Compliance with post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. An analysis of National Cancer Institute of Canada and intergroup trial JBR.10 and a review of the literature

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer: future perspectives for clinical research

Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a debated issue in clinical oncology. Although it is considered a standard for resected stage II-IIIA patients according to the available guidelines, many questions are still open. Among them, it should be acknowledged that the treatment for stage IB disease has shown so far a limited (if sizable) efficacy, the role of modern radiotherapies requires to be evaluated in large prospective randomized trials and the relative impact of age and comorbidities should be weighted to assess the reliability of the trials' evidences in the context of the everyday-practice. In addition, a conclusive evidence of the best partner for cisplatin is currently awaited as well as a deeper investigation of the fading effect of chemotherapy over time. The limited survival benefit since first studies were published and the lack of reliable prognostic and predictive factors beyond pathological stage, strongly call for the identification of bio-molecular markers and classifiers to identify which patients should be treated and which drugs should be used. Given the disappointing results of targeted therapy in this setting have obscured the initial promising perspectives, a biomarker-selection approach may represent the basis of future trials exploring adjuvant treatment for resected NSCLC.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a newly developed type of surgery for lung cancer and has been demonstrated obvious minimally-invasive advantages compared with traditional thoracotomy. Theoretically, that less trauma leads to quicker recovery and may facilitate administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. We tested this hypothesis in this study.

Methods

One hundred and ten NSCLC patients underwent lobectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy from June 2004 to June 2010 was analyzed. The baseline characteristic criteria, variables related to surgery and accomplishing status of chemotherapy were analyzed.

Results

All 110 patients underwent lobectomy through VATS (n = 54) or thracotomy (n = 56) and adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in patients' age, preoperative pulmonary function, co-morbidity, pathologic staging between the two groups, whereas, blood loss, operation time and postoperative complications, chest tube duration and length of stay were less in VATS group. There were no significant differences in time to initiation chemotherapy. Cases in VATS group received more cycles of chemotherapy (3.6 vs. 3.0, p = 0.002). A higher proportion of patients received full dose on schedule in VATS group (57.4% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.013) and a higher proportion of patients completed ≥75% planed dose, (88.9% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.022); slightly higher proportion of patients in thoracotomy group had grade 3 or more toxicity (20.4% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.074).

Conclusions

Patients underwent lobectomy by VATS have better compliance and fewer delayed or reduced dose on adjuvant chemotherapy than those by thoracotomy.

Contemporary results of surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy: a review of 549 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

We previously reported a high mortality after induction therapy and pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Recent reports suggest that operative mortality in these patients is declining. We analyzed our contemporary results to define operative mortality and factors determining surgical risk.

METHODS

Eligible patients were identified from our prospective surgical database. Complications were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models assessed the association of preoperative tests and clinical characteristics with outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) statistics were calculated in a leave-one-out crossvalidation scheme to evaluate the predictive value of various models.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to December 2006, 549 patients underwent surgery after induction therapy. Median patient age was 64 years (range: 30-86), and 54% were women (298/549). All received chemotherapy, and 17% also had radiation. Lobectomy (388/549, 71%) and pneumonectomy (70/549, 13%) were the most common procedures. Complications occurred in 250 patients (46%), with grade 3 or higher in 23% (126/549). Inhospital mortality was 1.8% (10/549), with only one death after right pneumonectomy (1/30, 3%). Multivariate analysis showed that predicted postoperative (PPO) pulmonary function was associated with postoperative morbidity. By receiver operating characteristic curves, PPO product (AUC = 0.75, p < 0.001), PPO diffusion capacity (AUC = 0.70, p < 0.001), and preoperative % predicted PPO diffusion capacity (AUC = 0.66, p < 0.001) predicted mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our current experience shows that resection of non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy, including pneumonectomy, is associated with low mortality. PPO pulmonary function is the strongest predictor of operative risk and should be used to select patients for surgery.

Vaccination therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: review of agents in phase III development

The historical results of cancer vaccination for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were disappointing. In the current decade, however, new insights in the interaction between tumours and the immune system have led to the development of immunotherapy as a fundamentally new concept for the treatment of NSCLC. Modern NSCLC vaccine strategies rely on better identification of antigenic targets, addition of strong immunoadjuvants, and use of more efficient delivery systems. These treatments have convincingly demonstrated to elicit potent immune responses and have shown promising efficacy signals and excellent tolerability in phase II randomised studies. This-together with recent positive phase III data in indications other than NSCLC-has helped to establish the proof of principle for cancer vaccination. In NSCLC, ongoing phase III trials are investigating this approach in different treatment settings: the Melanoma AntiGEn A3 vaccine in resected early-stage NSCLC, the L-BLP25 vaccine in locally advanced NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy, and belagenpumatucel-L, the epidermal growth factor and the TG4010 vaccine in advanced stage, either as an adjunct to chemotherapy or as maintenance after completion of chemotherapy. Mode of action, development, available clinical data, and currently ongoing phase III studies are reviewed.

Predictors of non-compliance in autologous hematopoietic SCT patients undergoing out-patient transplants

Non-compliance has received significant attention in medicine, yet few studies have examined its correlates in autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) patients. This study examined predictors of non-compliance in a sample of 151 AHSCT patients treated in an outpatient setting. Before AHSCT, participants completed a validated measure of mood and retrospective chart reviews were conducted to assess non-compliance during AHSCT, defined as refusal of oral hygiene, prescribed exercise programs, oral nutrition and/or prescribed medications. We found 121 patients (80%) were non-compliant with an aspect of the AHSCT regimen on 1 or more days; mean percentage of non-compliant days was 16.6 (s.d. 15.6). Men were more likely than women to be non-compliant (P<0.05); as were participants with an elevated depression score (P<0.05). Stepwise regression models identified significant predictors of non-compliance: gender, depression, global distress and nausea and vomiting severity (P-values all <0.01). Further analysis revealed that the interaction of the psychological variables with gender was a more robust predictor of non-compliance (P<0.001). For outpatient AHSCT, our findings suggest the need to broaden conceptualizations of risk factors for non-compliance and the importance of assessing patient barriers to compliance to ensure optimal treatment outcome.

Clinical symptoms and chemotherapy completion in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia: a retrospective comparison study with a younger cohort

Background

Cancer affects older adults disproportionately. The disease is often difficult to diagnose and treat due to co-morbidities and performance status, and patients tend to discontinue chemotherapy prematurely. There are no systemic studies of the reasons and factors that create a higher withdrawal rate in older acute leukemia patients. This study tried to understand the initial characteristics, blood counts and bone marrow measurements in older acute leukemia patients by comparing them with a younger group to provide information and assistance in early clinical diagnosis, treatment and reasons for treatment withdrawal.

Methods

Using retrospective medical record reviews, we examined clinical characteristics and chemotherapy completion status in the patients of two groups (age ≥ 60, n = 183 and age <60, n = 183) who were diagnosed with acute leukemia for the first time and were hospitalized in Union Hospital Affiliated with Fujian Medical University from 2004 to 2008.

Results

There were no statistical differences in initial presenting symptoms of fatigue (67.2% vs. 57.9%, P>0.05) and pallor (53% vs. 59.6%, P>0.05) between the two groups, but older patients demonstrated more underlying diseases including lung infections (25.7%, P = <0.001), cardiovascular disease (4.4%, P = 0.007), and hypertension (20.8%, P =< 0.001). The complete remission rate after chemotherapy (1 to 2 courses) was 49.5% in the older group and 66.7% in the younger group (χ² = 6.202, P = 0.013). The percentage of patients age 60 and older who prematurely discontinued chemotherapy (50.3%), mainly due to the influences of traditional Chinese concept of critical illness, financial difficulties, and intolerance to adverse reactions to chemotherapy, was significantly higher than that of younger patients (37.7%) (χ² = 5.866, P = 0.015).

Conclusions

A comprehensive approach to diagnosis, treatment selection, and toxicity management, and implementing strategies to enhance treatment compliance may improve outcomes in older adults with acute leukemia.

[Interdisciplinary treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]

At the time of diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, about two thirds of the patients manifest tumor disease limited to the lungs without distant metastases. In this group localized tumor spread (stages I and II) can be distinguished from locally advanced spread including lymph node metastases (stages IIIA and B). In stages I and II with sufficient cardiopulmonary function, surgical resection is considered the standard treatment approach. If lobe resection is not possible due to comorbidities or limited pulmonary function, parenchyma-sparing resection or definitive radiotherapy is advocated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for individual cases in stage IB and as the standard treatment in stage II. In stages IIIA and IIIB interdisciplinary consultation involving pneumologists/oncologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists is necessary to reach decisions on treatment recommendations. Generally multiple treatment modalities are employed in these stages, such as induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and subsequent irradiation or simultaneous chemoradiotherapy. These treatment combinations with curative intent should be differentiated from the numerous treatment methods with palliative intent.

Improved compliance with adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Poor compliance has been a common feature in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC with only 48% to 69% of patients completing all planned cycles. We retrospectively evaluated compliance and toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy in the 2 years following recent reports of successful adjuvant chemotherapy trials for NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of NSCLC between May 2003 and May 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics, ECOG status, stage, pathologic subtype and type of surgery were recorded. The number of chemotherapy cycles, delays, dose reductions and change of chemotherapy were reported.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were identified. The median age was 62 years (38% stage I, 18% stage II, 30% stage III and 14% had multiple primary tumors of variable stages). Twenty percent were ECOG PS2; Only 12% had undergone pnemonectomy. Forty-one patients (82%) started cisplatin/vinorelbine (three switched to carboplatin because of nephrotoxicity, and one switched to carboplatin/paclitaxel because of fatigue and vomiting). Three patients received other cisplatin-based combinations; six received carboplatin-based treatment (one each because of advanced age and cardiac dysfunction and 4 because of preexisting neuropathy). Eighty percent completed all treatment; 40% required a dose reduction and 58% required delays in treatment. Six events of febrile neutropenia were reported in 5 patients and 5 patients required admission for toxicity. There were no toxic deaths. Multivariate analysis showed no effect of age, gender, extent of surgery or ECOG status on compliance, need for treatment modification or toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to historical trials, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for resected NSCLC is now accepted by patients and physicians with a high degree of compliance.

The feasibility of adjuvant carboplatin and docetaxel in patients with curatively resected locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy benefits selected patients with stages II and III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, carboplatin being tolerated better than cisplatin, carboplatin-based adjuvant therapy may have better chemotherapy compliance. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and toxicity of adjuvant carboplatin and docetaxel in patients with completely resected locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Eighty patients with completely resected locally advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this trial. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated between 1 and 4 weeks after surgery, and consisted of four cycles of carboplatin (AUC=5), and docetaxel (Taxotere, 75mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks, after which patients received prophylactic G-CSF supportive therapy.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were: Median age 55 years (range 34-73): gender ratio was 56.3% male/43.7% female: 72.5% of the patients were at stage IIIA and 27.5% were at stage IIIB. The two most common histologies were adenocarcinoma (62.5%) and squamous cell carcinoma (17.5%). Sixty-six patients (82.5%) received four cycles of therapy over a 12-week period. Fourteen patients (17.5%) did not complete therapy due to: patient refusal (n=12), severe adverse events (n=1) and bone metastases during chemotherapy (n=1). No treatment related deaths were observed and the primary adverse events were hematologic toxicity, alopecia, fatigue and gastointestinal reaction (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with carboplatin and docetaxel with the use of G-CSF supportive therapy has an acceptable toxicity profile such that the majority of patients completed four cycles of therapy in 12 weeks.

Feasibility study for biweekly administration of cisplatin plus gemcitabine as adjuvant-chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of biweekly administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, single-institutional study. Patients with completely resected NSCLC (p-Stages IB-IIIA) with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Simon's optimal two-stage design was applied. Both cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) were given on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of this combination in the four cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (19 lobectomies and 1 pneumonectomy) were enrolled in this study. Nine (45%) of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 6 (30%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon in this series. No treatment-related death was encountered. Thirteen (65%) patients completed the planned 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median intensity was 24 (range 21-25) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 24.0 (21-25) mg/(m(2) week) cisplatin and 483 (range 412-500) mg/(m(2) week) with an average of 481.0 (412-500) mg/(m(2) week) gemcitabine. The median relative dose intensity of cisplatin was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 87.4 (25-100) % and that of gemcitabine was 100 (range 25-100) % with an average of 86.8 (25-100) %.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC. A multicenter phase III trial is warranted to assess the efficacy of this regimen at promoting survival and preventing recurrence.

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 trial

PURPOSE

National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 demonstrated that adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin after resection of stage IB-II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved relapse-free and overall survival. However, many patients either are not referred for chemotherapy or decline treatment. To aid in treatment decision making, quality-adjusted survival estimates of the JBR.10 trial were derived using a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis.

METHODS

Survival curves for treatment (N = 242) and observation groups (N = 240) were partitioned into three health states: time with >or= grade 2 (early or late) chemotherapy-related toxicity (TOX), time in relapse (REL), and time without toxicity or relapse (TWiST). Q-TWiST = u(TOX) x TOX + u(TWiST) x TWIST + u(REL) x REL, where weights u(TOX), u(TWIST), and u(REL) range from 0 to 1. Threshold utility analysis was performed to test the sensitivity of the results to changes in the weights. Weights were derived in an exploratory fashion using different methods. Methods included use of arbitrary values, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) quality-of-life data prospectively collected in JBR.10 (global assessment questions and symptom-based questions), and lastly weights European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions questionnaire collected from early-stage NSCLC (nontrial) patients after resection with discounting for toxicity and relapse. The alpha level was .05.

RESULTS

Threshold utility analysis revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred for all possible weight values for relapse and toxicity (u(REL), u(TOX)), although the result was not always statistically significant. The adjuvant chemotherapy group had better Q-TWiST in the range of 5 to 6 additional months, which was statistically significant using all methods.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage NSCLC improves quality-adjusted survival despite chemotherapy toxicity.

Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy in stage I (T1-2 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Stereotactic Radiotherapy has the potential to produce high local control rates with low risk of severe lung toxicity. From December 2000 to January 2006, 68 inoperable patients (median age 76 years) with stage I NSCLC received definitive hSRT. A mean total dose of 37.5 Gy (24-40 Gy; 60%-isodose) in 3-5 fractions was applied. Immobilisation was carried out by means of a vacuum couch and low pressure foil (Medical Intelligence, Schwab München, Germany). Staging procedures were thoracic and abdominal CT-scan, FDG-PET and CT or MRI of the brain in all patients. Clinical target volume was the tumor as seen in lung windowing of CT and in FDG-PET. Organ movements (6-22 mm) and patient positioning in the couch (3-12 mm) were added as safety margin for the definition of the planning target volume (PTV), that was enclosed by the 60%-isodose. We observed four (6%) local tumor recurrences, resulting in an actuarial local tumor control rate of 96%, 88% and 88% after 1, 2 and 3 year follow-up. Nineteen patients died, with eight patients due to cancer (12%), two to local tumor progression alone. Cancer-specific survival is 96%, 82% and 73% at 1, 2 and 3 years. Eleven patients died from comorbidities, making a 53% overall 3-year survival. Fifty five percent of the patients were affected by mild acute and subacute side effects, with only 3% experiencing pneumonitis III degrees . Late effects were pneumonitis III degrees in 1%, rib fractures in 3%, and benign pleural effusion in 2 patients. Hypofractionated SRT is safe even in elderly patients with stage I NSCLC and significantly reduced lung capacity. It leads to high local control rates and should be offered to patients not amenable for curative resection.

Non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly: defining treatment options

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the Western countries. Recent advancements in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have led to an improvement in outcomes, although 5-year survival rates remain about 15%. Moreover, the number of patients diagnosed and treated with lung cancer over the age of 65 years is growing. Despite this fact, elderly patients are infrequently included into clinical trials, which results in a limited amount of evidence-based options regarding therapy for the elderly. The limited data correlate directly with the lack of established treatment guidelines for elderly patients with NSCLC. In this article, we review both retrospective and prospective studies that help to define treatment of the elderly with early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. Ultimately, increasing participation of the elderly within clinical trials is essential to firmly establish treatment regimens to increase survival while minimizing toxicity.

Quality-of-life outcomes for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized trial, JBR.10

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is now the standard of care, but there is little information regarding its impact on quality of life (QOL). We report the QOL results of JBR.10, a North American, intergroup, randomized trial of adjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine compared with observation in patients who have completely resected, stages IB to II NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

QOL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and a trial-specific checklist at baseline and at weeks 5 and 9 for those who received chemotherapy and at follow-up months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36. A 10-point change in QOL scores from baseline was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-two patients were randomly assigned on JBR.10. A total of 173 patients (82% of the expected) in the observation arm and 186 (85% of expected) in the chemotherapy arm completed baseline QOL assessments. The two groups were comparable, with low global QOL scores and significant symptom burden, especially pain and fatigue, after thoracotomy. Changes in QOL during chemotherapy were relatively modest; fatigue, nausea, and vomiting worsened, but there was a reduction in pain and no change in global QOL. Patients in the observation arm showed considerable improvements in QOL by 3 months. QOL, except for symptoms of sensory neuropathy and hearing loss, in those treated with chemotherapy returned to baseline by 9 months.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this trial indicate that the negative effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on QOL appear to be temporary, and that improvements (with a return to baseline function) are likely in most patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgical resection is the treatment of choice in stages I and II of the disease; but even of this selected group of patients, almost half suffer recurrence following complete resection, usually in the form of distant metastases. The role of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy has been investigated extensively in the last two decades.

METHODS

Selective literature review of randomized phase III trials.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There is currently no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IA disease, whereas the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB disease remains controversial. To treat a patient with stage IB disease should be an individualized decision depending on age, tumor size, vascular invasion, and patient preference. Adjuvant chemotherapy is now the standard of care after complete resection of stage II-IIIA NSCLC. Patients considered for adjuvant chemotherapy should be under 75 years of age, have no contraindications to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and should be in a good performance status after surgery. Currently the standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen is a combination containing cisplatin and vinorelbine.

Age and comorbidity as independent prognostic factors in the treatment of non small-cell lung cancer: a review of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trials

PURPOSE

This study analyzed patients enrolled in two large, prospectively randomized trials of systemic chemotherapy (adjuvant/palliative setting) for non-small-cell lung Cancer (NSCLC). The main objective was to determine if age and/or the burden of chronic medical conditions (comorbidity) are independent predictors of survival, treatment delivery, and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Baseline comorbid conditions were scored using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), a validated measure of patient comorbidity that is weighted according to the influence of comorbidity on overall mortality. The CCI score (CCIS) was correlated with demographic data,(ie, age, sex, race), performance status (PS), histology, cancer stage, patient weight, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, outcomes of chemotherapy delivery (ie, type, total dose, and dose intensity), survival, and response.

RESULTS

A total of 1,255 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 61 years (range, 34 to 89 years); 34% of patients were elderly (at least 65 years of age); and 31% had comorbid conditions at randomization. Twenty-five percent of patients had a CCIS of 1, whereas 6% had a CCIS of 2 or greater. Elderly patients were more likely to have a CCIS equal to or greater than 1 compared with younger patients (42% v 26%; P < .0001), as were male patients (35% v 21%; P < .0001) and patients with squamous histology (36% v 29%; P = .001). Although age did not influence overall survival, the CCIS appeared prognostic (CCIS 1 v 0; hazard ratio 1.28; 95%CI, 1.09 to 1.5; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

In these large, randomized trials, the presence of comorbid conditions (CCIS > or = 1), rather than age more than 65 years, was associated with poorer survival.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in translational oncology: lung cancer perspective

Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is rapidly becoming a basic method in lung cancer research. Analysis of transcriptional activity of tumor cells or detection of tumor markers by this technique has the potential to change lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. Quantitative RT-PCR is characterized by unparalleled sensitivity and specificity, with very reliable reproducibility. Its prime advantage for gene expression analysis is its broad dynamic range of 10(7)-fold. Moreover, it is cost-effective, feasible in every day laboratory routine and efficient in terms of biological material consumption. Still, there are a number of methodological aspects that need to be carefully considered before it can sensibly be implemented into clinical practice. Three major technical issues: the choice of chemistries, gene expression data normalization and statistical processing of the results will be specifically highlighted in this review. Further, clinical applications of qRT-PCR will be thoroughly discussed: detection and staging of lung cancer and construction and validation of prognostic and predictive gene expression signatures.

UFT (tegafur and uracil) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for solid tumors (carcinoma of the lung, stomach, colon/rectum, and breast): clinical evidence, mechanism of action, and future direction

UFT (tegafur and uracil) is an oral anticancer drug that has been developed in Japan. Owing to its mild toxicity profile, UFT can be suitable in an adjuvant setting following a complete tumor resection, whereas its direct antitumor effect achieved may be insufficient for advanced unresectable disease. Therefore, a variety of adjuvant chemotherapy trials with UFT have been conducted, and results of well-designed randomized controlled trials have recently shown a survival benefit of postoperative UFT treatment in resected lung, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. In the present article, postoperative adjuvant trials with UFT-containing chemotherapy are reviewed, and the mechanism of action and future directions are also discussed.

Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline

PURPOSE

To determine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with completely resected stage IA-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Joint Expert Panel in August 2006 to review the evidence and draft recommendations for these therapies.

RESULTS

Available data support the use of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected NSCLC; however, the strength of the data and consequent recommendations vary by disease stage. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears detrimental to survival in stages IB and II, with a possible modest benefit in stage IIIA.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended for routine use in patients with stages IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease. Although there has been a statistically significant overall survival benefit seen in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) enrolling a range of people with completely resected NSCLC, results of subset analyses for patient populations with stage IB disease were not significant, and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB disease is not currently recommended for routine use. To date, very few patients with stage IA NSCLC have been enrolled onto RCTs of adjuvant therapy; adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended in these cases. Evidence from RCTs demonstrates a survival detriment for adjuvant radiotherapy with limited evidence for a reduction in local recurrence. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears detrimental to survival in stage IB and II, and may possibly confer a modest benefit in stage IIIA.

Adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin in elderly patients: National Cancer Institute of Canada and Intergroup Study JBR.10

PURPOSE

Recent trials have shown significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether elderly patients tolerate platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy and derive the same survival advantage is unknown. This retrospective study evaluated the influence of age on survival, adjuvant chemotherapy delivery, and toxicity in National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group study JBR.10.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pretreatment characteristics and survival were compared for 327 young (< or = 65 years) and 155 elderly (> 65 years) patients. Chemotherapy delivery and toxicity were compared for 213 treated patients (63 elderly, 150 young).

RESULTS

Baseline demographics by age were similar with the exception of histology (adenocarcinoma: 58% young, 43% elderly; squamous: 32% young, 49% elderly; P = .001) and performance status (PS; PS 0: 53% young, 41% elderly; P = .01). Chemotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival for elderly patients (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = .04). This benefit is similar to the effect for all patients in JBR.10. Mean dose-intensities of vinorelbine and cisplatin were 13.2 and 18.0 mg/m2/wk in young, respectively, and 9.9 and 14.1 mg/m2/wk in elderly patients (vinorelbine, P = .0004; cisplatin, P = .001), respectively. The elderly received significantly fewer doses of vinorelbine (P = .014) and cisplatin (P = .006). Fewer elderly patients completed treatment and more refused treatment (P = .03). There were no significant differences in toxicities, hospitalization, or treatment-related death by age group. Fifteen (11.9%) of 126 deaths in the young resulted from nonmalignant causes, and 15 (21.1%) of 71 in the elderly (P = .13).

CONCLUSION

Despite elderly patients' receiving less chemotherapy, adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin improves survival in patients older than 65 years with acceptable toxicity. Adjuvant chemotherapy should not be withheld from elderly patients.

Trial on refinement of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin: the TREAT protocol

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been proven to be beneficial for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, toxicity and insufficient dose delivery have been critical issues with the chemotherapy used. Doublet regimens with pemetrexed, a multi-target folate inhibitor, and platin show clear activity in non-small cell lung cancer and are well tolerated with low toxicity rates and excellent delivery.

Methods/Design

In this prospective, multi-center, open label randomized phase II study, patients with pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer, stage IB, IIA, IIB, T3N1 will be randomized after complete tumor resection either to 4 cycles of the standard adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen from the published phase III data, or to 4 cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 d1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d1, q 3 weeks. Primary objective is to compare the clinical feasibility of these cisplatin doublets defined as non-occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia > 7 days or bleeding, grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia and/or infection, grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity, non-acceptance leading to premature withdrawal and no cancer or therapy related death. Secondary parameters are efficacy (time to relapse, overall survival) and drug delivery. Parameters of safety are hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity of both arms.

Discussion

The TREAT trial was designed to evaluate the clinical feasibility, i.e. rate of patients without dose limiting toxicities or premature treatment withdrawal or death of the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed as well as the published phase III regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine. Hypothesis of the study is that reduced toxicities might improve the feasibility of drug delivery, compliance and the convenience of treatment for the patient and perhaps survival.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00349089

A phase III study of surgical resection and paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy with or without adjuvant radiation therapy for resected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9734

PURPOSE

Patients with completely resected stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are at substantial risk for locoregional and systemic recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy has recently improved overall control for these patients. We added adjuvant chemotherapy to control presumed micrometastatic disease and then randomized patients to receive radiation therapy (RT) or observation to determine the benefit of local radiation consolidation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient eligibility required histologically documented stage IIIA (radiographically occult N2) NSCLC that was completely resected, with no known residual disease, surgical staging per protocol requirements, Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0/1, no previous chemotherapy or RT, and minimal laboratory values. All eligible patients received 4 cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours with carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 on days 1, 22, 43, and 64 beginning 4-8 weeks after surgery. Two to 4 weeks after chemotherapy, patients were randomized to receive RT as 5000 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks or observation.

RESULTS

The study closed after 2 years because of slow accrual. Forty-four patients entered the study; 2 were ineligible, and 5 were not randomized because of progression, adverse reaction, or patient withdrawal. Thirty-seven patients were the basis of this analysis. Median failure-free survival was 16.8 months on the observation arm and 33.7 months on the RT arm, with a 1-year survival rate of 72% on the observation arm and 74% on the RT arm. There were no statistical differences between the observation and RT arms for failure-free survival or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In this small study, consolidation RT after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIA NSCLC did not significantly improve outcome for this high-risk population.

Effects of presurgical exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness among patients undergoing thoracic surgery for malignant lung lesions

BACKGROUND

To determine the effects of preoperative exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for malignant lung lesions.

METHODS

Using a single-group design, 25 patients with suspected operable lung cancer were provided with structured exercise training until surgical resection. Exercise training consisted of 5 endurance cycle ergometry sessions per week at intensities varying from 60% to 100% of baseline peak oxygen consumption (VO(2 peak)). Participants underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 6-minute walk (6 MW), and pulmonary function testing at baseline, immediately before, and 30 days after surgical resection.

RESULTS

Five patients were deemed ineligible before surgical resection and were removed from the analysis. Of the remaining 20 patients follow-up assessments were obtained for 18 (90%) before resection and 13 (65%) patients postresection. The overall adherence rate was 72%. Intention-to-treat analysis indicated that mean VO(2peak) increased by 2.4 mL . kg(-1) . min(-1)(95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-3.8; P = .002) and 6MW distance increased 40 m (95% CI, 16-64; P = .003) baseline to presurgery. Per protocol analyses indicated that patients who attended >or=80% of prescribed sessions increased VO(2peak) and 6 MWD by 3.3 mL.kg(-1).min(-1) (95% CI, 1.1-5.4; P = .006) and 49 meters (95% CI, 12-85; P = .013), respectively. Exploratory analyses indicated that presurgical exercise capacity decreased postsurgery, but did not decrease beyond baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative exercise training is a beneficial intervention to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing pulmonary resection. This benefit may have important implications for surgical outcome and postsurgical recovery in this population. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Postoperative Chemotherapy in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

A systematic review of the evidence for postoperative chemotherapy in completely resected nonsmall cell lung cancer was conducted. Seven meta-analyses and 25 randomized trials met the pre-defined eligibility criteria for the review. The evidence indicates that postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone; for patients with a good performance status who are fit enough for chemotherapy, the survival benefits strongly outweigh the adverse effects of treatment. To date the trials restricted to stage IB or II disease have obtained the greatest survival benefits with postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. The evidence does not support the use of postoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Relevant randomized trials and meta-analyses, published as articles or abstracts, were identified through electronic and hand searches by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Seven meta-analyses and 26 randomized trials comparing surgery with or without chemotherapy met the pre-defined eligibility criteria for the review. The meta-analyses all showed a survival advantage for platinum- or UFT-based postoperative chemotherapy, although the results did not always achieve statistical significance. The results of individual trials were inconsistent, although recent trials have detected a large survival advantage with postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. Differences in trial design, patient characteristics, disease stage, use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimen may explain the variation in results.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. In patients fit for chemotherapy, the survival benefits strongly outweigh the adverse effects of the treatment.

Problems in pathologic staging of lung cancer

CONTEXT

Tumor stage is the most important prognostic and predictive factor for patients with lung cancer, the most lethal neoplasm in the United States. It is used by thoracic surgeons, radiation therapists, and oncologists to determine whether patients with these neoplasms will be treated surgically with curative intent or with palliative radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review the variety of practical problems that can arise during the assessment of the pathologic stage and other prognostic/predictive factors included in the College of American Pathologist checklist for evaluation of resected lung neoplasms.

DATA SOURCES

Potential practical difficulties that can arise during the pathologic staging of lung cancer patients include the distinction between pT1, pT2, and pT3 lesions based on their location and the presence of visceral pleura and/or parietal pleura invasion; the differential diagnosis between multiple synchronous or metachronous primary lung neoplasms (pT1m) and intrapulmonary metastasis of non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (pT4 or pM1 according to their location); and the role of the recent American Joint Committee on Cancer terminology for the classification of lymph nodes (isolated tumor cells, micrometastases, and metastases).

CONCLUSIONS

The variety of practical problems that can arise during the assessment of important prognostic and predictive features such as resection margin status and evaluation of lymphovascular invasion are reviewed. A brief discussion of the assessment of the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on resected lung neoplasms is also included.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carries with it an unfavorable prognosis even in patients who have undergone surgical intervention. Efforts to improve the outcome of patients with early-stage NSCLC have focused on adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The role of adjuvant therapy in NSCLC has been clarified by the recent publication of several large randomized trials. The International Adjuvant Lung Trial was the first prospective trial to report that adjuvant chemotherapy following complete surgical resection of NSCLC improved absolute overall survival by approximately 5% at 5 years. This result has subsequently been confirmed by several other trials. As a result, adjuvant chemotherapy following complete resection of stage IB-III NSCLC can now be considered the standard of care. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which has long been investigated for stage III NSCLC, was also recently explored in stage I/II NSCLC. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems promising, more work is needed to comprehensively evaluate and optimize this approach. The current evidence for adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC is reviewed in this article.

Undertreatment of Elderly Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The absolute number of patients with lung cancer is rising as a result of our aging population. Until recently, clinicians have been reluctant to aggressively treat elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of a lack of supportive data and concern for potential toxicity. Recently, evidence has emerged that suggests that, similar to younger patients, healthy elderly patients can benefit from therapy in all stages of NSCLC. This review will discuss the findings that indicate that chronologic age alone should not be a barrier to appropriate treatment for NSCLC, but consideration should be given to more important prognostic factors such as comorbidities and performance status.

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We undertook to determine whether adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin prolongs overall survival among patients with completely resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with completely resected stage IB or stage II non-small-cell lung cancer to vinorelbine plus cisplatin or to observation. The primary end point was overall survival; principal secondary end points were recurrence-free survival and the toxicity and safety of the regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 482 patients underwent randomization to vinorelbine plus cisplatin (242 patients) or observation (240); 45 percent of the patients had pathological stage IB disease and 55 percent had stage II, and all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. In both groups, the median age was 61 years, 65 percent were men, and 53 percent had adenocarcinomas. Chemotherapy caused neutropenia in 88 percent of patients (including grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 7 percent) and death from toxic effects in two patients (0.8 percent). Nonhematologic toxic effects of chemotherapy were fatigue (81 percent of patients), nausea (80 percent), anorexia (55 percent), vomiting (48 percent), neuropathy (48 percent), and constipation (47 percent), but severe (grade 3 or greater) toxic effects were uncommon (<10 percent). Overall survival was significantly prolonged in the chemotherapy group as compared with the observation group (94 vs. 73 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; P=0.04), as was relapse-free survival (not reached vs. 46.7 months; hazard ratio for recurrence, 0.60; P<0.001). Five-year survival rates were 69 percent and 54 percent, respectively (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin has an acceptable level of toxicity and prolongs disease-free and overall survival among patients with completely resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.