Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents

Evaluation and Management of the Adolescent Varicocele

PURPOSE

Varicocele is one of the most common genital conditions referred to pediatric urologists. Most adolescents with varicocele are asymptomatic and their fertility future (and surgery benefit) is largely unknown. This review assesses varicocele evaluation, management and indications for repair, as well as types and success of varicocelectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on Embase™, PubMed® and Google Scholar™ for adolescent varicocele. Original research articles and relevant reviews were examined, and a synopsis of these data was generated for a comprehensive review of clinical adolescent varicocele management.

RESULTS

The prevalence of adolescent varicocele is similar to the adult population. While ultrasound is the most sensitive method for determining testicular volumes, orchidometer measurement may be adequate to gauge significant discordance. Significant hypotrophy of the affected testis with poor total testicular volume may indicate a testis at risk and warrant surgical repair. Similar findings have been noted with an associated high peak retrograde venous flow. Testicular hypotrophy often resolves following surgery but may also improve spontaneously if followed through adolescence. Continued scrotal pain despite adequate support or serial abnormal semen analysis in Tanner stage V boys is an indication for varicocelectomy. Artery and lymphatic sparing techniques (microscopic subinguinal or laparoscopic) are associated with the lowest risk of recurrence and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Overtreatment and under treatment are medically and financially costly. Abnormal serial semen analysis with or without testicular hypotrophy is an indication for varicocele repair. If observation remains the treatment, followup with an adult urologist should be encouraged until paternity is achieved.

Natural history of testicular size in boys with varicoceles

INTRODUCTION

Testicular size is commonly used as a proxy for future fertility in adolescent boys diagnosed with varicoceles. Surgery is often performed based on a 15-20% reduction in volume of the ipsilateral testicle when compared to the unaffected side. Recent European Association of Urology guidelines, however, have highlighted the risk of overtreatment. Data on the natural progression of testicular size discrepancy are limited in this population. To evaluate the role of a non-surgical approach, the present study reports on testicular size progression in 35 boys with left-sided varicoceles managed with observation alone.

METHODS

In the present study, 103 consecutive boys who were seen for varicocele were retrospectively evaluated; the 35 who were seen for at least three sequential visits by the same pediatric urologist for a unilateral left varicocele were selected. In the present practice, surgical management of varicoceles in teens is offered, but not recommended unless surgery is being performed for another reason (3/103). The Prader orchidometric testicular volumes that were documented for all visits were recorded and the volume of the left testicle as a percentage of the right was calculated. This analysis was performed for the entire population, and subgroup analysis was conducted for boys with a Grade 3 varicocele, with >10% asymmetry at diagnosis, and by dividing the population into prepubertal and pubertal age groups. Boys with bilateral varicoceles, concurrent testicular masses, or volumes recorded by a nurse practitioner were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The mean left testicular volume in the population was found to measure 96%, 95% and 96% of the right at the first, second and third visit (median interval was 2.0 years), respectively. Among the 26 boys seen for a fourth visit (median 3.3 years) and the 15 seen for a fifth visit (median 4.3 years), the mean left testicular volumes were 98% and 97% of the right at diagnosis and 97% at both the fourth and fifth visits (Figure). Likewise, no differences were seen after dividing the population into prepubertal (9-11 years, n = 9) and pubertal (12-14 years, n = 26) groups. Among the 13 (37%) boys with a Grade 3 varicocele at presentation, the left testicular volume was 95% (SD 11.4) of the right and remained unchanged by the third visit (96%, P = 0.69). In addition, among the 11 boys (31%) with greater than 10% size difference at the first visit, the left testicle measured 82% of the right (SD 5.3) at diagnosis and increased to 92% (SD 6.3) by the third visit (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In the 35 boys observed over a median of 2.0 years or three consecutive visits, there was no worsening of testicular asymmetry. This finding is consistent with some previous observational data on pediatric varicoceles, but carries the advantages of a narrower age range and longitudinal follow-up in all patients. At the same time, these results differ from other studies that show no improvement or worsening of asymmetry during follow-up. This difference is attributed to the inherent characteristics of the present study population and the choice of orchidometer for measurement. The present data have the advantage of excluding selection bias. Recognizing that this study is a retrospective, single-operator study with a small sample size, prospective, randomized trials are recommended to weigh surgery vs observation in adolescent varicocele patients.

CONCLUSIONS

No progression in atrophy/hypotrophy of the left testis was found in a series of 35 consecutive patients who were followed non-surgically for left-sided varicocele. Our data thus support observation as management for childhood varicocele in younger teens.

Prepubertal presentation of varicocele does not affect outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Varicoceles in prepubertal boys are uncommon and little is known of the natural history. Historically, a large percentage of these boys have undergone surgical repair with the belief that such early presentation carried a worse prognosis, making assessment of longitudinal outcomes difficult.

OBJECTIVE

While there may be concern that varicocele could represent a progressive disease and therefore prepubertal presentation would portend a worse prognosis, we hypothesized that there would be no difference between the prepubertal boys and other adolescents with varicocele.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed a database of boys at a single institution with a documented left-sided varicocele between 1995 and 2011. Inclusion criteria were one or more of the following: 1. Clinician-documented Tanner 1 status, 2. Right testis orchidometric or ultrasound calculated volume of ≤3 cc's. Patients were drawn from a prospectively maintained database of all boys presenting to the outpatient urology clinic receiving a diagnosis of varicocele. A cohort of adolescent boys was assembled by matching as closely as possible with respect to testis volume disparity and grade of varicocele. All matches were within 2% of volume difference. Volume was calculated using the length*width*height*0.71 formula. Testis size disparity was set to a threshold of ≥20% using the Lambert formula: (VolumeRight - VolumeLeft)/VolumeRight*100%. Our primary outcome was defined as hypotrophy or the need for surgery for hypotrophy at the termination of the study. We planned a single subgroup analysis of boys based on presentation with or without hypotrophy. The decision for surgery or observation was made by the individual clinician at the time of patient assessment.

RESULTS

On presentation, the prepubertal cohort was younger (10.8 vs 14.1 years), and with smaller left (2.4 vs 11.6 cc) and right (2.4 vs 11.6 cc) testis volume. There were no significant differences with respect to varicocele grade and volume differentials at presentation. At the end of the study, 76% of the prepubertal cohort had neither hypotrophy nor the requirement for operation, compared with 83% of the matched cohort (P = 0.71, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, there were no significant differences in outcome when comparing prepubertal boys with initial symmetry or hypotrophy to their matched cohort of older adolescents.

DISCUSSION

The prepubertal varicocele is a rare clinical problem for which little data exists to guide the clinician. In a review of Pubmed indexed English language manuscripts, we were only able to find five papers with information on Tanner stage; only 31 prepubertal boys have longitudinal data reported. This study approximately doubles the number of boys for whom such data is available in the literature. Our chief limitation was sample size. A power analysis indicated that a final-analysis cohort of 90 prepubertal boys would be required to detect a 20% difference in outcome between that group and a matched cohort of pubertal or post-pubertal boys. We propose that given the lack of evidence for worse outcomes in prepubertal boys with varicocele that prepubertal status, in and of itself, not be considered an additional indication for correction of varicocele.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective cohort of prepubertal boys with left testis varicocele and their matched cohort, we did not detect a difference in the rate of good outcomes, defined as the absence of hypotrophy and lack of need for surgical intervention. While we may have suspected, as have others, that prepubertal presentation would have conveyed a more pressing need to intervene, it is likely that these boys represent the very same patients that we see more commonly later in their adolescence, and should thus be managed in a similarly conservative fashion.

Imaging and interventional therapy for varicoceles

Varicocele is a common treatable cause of testicular pain, male infertility, and Leydig cell dysfunction. Scrotal ultrasonography has become the modality of choice in the diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of varicocele. Visualization of dilated veins and reflux into the pampiniform plexus enables accurate diagnosis. Although the pathophysiology of varicocele in testicular dysfunction remains unclear, numerous studies have established significant improvement in the seminal parameters and pregnancy rates after varicocele repair. Interventional therapy is a minimally invasive effective treatment option for primary and salvage varicocele repair. This review discusses sonographic criteria used in the pre- and post-procedural evaluation of varicocele and various interventional techniques for varicocele treatment.

Impact of internal spermatic artery preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence and the catch-up growth rate in adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV) in adolescents with varicocele and analyze the impact of internal spermatic artery (ISA) preservation on surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 92 adolescents with left varicocele who underwent LV between December 1998 and January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 13.2 ± 2.1 years. Age, grade of disease, number of ligation veins, recurrence rates, and catch-up growth were analyzed in patients who underwent ISA preservation and ligation. The median duration of the follow-up was 21 months.

RESULTS

ISA preservation was performed on 50 patients (54%). There were no significant inter-group differences in terms of age, varicocele grade, number of ligation veins, and catch-up growth (93% vs. 90%). The patients who received artery preservation demonstrated a higher recurrence rate (22%) than those who received artery ligation (5%; p = 0.032). Among 13 patients who had persistent or recurrent varicocele, nine were treated with embolization and one was treated with magnification-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy. None of these 10 patients demonstrated recurrence or testicular atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

LV with ISA ligation can reduce the recurrence rate and results in the same catch-up growth rate in comparison with LV with ISA preservation.

Variations in the management of asymptomatic adolescent grade 2 or 3 left varicoceles: a survey of practitioners

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to evaluate variations in management of asymptomatic adolescent grade 2 and 3 varicoceles by pediatric urologists.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Electronic survey of all 267 current members of AAP Urology with 74 (28%) responding.

RESULTS

When managing patients with positive examination findings, 49% of surveyed practitioners use scrotal sonography as initial screening, while 38% use only manual orchidometry and 11% observation with serial examinations. If significant testicular size discrepancy is identified, 32% immediately intervene surgically, while 59% repeat measurements in 6-12 months. When no discrepancy is identified, 36.6% of practitioners discharge their patients with no follow-up, 22.5% refer to an infertility specialist, and 31% evaluate with semen analysis. Fifty-seven percent of practitioners have never sent patients for semen analysis; only 4% send >50% of patients. Of these, 52% and 27% analyzed semen at 17-18 years and 19-20 years, respectively, and 10% send for semen analysis at <17 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey demonstrates that there does not appear to be a consensus among pediatric urologists managing asymptomatic grade 2 and 3 varicoceles. Better understanding of which adolescent patients with varicoceles will go on to develop male infertility is necessary to identify pediatric patients who could benefit from early intervention.

Is semen analysis necessary for varicocele patients in their early 20s?

PURPOSE

To determine whether it is necessary to analyze the semen of varicocele patients in their early 20s who are not complaining of infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from 128 men with varicocele with no complaint of infertility, but with complaints of pain/discomfort or a mass/swelling during a 4-year period beginning in January 2009. The varicocele cases were matched 4 : 1 by age to 32 hemospermia controls.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 22.0 years in the case group and 24.0 years in the control group. The median values of the percentage of normal motility, normal morphology, and density in the case group were 42.5%, 40.0%, and 51.0×10(6)/mL, respectively. The median serum testosterone level was 4.2 ng/mL and 7.0% of the total patients had low serum testosterone levels in the case group. The number of patients with asthenospermia (17.2%), oligospermia (10.9%), and teratospermia (5.5%), and those with at least one abnormal semen parameter (19.5%) was significantly higher in the case group than the control group. The median values of the motility, morphology, and density of the case group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The multivariate analysis showed that patient characteristics (age, presence of pain, duration of symptoms, and grade of varicocele) cannot help to predict abnormal semen parameters (asthenospermia, oligospermia, teratospermia, or cases of at least 1 abnormal semen parameter) or serum testosterone levels <3.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Semen analysis is required as a screening test for semen abnormalities regardless of the chief complaint in varicocele patients in their early 20s.

Role of varicocele repair for male infertility in the era of assisted reproductive technologies

Varicocele is an abnormal condition characterized by dilatation of the pampiniform plexus veins draining the testis and is present in 15 % of men. Varicoceles have an adverse effect on spermatogenesis and are the most common cause of male infertility. Approximately 35 % of infertile men and more than 70 % of men with secondary infertility were reported to have varicoceles. Although data on methods of varicocele repair are accumulating, there remains controversy regarding the indications and techniques for varicocele repair. In addition, the role of varicocele repair in this era of assisted reproductive technologies continues to be debated. In this study, we performed a comprehensive PubMed search in order to review the current status of varicocele repair for male infertility. We reviewed English-language studies published from 1992 through 2013. After reviewing the articles, we identified a recent meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials, which found that varicocele repair for oligozoospermic men was associated with better pregnancy rates as compared with observation. Our review of prospective studies showed that all semen parameters, including sperm concentration, motility, and progressive motility, were significantly improved after varicocele repair. We also summarize the findings of recent studies reporting beneficial effects of varicocele repair, i.e., decreased oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation after varicocele repair and superior cost effectiveness versus in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection alone, which may be important in the era of assisted reproductive technologies. Varicocele repair is a widespread, well-established procedure that can improve semen parameters in men with infertility. The effect of such treatment on the pregnancy rate is unclear because evidence is limited due to difficulties in recruiting patients for studies. Among the repair techniques, microsurgical repair using a subinguinal approach is potentially the best practice, although this procedure requires training in microsurgery. All these topics require further research in studies with sufficient patient enrollment and follow-up.

Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies

Varicocele is defined as abnormally dilated scrotal veins. It is present in 15 % of normal males and in 40 % of males with infertility. This disorder is a challenge for the physicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment, as the pathophysiology of varicocele is not yet completely understood. For this reason, accurate diagnostic criteria and clear indications for treatment in asymptomatic adolescents or adults with clinical or subclinical varicocele are still not defined. Ultrasonography (US) is considered the best method for calculating the volume of the testicles, measuring vein diameter and monitoring the growth of the testis in adolescent patients. Color-Doppler US is the method of choice for detecting spermatic vein reflux and for classifying the grade of varicocele. Various classification systems have been published with recommendations on how to perform US imaging of the scrotum. Currently, color-Doppler US and spectral analysis are the most effective, non-invasive diagnostic procedures as they allow detection of subclinical varicocele associated with infertility. Various techniques are used in the treatment of varicocele including open surgery, laparoscopic procedures and interventional radiology. However, there is no consensus among physicians on which technique is the most effective in terms of outcome and complication rates. This review shows that color-Doppler US is currently the most widely employed diagnostic method for detection and classification of varicocele caused by venous reflux, as it is reliable and easily performed. The review also highlights the role of varicocelectomy in the management of adult male infertility.

Intravenous methylene blue venography during laparoscopic paediatric varicocelectomy

INTRODUCTION

One of the challenges of varicocele surgery is to prevent hydrocele formation while still ensuring success. Methylene blue has been used to identify and preserve lymphatic vessels, and venography has been a standard component of sclerotherapy and percutaneous retrograde techniques. The authors have combined both approaches during laparoscopic varicocelectomy and report their experience.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed of adolescents with idiopathic varicocele and spontaneous venous reflux on Doppler ultrasound. A pampiniform plexus vein was cannulated via scrotal incision before creating the pneumoperitoneum. A mixture of methylene blue and Omnipaque™ was injected into the pampiniform plexus with fluoroscopic screening. Laparoscopic selective vein ligation was then performed using 5mm endoscopic clips or a bipolar vessel sealing device such as Plasmakinetic™ or Ligasure™. Venography was repeated to confirm complete ligation of the internal testicular veins. Patients were followed-up at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery with clinical examination and Doppler ultrasound. Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic selective vein ligation with venography and methylene blue injection. The median age was 14.7 (14.6-15.7) years. The recurrence rate was 12%. No patients developed a hydrocele. The length of surgery was 120 (100-126) minutes.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative intra-venous methylene blue injection and venography helps to identify venous duplications of the internal testicular veins and enhances the success rate of laparoscopic selective vein ligation. This approach prevents hydrocele formation but has a 12% recurrence rate, which appears to be higher than some techniques described in the literature.

Morphological and surgical overview of adolescent testis affected by varicocele

Varicocele is a common pathology of the testis frequently associated with infertility. For its management, a fine morphological study of the testis, both macroscopically and microscopically, and an accurate choice of surgical procedure are mandatory. The present review focuses its attention on the anatomic substrates of adolescent varicocele and its pathophysiologic modifications. The comprehensive assessment of all the reported alterations should be considered by the clinician before deciding the type of treatment and the timing.

Active surveillance of the adolescent with varicocele: predicting semen outcomes from ultrasound

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that active surveillance of the adolescent varicocele is not associated with a high prevalence of suboptimal semen analysis and that patients with abnormal semen analysis have smaller testicular volumes and larger volume differentials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an institutional review board approved retrospective cohort study of adolescents with a clinically detected varicocele. Patients were initially observed by serial scrotal ultrasound evaluating testicular size and differential. Semen analysis was routinely collected in Tanner V cases, around age 18 years. Prevalence of normal semen analysis parameters was calculated, and logistic regression was used to model the ability of age at presentation and testicular volume parameters to predict a normal semen analysis.

RESULTS

A cohort of 73 patients underwent surveillance with a mean ± SD age at presentation of 15.5 ± 2.3 years. Median followup was 2.7 years, during which time subjects underwent a median of 3 scrotal ultrasounds. A low total motile count was found in 48 patients (66%). Neither age at presentation nor testicular volume differential could predict normal semen volume, density, sperm motility or total motile count. Total testicular volume from the final ultrasound predicted total motile count (p = 0.008). However, the collective observations of volume during the entire period of surveillance could not predict total motile count (p = 0.847).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high prevalence of suboptimal semen analysis in adolescents with a varicocele who are followed with active surveillance. Total testicular volume can predict total motile count at the end of adolescence but not throughout.

Adolescent varicocoele management controversies

Varicocoele is defined as excessive dilatation of the pampiniform venous plexus of the spermatic cord. Varicocoele frequently appears during early puberty and is recognized to be the most common surgically correctable cause of male infertility. However, the actual incidence in adolescents, pathophysiology and the association with male factor infertility all remain somewhat controversial. The most accurate diagnostic technique for identifying young men who will benefit from surgical treatment has yet to be established. Observations of testicular asymmetry and deteriorating semen quality helped establish current guidelines and recommendations for surgical treatment. Further studies, comparing observation with surgical intervention, are needed to refine the current indications for varicocoele repair in the adolescent male.

Current issues in varicocele management: a review

The most common cause of male infertility is varicocele, and varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. In this article we reviewed the concept of varicocele in terms of its diagnosis, method of treatment, indications for treatment, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors. Physical examination is an essential diagnostic tool in the evaluation of a patient with a varicocele. However, as it depends on subjective findings, standardization of the physical examination method is needed. Various methods for treatment of varicocele exist, including open surgical, laparoscopic, microscopic surgical, and radiologic treatment such as embolization. Among these treatment approaches, microscopic inguinal or subinguinal varicocelectomy has superior outcomes, with a low complication rate. The influence of the treatment of varicocele on fertility is still a controversial issue and a difficult question to address, because there are limitations to performing a randomized control study, and previous studies had a heterogeneity of subjects and high dropout rate. However, there is robust evidence that varicocelectomy improves semen parameters as a surrogate marker of the potential for fertility. To date, general indications for treatment of varicocele are limited in patients with proven infertility, clinical palpable varicocele, and abnormal semen characteristics. Recently, it was shown that some symptoms other than infertility could be an indication for varicocelectomy because these symptoms are frequently related to deterioration of semen parameters. Varicocele in the adolescent presents a more difficult decision regarding whether to treat. A testicular size discrepancy of more than 20% is helpful for treatment decisions. Various prognostic factors were noted in several studies without, however, a consistent consensus.

Adolescent varicocele-is the 20/38 harbinger a durable predictor of testicular asymmetry?

PURPOSE

Part of the management of adolescent varicocele is trying to prognosticate who with testicular asymmetry will have catch-up growth with observation and who will have persistent asymmetry. We previously reported that catch-up growth is rare when peak retrograde flow greater than 38 cm per second is associated with 20% or greater asymmetry (ie the 20/38 harbinger). We sought to determine if this 20/38 cutoff held true with a larger series, and what peak retrograde flow value should be used when 15% instead of 20% asymmetry is chosen as the cutoff.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients from our large varicocele registry who had undergone at least 2 duplex Doppler ultrasounds and had been observed for at least 10 months in the interim. Outcomes were determined regarding those who met the 20/38 cutoff and what peak retrograde flow value could be used to recommend surgery when 15% to 19.9% asymmetry was included in the cutoff value.

RESULTS

Of 355 adolescent boys with left varicocele 44 (mean age 14.0 years, range 9 to 20) were followed with observation initially and met the 20/38 cutoff, while 9 additional patients met the 15/38 cutoff (initial asymmetry 15% to 19.9%). When combining both groups, only 3 boys had catch-up growth to less than 15% on followup. Thus, 50 of 53 patients did not demonstrate catch-up growth after a mean followup of 15.5 months (range 10 to 44).

CONCLUSIONS

Not only does a peak retrograde flow of greater than 38 cm per second hold up for predicting persistent/worsening asymmetry when combined with a 20% asymmetry cutoff, it also is an excellent predictor of persistent and/or worsening asymmetry when combined with a 15% asymmetry cutoff. Therefore, it might be unnecessary to follow an adolescent boy with observation who is at or above this 15/38 cutoff.

Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review

Varicocelectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for the treatment of male infertility. Although several different techniques for varicocele repair have been described in the literature, microsurgical varicocelectomy performed through a subinguinal or inguinal incision is recognized as the gold-standard approach for varicocelectomy, due to high success rates with minimal complications. Standard indications for varicocelectomy include palpable varicocele(s), with one or more abnormal semen parameters, and, for the couple trying to conceive, in the setting of normal or correctable female infertility. However, varicocele repair is often recommended and undertaken for reasons other than infertility, including low serum testosterone, testicular pain, testicular hypotrophy and poor sperm DNA quality. This article reviews the technical aspects of microsurgical varicocelectomy, and its indications in adults and adolescents.

Ultrastructure of the seminiferous tubules in oligoasthenoteratozoospermic men associated with varicocele

Varicocele is associated with venous reflux that may cause increased heat and interstitial pressure within the testes, with variable pathological effects on spermatogenesis. This study aimed to study the ultrastructural testicular changes in the seminiferous tubules of 20 infertile severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) men associated with varicocele and five patients with obstructive azoospermia without varicocele as controls. They were subjected to testicular biopsy which was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. Ultrastructurally, the seminiferous epithelium in the testicular biopsies of infertile severe OAT men associated with varicocele was variably affected in the form of thickening of the peritubular connective tissue, vacuolation of Sertoli cell and germ cell cytoplasm, presence of degenerated and apoptotic cells among the germinal epithelium, altered spermatids and abnormal spermatozoa. It is concluded that varicocele in severe OAT men is associated with ultrastructural changes in the seminiferous tubule.

Varicocele in adolescence: where are we now?

The exact pathophysiology of varicocele and the subsequent alteration of spermatogenesis has been the subject of much debate. Despite an enormous amount of literature on the subject, the appropriate management of varicocele in the adolescent patient population has not yet been clearly elucidated. While not every male with varicocele will be subfertile, the possibility potentially lends credence to early diagnosis for those in whom treatment will have an impact.

Effect of varicocelectomy on testicular volume in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of surgical intervention on catch-up growth as determined by a decreased testicular volume discrepancy in children and adolescents with varicocele.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE and the PubMed database and cross-referenced as of October 28, 2011 using the terms "varicocele," "children," "adolescent," "surgery," and "testicular volume." All relevant studies were of the testicular volume discrepancy variance before and after surgical repair. The outcomes included the number of patients with initial testicular atrophy and those with catch-up growth after surgical repair. The database search, quality evaluation, and data extraction were independently performed by 2 reviewers.

RESULTS

Of 75 studies, 14 were included for analysis and involved 1475 patients. The combined analysis showed that the testicular volume discrepancy was significantly reduced after surgery in the ≥10% group (P < .00001) and ≥20% group (P < .00001), respectively. No difference was found between the 2 groups (P = .70). Taken together, the number of patient with testicular volume disproportion in all pediatric and adolescent varicocele patients significantly decreased after surgery (P < .00001). The average proportion of catch-up growth was 76.4% (range 52.6%-93.8%).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis suggested clear advantages of surgical intervention on reducing testicular hypotrophy when the discrepancy is ≥10% in children and adolescents with varicocele. Additional prospective and controlled studies are warranted to elucidate the treatment of children and adolescents with varicocele.

The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele

During adolescence, the risk of developing a varicocele increases. Prevalence is less than 1% in boys aged younger than 10 years, but approaches that of the general adult population (about 15%) during puberty. For adolescent males with varicoceles, surgical risk factors have not yet been clearly delineated and clinical severity correlates poorly with prognosis. Fortunately, the widespread use of Doppler ultrasonography is transforming the diagnostic work-up for this demographic. A continuous reflux detected by color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) is thought to have a negative prognostic value and evidence suggests that a peak retrograde flow above 38 cm per second is a powerful predictor of lack of spontaneous improvement in adolescent patients with ≥ 20% asymmetry between testes. CDUS also enables the detection of varicocele resulting from reflux in the deferential vein adjunctive to a refluxing internal spermatic vein; a causality that accounts for approximately 15% of cases. In addition to a diagnostic role, hemodynamic parameters can be used to predict the risk of persistence or worsening asymmetry. Although further studies are necessary to validate single parameters, it seems that the more severe the reflux, the greater the likelihood that the patient will develop testicular asymmetry.

Testicular volume and semen parameters in patients aged 12 to 17 years with idiopathic varicocele

PURPOSE

Varicocele is potentially a progressive condition that may affect fertility. The authors have encouraged sperm banking for their postpubertal patients with varicocele and aim to evaluate the sperm parameters in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

With institutional ethical approval, sperm variables (volume, concentration, and forward motility) of patients with postpubertal varicocele who opted for sperm banking were prospectively recorded. The following parameters were also acquired: (a) ultrasound measurement of testicular volume, (b) clinical grade, and (c) venous Doppler. Patients were divided into 2 groups: symmetrical testis (group A) and asymmetrical testis (group B). Testicular asymmetry was defined as greater than 20% difference in testicular volume compared with contralateral testis. Sperm parameters were compared between groups A and B using Mann-Whitney U test and P < .05.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included: 10 in group A and 5 in group B. Median semen concentration in group B was significantly lower than group A (3 vs 26 million/mL; P = .04). One hundred percent of group B failed World Health Organisation adult criteria for normal spermiograms compared with 50% of group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Sperm concentration and quality was lower in patients with asymmetrical testis. Testicular dysfunction may be present before the onset of testicular hypotrophy. When testicular hypotrophy is present, testicular dysfunction is very likely.

Current management principles for adolescent varicocele

The authors review the current approach to management of the adolescent varicocele which has evolved over the past two decades. Principles of observational, surgical and adjunctive management are discussed relative to significant clinical findings. A selective approach to surgical intervention is advocated with the goal of preserving fertility potential.

Testicular symmetry and adolescent varicocele--does it need followup?

PURPOSE

Appropriate management for adolescent varicocele with testicular symmetry is rarely discussed. We examined the natural history of varicocele in patients presenting with testicular symmetry to achieve better understanding of the clinical course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our varicocele registry was queried for adolescent boys who presented with varicocele in association with less than 15% testicular asymmetry and who underwent at least 1 testicular asymmetry assessment 12 or more months later. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on an initial testicular asymmetry measurement of less than 10% vs 10.0% to 14.9%. Logistic regression modeling was used to analyze the association of Tanner stage, varicocele grade, peak retrograde flow and maximum vein diameter at presentation with increased testicular asymmetry at followup. Kaplan-Meier methodology was applied to compare testicular asymmetry progression rates.

RESULTS

We identified 89 adolescents, of whom 52 (58.4%) and 37 (41.6%) presented with less than 10.0% and 10.0% to 14.9% testicular asymmetry, respectively. Of the patients 37 (41.6%) showed testicular asymmetry progression at a median 18-month followup. The overall 3-year testicular asymmetry progression-free rate was 48% while in patients with peak retrograde flow 30 cm per second or greater it was 23%. On multivariate analysis controlled for age, Tanner stage and varicocele grade a peak retrograde flow of 30 cm per second or greater was associated with worsening testicular asymmetry (OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.6-8.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with varicocele and less than 15% testicular asymmetry are at risk for asymmetry during followup. Those with peak retrograde flow 30 cm per second or greater are at increased risk for early asymmetry while those with peak retrograde flow less than 30 cm per second may still show asymmetry but tend to do so after longer followup.

Is the comparison of a left varicocele testis to its contralateral normal testis sufficient in determining its well-being?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a size difference between a left testis involved with a varicocele and the contralateral normal testis is sufficient in its size assessment.

METHODS

We reviewed all pediatric scrotal ultrasounds at Helen DeVos Children's Hospital between 2001 and 2008. Sonographic testicular measurements were recorded for patients with clinically diagnosed left varicocele (n = 81 for "varicocele" group) and for patients with no specific pathologic findings (n = 184 for "normal" group). We first compared the sizes between left and right testes for all patients, then between the "varicocele" group and the "normal" group separately for left and right.

RESULTS

There were no significant size differences between left and right testes for the "normal" group, whereas the left was significantly smaller than the contralateral right for the "varicocele" group (P = .0048 for length; P = .012 for volume) for all ages. For boys 16 years or older, both the left and contralateral right testes of "varicocele" boys were smaller than those of "normal" boys, adjusting for age (P for left = .026 for length and .059 for volume; for right P = .033 for length and .031 for volume).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that the left testis in boys with varicocele is most often smaller than the contralateral right testis no matter the age. Compared with normal boys in late adolescence, the contralateral right testis is smaller in boys with varicocele.

Radiologically assessed testicular changes in infertile males with varicocele

The aim of this study was to assess vascular disturbances in the testis of infertile males associated with varicocele. In total, 124 consecutive male subjects were divided into the following groups: healthy fertile controls (n = 10), Gp1 (n = 28); infertile males with subclinical varicocele, Gp2 (n = 26); infertile males with grade I left varicocele, Gp3 (n = 28); infertile males with grade II left varicocele and Gp4 (n = 32); infertile males with grade III left varicocele. They were subjected to colour duplex for pampiniform plexus and scrotal scintigraphy. There was significant decrease in arterial blood velocity, testicular arterial diameters and testicular perfusion especially in high grade varicocele compared with healthy controls. The mean vein diameter demonstrated significant negative correlation with arterial diameter, arterial blood velocity, perfusion index, testicular size and significant positive correlation with perfusion index. The mean testicular size demonstrated significant positive correlation with arterial blood velocity, perfusion index and nonsignificant correlation with arterial diameter. It is concluded that there are significant decreases in testicular volume, testicular perfusion, blood velocity and testicular artery diameter in infertile males with varicocele.

Adolescent varicocele: influence of Tanner stage at presentation on the presence, development, worsening and/or improvement of testicular hypotrophy without surgical intervention

PURPOSE

Testicular asymmetry in adolescents with varicocele can worsen, remain unchanged or decrease on followup. We determined the incidence of testicular asymmetry at presentation by Tanner stage and the correlation between Tanner stage at presentation and subsequent changes in percent asymmetry (ability for catch-up growth or progressive asymmetry) without surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied the records of 115 boys with a mean age of 14.1 years (range 9.2 to 20.0) with grade 2 or 3 left varicocele who underwent testicular volume measurement at 2 visits at least that were a minimum of 6 months apart. Of the patients 92% and 8% underwent Doppler duplex ultrasound and orchidometry, respectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups, including those with less than 15% and those with 15% or greater asymmetry. Catch-up growth was defined as less than 15% asymmetry at any subsequent visit.

RESULTS

At presentation 58%, 64%, 67%, 35% and 39% of Tanner 1 to 5 cases showed 15% or greater testicular asymmetry, respectively. When Tanner 1 to 3 cases were combined and compared with Tanner 4 and 5 cases, the difference in initial asymmetry was significant (64% vs 38%, p = 0.007). Although it was not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more catch-up growth for the later Tanner stages, including 27% for Tanner 1 to 3 vs 53% for Tanner 4 and 5 (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Slightly more than 50% of children and adolescents referred with varicocele have 15% or greater testicular asymmetry at presentation. Initial asymmetry is statistically more common in cases of earlier Tanner stages (1 to 3). Adolescents with 15% or greater testicular asymmetry who present at higher Tanner stages (4 and 5) show a trend toward a higher incidence of catch-up growth, although it is not significant.

Treatment strategy for the adolescent varicocele

A varicocele is a dilatation of the testicular vein and the pampiniform venous plexus within the spermatic cord. Although rare in pediatric populations, the prevalence of varicoceles markedly increases with pubertal development. Varicoceles are progressive lesions that may hinder testicular growth and function over time and are the most common and correctable cause of male infertility. Approximately 40% of men with primary infertility have a varicocele, and more than half of them experience improvements in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. The decision to treat adolescents with varicocele is a controversial one. The task for pediatricians and urologists is to identify those adolescents who are at greatest risk for infertility in adulthood, in an effort to offer early surgical intervention to those most likely to benefit.

The genetic and phenotypic basis of infertility in men with pediatric urologic disorders

Male factor is a major component of infertility for many couples. The presence of congenital genitourinary anomalies in male partners can cause male infertility. We reviewed the state-of-the-art treatment and outcomes for male infertility caused by pediatric urologic disorders. Disorders were classified by whether they led to infertility through pre-testis, testicular, or post-testis effects. Despite the complexity of pediatric urologic disorders that can affect fertility, natural paternity and paternity through assisted reproductive technology are common. Given the significant recent advances in infertility treatments, paternity with many currently untreatable pediatric disorders is likely in the future.

Testicular asymmetry and adolescent varicoceles managed expectantly

PURPOSE

Adolescent varicocele is often associated with testicular asymmetry. Depending on the degree of asymmetry, some physicians will recommend surgery. However, given the possibility that asynchronous growth may be transient, others advocate for a period of observation. We reviewed our outcomes in such patients who were initially treated expectantly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our pediatric varicocele database. We analyzed the outcomes of patients presenting for evaluation of varicocele who were followed with serial testicular volume measurements using scrotal ultrasound or ring orchidometry and who had at least a 6-month interval between measurements. Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups based on initial and final testicular asymmetry.

RESULTS

We identified 181 patients (median age 13.8 years) who were followed expectantly. Serial volume measurements had been obtained at a median interval of 12 months (interquartile range 8 to 21) between first and most recent visits. Mean percent asymmetry for the group did not change with time. Among patients who initially had less than 20% asymmetry 35% had 20% or greater asymmetry on followup, and among those with 20% or greater asymmetry initially 53% remained in that range (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymmetry can be a transient phenomenon. Patients with initial asymmetry can end up with significant asymmetry, and many with significant asymmetry can have catch-up growth. However, when patients have a peak retrograde flow of 38 cm per second or greater on duplex Doppler ultrasound in association with 20% or greater asymmetry spontaneous catch-up growth is unlikely to occur.

Predictors of improved seminal parameters and fertility after varicocele repair in young adults

The aim of our study was to determine hormonal or biochemical markers in patients with clinically palpable left varicocele but without a history of infertility, with especial emphasis on nitric oxide, related with improved seminal parameters after varicocelectomy. Semen samples were obtained from 202 patients with left varicocele grade II or III. Nitric oxide levels in seminal plasma were determined by the Griess technique. Testicular volume was determined ultrasonographically in both testes and hormonal profile was measured. The post-operative sperm concentration increased significantly in patients with normal sperm count or moderate oligozoospermia, but we did not find an increment in sperm count in patients with mild and severe oligozoospermia after surgery. The mean percentage of normal motility significantly increased after surgery, but we did not observe a significant increment in morphologically normal sperm count and testicular volume after varicocele repair. Moreover, we did not find any correlation between nitric oxide concentrations and severity of oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia or abnormal sperm morphology in this population. It is concluded that in the general male population, varicocele repair is not associated with an improved semen profile in all cases. We did not observe a significant correlation between nitric oxide concentrations and semen profile.

Effects of grade 1 varicocele detected in the pediatric age-group on testicular development

PURPOSE

A number of reports have indicated the effectiveness of varicocelectomy on large varicoceles in adolescents. We carried out a 5-year follow-up study to examine the effect of grade 1 varicocele on testicular development.

METHODS

Of 31 boys with left grade 1 varicocele (mean age, 12.6 years), 10 underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy and 21 were conservatively observed and evaluated for testicular volume and varicocele grade. The control group consisted of 20 healthy age-matched boys without a varicocele. The mean relative left testicular volume was compared with the right testis and the absolute bilateral testicular volumes among the boys in all groups.

RESULTS

Of 21 boys who were observed, 13 (62%) continued to have grade 1 varicocele, 4 (19%) developed grade 2 varicocele, and the other 4 boys (19%) showed spontaneous resolution. Twelve testes (57%) developed in parallel with the right testis, and 1 boy (5%) who experienced spontaneous resolution of the varicocele had catch-up testicular growth, whereas 8 boys (38%) had left testicular growth delay with or without an increasing grade of varicocele. Varicocelectomy, but not observation, improved the previously noted testicular growth delay. Furthermore, right testicular growth delay was also noted during observation.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the total number of boys with grade 1 varicocele showed normal development, whereas many boys presented with growth delay in both testes. Thus, we still need to define reliable predictors that will permit selection of the best candidates for varicocelectomy.

Preserved testicular artery at varicocele repair

Whether or not varicocele causes infertility is a contentiously debated issue. This study aimed to compare semen parameters and pregnancy rate in infertile males who underwent varicocelectomy with preserved or accidentally ligated testicular artery. Ninety-five infertile oligoasthenozoospermic patients with left-sided varicocele were subjected to subinguinal varicocelectomy with trial of preserving testicular artery. According to absence or presence of testicular artery in the histological excised pedicle the cases were divided into two groups; group 1 (n = 60) with preserved testicular artery and group 2 (n = 35) where the artery was accidentally ligated being not defined or injured. Semen analysis was carried out after 4, 8 and 12 months and post-operative pregnancy rate was assessed after 1 year. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH) and total testosterone (T) were estimated pre- and post-operatively. Semen parameters (total sperm count, sperm concentration and sperm motility) showed significant increase post-operatively compared with pre-operative parameters but were comparable in both groups with no significant difference. Serum FSH, LH, T hormones and pregnancy rate (23.3% versus 22.9%) 1 year post-operatively showed no significant difference. It is concluded that accidental ligation of testicular artery has no deleterious effect on semen parameters during primary varicocele repair if the testicular arterial supply was not compromised.