The Efficacy of Dihydrotestosterone Transdermal Gel Before Primary Hypospadias Surgery: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study

Effect of preoperative hormonal stimulation on postoperative complication rates after proximal hypospadias repair: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of preoperative hormonal stimulation on complication rates following proximal hypospadias repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We comprehensively searched the published and unpublished literature between 1990 and 2010. Eligibility criteria were applied. Title, abstract and full text screening was carried out by 2 independent authors, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Heterogeneity between studies was tested using Cochran chi-square Q test and quantified by calculating I(2). Quality appraisal of included studies was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted when appropriate using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 288 citations, of which 11 (622 patients) met inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the systematic review. Most series were retrospective observational studies of moderate or low methodological quality. Of the patients 45% underwent administration of preoperative hormonal stimulation, with intramuscular testosterone being the most commonly prescribed formulation. Four studies addressed postoperative complication rate stratified by preoperative hormonal stimulation use and were included in a meta-analysis. The odds ratio for a complication occurring with preoperative hormonal stimulation use was 1.67 (CI 0.96-2.91, p = 0.07, I(2) = 0%). No persistent side effects due to preoperative hormonal stimulation were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge this is the only systematic review and meta-analysis thus far that has critically assessed the effect of preoperative hormonal stimulation on operative outcomes after hypospadias repair. The published literature is of low quality and lacks standardized reporting of important patient and surgical details. The effect of preoperative hormonal stimulation on operative outcomes after hypospadias repair remains unclear and requires further investigation.

The influence of perioperative factors on primary severe hypospadias repair

Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital malformations of the male genitalia. Severe cases present with associated curvature greater than 30° and the meatus opening proximally to the penoscrotal junction. The perioperative management of patients with primary severe hypospadias is variable. Systematic evaluation of the upper urinary tract and the search for enlarged prostatic utricles seem unnecessary in patients with isolated primary severe hypospadias, and should be limited to severe cases with associated extraurinary malformations. Detection of a disorder of sex development is key for gender assignment and prognosis, but the identification of cases warranting a full work-up and the influence of such a diagnosis on the success of hypospadias repair is controversial. Preoperative hormonal stimulation allows for penile growth irrespective of the administration route. Associated morbidity is minimal, but its influence on the success of surgery is still unknown. An age of 6-18 months is generally recommended for surgery, but no trial data support this policy. Second-layer coverage of the urethroplasty and postoperative urinary drainage seem to reduce the complications of surgery, whereas postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and type of dressing have minimal impact on surgical success. Overall, most interventions are based on weak evidence, and their influence on the outcomes of repair is ill-defined. Clinicians should be made aware of the evidence supporting any single intervention in order to standardize their management policies. We hope the issues outlined here will prompt researchers to design new studies to address the clinically relevant questions.

Does androgen stimulation prior to hypospadias surgery increase the rate of healing complications? - A preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

Androgens have a positive effect on penile growth in children, but they may also have a repressive effect on the healing process. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcomes of onlay urethroplasty with and without preoperative androgen stimulation in patients with severe hypospadias.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Of 300 severe hypospadias cases treated at a single institution, 126 operated on by the same surgeon had complete follow-up data, and 30 of these received preoperative androgen treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin and/or systemic testosterone) 1-24 months before surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients presented with a complication (27.7%) of whom 26 (20.6%) had a fistula or dehiscence. Among patients on androgen stimulation there was a 30% healing complication rate (9/30) whereas for those without this was 17.7% (17/96). When androgenic treatment was given > 3 months prior to surgery the healing complication rate was 21.7% (5/23), and when < 3 months prior to surgery the rate reached 57% (4/7). Mean follow up was 41 months (10-97).

CONCLUSION

Although the numbers were too small in this series to reach statistical significance, the tissular interactions of androgens in the healing process reported by dermatologists should alert the hypospadiologists and lead to a further prospective study to define the optimal protocol for stimulation of the penis in specific cases without affecting outcome.

Hypospadias surgery past, present and future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypospadias surgery has been in continuous evolution for many years with steadily improving reported results. Despite this many unanswered questions on its cause, management and outcomes remain. Recent research has done little to clarify most matters.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing evidence of a balance of genetic and developmental factors in the development of hypospadias, but there is doubt whether the incidence of hypospadias is increasing or not. Many technical aspects of hypospadias repair and variations of perioperative management seem to have little effect on outcome, whereas the age at which surgery is performed may. Although efforts are being made to relate anatomical findings to outcome, a lack of objective assessment and standardization is a handicap. Severe hypospadias, particularly that associated with significant chordee, remains challenging although strategies for management are being developed. The future may lie in development of autologous tissue culture for these severe cases.

SUMMARY

Further development of hypospadias surgery would benefit from objective, standardized methods of describing anatomy and outcome measures to facilitate effective comparison of techniques and procedures.

When size matters: a clinical review of pathological micropenis

Micropenis is a significantly small penis with normal internal male genitalia. Micropenis is usually diagnosed shortly after birth, and the cause should be established; in addition, it should be differentiated from other associated syndromes. The role of the pediatric nurse practitioner is to diagnose the micropenis, guide the parents through the options of management, and support all involved through the selected treatment, whether hormonal or surgical. Patients affected with micropenis will need long-term management from their pediatric nurse practitioners, as well as follow-up by endocrinologists, urologists, pediatric surgeons (if surgery is chosen as the treatment), psychologists, and social workers. The need of more long-term research on patients with micropenis also is discussed.

Does administration of transdermal dihydrotestosterone gel before hypospadias repair improve postoperative outcomes?

In an effort to improve the outcome of hypospadias repair, Kaya et al. performed a prospective, randomized study of transdermal dihydrotestosterone (DHT) gel as a preoperative adjunct to surgery. They found that patients who received DHT gel had fewer complications and better cosmesis than patients who underwent surgery alone. The authors attribute the differences between the two groups to an increased blood flow produced by the gel. The series of patients was small, and a larger sample size might have produced different results. Some of the outcomes measured were subjective, and the methods used to assess these outcomes were not clear. If a larger study confirms the results obtained by Kaya and colleagues, transdermal DHT gel might prove to be a valuable adjunct to hypospadias surgery.