51
|
Gulli G, Marquardt L, Rothwell PM, Markus HS. Stroke Risk After Posterior Circulation Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack and its Relationship to Site of Vertebrobasilar Stenosis. Stroke 2013; 44:598-604. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.669929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giosue Gulli
- From the Stroke and Dementia Research Centre, St. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom (G.G., H.S.M.); and Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (L.M., P.M.R.)
| | - Lars Marquardt
- From the Stroke and Dementia Research Centre, St. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom (G.G., H.S.M.); and Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (L.M., P.M.R.)
| | - Peter M. Rothwell
- From the Stroke and Dementia Research Centre, St. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom (G.G., H.S.M.); and Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (L.M., P.M.R.)
| | - Hugh S. Markus
- From the Stroke and Dementia Research Centre, St. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom (G.G., H.S.M.); and Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (L.M., P.M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
NII K, ABE G, IKO M, NOMOTO Y, YU I, SAKAMOTO K, KAZEKAWA K. Endovascular Angioplasty for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Occlusion Without Visualization of the Stump of the Artery Ostium. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2013; 53:422-6. [DOI: 10.2176/nmc.53.422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kouhei NII
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Kieikai Hospital
| | - Gorou ABE
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Kieikai Hospital
| | - Minoru IKO
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Kieikai Hospital
| | | | - Iwae YU
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Kieikai Hospital
| | - Kimiya SAKAMOTO
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital
| | - Kiyoshi KAZEKAWA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Kocak B, Korkmazer B, Islak C, Kocer N, Kizilkilic O. Endovascular treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. World J Radiol 2012; 4:391-400. [PMID: 23024840 PMCID: PMC3460226 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i9.391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2012] [Revised: 09/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/10/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis seems a safe, effective and useful technique for resolving symptoms and improving blood flow to the posterior circulation, with a low complication rate and good long-term results. In patients with severe tortuosity of the vessel, stent placement is a real challenge. The new coronary balloon-expandable stents may be preferred. A large variability of restenosis rates has been reported. Drug-eluting stents may be the solution. After a comprehensive review of the literature, it can be concluded that percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of extracranial VA stenosis is technically feasible, but there is insufficient evidence from randomized trials to demonstrate that endovascular management is superior to best medical management.
Collapse
|
54
|
Nozaki K. Surgical Intervention for Cerebral Ischemia: Effective or Not? World Neurosurg 2012; 78:45-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2012] [Accepted: 01/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
55
|
Ota T, Usami K, Iijima A, Saito N. Staged Surgical Treatment for Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis: Combined Treatment with Endovascular Angioplasty and Bypass Surgery. World Neurosurg 2012; 78:90-4. [PMID: 22381307 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2011] [Revised: 10/25/2011] [Accepted: 12/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Ota
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Yan Y, Liang L, Chen T, Zhong C, Li P. Treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis with stent-assistant angioplasty in the elderly. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2012. [DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302012000400011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
57
|
Treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis with stent-assistant angioplasty in the elderly. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0104-4230(12)70223-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
58
|
Zhou Y, Yang QW, Xiong HY. Angioplasty with stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis: a systematic review. J Int Med Res 2012; 40:18-27. [PMID: 22429342 DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intracranial artery stenosis can be fatal, requiring fast, safe and effective intervention. The introduction of the Wingspan™ stent system with Gateway™ percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon catheter has made intracranial intervention possible in a clinical trial setting. This systematic review planned to identify and review all randomized controlled trials comparing angioplasty and stenting of intracranial arteries with standard medical care. METHODS Electronic databases and relevant records were examined for possible trials using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS A total of 3661 records were identified by searching several English language databases and other sources including Chinese academic journals. The recently discontinued Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial was the single qualifying study and showed clear advantage of medical management over percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS). CONCLUSIONS The SAMPRASS trial indicated that PTAS is associated with high complication and morbidity rates. Definitive recommendations cannot be made until convincing results from additional robustly designed randomized trials become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Zhou
- Department of Military Epidemiology, The Third Military Medical University, and Department of Neurology, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Ramirez CA, Febrer G, Gaudric J, Abou-Taam S, Beloucif K, Chiche L, Koskas F. Open Repair of Vertebral Artery: A 7-Year Single-Center Report. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26:79-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2011] [Revised: 08/19/2011] [Accepted: 09/13/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
60
|
Antoniou GA, Murray D, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, Schiro A, Serracino-Inglott F, Smyth JV. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in patients with proximal vertebral artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2011; 55:1167-77. [PMID: 22206680 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2011] [Revised: 09/06/2011] [Accepted: 09/24/2011] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the proximal vertebral artery is an important cause of cerebrovascular ischemic events with a significant associated morbidity and mortality. Endovascular treatment has emerged as a promising tool of the therapeutic armamentarium, along with medical therapy and surgical reconstruction. Our objective was to systemically review the pertinent evidence on the endovascular management of proximal vertebral artery disease and perform an analysis of the published outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature identified all studies reporting percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting, or both, for proximal vertebral artery stenosis. Web-based search engines were searched using the Medical Subject Headings terms "vertebral artery," "angioplasty," and "stents" in all possible combinations. Studies comprising a series of at least five patients were considered for analysis. Periprocedural transient ischemic attack and stroke and death from any cause ≤30 days of treatment were defined as the primary outcome end points. RESULTS One randomized controlled trial comparing angioplasty and stenting of the proximal vertebral artery and medical therapy was identified. No comparative studies of endovascular treatment and open surgical repair were found. Forty-two selected studies reported endovascular treatment (angioplasty or stenting, or both) of 1117 vertebral arteries in 1099 patients. The weighted mean technical success rate was 97% (range, 36%-100%). Periprocedural transient ischemic attack occurred in 17 patients (1.5%). The combined stroke and death rate was 1.1%. Recurrent symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency developed in 65 of 967 patients (8%) within a reported follow-up of 6 to 54 months. Restenosis developed in 183 of 789 patients (23%) who underwent follow-up imaging (range, 0%-58%). Reintervention for recurrent disease during follow-up occurred in 86 patients (9%; range, 0%-35%). CONCLUSIONS There is limited comparative evidence on the efficacy of medical, surgical, and endovascular treatment of proximal vertebral artery disease. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting has low periprocedural neurologic adverse events and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Mohammadian R, Najaran A, Sohrabi B, Mansourizadeh R, Mohammadian F, Nasiri B, Farhoudi M. Vertebral artery orifice stenosis: a report of 43 cases from northwest iran treated with angioplasty and stenting. Neuroradiol J 2011; 24:749-57. [PMID: 24059771 DOI: 10.1177/197140091102400513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2011] [Accepted: 02/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
More than one quarter of all transient ischemic attacks (TIA's) and ischemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar (VB) circulation. Vertebral artery stenotic lesion, particularly at the origin of the vertebral artery, is not uncommon but it is a less studied area. Here we present our endovascular treatment experience in a group of patients with vertebral artery orifice stenosis. We enrolled a group of patients with vertebral artery orifice stenosis who presented with confirmed posterior circulation stroke. Vertebrobasilar insufficiency syndrome was confirmed by imaging studies and clinical findings. Vertebral artery stenosis diagnosed by CT or MR Angiography and confirmed by Conventional and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Angiography was performed by using of femoral or radial artery approach. From October 2008 to January 2010, forty-three consecutive patients (69.8% men) underwent stent placement for symptomatic vertebral artery orifice stenosis. Mean degree of stenosis was 70.45 +/- 7.455 percent and mean age was 71.65 +/- 7.743 years . In the 22 patients (22/43, 51.16%) stenosis were in left side. In the thirty patients (30/43, 69.6%) there was evidence of atherosclerotic disease in the internal carotid artery and in the 23% contra lateral vertebral artery was involved. There were five different cases with left renal artery stenosis especially in the men with left vertebral artery stenosis. Initial technical success rate was 100%. No cerebrovascular complications or embolic events occurred. Six months control angiography follow-up revealed one patient with stent occlusion and moderate (40%) restenosis in the another patient. According to our finding angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery orifice stenosis is safe and effective. Patients with vertebral artery orifice disease frequently have coexistent atherosclerotic stenosis in the other major extracranial arteries including carotid and renal arteries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Mohammadian
- Neuroscience Research Center (NSRC); Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; Tabriz, Iran - ,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Prevalence and Prognosis of Asymptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis in Patients With Clinically Manifest Arterial Disease. Stroke 2011; 42:2795-800. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.612903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
63
|
Stayman AN, Nogueira RG, Gupta R. A Systematic Review of Stenting and Angioplasty of Symptomatic Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis. Stroke 2011; 42:2212-6. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.611459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron N. Stayman
- From the Department of Neurology (A.N.S.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Departments of Neurology (R.G.N., R.G.), Neurosurgery and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Raul G. Nogueira
- From the Department of Neurology (A.N.S.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Departments of Neurology (R.G.N., R.G.), Neurosurgery and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rishi Gupta
- From the Department of Neurology (A.N.S.), Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Departments of Neurology (R.G.N., R.G.), Neurosurgery and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Stroke 2011; 42:e420-63. [DOI: 10.1161/str.0b013e3182112d08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas G. Brott
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Jonathan L. Halperin
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Suhny Abbara
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - J. Michael Bacharach
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - John D. Barr
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - Christopher U. Cates
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Mark A. Creager
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Susan B. Fowler
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Gary Friday
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - E. Bruce McIff
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - Peter D. Panagos
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Thomas S. Riles
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Robert H. Rosenwasser
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Allen J. Taylor
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Circulation 2011; 124:489-532. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0b013e31820d8d78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 406] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G. Brott
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Jonathan L. Halperin
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Suhny Abbara
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - J. Michael Bacharach
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - John D. Barr
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - Christopher U. Cates
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Mark A. Creager
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Susan B. Fowler
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Gary Friday
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - E. Bruce McIff
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | | | - Peter D. Panagos
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Thomas S. Riles
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Robert H. Rosenwasser
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| | - Allen J. Taylor
- ASA Representative. ACCF/AHA Representative and ACCF/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. SCCT Representative. SVM Representative. ACR, ASNR, and SNIS Representative. SCAI Representative. ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Liaison. AANN Representative. AAN Representative. SIR Representative. ACEP Representative. SVS Representative. AANS and CNS Representative. SAIP Representative. Former Task Force member during this writing effort
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Vuillier F, Decavel P, Medeiros de Bustos E, Tatu L, Moulin T. [Cerebellar infarction]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2011; 167:418-30. [PMID: 21529870 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2011.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2010] [Revised: 11/26/2010] [Accepted: 01/17/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cerebellar infarction can be difficult to diagnose because the clinical picture is often dominated by fairly non-specific symptoms, which are more indicative of a benign condition. When cerebellar infarction affects the brainstem, the semiology is richer, and pure cerebellar signs are rendered less important. A perfect knowledge of the organisation of the cerebellar artery territories is required, regardless of the infarct topography. This knowledge is essential for making an accurate diagnosis, understanding the mechanisms and organising a treatment plan. Clinical algorithms for the treatment of dizziness, headaches and vomiting would improve the selection of candidates for brain imaging. Thus, the early identification of patients with a high risk of subsequent deterioration would lead to a better prognosis in cases of cerebellar artery territory infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Vuillier
- Service de neurologie 2, hôpital Jean-Minjoz, centre hospitalier universitaire, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
67
|
Hatano T, Tsukahara T, Miyakoshi A, Arai D, Yamaguchi S, Murakami M. Stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis of the vertebral artery ostium: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 117 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2011; 68:108-16; discussion 116. [PMID: 21099720 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e3181fc62aa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is thought to be a safe treatment option, the main concerns related to treating vertebral artery ostium (VAO) stenosis with stents have been the rate of restenosis and the uncertain long-term results. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the angiographic and clinical results of stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis of the VAO. METHODS One hundred seventeen consecutive patients with atherosclerotic VAO stenosis were treated with stent placement over a period of 12 years. All patients were retrospectively analyzed through the use of a prospectively collected database. The indication criteria for this treatment protocol were symptomatic severe VAO stenoses (> 60%) and asymptomatic severe VAO stenoses (> 60%) with incidentally detected infarction in the posterior circulation. The target diameter of stent dilatation from 1997 to 2000 was the normal vessel diameter just distal to the lesion. Moderate overdilation in the proximal portion of the stents has been performed since 2001. RESULTS Successful dilatation was obtained in 116 of 117 cases. Transient neurological complications developed in 2 patients; however, no patients experienced any permanent neurological complications. One hundred four patients underwent follow-up angiography at 6 months after stenting. The restenosis rate at the 6-month follow-up was 9.6% (10 of 104). Until 2000, the restenosis rate after stenting was 13.3%. Since 2001, the restenosis rate has decreased to 4.5%. The median clinical follow-up period was 48 months. The annual rate of strokes in the posterior circulation was 0.95%. CONCLUSION Stent placement for atherosclerotic VAO stenosis is considered to be a feasible and safe treatment and may be effective for stroke prevention. The moderate overdilation of stents may be an effective modality for the prevention of restenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taketo Hatano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/ SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Vasc Med 2011; 16:35-77. [DOI: 10.1177/1358863x11399328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
69
|
Papke K, Meila D, Brassel F. Vaskuläre Interventionen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Radiologe 2011; 51:223-33; quiz 234-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2138-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
70
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ, Jacobs AK, Smith SC, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Albert N, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, Ohman EM, Page RL, Riegel B, Stevenson WG, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive summary. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 81:E76-123. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
71
|
2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:1002-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
72
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:e16-94. [PMID: 21288679 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
73
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. Stroke 2011; 42:e464-540. [PMID: 21282493 DOI: 10.1161/str.0b013e3182112cc2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
74
|
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2011; 124:e54-130. [PMID: 21282504 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0b013e31820d8c98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
75
|
Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Stent Fracture: A Case Report. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:1751-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2009] [Revised: 05/13/2010] [Accepted: 07/08/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
76
|
Ghandehari K, Edaraki K, Karimi M, Ghorbani A, Borhani Haghighi A, Shabestari M. Persian experience of angioplasty and stenting in cerebral arteries. Int J Stroke 2010; 5:337-8. [PMID: 20636721 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00452.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
77
|
Conforto AB, Ciríaco JGM, Yamamoto FI, Puglia Júnior P, Leite CDC, Martin MDGM, Scaff M. Avoiding pitfalls in diagnosing basilar artery occlusive disease: clinical and imaging clues - case report. SAO PAULO MED J 2010; 128:171-3. [PMID: 20963368 PMCID: PMC10938960 DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802010000300009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2008] [Revised: 09/03/2009] [Accepted: 02/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The aim of this paper was to report on the characteristics that aid in establishing the diagnosis of basilar artery occlusive disease (BAOD) among patients with hemiparesis and few or minor symptoms of vertebrobasilar disease. CASE REPORT This report describes two cases in a public university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We present clinical and imaging findings from two patients with hemiparesis and severe BAOD, but without clinically relevant carotid artery disease (CAD). One patient presented transient ischemic attacks consisting of spells of right hemiparesis that became progressively more frequent, up to twice a week. The neurological examination revealed slight right hemiparesis and right homonymous hemianopsia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed pontine and occipital infarcts. Magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography revealed severe basilar artery stenosis. The other patient presented sudden left-side hemiparesis and hypoesthesia. One year earlier, she had reported sudden onset of vertigo that, at that time, was attributed to peripheral vestibulopathy and was not further investigated. MRI showed a right-side pontine infarct and an old infarct in the right cerebellar hemisphere. Basilar artery occlusion was diagnosed. Both patients presented their symptoms while receiving aspirin, and became asymptomatic after treatment with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS Misdiagnosing asymptomatic CAD as the cause of symptoms in BAOD can have disastrous consequences, such as unnecessary carotid endarterectomy and exposure to this surgical risk while failing to offer the best available treatment for BAOD. Clinical and imaging features provided important clues for diagnosis in the cases presented.
Collapse
|
78
|
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Hung Lin
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
79
|
Werner M, Bräunlich S, Ulrich M, Bausback Y, Schuster J, Lukhaup A, Botsios S, Scheinert D, Schmidt A. Drug-Eluting Stents for the Treatment of Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis. J Endovasc Ther 2010; 17:232-40. [DOI: 10.1583/09-2904.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
80
|
Jenkins JS, Patel SN, White CJ, Collins TJ, Reilly JP, McMullan PW, Grise MA, Grant AG, Ramee SR. Endovascular stenting for vertebral artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:538-42. [PMID: 20152558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2009] [Revised: 08/07/2009] [Accepted: 08/10/2009] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and long-term durability of catheter-based therapy for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis (VAS). BACKGROUND Symptomatic VAS carries with it a 5-year 30% to 35% risk of stroke. The 2-year mortality approaches 30% for medically managed strokes involving the posterior circulation. Surgical bypass is rarely performed, due to high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular revascularization with primary stenting offers an attractive treatment option for these patients. METHODS One-hundred five consecutive symptomatic patients (112 arteries, 71% male) underwent stent placement for extracranial (91%) and intracranial (9%) VAS from 1995 to 2006. Fifty-seven patients (54%) had bilateral VAS, 71 patients (68%) had concomitant carotid disease, and 43 patients (41%) had a prior stroke. RESULTS Procedural and clinical success was achieved in 105 (100%) and 95 (90.5%) patients, respectively. One-year follow-up was obtained in 87 (82.9%) patients, of which 69 patients (79.3%) remained symptom-free. At 1 year, 6 patients (5.7%) had died and 5 patients (5%) had a posterior circulation stroke. Target vessel revascularization occurred in 7.4% at 1 year. At a median follow-up of 29.1 months (interquartile range 12.8 to 50.9 months), 13.1% underwent target vessel revascularization, 71.4% were alive, and 70.5% remained symptom-free. CONCLUSIONS In experienced hands, stenting for symptomatic VAS can be accomplished with a very high success rate (100%), with few periprocedural complications, and is associated with durable symptom resolution in the majority (approximately 80%) of patients. We conclude that endovascular stenting of vertebral artery atherosclerotic disease is safe and effective compared with surgical controls and should be considered first-line therapy for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Stephen Jenkins
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Ghandehari K, Edraki K, Karimi M, Ghorbani A, Borhani Haghighi A, Shabestari M. Complications of angioplasty and stenting of cervicocerebral arteries in Iran. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010; 18:49-53. [PMID: 20124297 DOI: 10.1177/0218492309355598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Angioplasty and stenting of the cervicocerebral arteries is a novel treatment for atherosclerotic stenosis, which has periprocedural complications. Data were collected prospectively from 2007 to 2009 in a multicenter cohort of patients undergoing interventions for cervicocerebral stenosis. Retrospective assessment of the 2003-2006 archives of the same interventionists and a review of their published work is the second part of this national survey. In 592 extracranial internal carotid artery angioplasty and stenting procedures in 581 patients (73% male; mean age, 63.4 + or - 7 years), transient ischemic attack, stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and death occurred in 1.7%, 1.7%, 0.34%, and 1.52%, respectively. In 114 extracranial vertebral artery angioplasty and stenting procedures in 110 patients (68% male; mean age, 65.3 + or - 6 years), transient ischemic attack and stroke each developed in 1 (0.92%) patient, but there was no intracerebral hemorrhage or death. In 70 intracranial angioplasty and stenting procedures in 67 patients (76% male; mean age, 68.5 + or - 8 years), transient ischemic attack, stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and death were observed in 1.4%, 8.6%, 1.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The frequency of periprocedural complications in angioplasty and stenting of cervicocerebral arteries by our neurointerventionists was similar to that in developed countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavian Ghandehari
- Department of Neurology, Ghaem Hospital, Ahmadabad Street, PO Box 91766-99199, Mashhad, Iran.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
82
|
Patel T, Shah S, Malhotra H, Radadia R, Shah L, Shah S. Transradial approach for stenting of vertebrobasilar stenosis: A Feasibility Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74:925-31. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
83
|
Parkhutik V, Lago A, Tembl JI, Aparici F, Vazquez V, Mainar E. Angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic and asymptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: to treat or not to treat. Eur J Neurol 2009; 17:267-72. [PMID: 19765054 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02786.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Comprehensive indications for treatment of symptomatic vertebral stenosis remain unavailable. Even less is known about endovascular treatment of asymptomatic cases. We treated symptomatic and asymptomatic vertebral ostium stenosis with angioplasty and stenting and investigated the long term outcome. METHODS Consecutive patients with two different indications were included. Group 1 (G1) had symptomatic >50% stenosis. Group 2 (G2) had asymptomatic >50% stenosis and severe lesions of anterior circulation and were expected to benefit from additional cerebral blood supply. RESULTS Twenty nine vertebral origin stenoses in 28 patients (75% men, mean age 64 +/- 9 years) were treated. There were 16 G1 and 13 G2 cases. Technical success rate was 100%. Immediate neurological complications rate was 3.4% (one G1 patient with vertebral TIA due to release of emboli). Two further strokes were seen during follow up (32 +/- 24 months): vertebrobasilar stroke in a G2 patient with permeable stent in V1 segment, new ipsilateral V3 occlusion and high-risk cardioembolic source, and carotid stroke in a G1 patient who had had ipsilateral carotid stenting. There were no deaths of any cause. Asymptomatic restenosis was observed in one out of 19 patients from both groups who underwent a follow up angiography. CONCLUSIONS Angioplasty and stenting appears to be technically feasible and safe in asymptomatic and symptomatic vertebral stenosis. More studies are needed in order to clarify its role in primary and secondary prevention of vertebrobasilar stroke. High risk anterior circulation lesions should be taken into account as a possible indication in patients with asymptomatic vertebral stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Parkhutik
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
84
|
Taylor RA, Siddiq F, Memon MZ, Qureshi AI, Vazquez G, Hayakawa M, Chaloupka JC. Vertebral artery ostial stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis in 72 consecutive patients: clinical outcomes and follow-up results. Neuroradiology 2009; 51:531-9. [PMID: 19437002 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-009-0531-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2009] [Accepted: 04/15/2009] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The study's purpose is to report the technical and clinical outcomes of a patient cohort that underwent vertebral artery ostium stent placement for atherosclerotic stenosis. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of neurointerventional procedures performed at a single center from 1999 to 2005. Outcome measures included recurrent transient neurological deficits (TNDs), stroke, and death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate stroke- and/or death-free survival at 12 months. Cox proportional hazard was used to identify risk factors for recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemic events. RESULTS Seventy-two patients with 77 treated vertebral ostial lesions were included. The 30-day stroke and/or death rate was 5.2% (n = 4), although no event was directly related to the vertebral ostium stent placement. Three procedure-related strokes were secondary to attempted stent placement at other sites (one carotid artery and two basilar arteries), and the one death was secondary to the presenting stroke severity. The mean clinical follow-up time available for 66 patients was 9 months. There were 14 TNDs (21%), two strokes (3%), and two deaths (3%) recorded in the follow-up. Recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemic events occurred in nine patients (seven TNDs and two strokes). No recurrent stroke and/or deaths were related to the treated vertebral ostium. Stroke- and/or death-free survival rate (including periprocedural stroke and/or death) was 89 +/- 5% at 12 months. No vascular risk factor was significantly associated with recurrent vertebrobasilar ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS Vertebral artery ostium stent placement can be safely and effectively performed with a low rate of recurrent stroke in the territory of the treated vessel. Patients who also underwent attempted treatment of a tandem intracranial stenosis appeared to be at highest risk for periprocedure stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Taylor
- Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
85
|
Compter A, van der Worp HB, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Algra A, Lo TH, Mali WPTM, Moll FL, Kappelle LJ. VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial. Trials 2008; 9:65. [PMID: 19025615 PMCID: PMC2611963 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2008] [Accepted: 11/24/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Twenty to 30 percent of all transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar circulation. Atherosclerotic stenosis ≥ 50% in the vertebral artery accounts for vertebrobasilar stroke in at least one third of the patients. The risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with vertebral stenosis is uncertain and revascularisation of vertebral stenosis is rarely performed. Observational studies have suggested that the risk of subsequent stroke or death in patients with vertebrobasilar ischaemic events is comparable with that in patients with carotid territory events. Treatment of vertebral stenosis by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been introduced as an attractive treatment option. The safety and benefit of stenting of symptomatic vertebral stenosis as compared with best medical therapy alone remains to be elucidated in a randomised clinical trial. Study objectives The primary aim of the Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial (VAST) is to assess whether stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50% is feasible and safe. A secondary aim is to assess the rate of new vascular events in the territory of the vertebrobasilar arteries in patients with symptomatic vertebral stenosis ≥ 50% on best medical therapy with or without stenting. Design This is a randomised, open clinical trial, comparing best medical treatment with or without vertebral artery stenting in patients with recently symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The trial will include a total of 180 patients with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke attributed to vertebral artery stenosis ≥ 50%. The primary outcome is any stroke, vascular death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 30 days after start of treatment. Secondary outcome measures include any stroke or vascular death during follow-up and the degree of (re)stenosis after one year. Discussion Improvements both in imaging of the vertebral artery and in endovascular techniques have created new opportunities for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. This trial will assess the feasibility and safety of stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis and will provide sufficient data to inform a conclusive randomised trial testing the benefit of this treatment strategy. The VAST is supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (2007B045; ISRCTN29597900).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Compter
- Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, HP G 03,228, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
86
|
Edlow JA, Newman-Toker DE, Savitz SI. Diagnosis and initial management of cerebellar infarction. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7:951-64. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70216-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
87
|
Carotid endarterectomy, stenting, and other prophylactic interventions. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2008. [PMID: 18793902 DOI: 10.1016/s0072-9752(08)94065-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
|
88
|
Treatment of patients older than 60 years with symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008. [DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200806020-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
89
|
Marquardt L, Kuker W, Chandratheva A, Geraghty O, Rothwell PM. Incidence and prognosis of >=50% symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis: prospective population-based study. Brain 2008; 132:982-8. [PMID: 19293244 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- L Marquardt
- Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
90
|
Dabus G, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT. Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery-origin and innominate/subclavian disease: indications and technique. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007; 17:381-92, ix. [PMID: 17826639 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2007.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 20% to 40% of patients who have cerebral vascular disease have a vertebral artery-origin stenosis. Atherosclerotic lesions of vertebral arety origin are a potential cause of posterior circulation ischemia, which can be disabling or deadly. Endovascular treatment of vertebral artery-origin and innominate/subclavian artery stenosis has changed in the last 15 years. Surgery usually is successful technically; however, it is also associated with high rates of procedural and periprocedural complications. New techniques and technologies that can be used in the treatment of such lesions are being developed. In this article, the authors discuss the indications, technical aspects, and long-term results of angioplasty and stenting of these vessels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Dabus
- Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Gray 241, Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
91
|
Vicenzini E, Puccinelli F, Ricciardi MC, Guidetti G, Delfini R, Lenzi GL. Contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded duplex sonography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of basilar stenting. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2007; 26:543-6. [PMID: 17384055 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.4.543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Vicenzini
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Viale dell' Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|