Solubility and pH Value of 3 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Long-term Investigation

Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review

Epoxy resin-based sealers are currently widely used, and several studies have considered AH Plus to be the gold-standard sealer. However, it still has limitations, including possible mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, inflammatory response, and hydrophobicity. Drawing upon the advantages of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium silicate-based sealers were introduced with high levels of biocompatibility and hydrophilicity. Because of the hydrophilic environment in root canals, water resorption and solubility of root canal sealers are important factors contributing to their stability. Sealers displaying lower microleakage and stronger push-out bond strength are also needed to endure the dynamic tooth environment. Although the physical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers meet International Organization for Standardization recommendations, and they have consistently reported to be biocompatible, they have not overcome conventional resin-based sealers in actual practice. Therefore, further studies aiming to improve the physical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers are needed.

Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols

This study aimed to investigate the influence of immersion duration and the type of immersion solution on the outcome of push-out bond strength (POBS) tests. Root canals of 120 straight single-rooted teeth were instrumented to a diameter of 1.5 mm and irrigated with 5 mL of 3% NaOCl. Four horizontal slices with a thickness of 1 mm were cut, representing the mid-portion of the root. The specimens (n = 480) were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) for 60 seconds, then twice with distilled water (DW) for 30 s each. The canals were filled with either AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Konstanz, Germany) or BioRoot RCS (Septodont, St. Maur-des-Fossés, France) (n = 240). Separated into four groups per type of sealer (n = 60), the specimens were incubated at 37 °C covered with gauze moistened in DW or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for either one or eight weeks. Dislodgement resistance was measured and POBS was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (p = 0.05). AH Plus showed higher POBS when stored in PBS compared to DW, irrespective of the incubation period (p < 0.05). BioRoot RCS displayed higher POBS when stored in DW compared to PBS after eight weeks of incubation (p < 0.05). No difference was found after one week of incubation (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the sealer or the immersion solution, POBS decreased from one week to eight weeks (p < 0.05). Mixed failure modes were found in all groups irrespective of sealer, immersion medium, or immersion period. POBS decreased after a longer incubation time in both immersion solutions. Duration of immersion and the type of immersion solution had a significant impact on the outcome of the POBS testing protocol.

Esterases affect the physical properties of materials used to seal the endodontic space

Materials used to seal the endodontic space are subjected to enzymatic degradative activities of body fluids and bacteria.

OBJECTIVES

To assess effects of simulated human salivary, blood and bacterial esterases (SHSE) on physical properties of typical restorative material and root canal sealers.

METHODS

Specimens of set methacrylate-based resin composite (BisfilTM2B; RC), calcium-silicate sealer (EndoSequence®; BC) or epoxy-resin sealer (AH-Plus®; ER) were tested after up to 28Days exposure to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or SHSE, using ANSI/ADA-57:2000 and ISO-6876:2012.

RESULTS

Regardless of media, microhardness increased with time for BC remained unchanged for ER and decreased for RC (p < 0.05). SHSE moderated the increase for BC compared to PBS (28.0 ± 4.8 vs. 38.1 ± 7.9 KHN) at 7Days, and enhanced the decrease for RC at 7Days (55.6 ± 7.1 vs. 66.3 ± 6.5 KHN) and 28Days (52.3 ± 9.2 vs. 62.6 ± 8.5 KHN). Compressive strength was enhanced only for BC by either media. BC expanded with time for both incubation conditions; SHSE moderated the expansion compared to PBS at 7Days (0.026 ± 0.01% vs. 0.049 ± 0.007%). Shrinkage of ER was similar for both incubation media and was lower than that for RC (p < 0.05). Shrinkage of RC was enhanced by SHSE compared to PBS at 7Days (0.5 ± 0.07% vs. 0.38 ± 0.08%). Weight loss was lowest for ER and highest for BC (p < 0.05). It was enhanced by SHSE compared to PBS for BC at 28Days (2.40 ± 0.2 vs. 2.96 ± 0.19 W L%), and for RC at 7Days (0.54 ± 0.09 vs. 0.80 ± 0.1 W L%).

SIGNIFICANCE

Simulated body fluids and bacterial esterases affected the physical properties of test materials, suggesting potential impacts on sealing ability and resistance to bacterial ingress, and tooth strength ultimately affecting their clinical performance.