingly prevalent in liver transplant recipients due to the development or worsening of metabolic syndrome and all its components (arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal injury, etc.). These comorbidities result from a combination of pre-liver transplant features, immunosuppressive agent side-effects, changes in metabolism and hemodynamics after liver transplantation and the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle. In this review we describe the most prevalent metabolic and cardiovascular complications present after liver transplantation, as well as proposing management strategies.

Spotlight on Impactful Research: Long-Term Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy and Brain Function in Patients After Liver Transplantation

http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/15-4-reading-cheung a video presentation of this article - http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/15-4-interview-cheung an interview with the author https://www.wileyhealthlearning.com/Activity/7088571/disclaimerspopup.aspx questions and earn CME.

Risk factors for the metabolic syndrome components of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is the most common long-term complication after liver transplantation, and it has been increasing in incidence. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for each MS component -hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia-after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), including characteristics of living-donors.

METHODS

Data related to clinicopathological parameters including MS components in 461 consecutive patients who underwent LDLT were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Prevalence of all MS components (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) increased from 9.3%, 16.5%, and 7.2% before LDLT to 44.9%, 45.3%, and 50.8% after LDLT, respectively. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the three factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.086, P = 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.036, P = 0.001), and BMI (OR 1.072, P = 0.026) were independent predictors for post-LDLT hypertension. Next, the three factors, male recipient (OR 2.471, P < 0.001), recipient age (OR 1.039, P = 0.002), and donor BMI (OR 1.124, P = 0.012) were independent for post-LDLT diabetes mellitus. The four factors, cyclosporine use (OR 2.015, P = 0.001), prolonged prednisolone use (OR 1.928, P = 0.002), recipient age (OR 1.019, P = 0.037), and GRWR (OR 0.316, P = 0.037) were independent for post-LDLT dyslipidemia as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only recipient-related factors but also donor-related factors were independently associated with each targeted post-LDLT MS component.

Blood pressure control according to clinical practice guidelines is associated with decreased mortality and cardiovascular events among liver transplant recipients

Data for liver transplant recipients (LTRs) regarding the benefit of care concordant with clinical practice guidelines for management of blood pressure (BP) are sparse. This paper reports on clinician adherence with BP clinical practice guideline recommendations and whether BP control is associated with mortality and cardiovascular events (CVEs) among LTRs. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of adult LTRs who survived to hospital discharge at a large tertiary care network between 2010 and 2016. The primary exposure was a BP of <140/<90 mm Hg within year 1 of LT. Among 602 LTRs (mean age 56.7 years, 64% men), 92% had hypertension and 38% had new onset hypertension. Less than 30% of LTRs achieved a BP of <140/<90 mm Hg over a mean of 43.2 months. In multivariable models, adjusted for key confounders, BP control post-LT compared with lack of control was associated with a significantly lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39, 0.87) and of CVEs (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43, 0.97). The association between BP control of <140/<90 mm Hg with improved survival and decreased CVEs in LTRs suggests that efforts to improve clinician adherence to BP clinical practice recommendations should be intensified.

[Other specific types of diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (Update 2019)]

The heterogenous catagory "specific types of diabetes due to other causes" encompasses disturbances in glucose metabolism due to other endocrine disorders such as acromegaly or hypercortisolism, drug-induced diabetes (e. g. antipsychotic medications, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive agents, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)), genetic forms of diabetes (e. g. Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY), neonatal diabetes, Down Syndrome, Klinefelter Syndrome, Turner Syndrome), pancreatogenic diabetes (e. g. postoperatively, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, haemochromatosis, cystic fibrosis), and some rare autoimmune or infectious forms of diabetes. Diagnosis of specific diabetes types might influence therapeutic considerations. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is not only found in patients with pancreatogenic diabetes but is also frequently seen in type 1 and long-standing type 2 diabetes.

Management of Recurrent and De Novo NAFLD/NASH After Liver Transplantation

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a growing indication for liver transplant whether the primary or secondary cause of liver disease, and it is expected to be the leading indication in the years to come. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis recurs after transplant but the impact of the recurrence on allograft and patient outcomes is unclear. A group of multidisciplinary transplant practice providers convened at the International Liver Transplantation Society NASH consensus conference with the purpose of determining the current knowledge and future directions for understanding the recurrence rates, risk and management of NASH in the transplant allograft. Specific questions relating to posttransplant NASH were proposed and reviewed in detail with recommendations on future actions to fill the knowledge gaps.

Not All Cellular Rejections Are the Same: Differences in Early and Late Hepatic Allograft Rejection

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is common after liver transplantation (LT), and it is often thought to have a minimum impact on outcomes. Because alloimmune response changes over time, we investigated the role of the timing of TCMR on patient and allograft survival and examined the risk factors for early and late TCMR. We reviewed protocol liver biopsies for 787 consecutive LT recipients with an 8.6-year follow-up. The incidence of early TCMR (≤6 weeks after LT) was 33.5% with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients having the lowest incidence. Younger recipient age (P < 0.01), number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches (P < 0.01), and use of deceased donor allografts (P = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of early TCMR, which had no impact on allograft (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79-1.32; P = 0.89) or overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.34; P = 0.86). Late TCMR (>6 weeks after LT) was less common (17.7%) and was associated with different risk factors. The majority of late TCMR (56.2%) episodes had no antecedent early TCMR, although moderate-to-severe early TCMR (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.55-5.23; P < 0.01) and steroid resistance (HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.87-6.99; P < 0.01) were associated with late TCMR. Late TCMR increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.35-2.65; P = 0.001) and graft loss (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23-2.37; P = 0.001). Thus, these data suggest that the timing and histologic grade of TCMR determine its impact on patient and allograft survival. Early mild TCMR episodes after LT do not adversely impact patient or allograft survival provided that they are adequately treated. The occurrence of late TCMR carries deleterious effects with increased longterm risk of graft loss and decreased survival. Patients with moderate-to-severe early TCMR are at an increased risk for late TCMR and warrant closer clinical follow-up.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis before and after liver transplant: keeping up with the times

In the last years, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become a leading indication for liver transplant (LT). After transplant, both recurrent and de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can be commonly diagnosed. However, dedicated surveillance programs for patients with pre- or post-transplant NAFLD are not available. Areas covered: Patients waiting for LT for NASH show specific peculiarities and would deserve targeted stratification of mortality risk. Obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus can be often found after transplant. These conditions, together with immunosuppressive regimen, make LT recipients a high-risk population for both recurrent and de novo NAFLD. Development of fatty liver disease after LT has a relevant impact on both morbidity and mortality. Expert commentary: A targeted stratification of neoplastic and cardiovascular risk for patients with NASH waiting for LT would be mandatory. In both pre- and post-transplant period, NAFLD should be considered not only a liver disease but also a cardiovascular risk factor. Patients within Transplant Program, especially those with known metabolic risk factors, should be followed with personalized diagnostic and life-style interventions before and after LT.

International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Statement on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients

Effective immunosupression management is central to achieving optimal outcomes in liver transplant recipients. Current immunosuppression regimens and agents are highly effective in minimizing graft loss due to acute and chronic rejection but can also produce a substantial array of toxicities. The utilization of immunosuppression varies widely, contributing to the wide disparities in posttransplant outcomes reported between transplant centers. The International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) convened a consensus conference, comprised of a global panel of expert hepatologists, transplant surgeons, nephrologists, and pharmacologists to review the literature and experience pertaining to immunosuppression management to develop guidelines on key aspects of immunosuppression. The consensus findings and recommendations of the ILTS Consensus guidelines on immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients are presented in this article.

Management of diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Diabetes is a common feature in cirrhotic individuals both before and after liver transplantation and negatively affects prognosis. Certain aetiological agents of chronic liver disease and loss of liver function per se favour the occurrence of pre-transplant diabetes in susceptible individuals, whereas immunosuppressant treatment, changes in lifestyle habits, and donor- and procedure-related factors contribute to diabetes development/persistence after transplantation. Challenges in the management of pre-transplant diabetes include the profound nutritional alterations characterizing cirrhotic individuals and the limitations to the use of drugs with liver metabolism. Special issues in the management of post-transplant diabetes include the diabetogenic potential of immunosuppressant drugs and the increased cardiovascular risk characterizing solid organ transplant survivors. Overall, the pharmacological management of cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation is complicated by the lack of specific guidelines reflecting the paucity of data on the impact of glycaemic control and the safety and efficacy of anti-hyperglycaemic agents in these individuals.

TLR9 rs352139 Genetic Variant Promotes Tacrolimus Elimination in Chinese Liver Transplant Patients During the Early Posttransplantation Period

BACKGROUND

There are limited markers that could facilitate individualized tacrolimus treatment in the early posttransplantation period. Genetic factors have been found to play critical roles in determining tacrolimus pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the association of donor and recipient Toll-like receptor (TLR) polymorphisms with tacrolimus elimination and the potential mechanism for TLR gene polymorphism-mediated tacrolimus metabolism.

METHODS

Two independent cohorts including 297 patients receiving liver transplantation (LT) were enrolled in this study (cohort A was composed of 200 patients; cohort B included 97 patients and served as a validation set). Toll-like receptors polymorphisms were genotyped using TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) assays. The protein expressions were detected by Western blotting. The metabolism assay was used to quantify tacrolimus elimination. The activity of nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) was evaluated by luciferase reporter assay.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough blood concentrations (C/D) ratios were significantly lower for donor TLR9 rs352139 AG/GG carriers than AA carriers at weeks 1, 2, and 3 after LT. In multivariate analysis, donor and recipient CYP3A5 rs776746 and donor TLR9 rs352139 were independent predictors of tacrolimus C/D ratios in the early period after transplantation in both cohorts. When investigating the combined effects of donor CYP3A5 rs776746 and donor TLR9 rs352139 genotypes, the C/D ratios were remarkably significant at all time points during the first month after LT within the four groups. Furthermore, CYP3A5 mRNA expression in liver tissue was significantly higher for AG/GG patients than AA carriers after LT. In addition, we demonstrated that the TLR9 rs352139 genetic variant promotes tacrolimus metabolism of liver cells via upregulation of CYP3A5, which is dependent on the repression of NF-κB/pregnane X receptor (PXR) signaling.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor TLR9 rs352139 genetic variant facilitated tacrolimus elimination during the early stage after LT in Chinese patients, which might be related to the upregulation of CYP3A5 enzyme via the NF-kB/PXR signaling pathway.

Predictors of De Novo Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease After Liver Transplantation and Associated Fibrosis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can occur de novo in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for indications other than NAFLD, and it has been increasingly recognized as a complication in the post-LT setting. This study aims to better characterize de novo NAFLD after LT by identifying risk factors for its development, describing incidence and extent of fibrosis, assessing the diagnostic utility of noninvasive serum fibrosis algorithms, and comparing survival to those without NAFLD. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of de novo NAFLD in a post-LT cohort. Those whose primary indication for LT was nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were excluded. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. De novo NAFLD and fibrosis were assessed on posttransplant liver biopsies, and noninvasive fibrosis scores were calculated from concomitant blood tests. After applying the exclusion criteria, 430 for-cause post-LT biopsies were evaluated; 33.3% (n = 143) had evidence of de novo steatosis and/or NASH at a median of 3.0 years after transplant. On multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR], 1.12; P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR, 3.01; P = 0.002), hepatitis C virus (OR, 4.61; P < 0.001), weight gain (OR, 1.03; P = 0.007), and sirolimus use (OR, 3.11; P = 0.02) were predictive of de novo NAFLD after LT. Significant fibrosis (≥F2) was present in almost 40% of the cohort. Noninvasive serum fibrosis scores were not useful diagnostic tests. There was no significant difference in the short-term or longterm survival of patients who developed de novo NAFLD. In conclusion, diabetes, BMI, weight gain after LT, and sirolimus-based immunosuppression, in keeping with insulin resistance, were the only modifiable factors associated with development of de novo NAFLD. A significant proportion of patients with de novo NAFLD had fibrosis and given the limited utility of noninvasive serum fibrosis algorithms, alternative noninvasive tools are required to screen for fibrosis in this population. There was no significant difference in the short-term or longterm survival of patients who developed de novo NAFLD.

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing simultaneous liver transplantation and sleeve gastrectomy

Obesity is increasingly common before and after liver transplantation (LT), yet optimal management remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes for obese patients undergoing LT, including a noninvasive weight loss program and combined LT and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Since 2006, all patients referred for LT with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² were enrolled. Patients who achieved weight loss (BMI <35) underwent LT alone, and those who did not underwent simultaneous LT + SG. Analysis of long-term outcomes for patients ≥3 years posttransplant was performed. Since 2006, there were 36 in the weight loss intervention (LT cohort) and 13 in the LT + SG cohort with >3 years of follow-up, whereas overall, a total of 29 patients underwent LT + SG. Patients in the LT cohort had less severe obesity at enrollment (40.0 ± 2.7 vs. LT + SG cohort 46.0 ± 4.5; P < 0.001). In the LT cohort, 83.3% (30 of 36) achieved >10% loss in total body weight (TBW) pre-LT. Three years posttransplant, 29.4% of patients in the LT cohort maintained >10% loss in TBW, whereas 100% of the LT + SG patients did (P < 0.001). Patients who underwent LT + SG maintained a significantly higher percentage of total body weight loss after 3 years of follow-up (LT cohort 3.9 ± 13.3% vs. LT + S G cohort 34.8 ± 17.3%; P < 0.001). Patients in the LT + SG also had a lower prevalence of hypertension, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis and required fewer antihypertensive medications and lipid agents at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Whereas weight loss before transplantation was achieved by obese patients, weight regain was common in the LT cohort. Combined LT + SG resulted in more effective and more durable weight loss, as well as fewer metabolic complications at last follow-up. (Hepatology 2018).

Everolimus vs Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

No trial has investigated the long-term outcome of everolimus (EVR)-incorporating immunosuppression vs tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With a propensity score methodology, 178 recipients on TAC and MMF were compared to 178 patients on TAC and EVR.

RESULTS

At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 45 (46.3) months, the probability of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, and death was 36.6% for MMF and 28.1% for EVR (P = .0891). Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically lower for EVR (3.3% vs 7.3%, P = .09), while adverse events (70.2% vs 58.9%, P = .02) and drug discontinuations (21.3% vs 11.8%, P = .01) were significantly higher with regard to hypercholesterolemia (P = .001), thrombocytopenia (P = .0062), and edema (P = .0107). Patients on MMF showed more hypertension (P = .0315), tremor (P = .0006), cytomegalovirus infection (P = .0165), and malignancies (P = .0175). EVR was associated with lesser deterioration in mean (SD) renal function at the latest follow-up (-2.2 (1.8) vs -5.1 (3.2) mL/min/1.73 m², t = 3.6, P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of the combination of TAC and EVR is comparable to that of TAC and MMF. Drug discontinuations and adverse events were higher for patients on EVR, but these latter showed less hypertension, cytomegalovirus infection, and renal dysfunction. The observed reduction in posttransplant malignancies for EVR requires longer follow-up to be confirmed.

De-novo nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with long-term increased mortality in liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Patients who have undergone transplantation often develop metabolic syndrome (MetS) and de-novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of metabolic disease on cardiovascular and neoplastic risk and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from patients who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2005 in two Italian transplant centers were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was carried out for predictors of de-novo NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cardiovascular events, de-novo extrahepatic cancers, and survival. Survival analysis was completed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant for all tests.

RESULTS

De-novo NAFLD was found in one-fifth of 194 patients. Patients with de-novo NAFLD fulfilled the criteria of MetS in 74.4% of cases, while patients without de-novo NAFLD in 29.8% (P=0.000). On multivariate analysis, MetS correlated independently with de-novo NAFLD and this emerged as an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and as a relevant risk factor for solid extrahepatic cancer. Data on smoking habits, which represent a consolidated risk factor for cardiovascular events and cancer in both the general population and patients who have undergone transplantation, are not available. In the subset of histologically proven NASH, it was the strongest predictor of long-term survival (hazard ratio=4.133, 95% confidence interval: 1.385-12.331, P=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Post-transplant NAFLD represented a strong risk factor for cardiovascular atherosclerotic disease and solid extrahepatic cancer, whereas de novo histologically proven NASH was an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

The Role of Bariatric Surgery in Abdominal Organ Transplantation-the Next Big Challenge?

Obesity is linked to inferior transplant outcome. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an established treatment of morbid obesity. We provide an overview on BS in the field of kidney (KT) and liver transplantation (LT). In end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and KT patients, BS seems safe and feasible. Complication rates were slightly higher compared to the non-transplant population, whereas weight loss and improvement of comorbidities were comparable. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was the preferred procedure before KT and superior to gastric bypass (GB) in regard to mortality and morbidity. If conducted after KT, both procedures showed comparable results. BS before LT was associated with high complication rates, in particular after GB. Albeit distinct complications, SG conducted after LT showed the best results. Immunosuppression (IS) changes after BS were rare.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation - Where do we stand?

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) is a challenging and multisystem disease that has a high socioeconomic impact. NAFLD/NASH is a main cause of macrovesicular steatosis and has multiple impacts on liver transplantation (LT), on patients on the waiting list for transplant, on post-transplant setting as well as on organ donors. Current data indicate new trends in the area of chronic liver disease. Due to the increased incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components, NASH cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma caused by NASH will soon become a major indication for LT. Furthermore, due to an increasing incidence of MetS and, consequently, NAFLD, there will be more steatotic donor livers and less high quality organs available for LT, in addition to a lack of available liver allografts. Patients who have NASH and are candidates for LT have multiple comorbidities and are unique LT candidates. Finally, we discuss long-term grafts and patient survival after LT, the recurrence of NASH and NASH appearing de novo after transplantation. In addition, we suggest topics and areas that require more research for improving the health care of this increasing patient population.

Consensus document. Management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Clinical practice guideline

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the main cause of liver diseases in Spain and the incidence is raising due to the outbreak of type 2 diabetes and obesity. This CPG suggests recommendation about diagnosis, mainly non-invasive biomarkers, and clinical management of this entity. Life-style modifications to achieve weight loss is the main target in the management of NAFLD. Low caloric Mediterranean diet and 200 minutes/week of aerobic exercise are encouraged. In non-responders patients with morbid obesity, bariatric surgery or metabolic endoscopy could be indicated. Pharmacological therapy is indicated in patients with NASH and fibrosis and non-responders to weight loss measures. NAFLD could influence liver transplantation, as a growing indication, the impact of steatosis in the graft viability, de novo NAFLD rate after OLT and a raised cardiovascular risk that modify the management of this entity. The current CPG was the result of the First Spanish NAFLD meeting in Seville.

Risk factors for arterial hypertension after liver transplantation

Arterial hypertension represents a common complication of immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with hypertension after LT. From a cohort of 323 cirrhotic patients who underwent LT from 2008 to 2012, 270 patients were retrospectively evaluated, whereas 53 (16.4%) patients deceased. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg in at least two visits and/or the need for antihypertensive therapy. The prevalence of hypertension was 15% before LT and significantly increased up to 53% after LT (P < .001). Mean follow-up was 43 ± 19 months. In normotensive (NT) subjects at baseline, 35.9% developed sustained hypertension after LT, whereas 15.2% developed transient hypertension within the first month after LT, and then returned NT. The development of sustained hypertension after LT was related to the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor treatment (odds ratio [OR], 4.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-13.48; P = .02), alcoholic cirrhosis before LT (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.44-8.09; P = .005), and new-onset hepatic steatosis after LT (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.10-4.11; P = .02). Tacrolimus, the etiology and severity of liver disease, and other immunosuppressive regimens were not related to the development of hypertension after LT. In our cohort, the prevalence of arterial hypertension has increased up to 53% after LT, and metabolic comorbidities and immunosuppressive treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are the risk factors for the development of hypertension after LT.

Follow-up of the Post-Liver Transplantation Patient: A Primer for the Practicing Gastroenterologist

The focus in liver transplantation in the next 10 years will likely change from preventing viral disease recurrence to minimizing the toll of rejection and fatty liver disease, minimizing the complications from immunosuppression with withdrawal strategies, and more optimal management of long-term risks, such as malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and renal failure. In addition, now that short-term results (<1 year) have improved significantly, there will be a shift toward improving long-term patient and graft survival, as well as a focus on primary care preventive strategies.

Changes in dietary patterns and body composition within 12 months of liver transplantation

Background

Cardiometabolic risk factors are increasing in liver transplant recipients (LTR). Influencing dietary factors have not been assessed. The aim of this observational study was to assess changes in weight, metabolic function, dietary intake and eating behaviours in the first year after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Methods

Consecutive recruitment of 17 patients (14 males) awaiting OLT at a single tertiary hospital. Dietary intake, food behaviours and anthropometry were recorded at baseline, and 6 and 12 months post-transplant.

Results

By 12 months, patients had gained on average 7.3% of body weight. The prevalence of overweight or obesity increased from baseline 53% to 77% (P=0.001). By 6 months, 65% (n=11/17) of patients had altered glucose metabolism. Dietary intake was consistent with a Western-style dietary pattern with high saturated fat. Over half of the patients (69%, n=11/16) reported low to no depressive feelings and rated their self-esteem as good (53%, n=9/16). The Power of Food Scale increased between pre and post-transplant, indicating a stronger appetitive drive.

Conclusions

Weight gain occurs early post-transplant, with significant metabolic dysfunction present within 6 months, however is not associated with significant psychological distress. Early dietary intervention designed to limit weight gain and target cardiometabolic health is recommended for this unique patient population.

Effects of Exercise and Sport in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review

Solid organ transplantation is the criterion standard treatment for many with end-organ failure and can offer a new independence from the burden of disease. However solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) remain at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, and poor quality of life and physical functioning. Increasing physical activity and exercise can improve the health of the general population; however, the effects on those with a transplant remain unclear. Intensive exercise and sporting activity has the potential to be beneficial, although there remain concerns particularly around the effects on immune function and the CV system. This review summarizes what is known about the effects of exercise on determinants of health in SOTRs and then collates the available literature investigating the consequences of intensive exercise and sport on the health of SOTR. There is a paucity of high-quality research, with most evidence being case studies or anecdotal; this is understandable given the relatively few numbers of SOTRs who are performing sport and exercise at a high level. However, if suitable evidence-based guidelines are to be formed and SOTRs are to be given reassurances that their activity levels are not detrimental to their transplanted organ and overall health, then more high-quality studies are required.

Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease

Alcohol-related liver disease is the second most frequent indication for liver transplantation (LT), yet as many as 90% to 95% of patients with alcohol-related end-stage liver disease are never formally evaluated for LT. Furthermore, despite its significance as a cause of chronic liver disease and indication for LT, it has received little attention in recent years for several reasons, including the good posttransplant short-term results, and the lack of specific "drugs" used for this disease. A writing group, endorsed by the International Liver Transplant Society, was convened to write guidelines on Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease to summarize current knowledge and provide answers to controversial and delicate ethical as well as clinical problems. We report here a short version of the guidelines (long version available at www.ilts.org) with the final recommendations graded for level of evidence. The writing group membership is expected to remain active for 5 years, reviewing the guideline annually, and updating the online version when appropriate.

Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group

Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.

De Novo and Recurrence of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis After Liver Transplantation

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in developing countries. Approximately 25% of patients with NAFLD develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH-related cirrhosis is now a leading listing indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Although posttransplant survival for NASH-related cirrhosis is comparable with that of other liver diseases, many patients have features of metabolic syndrome, which can contribute to a recurrence of NAFLD or NASH. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of de novo and recurrence of NASH after liver transplantation.

Simultaneous living donor liver transplant with sleeve gastrectomy for metabolic syndrome and NASH-related ESLD-First report from India

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with morbid obesity and metabolic syndrome is now a common cause of end-stage liver disease (ESLD). These patients are high-risk candidates for liver transplant, and require bariatric surgery to prevent recurrent disease in the new liver. Data reports bariatric surgery after transplant, which maybe difficult because of adhesions between the stomach and liver in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipient. We report the first case of combined LDLT with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from India. A morbidly obese diabetic woman with NASH-related ESLD was planned for combined right lobe LDLT with open SG, in view of failed diet therapy, musculo-skeletal complaints, and restricted mobility. Postoperatively, with liver graft functioning adequately, bariatric diet restrictions resulted in maximum reduction of 25% weight, achieving a target BMI below 30 kg/m² within 2 months, along with complete cure of diabetes and better ambulation. Thus, combination of LDLT and bariatric surgery in the same sitting is safe and effective in management of metabolic syndrome and associated NASH-related ESLD.

Modification of immunosuppressive therapy as risk factor for complications after liver transplantation

Management of complications post-liver transplantation (LT) includes immunosuppressive manipulations with the aim to reduce the overall burden of immunologic suppression and compensate for renal, cardiovascular, metabolic toxicities, and for the increased oncologic risk. Two approaches can be implemented to reduce immunosuppression-related adverse events: upfront schedules tailored to the pretransplant individual patient's risk profile versus downstream modifications in the event of immunosuppression-related complications. Upfront strategies are supported by evidence originating from prospective randomized trials and consist of triple/quadruple schedules whereby calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-exposure is reduced with combination of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies, antimetabolites and corticosteroids. Quadruple regimens allow for staggering of CNI introduction and higher renal function in the early term, but their superiority in the long term has not yet been established. A more recent upfront schedule contemplates early (4 weeks) introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) everolimus and allows for reduction of CNI up to 4 years posttransplantation. Incorporation of mTORi has the potential to prolong time to recurrence for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, as suggested by the available evidence, downstream immunosuppressive manipulations are more frequently adopted in clinical practice. These encompass CNI replacement and immunosuppression withdrawal. Switching CNI to mTORi monotherapy is the option most commonly adopted to relieve renal function and compensate for posttransplant malignancies. Its impact is dependent on interval from transplantation and underlying severity of renal impairment. Introduction of mTORi is associated with longer overall survival for patients with extrahepatic posttransplant malignancies, but results are awaited for recurrences of hepatocellular carcinoma. Immunosuppression withdrawal seems feasible (70%) in very long term survivors (>10 years), but is not associated with reversal of immunosuppression-related complications. Awaiting novel immunosuppressive drug categories, integration of upfront strategies with the aim to reduce CNI-exposure and a low threshold for adjustment in the posttransplant course are both advisable to improve long-term outcomes of LT.

Prediabetes in Pediatric Recipients of Liver Transplant: Mechanism and Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of calcineurin inhibitor exposure and states of insulin resistance-obesity and adolescence-in prediabetes after pediatric liver transplant via oral glucose tolerance testing, which previously has not been done systematically in these at-risk youths.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study of 81 pediatric recipients of liver transplant. Prediabetes was defined as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; glucose ≥140 mg/dL at 2 hours) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG, ≥100 mg/dL). Corrected insulin response (CIR) was calculated as measure of insulin secretion, corrected for glucose (CIR₃₀, CIR₆₀, CIR₁₂₀).

RESULTS

Subjects were aged 8.1-30.0 years and 1.1-24.7 years post-transplant; 44% had prediabetes-27% IGT, 14% IFG, and 3% both. IGT was characterized by insulin hyposecretion, with lower CIR₆₀ and CIR₁₂₀ in IGT than subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Subjects with tacrolimus trough >6 µg/mL at study visit had lower CIR₁₂₀ than those with trough ≤6 µg/mL and those off calcineurin-inhibitors. Mean of tacrolimus troughs preceding the study visit, years since transplant, and rejection episodes were not associated significantly with lower CIR. CIR suppression by tacrolimus was most pronounced >6 years from transplant. Overweight/obese subjects and adolescents who retained normal glucose tolerance had greater CIR than those who were IGT.

CONCLUSION

IGT after pediatric liver transplant is driven by inadequate insulin secretion. It is quite common but not detectable with fasting laboratory values-the screening recommended by current guidelines. Calcineurin inhibitors suppress insulin secretion in these patients in a dose-dependent manner. Given the recent focus on long-term outcomes and immunosuppression withdrawal in these children, longitudinal studies are warranted to investigate whether IGT is reversible with calcineurin inhibitor minimization.

NAFLD and liver transplantation: Current burden and expected challenges

Because of global epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing both in Europe and the United States, becoming one of the most frequent causes of chronic liver disease and predictably, one of the leading causes of liver transplantation both for end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. For most transplant teams around the world this will raise many challenges in terms of pre- and post-transplant management. Here we review the multifaceted impact of NAFLD on liver transplantation and will discuss: (1) NAFLD as a frequent cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis, end-stage chronic liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma; (2) prevalence of NAFLD as an indication for liver transplantation both in Europe and the United States; (3) the impact of NAFLD on the donor pool; (4) the access of NAFLD patients to liver transplantation and their management on the waiting list in regard to metabolic, renal and vascular comorbidities; (5) the prevalence and consequences of post-transplant metabolic syndrome, recurrent and de novo NAFLD; (6) the alternative management and therapeutic options to improve the long-term outcomes with particular emphasis on the correction and control of metabolic comorbidities.

Cardiovascular risk after orthotopic liver transplantation, a review of the literature and preliminary results of a prospective study

Improved surgical techniques and greater efficacy of new anti-rejection drugs have significantly improved the survival of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This has led to an increased incidence of metabolic disorders as well as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases as causes of morbidity and mortality in OLT patients. In the last decade, several studies have examined which predisposing factors lead to increased cardiovascular risk (i.e., age, ethnicity, diabetes, NASH, atrial fibrillation, and some echocardiographic parameters) as well as which factors after OLT (i.e., weight gain, metabolic syndrome, immunosuppressive therapy, and renal failure) are linked to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, currently, there are no available data that evaluate the development of atherosclerotic damage after OLT. The awareness of high cardiovascular risk after OLT has not only lead to the definition of new but generally not accepted screening of high risk patients before transplantation, but also to the need for careful patient follow up and treatment to control metabolic and cardiovascular pathologies after transplant. Prospective studies are needed to better define the predisposing factors for recurrence and de novo occurrence of metabolic alterations responsible for cardiovascular damage after OLT. Moreover, such studies will help to identify the timing of disease progression and damage, which in turn may help to prevent morbidity and mortality for cardiovascular diseases. Our preliminary results show early occurrence of atherosclerotic damage, which is already present a few weeks following OLT, suggesting that specific, patient-tailored therapies should be started immediately post OLT.

Combined liver transplantation and sleeve gastrectomy for end-stage liver disease in a bariatric patient: First European case-report

•

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis is the 3rd indication for liver transplantation.

•

Obese transplanted patients have higher morbidity and mortality rates.

•

Bariatric surgery decreases morbidity and mortality in obese patients.

•

Combined liver transplant and sleeve gastrectomy can be safely performed.

Introduction

Obesity is a contributor to the global burden of chronic diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH cirrhosis is becoming a leading indication for liver transplant (LT). Obese transplanted patients have higher morbidity and mortality rates. One strategy, to improve the outcomes in these patients, includes bariatric surgery at the time of LT. Herein we report the first European combined LT and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Case presentation

A 53 years old woman with Hepatocellular carcinoma and Hepatitis C virus related cirrhosis, was referred to our unit. She also presented with severe morbid obesity (BMI 40 kg/m²) and insulin-dependent diabetes. Once listed for LT, she was assessed by the bariatric surgery team to undergo a combined LT/SG. At the time of transplantation the patient had a model for end-stage liver disease calculated score of 14 and a BMI of 38 kg/m².

The LT was performed using a deceased donor. An experienced bariatric surgeon, following completion of the LT, performed the SG. Operation time was 8 h and 50 min. The patient had an uneventful recovery and is currently alive, 5 months after the combined procedure, with normal allograft function, significant weight loss (BMI = 29 kg/m²), and diabetes resolution.

Conclusion

Despite the ideal approach to the management of the obese LT patients remains unknown, we strongly support the combined procedure during LT in selected patients, offering advantages in terms of allograft and patient survival, maintenance of weigh loss that will ultimately reduce obese related co-morbidities.

Metabolic syndrome in liver transplantation: A preoperative and postoperative concern

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome is increasing among patients undergoing liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is a manifestation of metabolic syndrome and is an increasingly common cause of end-stage liver disease necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation. We sought to determine the effect of preoperative risk factors on the development of post-transplant metabolic syndrome, complications, readmissions, and mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a review of 114 orthotopic liver transplantations at our institution from May 2012 to April 2014.

RESULTS

Patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 95) metabolic syndrome were similar with regard to age, race, and model for end-stage liver disease at time of transplant. Donor and operative factors also were similar between the groups. Preoperative diabetes was found to be associated with an increased rate of readmission (odds ratio 3.45, P = .03). While preoperative metabolic syndrome itself was not a significant predictor of worse outcomes, postoperative metabolic syndrome was associated with significantly greater readmissions in the first year. Major predictors of new onset metabolic syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation included preoperative diabetes and obesity (odds ratio 8.54 and odds ratio 5.49, P < .01 each).

CONCLUSION

Efforts to decrease the incidence of postoperative metabolic syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation may decrease readmissions and improve outcomes, along with decreasing resource utilization.

Metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver or kidney transplantation

Transplantation is a definitive treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease, and for some patients with acute liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma or end-stage renal disease. Long-term post-transplantation complications have become an important medical issue, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are now the leading cause of mortality in liver or kidney transplant recipients. The increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) likely plays a role in the high incidence of post-transplantation CVD. MS and its hepatic manifestation, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), are prevalent among the general population and in pre- and post-transplantation settings. MS components are associated with recurrent or de novo NAFLD in transplant recipients, potentially influencing post-transplantation survival. Moreover, recent data reveal an important association between NAFLD and risk of incident of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, NAFLD identification could represent an additional clinical feature for improving the stratification of liver and kidney transplant recipients with regards to risks of CVD, CKD and renal allograft dysfunction. All MS components are potentially modifiable; therefore, it is crucial that hepatologists, nephrologists and primary care physicians become more engaged in managing post-transplantation metabolic complications. The present review discusses the recent clinical evidence regarding the importance of MS and its components after liver and kidney transplantation, as well as the link between MS and NAFLD after liver and kidney transplantation.