Results of superior vena cava resection for lung cancer

Superior vena cava reconstruction using bovine jugular vein conduit

The glutaraldehyde-treated bovine jugular vein conduit (BJVC) is a xenograft conduit initially used for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction and has never been used for reconstruction of superior vena cava (SVC). In September 2003, a patient with SVC obstruction underwent SVC reconstruction using BJVC. He has been alive for 42 months and free from signs and symptoms of SVC obstruction except that metastasis was found in the vertebrae. The radionuclide venography showed the graft tube was patent and only slight stenosis was found in the proximal anastomosis. The initial result supports BJVC as an acceptable alternative for SVC reconstruction.

Special Treatment Issues in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This chapter of the guidelines addresses patients who have particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations. This includes patients with Pancoast tumors, T4N0,1M0 tumors, satellite nodules in the same lobe, synchronous and metachronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs), solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, metaanalyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. For ensuring that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications that were appropriate to the topics covered in this chapter were obtained by performance of a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. When possible, we also referenced other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method (see "Methodology for Lung Cancer Evidence Review and Guideline Development" chapter), and reviewed by all members of the lung cancer panel before approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Health and Science Policy Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach seems to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided appropriate staging has been conducted. Patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon. Such patients, however, seem to benefit from resection as part of the treatment as opposed to chemoradiotherapy alone when carefully staged and selected. Patients with a satellite lesion in the same lobe as the primary tumor have a good prognosis and require no modification of the approach to evaluation and treatment than what would be dictated by the primary tumor alone. However, it is difficult to know how best to treat patients with a focus of the same type of cancer in a different lobe. Although MPLCs do occur, the survival results after resection for either a synchronous presentation or a metachronous presentation with an interval of < 4 years between tumors are variable and generally poor, suggesting that many of these patients may have had a pulmonary metastasis rather than a second primary lung cancer. A thorough and careful evaluation of these patients is warranted to try to differentiate between patients with a metastasis and a second primary lung cancer, although criteria to distinguish them have not been defined. Selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland seem to benefit substantially from resection. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, as long as tumors can be completely resected and there is absence of N2 nodal involvement, primary surgical treatment should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Superior Vena Cava Resection for Lung and Mediastinal Malignancies: A Single-Center Experience With 70 Cases

BACKGROUND

The oncologic value of superior vena cava (SVC) resection for lung and mediastinal malignancies remains controversial. In this context, we have reviewed our experience in the treatment of locally advanced lung and mediastinal tumor invading the SVC system, analyzing postoperative outcome and long-term oncologic results.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients who underwent SVC resection were retrospectively analyzed to assess postoperative mortality, and overall and procedure-specific morbidity. Overall survival was calculated for mediastinal and lung tumor groups.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2004, 70 consecutive patients (52 with lung cancer and 18 with mediastinal tumors) underwent SVC system resection. There were 25 replacements (36%) of the SVC system by prosthesis, whereas the remaining underwent partial resection. Major postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in lung cancer patients were 23% and 7.7%, respectively (50% and 5.6% in mediastinal tumors). In the lung cancer group, 5-year survival probability was 31%, and it was affected by mediastinal nodal status (5-year survival in N0-N1 patients 52%, 21% in N2 patients, 0 in N3 patients). Median survival for mediastinal tumors was 49 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, SVC resection may achieve permanent cure in patients who would have been defined as inoperable 10 years ago. In the case of mediastinal tumors, the need for SVC resection alone should not be considered a contraindication for surgery when prosthetic replacement is feasible. In the case of lung tumors, infiltration of SVC can achieve satisfactory long-term results after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, only when pathologic N2 disease is excluded by preoperative mediastinoscopy.

Superior vena cava resection for lung and mediastinal malignancies

Even though the benefit of superior vena cava resection for lung and mediastinal malignancies remains controversial, the recent international experiences have demonstrated technical feasibility of such an extended surgery with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Concerning lung cancer, a multicentric international study over a 40-year period reports a risk of developing postoperative complications and mortality of 30% and 12%, respectively, with a 5-year probability of survival of 21%. The same study, analysing the results of the last 10 years, demonstrated an improvement of the outcome with a 6% of postoperative mortality, with a 5-year probability of survival of 28%. With regards to mediastinal malignancies, completeness of surgical resection is still considered one of the most important prognostic factors, and extended SVC resection could improve local control and disease free survival. In conclusion, radical resection of lung cancer and mediastinal malignancies involving SVC, is feasible, and it could lead to permanent cure in carefully selected patients.

Imaging of the Patient with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States for both men and women. Even though the 5-year survival rate of patients with lung cancer remains dismal at 14% for all cancer stages, treatments are improving and newer agents for lung cancer appear promising. Therefore, an accurate assessment of the extent of disease is critical to determine whether the patient is treated with surgical resection, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the staging evaluation of the patient; however, radiologists need to be aware that there are also important differences in what each specialist needs from imaging to provide appropriate treatment. This article reviews the role of imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, with an emphasis on the radiologic imaging findings relevant for each specialty.

Surgical management of T3 and T4 lung cancer

Locally advanced lung cancer (T(3) or T(4)) has a significantly worse prognosis than lower stage disease. However, this diagnosis is usually made radiologically, and experienced thoracic surgeons are familiar with the low radiologic to pathologic correlation in tumors that abut the great vessels, mediastinum, or chest wall. Commonly these tumors do not directly invade adjacent structures and are, in fact, T(1) or T(2) tumors that are resectable through standard techniques. Where there is no clearly evident invasion of unresectable structures, the patient should be given the benefit of the doubt and considered at a lower (resectable) stage until proven otherwise. The curability of T(3) tumors varies according to the involved site. A T(3)N(0) tumor involving the chest wall provides the most favorable prognosis among the resected T(3) lesions, with a 5-year survival of >50% in lymph node-negative patients if resection is complete. Palliative incomplete resections of T(4) disease, in which tumor has invaded mediastinal structures, have not shown any survival benefit and are associated with very high morbidity and mortality. However, patients with limited invasion of the carina, left atrium, superior vena cava, or pulmonary artery may be able to be completely resected despite their T(4) classification. Surgical resection remains an important part of the therapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Modern techniques of chest wall resection and reconstruction and bronchoplastic procedures allow complete resection of locally advanced tumors with favorable 5-year survival rates and low morbidity and mortality.