Association of Tumor Size, Location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and Centrality Index Score with Perioperative Outcomes and Postoperative Renal Function

Volumetry may predict early renal function after nephron sparing surgery in solitary kidney patients

We investigate the impact of the residual kidney volume measured by tumor volumetry on preoperative imaging in predicting post-operative renal function. Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the standard treatment for T1 kidney tumors. Resection of kidney tumors in solidary kidneys needs precise preoperative counseling of patients regarding post-operative renal function.

Patients planned for renal tumor surgery who underwent prior nephrectomy on the contralateral side were included. We identified 35 patients in our database that underwent NSS in solitary kidneys and met the inclusion criteria. Tumor volumetry was performed on computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK). Clinical and pathological data were assessed. Follow-up data included renal function over 3 years.

Mean age was 64 ± 8.1 years. Mean tumor volume on imaging was 27.5 ± 48.6 cc. Mean kidney volume was 195.2 ± 62.8 cc and mean residual kidney volume was 173.4 ± 65.3 cc. We found a correlation between renal function (MDRD) and residual kidney volume on imaging 1-week post-surgery (p = 0.038). Mid- and long-term renal function was not associated with residual kidney volume.

In conclusion, renal volumetry may predict early renal function after NSS.

Warm ischemia time and postoperative complications after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlations between PADUA and RENAL scores, WIT and postoperative complications in a cohort of patients who underwent elective open or minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 96 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma between 2004 and 2013 at our Institution. The Spearman test was used to compare categorical variables. For all statistical analyses, a two-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) PADUA score was 7 (7-8) and the median (IQR) RENAL score was 7 (6-8). The median (IQR) warm ischemia time was 14 min (8-20). Low grade and high grade postoperative complications were found in 27 (28.1%) and 6 (6.3%) patients, respectively. PADUA risk group categories significantly correlated with WIT > 20 minutes and high grade postoperative complications, respectively (P = .04), regardless of the surgical approach. RENAL risk group categories significantly predicted longer hilar clamping time in our cohort (P = .04), but no statistically significant correlations with high grade postoperative complications were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective series nephrometric scores demonstrated to significantly predict longer warm ischemia time and higher postoperative complications, especially in those patients with more challenging and complex renal tumors. Therefore, when planning to perform partial nephrectomy, urologists should widely use these comprehensive tools.

Risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy

Purpose

To evaluate the frequency and clinical characteristics of postoperative hemorrhage as a complication of partial nephrectomy.

Materials and Methods

The demographics, physical statistics, tumor size, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, operative method, warm ischemic time, and presence of postoperative hemorrhage and its severity and method of intervention were examined in 300 partial nephrectomy patients in two medical centers (Stanford Medical Center and Kyung Hee University Medical Center) between March 2000 and March 2012.

Results

Of the 300 subjects, 13 (4.3%) experienced postoperative hemorrhage severe enough to require intervention more invasive than transfusion (Clavien grade III or higher). Univariate analysis of the bleeding and nonbleeding groups showed that whereas age, ischemic time, tumor size and stage, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and operative method did not differ significantly, the exophyticity (E) score was significantly higher for severe postoperative hemorrhage (p=0.04). However, multivariate analysis showed none of the factors to differ significantly. In most of the cases requiring intervention, selective embolization was sufficient, but in one case explorative laparotomy and nephrectomy were required. Clinical characteristics varied significantly among severe hemorrhage cases, with time of onset ranging from the first to the 30th postoperative day and symptoms presenting in a diverse manner, such as gross hematuria and pleuritic chest pain. Computed tomography and angiographic findings were consistent with either arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysms.

Conclusions

Severe hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy is rare. Nonetheless, with the great variability in presenting symptoms and time of onset after surgery, surgeons should exercise great vigilance during the postoperative care of partial nephrectomy patients.

Clinical analysis of the PADUA and the RENAL scoring systems for renal neoplasms: a retrospective study of 245 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical significance of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic (PADUA) and radius exophytic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location (RENAL) scoring systems for renal neoplasms in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical data of 245 Chinese patients with renal neoplasms undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from June 2008 to June 2012. The perioperative complications and variables, as well as PADUA and RENAL score, were compared.

RESULTS

The PADUA and RENAL scoring systems were significantly associated with percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.032 and P = 0.026 respectively), whereas the RENAL scoring system was also significantly associated with warm ischemia time (P = 0.032). On multivariate analysis, both scores were able to predict percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (PADUA, P = 0.011; RENAL, P = 0.028). There were no significant associations between the two scoring systems assessed and the occurrence of complications or tumor stage. The correlation between PADUA classification and RENAL nephrometry score was significant (P < 0.0001). Fleiss' generalized kappa was 0.69-0.89 for the various components of the PADUA score and 0.67-0.89 for the RENAL nephrometry components.

CONCLUSIONS

The PADUA classification and RENAL nephrometry score are comprehensive assessment tools for delineating renal tumor anatomy. The reproducibility of the PADUA and RENAL scores is substantial, but further research is required to evaluate its performance in more accurately predicting operative and patient-related outcomes.

Is diameter-axial-polar scoring predictive of renal functional damage in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy? An evaluation using technetium Tc 99m (⁹⁹Tcm) diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid (DTPA) glomerular filtration rate

OBJECTIVE

To identify the effects of diameter-axial-polar (DAP) scoring and other clinical variables on renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 59 patients with complete radiographic, clinical and follow-up information were included for analysis. Technetium Tc 99m ((99) Tc(m) )-diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid (DTPA) renal scintigraphy was used to determine the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of both kidneys and each kidney individually. All cross-sectional images were reviewed by a single radiologist and a DAP score was assigned.

RESULTS

The median decline in total GFR after PN was 13% at a median follow-up of 12 months (from 86.8 to 76.2 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , P < 0.001). The median GFR of the operated kidney showed a significant decrease peri-operatively (42.4 to 27.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , P < 0.001). The function of the contralateral kidney showed a significant increase (43.5 to 48.8 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, preoperative total GFR, ischaemia time and DAP sum score were independent predictors of absolute functional decline of the affected kidney (all P < 0.001), while only preoperative total GFR and DAP sum score were significantly associated with the total absolute GFR reduction (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative renal function status and DAP score of renal tumours are the primary determinants of long-term functional outcomes after PN, but renal ischaemia damage to the operated kidney after PN is possibly masked by functional compensation of the contralateral healthy kidney if only overall renal function is assessed.

Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a)

OBJECTIVE

To compare laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with robotic PN (RPN) using meta-analytical techniques, since there has been a rise in the incidence of small renal masses (SRM; <4 cm) minimally invasive approaches are becoming more popular in dealing with such pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies comparing LPN and RPN. Comparative studies evaluating RPN and LPN that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected. Data on preoperative, operative (operative time, estimated blood loss [EBL], and warm ischaemia time [WIT]), postoperative (length of stay [LOS]) variables and complications were collected. A meta-analysis using random effect model was performed. A further Bland-Altman analysis of some of the operative variables was done to compare their reproducibility and mean difference in techniques.

RESULTS

Six studies matched the selection criteria. In all, 256 patients were analysed (40% RPN and 60% LPN). There was no significant different in EBL (P = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.01 to 104.26). Similarly, there was no significant different in WIT between the groups (P = 0.23, 95% CI -15.22 to 3.70). Also, LOS (P = 0.22, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.09) and overall postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.84, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite multiple studies reporting better perioperative variables for RPN, the present study found no significant differences between RPN and LPN. This has implications for both the surgeon and the patient. Lack of randomised controlled trials in addition to a lack of long-term oncological data for RPN are current limitations.