51
|
Moreno V, Roda D, Pikiel J, Trigo J, Bosch-Barrera J, Drew Y, Kristeleit R, Hiret S, Bajor DL, Cruz P, Beck JT, Ghosh S, Dabrowski C, Antony G, Duan T, Veneris J, Zografos E, Subramanian J. Safety and Efficacy of Dostarlimab in Patients With Recurrent/Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from Cohort E of the Phase I GARNET Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2022; 23:e415-e427. [PMID: 35729005 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dostarlimab is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody being evaluated in recurrent/advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in the ongoing Phase I, multi-center, open-label, 2-part (dose escalation and cohort expansion) GARNET study (NCT02715284). MATERIALS AND METHODS Here, we report an interim analysis of patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC who progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received dostarlimab (500 mg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W] for Cycles 1-4, then 1000 mg Q6W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for > 2 years. The primary endpoints were immune-related objective response rate (irORR) per investigator-assessed irRECIST and safety. RESULTS As of 8, July 2019, 67 patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC were enrolled and treated with dostarlimab; the majority had programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1% (35.8% of patients) or PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% (29.9% of patients); 7.5% had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, and 26.9% had unknown PD-L1 TPS status. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range: 0.0-22.6). irORR was 26.9%, including 2 complete and 16 partial responses. The median duration of response of 11.6 months (range: 2.8-19.4). Responses were observed in 2 of 24 (16.7%) patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, 4 of 20 (20.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% and 2 of 5 (40.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Fatigue (4.5%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related TRAEs (any grade) were observed in 28.4% of patients. CONCLUSION Dostarlimab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced/recurrent NSCLC that progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy, including across all PD-L1 subgroups, and has an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Moreno
- START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Jose Trigo
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Joaquim Bosch-Barrera
- Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Yvette Drew
- Clinical and Translational Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Sandrine Hiret
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
| | - David L Bajor
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Centre, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Liu SV, Hu X, Li Y, Zhao B, Burke T, Velcheti V. Pembrolizumab-combination therapy for previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: Real-world outcomes at US oncology practices. Front Oncol 2022; 12:999343. [PMID: 36324586 PMCID: PMC9618586 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.999343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The availability of immunotherapies has expanded the options for treating metastatic NSCLC, but information is needed regarding outcomes of immunotherapy for patients treated outside of clinical trials. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of therapy with first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin (pembrolizumab-combination) for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the real-world setting of oncology clinics in the United States (US). Methods Using deidentified, longitudinal patient records from a nationwide, electronic health record-derived US database, we identified patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations, who had received no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and initiated first-line pembrolizumab-combination therapy from 11-May-2017 to 31-January-2019; data cutoff was 31-August-2020. Patients treated in a clinical trial were excluded. Manual chart review supplemented technology-enabled abstraction to identify disease progression and tumor response. Time-to-event endpoints from initiation of pembrolizumab-combination therapy were determined using Kaplan-Meier. Results Of 377 patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, 105 (28%), 104 (28%), and 103 (27%) had programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%, 1–49%, and <1%, respectively; PD-L1 expression was not documented for 65 patients (17%). Median age was 66 years, and 227 patients (60%) were men. Median follow-up time from first-line therapy initiation to data cutoff was 31.2 months (range, 19.0-39.6 months). Median pembrolizumab real-world time on treatment (rwToT) was 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.0-6.7); 12- and 24-month on-treatment rates for pembrolizumab were 28.0% and 14.9%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.6-19.9). For patients in PD-L1 expression ≥50%, 1-49%, <1%, and unknown cohorts, the 12-month survival rates were 66.0%, 58.5%, 54.5%, and 58.3%, respectively, and 24-month survival rates were 43.1%, 37.2%, 35.6%, and 42.0%, respectively. Median real-world progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-7.1); and the real-world response rate was 39.3%, with median duration of response of 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.5-16.8). Conclusions These findings demonstrate the benefits of first-line pembrolizumab-combination therapy for patients with EGFR/ALK-wild-type, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and good performance status who are treated at US community oncology clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen V. Liu
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
- *Correspondence: Stephen V. Liu,
| | - Xiaohan Hu
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Yeran Li
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Bin Zhao
- Clinical Research, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Thomas Burke
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Vamsidhar Velcheti
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Sadik H, Pritchard D, Keeling DM, Policht F, Riccelli P, Stone G, Finkel K, Schreier J, Munksted S. Impact of Clinical Practice Gaps on the Implementation of Personalized Medicine in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200246. [PMID: 36315914 PMCID: PMC9666118 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine presents new opportunities for patients with cancer. However, many patients do not receive the most effective personalized treatments because of challenges associated with integrating predictive biomarker testing into clinical care. Patients are lost at various steps along the precision oncology pathway because of operational inefficiencies, limited understanding of biomarker strategies, inappropriate testing result usage, and access barriers. We examine the impact of various clinical practice gaps associated with diagnostic testing-informed personalized medicine strategies on the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kira Finkel
- Reservoir Communications Group, Washington, DC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Hofmarcher T, Lindgren P, Wilking N. Systemic anti-cancer therapy patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Europe. J Cancer Policy 2022; 34:100362. [PMID: 36087918 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) is the recommended treatment modality in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in clinical guidelines. SACT options in aNSCLC have multiplied in recent years with the introduction of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This article presents findings from the first comparative analysis of SACT patterns in Europe. METHODS SACT rates in aNSCLC were estimated as the ratio between the number of patients treated with SACT (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy) and the number of potentially eligible patients for SACT in 11 countries (Belgium, Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, UK) between 2014 and 2020. Treated patients were estimated by combining national sales volume data of cancer drugs and average drug use per patient based on clinical trials. Potentially eligible patients were estimated from national epidemiological data. RESULTS SACT rates in aNSCLC differed greatly, ranging from around 30 % in Hungary, Poland, and the UK to almost 60 % in Ireland, Norway, and Portugal in 2014. SACT rates seemed to increase over time in most countries, but differences were still large by 2020, ranging from around 40 % in the UK to 75 % or more in Belgium, Norway, and Portugal. Even in countries with the highest SACT rates, far from all patients seemed to receive guideline-recommended SACT options, as underuse of immunotherapy and targeted therapy was common. CONCLUSION Up to 35 % of eligible patients with aNSCLC receives no SACT in certain European countries, although improvements have been achieved over time. The use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy is suboptimal even in countries with high SACT rates, indicating room to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes. POLICY SUMMARY Measuring if and what kind of therapy cancer patients have access to is vital to assess quality of care. The care of aNSCLC patients seems to be suboptimal in Europe, due to factors such as exclusion of patients with moderate performance status from SACT, limited resources for diagnostic testing, long reimbursement timelines and slow adoption of new medicines in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hofmarcher
- IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Råbygatan 2, SE-22361, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Peter Lindgren
- IHE - The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Råbygatan 2, SE-22361, Lund, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, SE-17177, Solna, Sweden
| | - Nils Wilking
- Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, SE-17177, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice: an analysis of the treatment patterns, survival and toxicity rates by sex. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04309-2. [PMID: 35997822 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04309-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim is to describe the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in clinical practice by providing the patient and tumor characteristics as well as survival and toxicity rates by sex. METHODS We used electronic health records to identify patients treated at the Cancer Center of the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland between January 1, 2017 and June 16, 2021. RESULTS We identified 5109 patients, 689 of whom (13.5%) received at least one dose of ICI. The fraction of patients who were prescribed ICI increased from 8.6% in 2017 to 22.9% in 2021. ICI represented 13.2% of the anticancer treatments in 2017 and increased to 28.2% in 2021. The majority of patients were male (68.7%), who were older than the female patients (median age 67 vs. 61 years). Over time, adjuvant and first line treatments increased for both sexes. Lung cancer and melanoma were the most common cancer types in males and females. The incidence of irAEs was higher among females (38.4% vs. 28.1%) and lead more often to treatment discontination in females than in males (21.1% vs. 16.8%). Independent of sex, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with greater median overall survival (OS, not reached vs. 1.1 years). Female patients had a longer median OS than males (1.9 vs. 1.5 years). CONCLUSIONS ICI play an increasingly important role in oncology. irAEs are more frequent in female patients and are associated with a longer OS. More research is needed to understand the association between patient sex and toxicity and survival.
Collapse
|
56
|
Attili I, Valenza C, Santoro C, Antonarelli G, Trillo Aliaga P, Del Signore E, Catania C, Spitaleri G, Passaro A, de Marinis F. Comparison of real-world data (RWD) analysis on efficacy and post-progression outcomes with pembrolizumab plus chemo vs chemo alone in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 < 50%. Front Oncol 2022; 12:980765. [PMID: 36033444 PMCID: PMC9399686 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundFollowing the introduction of immunotherapy (IO) in the first-line (1L) treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations, increasing real-world data depict how difficult it is to replicate data from clinical trials to clinical practice, with high rates of early treatment failure. In the context of chemo-IO, our study aims to compare platinum-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab combination to platinum-doublet alone in patients with low PD-L1 (<50%).MethodsWe retrospectively collected medical records from patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1<50%, consecutively treated at our Centre from 2016 to 2021. Patients were grouped according to 1L treatment received: chemo-IO (group A) or platinum-doublet (group B). Survival outcomes were analyzed and compared among the two groups.ResultsOverall, 105 patients were included: 49 in group A and 56 in group B. At data cut-off, median follow-up was 12.4 and 34.8 months, with 32/49 and 52/56 events for progression-free survival (PFS) and 21/49 and 29/56 events for overall survival (OS), respectively. No difference in PFS was observed between group B and group A (6.6 versus 8 months, HR 1.12, 95%CI 0.57-1.40). Patients receiving 1L platinum-doublet had significantly longer OS compared to those receiving chemo-IO (median OS 23.8 vs 14.9 months, HR 0.47, 95% CI 1.15- 3.98, p=0.01). 12 month-OS was 58% (95% CI 44-76%) in group A and 78% (95% CI 68-91%) in group B (p=0.040). Subgroup analysis identified KRAS G12C mutation as potentially affecting PFS in patients receiving chemo-IO (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0-10-0.91). The OS benefit of platinum-doublet was consistent across subgroups, with particular benefit in female sex, liver or pleural metastases, PD-L1 negative. Overall, only 46.9% of patients with progression received subsequent treatment in group A (15/32), compared to 86.5% in group B (45/52, all receiving 2L IO), with no difference in PFS to 2L (group A 3.7months, group B 4.1months, p=0.3).ConclusionsDespite small study population and differential follow-up, our study demonstrates that sequential use of 1L platinum-doublet and 2L IO is not inferior to 1L chemo-IO in non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1<50%. In addition, we identified subgroups who might benefit differentially from the two approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Attili
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Ilaria Attili,
| | - Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Celeste Santoro
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Antonarelli
- Division of New Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Pamela Trillo Aliaga
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Del Signore
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Catania
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Spitaleri
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Passaro
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Korde R, Veluswamy R, Allaire JC, Barnes G. Small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor: a systematic literature review of treatment efficacy, safety and quality of life. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1361-1368. [PMID: 35575164 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2078101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic literature review examines the current immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment paradigms, treatment gaps and unmet needs for treating SCLC with respect to efficacy, safety, health related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost-effectiveness. METHODS A search strategy was developed and executed using the National Library of Medicine bibliographic database (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar. Data regarding efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and HRQoL were extracted and entered in a data extraction sheet created a priori. RESULTS A total of 4961 patients were comprised in all the 12 studies combined. All the studies focus on extensive stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) and not limited stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). All studies used an ICI as the intervention arm and chemotherapy as the control arm. A statistically significant increase in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was observed when ICIs were added to chemotherapy, especially atezolizumab and durvalumab. ICIs in SCLC resulted in immune-related toxicities that have been well-documented in prior immunotherapy trials; their addition to cytotoxic chemotherapy did not worsen chemotherapy-related toxicities. Out of 12 studies, only 3 (25%) included measures to assess the impact of immunotherapy on SCLC patients' HRQoL. Although domain level scores were limited, the addition of ICIs did not seem to worsen symptoms. Two studies conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the combination of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy. The addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy was not found to be cost-effective in either study. CONCLUSION Combining ICIs with chemotherapy enhanced OS and PFS as well as not worsening HRQoL. Among all ICIs, PD-L1 inhibitors showed better effectiveness. Future studies should focus on real-world settings and more clinical trials using ICIs for not only ES-SCLC but also LS-SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasika Korde
- School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rajwanth Veluswamy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine, Center for Thoracic Oncology, Mount Sinai, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Jason C Allaire
- Health Economics and Patient Outcomes, Generativity Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Durham, USA
- Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Gisoo Barnes
- BeiGene, Ltd., Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Emeryville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: Association with Clinicopathological Factors and Molecular Alterations. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23094517. [PMID: 35562908 PMCID: PMC9101150 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting programmed cell death-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) have improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). High tumor PD-L1 expression, detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) typically on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histological specimens, is linked to better response. Following our previous investigation on PD-L1 in cytological samples, the aim of this study was to further explore the potential impacts of various clinicopathological and molecular factors on PD-L1 expression. Two retrospective NSCLC cohorts of 1131 and 651 specimens, respectively, were investigated for PD-L1 expression (<1%/1−49%/≥50%), sample type, sample site, histological type, and oncogenic driver status. In both cohorts, PD-L1 was positive (≥1%) in 55% of the cases. Adenocarcinomas exhibited lower PD-L1 expression than squamous cell carcinomas (p < 0.0001), while there was no difference between sample types, tumor locations, or between the two cohorts in multivariate analysis (all p ≥ 0.28). Mutational status correlated significantly with PD-L1 expression (p < 0.0001), with the highest expression for KRAS-mutated cases, the lowest for EGFR-mutated, and the KRAS/EGFR wild-type cases in between. There was no difference in PD-L1 levels between different prevalent KRAS mutations (all p ≥ 0.44), while mucinous KRAS-mutated adenocarcinomas exhibited much lower PD-L1 expression than non-mucinous (p < 0.0001). Our data indicate that cytological and histological specimens are comparable for PD-L1 evaluation. Given the impact of KRAS mutations and the mucinous growth pattern on PD-L1 expression, these factors should be further investigated in studies on ICI response.
Collapse
|
59
|
The use of immunotherapy in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 106:102394. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
60
|
Reguart N, Reyes R. Spotlight on Camrelizumab in Advanced Squamous Lung Cancer: Another Feather in the Cap of Chinese Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol 2022; 17:477-480. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
61
|
Bhargava P, Shrikhande SV. First-line immunotherapy: Hype rather than near reality in gastric cancer. THE NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA 2022; 35:98-99. [PMID: 36461855 DOI: 10.25259/nmji_645_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhat Bhargava
- Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of GI and HPB Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Temel JS, Petrillo LA, Greer JA. Patient-Centered Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:626-634. [PMID: 34985932 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence base demonstrating the benefits of an early focus on palliative care for patients with serious cancers, including advanced lung cancer, is substantial. Early involvement of specialty-trained palliative care clinicians in the care of patients with advanced lung cancer improves patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, and health care delivery, including hospice utilization. Since the time that many of these palliative care trials were conducted, the paradigm of cancer care for many cancers, including lung cancer, has changed dramatically. The majority of patients with advanced lung cancer are now treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapies, both of which have had a significant impact on patient's experience and outcomes. With this changing landscape of lung cancer therapeutics, patients are facing new and different challenges, including dealing with novel side effect profiles and coping with greater uncertainty regarding their prognosis. Patients who are living longer with their advanced cancer also struggle with how to address survivorship issues, such as sexual health and exercise, and decision making about end-of-life care. Although palliative care clinicians remain well-suited to address these care needs, they may need to learn new skills to support patients treated with novel therapies. Additionally, as the experience of patients with advanced lung cancer is becoming more varied and individualized, palliative care research interventions and clinical programs should also be delivered in a patient-centered manner to best meet patient's needs and improve their outcomes. Tailored and technology-based palliative care interventions are promising strategies for delivering patient-centered palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Temel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Laura A Petrillo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Real-World Time on Treatment with First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression ≥ 50%: 3-Year Follow-Up Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041041. [PMID: 35205788 PMCID: PMC8870405 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States (US), and real-world studies are needed to understand effectiveness of cancer therapies for patients treated outside of cancer clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent that aids the body’s immune system in fighting cancer, is administered for up to 2 years when treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the real-world time on treatment (rwToT), a surrogate indicator that has been associated with survival in NSCLC studies, for over 1000 patients with advanced NSCLC treated initially with pembrolizumab at US oncology clinics. The median rwToT for patients with good performance status (similar to those in clinical trials) was 7.4 months, consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with advanced NSCLC and good performance status at the start of therapy who are treated in real-world settings. Abstract Our aim was to evaluate real-world time on treatment (rwToT), overall and by KRAS mutation status, with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world oncology practice in the US. rwToT is a readily available, intermediate-range endpoint that is moderately to highly correlated with overall survival in clinical trials and real-world data. Using deidentified electronic medical record data, we studied patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2 who initiated pembrolizumab (1 November 2016 to 31 March 2020) for advanced NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 genomic alterations. The data cutoff was 31 March 2021, and the median study follow-up was 34 months. The Kaplan–Meier median rwToT with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.3–8.1) for 807 patients with PS 0–1, which was consistent with the median treatment duration in the KEYNOTE-024 trial (7.9 months). The median rwToT for 237 patients with PS 2 was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.4–2.8). For those with KRAS-mutated and KRAS wild-type nonsquamous NSCLC and PS 0–1, the median rwToT was 7.6 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Our findings suggest long-term benefit of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% in real-world settings in the US, particularly for patients with good performance status at the start of therapy, irrespective of KRAS status.
Collapse
|
64
|
Gridelli C, Peters S, Mok T, Forde PM, Reck M, Attili I, de Marinis F. First-line immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: results of an International Expert Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100355. [PMID: 34922299 PMCID: PMC8689080 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy represents the standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy in high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors (≥50%) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status. However, most pivotal clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) did not include patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Hence, a consensus is lacking on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this specific subgroup of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2021 with the aim of reviewing the available evidence on the use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2, both in clinical practice and in a research setting. RESULTS All panelists expressed concern about the applicability of currently available PS scales to evaluate patients for ICI treatment. The panelists agreed that, though limited, the available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in PS 2 NSCLC patients, whereas concern was raised on the safety of ICI combinations, mainly related to chemotherapy and/or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 toxicity. On the basis of reviewed data, ICI efficacy may be speculated in PS 2 NSCLC patients; however, PS 2 remains a negative prognostic category as compared to PS 0-1 in patients treated with ICI, as it is for chemotherapy. The panelists defined high, medium and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to the inclusion of PS 2 patients in prospective clinical trials and the specific evaluation of combined ICI treatments with attenuated chemotherapy doses. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the major limitations affecting PS 2 patients with NSCLC and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gridelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, 'S.G. Moscati' Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T Mok
- State Key Laboratory in Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P. R. China
| | - P M Forde
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - M Reck
- LungenClinic, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - I Attili
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - F de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Tang M, Lee CK, Lewis CR, Boyer M, Brown B, Schaffer A, Pearson SA, Simes RJ. Generalizability of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials to Real-world Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Lung Cancer 2022; 166:40-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
66
|
Sankar K, Bryant AK, Strohbehn GW, Zhao L, Elliott D, Moghanaki D, Kelley MJ, Ramnath N, Green MD. Real World Outcomes versus Clinical Trial Results of Durvalumab Maintenance in Veterans with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030614. [PMID: 35158881 PMCID: PMC8833364 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance durvalumab based on outcomes from the PACIFIC trial. The efficacy of this regimen in a real-world population has not been extensively studied. We found that the addition of durvalumab has significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in veterans with stage III non-small cell lung cancer as compared to veterans who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, but overall survival of veterans is reduced compared to patients in the PACIFIC trial. Additional studies will need to be performed to understand this efficacy-effectiveness gap. Abstract One year of durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world efficacy of durvalumab has not been determined. We conducted a multi-center observational cohort study across the Veterans Health Administration, including patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab, compared to patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression approaches were used to identify factors associated with PFS and OS. We calculated a hazard ratio and efficacy-effectiveness factor to compare OS of veterans to the referenced clinical trial population. A total of 1006 patients with stage III NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and at least one dose of durvalumab from November 2017 to April 2021 were compared to 989 patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone from January 2015 to December 2016. Adjuvant durvalumab was associated with higher PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.70, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50–0.66, p < 0.001). OS was shorter in veterans compared to PACIFIC (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.48, p = 0.02: EE gap 0.73). OS of veterans with stage III NSCLC treated with adjuvant durvalumab is improved compared to a modern comparator but is reduced compared to the PACIFIC population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamya Sankar
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (A.K.B.); (L.Z.); (D.E.)
| | - Alex K. Bryant
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (A.K.B.); (L.Z.); (D.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Garth W. Strohbehn
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA;
| | - Lili Zhao
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (A.K.B.); (L.Z.); (D.E.)
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - David Elliott
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (A.K.B.); (L.Z.); (D.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA Jonsson Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA;
| | - Michael J. Kelley
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA;
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nithya Ramnath
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA;
- Correspondence: (N.R.); (M.D.G.); Tel.: +1-734-232-6789 (N.R.); +1-734-763-1512 (M.D.G.)
| | - Michael D. Green
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; (A.K.B.); (L.Z.); (D.E.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
- Correspondence: (N.R.); (M.D.G.); Tel.: +1-734-232-6789 (N.R.); +1-734-763-1512 (M.D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Trajectory of health-related quality of life during the last year of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9351-9358. [PMID: 36109393 PMCID: PMC9633509 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07359-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to assess the trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the last year of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to explore when and to what degree deterioration of symptoms and physical functioning accelerate towards the end of life. METHODS Data from two RCTs of first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC was analyzed. HRQOL was assessed repeatedly using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13. Changes in HRQOL scores were investigated relative to the time of death. RESULTS The study sample included 730 patients, with a median of four HRQOL assessments per patient (range 1-9). Fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, and cough were the most pronounced symptoms in all phases of the disease trajectory. The deterioration rates of global quality of life, physical function, and key symptoms were relatively slow until 4 months before death. Then, the decline accelerated, and for physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea, there was a very rapid decline in the last 2 months. CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced NSCLC experience a high symptom burden that worsens over time, especially in the last 4 months. Regular symptom monitoring may help identify where patients are in the disease trajectory, serve as a trigger for changes in anticancer and symptomatic treatment, and facilitate discussions about end-of-life care.
Collapse
|
68
|
Fujimoto D, Miura S, Yoshimura K, Wakuda K, Oya Y, Haratani K, Itoh S, Uemura T, Morinaga R, Takahama T, Nakashima K, Tachihara M, Saito G, Tanizaki J, Otsubo K, Ikeda S, Matsumoto H, Hara S, Hata A, Masuda T, Yamamoto N. A Real-World Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer1. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 3:100265. [PMID: 35146460 PMCID: PMC8819387 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The real-world effectiveness of combination treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor for NSCLC, especially for the elderly (aged ≥75 y) or those with poor performance status (≥2), has not been fully elucidated. We investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of this combination therapy in these populations. Methods This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients who are chemo-naïve with advanced NSCLC who received a combination of platinum, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab between December 2018 and June 2019. This was an updated prespecified secondary analysis with the primary objective of investigating the safety and effectiveness in this cohort. Results Overall, 299 patients were included. Multivariate analysis identified performance status (0–1) and programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score (≥50%) as significant independent predictors of progression-free survival (p = 0.007, and p = 0.003, respectively). The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) was higher in the elderly and those with poor performance status than in their younger and good performance status counterparts. A total of 71 patients developed AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, and AE-related treatment discontinuation occurred at a significantly higher rate in older patients (median [range]) (70 [46–82] y) than in younger patients (68 [31–84] y) (p <0.001). Conclusions Combination treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had low real-world effectiveness for poor performance status patients. Severe AEs occurred at a higher rate in the elderly and poor performance status patients, and the AE-related treatment discontinuation rate increased with age. Physicians should be cautious about using this regimen, especially in the elderly and poor performance status patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Fujimoto
- Internal Medicine III, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Satoru Miura
- Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
- Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Satoru Miura, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, 2-15-3 Kawagishi-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8566, Japan.
| | - Kenichi Yoshimura
- Medical Center for Translational and Clinical Research, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazushige Wakuda
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuko Oya
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Koji Haratani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Shoichi Itoh
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Takehiro Uemura
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Morinaga
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Oita, Japan
| | | | - Kazuhisa Nakashima
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology & Respiratory Medicine, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Motoko Tachihara
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Go Saito
- Department of Respirology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Junko Tanizaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Kohei Otsubo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Matsumoto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Japan
| | - Akito Hata
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takeshi Masuda
- Department of Respiratory Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Rich P, Mitchell RB, Schaefer E, Walker PR, Dubay JW, Boyd J, Oubre D, Page R, Khalil M, Sinha S, Boniol S, Halawani H, Santos ES, Brenner W, Orsini JM, Pauli E, Goldberg J, Veatch A, Haut M, Ghabach B, Bidyasar S, Quejada M, Khan W, Huang K, Traylor L, Akerley W. Real-world performance of blood-based proteomic profiling in first-line immunotherapy treatment in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002989. [PMID: 34706885 PMCID: PMC8552188 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy has improved patient outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but better biomarkers are needed. A clinically validated, blood-based proteomic test, or host immune classifier (HIC), was assessed for its ability to predict ICI therapy outcomes in this real-world, prospectively designed, observational study. Materials and methods The prospectively designed, observational registry study INSIGHT (Clinical Effectiveness Assessment of VeriStrat® Testing and Validation of Immunotherapy Tests in NSCLC Subjects) (NCT03289780) includes 35 US sites having enrolled over 3570 NSCLC patients at any stage and line of therapy. After enrolment and prior to therapy initiation, all patients are tested and designated HIC-Hot (HIC-H) or HIC-Cold (HIC-C). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 1-year follow-up with the first 2000 enrolled patients. We report the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) NSCLC treated in the first-line (ICI-containing therapies n=284; all first-line therapies n=877), by treatment type and in HIC-defined subgroups. Results OS for HIC-H patients was longer than OS for HIC-C patients across treatment regimens, including ICI. For patients treated with all ICI regimens, median OS was not reached (95% CI 15.4 to undefined months) for HIC-H (n=196) vs 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9 to 6.4) for HIC-C patients (n=88); HR=0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.53), p<0.0001. For ICI monotherapy, OS was 16.8 vs 2.8 months (HR=0.36 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.58), p<0.0001) and for ICI with chemotherapy OS was unreached vs 6.4 months (HR=0.41 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.67), p=0.0003). HIC results were independent of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). In a subgroup with PD-L1 ≥50% and performance status 0–1, HIC stratified survival significantly for ICI monotherapy but not ICI with chemotherapy. Conclusion Blood-based HIC proteomic testing provides clinically meaningful information for immunotherapy treatment decision in NSCLC independent of PD-L1. The data suggest that HIC-C patients should not be treated with ICI alone regardless of their PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Rich
- Lung Cancer, Piedmont Physicians Group, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Eric Schaefer
- Highlands Oncology Group, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
| | - Paul R Walker
- Leo W Jenkins Cancer Center, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - John W Dubay
- Lewis and Faye Manderson Cancer Center at DCH Regional Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
| | - Jason Boyd
- Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Oubre
- Pontchartrain Cancer Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ray Page
- The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Mazen Khalil
- St. Bernards Hospital, Inc, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA
| | - Suman Sinha
- Christus Saint Michael Health System, Texarkana, Texas, USA
| | - Scott Boniol
- Christus Cancer Treatment Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Hafez Halawani
- St. Frances Cabrini Hospital Cancer Center, Alexandria, Louisiana, USA
| | - Edgardo S Santos
- Florida Precision Oncology, Division of Genesis Care, Aventura, Florida, USA
| | - Warren Brenner
- Lynn Clinical Research Institute, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | | | - Emily Pauli
- Clearview Cancer Institute, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
| | - Jonathan Goldberg
- Clinical Research Alliance, Caremount Medical, Mount Kisco, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Veatch
- Northwest Medical Specialties, Puyallup, Washington, USA
| | - Mitchell Haut
- Hematology and Oncology Associates, Inc, Canton, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kan Huang
- Phelps County Regional Medical Center, Rolla, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Wallace Akerley
- Huntsman Cancer Institute Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Hsu GG, MacKay E, Scheuer N, Ramagopalan SV. Keeping it real: implications of real-world treatment outcomes for first-line immunotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Immunotherapy 2021; 13:1453-1456. [PMID: 34641707 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Tweetable abstract Recent RWD studies suggest that the performance of immunotherapy in NSCLC is not as good as that seen in RCTs. However, analyses using RWD (and their interpretation) require careful appraisal and quantification of possible sources of bias.
Collapse
|
71
|
Real-world progression-free survival in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy-based regimens using a US dataset. Data Brief 2021; 37:107195. [PMID: 34169127 PMCID: PMC8209237 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
While results from clinical trials are important in determining the efficacy of treatment, restrictive eligibility criteria may limit generalizability to patient populations in the real-world setting. Real-world analyses can therefore identify subgroups of patients who may respond differently to specific therapeutic regimens. This supplementary data is supportive to the research article entitled “Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy–based regimens in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer” [1]. Using electronic health records data from a large demographically and geographically diverse oncology database, we present real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States treated with either first-line immunotherapy as monotherapy or single-agent immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. rwPFS was estimated for patients in each treatment group using Kaplan-Meier methods; analyses were conducted separately for patients with squamous and non-squamous histology and stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor programmed death ligand-1 expression, and presence of brain metastases.
Collapse
|