Percutaneous biopsy of primary tumor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma to predict high risk pathological features: comparison with nephrectomy assessment

Limitations of preoperative biopsy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: comparison to surgical pathology in 405 cases

Study Type--Diagnostic (cohort) Level of Evidence: 2b. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although there have been many investigations of biopsy for small renal masses, there are scant data on the accuracy of biopsy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We report a large series of biopsies and compare with nephrectomy pathology in patients with mRCC. The present study highlights the inaccuracy of biopsy in the setting of metastatic disease, which is related to sampling error because of heterogeneity within the tumour and among metastases. These limitations are important to realize when designing trials that depend on pathological findings from biopsy and not nephrectomy. In addition, we found that biopsy of primary tumours were more likely than biopsy of metastatic sites to be diagnostic of RCC. Future studies with multiquadrant biopsies of primary tumours could yield the most accurate pathological results for future studies.

OBJECTIVE

• To evaluate the ability of preoperative biopsy to identify high-risk pathological features by comparing pathology from preoperative metastatic site and primary tumour biopsies with nephrectomy pathology in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

•  We reviewed clinical and pathological data from patients who underwent biopsy before cytoreductive nephrectomy for mRCC at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 1991 to 2007. • Percutaneous biopsy techniques included fine-needle aspiration, core needle biopsy or a combination of both techniques.

RESULTS

• The pathology of 405 preoperative biopsies (239 metastatic site, 166 primary tumour) from 378 patients was reviewed at MDACC before cytoreductive nephrectomy. • The biopsy and nephrectomy specimens had the same histological subtype in 96.0% of clear-cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 72.7% of non-clear-cell RCCs. • Of 76 nephrectomy specimens where sarcomatoid de-differentiation was identified, only seven (9.2%) were able to be identified from the preoperative biopsy. • In 38.3% of patients, the same Fuhrman grade was identified in both the biopsy and nephrectomy specimens. • A definitive diagnosis of RCC was more likely to be reported in primary tumour biopsies than in metastatic site biopsies. (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

• Preoperative biopsy has limited ability to identify non-clear-cell histological subtype, Fuhrman grade or sarcomatoid features. • When surgical pathology is not available, a biopsy obtaining multiple samples from different sites within the primary tumour should be recommended rather than limited metastatic site biopsy to identify patients for clinical trials.

The penetration of renal mass biopsy in daily practice: a survey among urologists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The vast increase in recent publications on renal mass biopsy (RMB) suggests an increased interest in the subject. The objective of the survey was to assess the use of RMB in current urologic practice, including related factors such as indications and patterns in practice.

METHODS

The link to a web-based questionnaire ( www.surveymonkey.com ) was sent to all registered e-mail addresses (1854) of members of the Endourological Society in December 2010. The questionnaire contained six epidemiologic questions, 10 regarding patterns of practice, one regarding the influence of the literature, and one on future techniques. Chi-square test (for trends) was used to assess statistical significant differences among categorical answers.

RESULTS

In total, 190 responders completed the survey of whom 73% indicated performing RMB "never" or "rarely" compared with 9% performing RMB in 25% to 100% of cases. Thirteen percent of responders reported never to take a RMB. Of the latter, significantly fewer practice in university hospitals (6% vs 20%-30%, P=0.003). Main indications to perform RMB are still tumors in solitary/transplant kidneys and in metastatic disease. Lack of influence on clinical management and risk of false negatives were the main reasons not to perform biopsies. Sixty-one percent prefer histological biopsies compared with 8% who prefer cytological aspiration; 31% indicated that they combine both techniques. Other tissue differentiation techniques (Optical Coherence Tomography, Raman-spectroscopy) are unknown to 65% of urologists.

CONCLUSION

RMB is not yet applied widely in urologic practice, with academic urologists performing RMB less infrequently. Core biopsies are still preferred, although combined with cytologic punctures by a considerable number of responders.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: a survey of the Society of Urologic Oncology

OBJECTIVE

Several systemic agents have been approved for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and others are in various stages of development. We surveyed members of the Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) regarding the importance of adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapy for RCC and their participation in such trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was sent in October 2010 to 564 U.S. and Canadian members of the SUO and the SUO-Clinical Trials Committee with a valid e-mail address. A total of 136 urologic cancer specialists from a mixture of practice patterns responded to the questionnaire (24% participation rate).

RESULTS

At the time of the study, 75% participated in adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment protocols, including 75% with adjuvant and 16% with neoadjuvant protocols. There was universal support for continued investigation of agents for adjuvant use in RCC with locoregional metastasis (100%) and nearly universal support for investigation of agents in patients with "high risk" (99%) and "intermediate risk" (91%) localized RCC after nephrectomy. The vast majority of respondents also supported investigation of neoadjuvant therapies in patients with advanced RCC (98%) or locally-advanced RCC (98%), with 70% also supporting neoadjuvant trials in patients with localized RCC. Importantly, 98% of respondents indicated interest in participating in future adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials.

CONCLUSION

Urologic cancer specialists surveyed in late 2010 demonstrated nearly universal support for trials to investigate the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for RCC of all stages. With appropriate patient selection and outcome assessment, this widespread support indicates great potential for future clinical trials which will require the participation of urologic surgeons.

Systemic therapy for metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: recent progress and future directions

Insights into the biology of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) have identified multiple pathways associated with the pathogenesis and progression of this cancer. This progress has led to the development of multiple agents targeting these pathways, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, and the mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus. With the exception of temsirolimus, phase 3 trials tested these agents in patients with clear-cell histology; therefore, their efficacy in non-CCRCC is unclear. To date, there is no established effective therapy for patients with advanced non-CCRCC. This article focuses on treatment options for metastatic non-CCRCC.