Effects of lumbopelvic joint manipulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals

Lumbopelvic joint manipulation and quadriceps activation of people with patellofemoral pain syndrome

CONTEXT

Quadriceps weakness and inhibition are impairments associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Lumbopelvic joint manipulation has been shown to improve quadriceps force output and inhibition, but the duration of the effect is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether quadriceps strength and activation are increased and maintained for 1 hour after high-grade or low-grade joint mobilization or manipulation applied at the lumbopelvic region in people with PFPS.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

University laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight people with PFPS (age = 24.6 ± 8.9 years, height = 174.3 ± 11.2 cm, mass = 78.4 ± 16.8 kg) participated.

INTERVENTION(S)

Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: lumbopelvic joint manipulation (grade V), side-lying lumbar midrange flexion and extension passive range of motion (grade II) for 1 minute, or prone extension on the elbows for 3 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Quadriceps force and activation were measured using the burst superimposition technique during a seated isometric knee extension task. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to compare changes in quadriceps force and activation among groups over time (before intervention and at 0, 20, 40, and 60 minutes after intervention).

RESULTS

We found no differences in quadriceps force output (F(5.33,101.18) = 0.65, P = .67) or central activation ratio (F(4.84,92.03) = 0.38, P = .86) values among groups after intervention. When groups were pooled, we found differences across time for quadriceps force (F(2.66,101.18) = 5.03, P = .004) and activation (F(2.42,92.03) = 3.85, P = .02). Quadriceps force was not different at 0 minutes after intervention (t(40) = 1.68, P = .10), but it decreased at 20 (t(40) = 2.16, P = .04), 40 (t(40) = 2.87, P = .01) and 60 (t(40) = 3.04, P = .004) minutes after intervention. All groups demonstrated decreased quadriceps activation at 0 minutes after intervention (t(40) = 4.17, P < .001), but subsequent measures were not different from preintervention levels (t(40) range, 1.53-1.83, P > .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions directed at the lumbopelvic region did not have immediate effects on quadriceps force output or activation. Muscle fatigue might have contributed to decreased force output and activation over 1 hour of testing.

Quadriceps activation following knee injuries: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Arthrogenic muscle inhibition is an important underlying factor in persistent quadriceps muscle weakness after knee injury or surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the magnitude and prevalence of volitional quadriceps activation deficits after knee injury.

DATA SOURCES

Web of Science database.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies involved human participants and measured quadriceps activation using either twitch interpolation or burst superimposition on patients with knee injuries or surgeries such as anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLd), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr), and anterior knee pain (AKP).

DATA EXTRACTION

Means, measures of variability, and prevalence of quadriceps activation (QA) failure (<95%) were recorded for experiments involving ACLd (10), ACLr (5), and AKP (3).

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 21 data sets from 18 studies were initially identified. Data from 3 studies (1 paper reporting data for both ACLd and ACLr, 1 on AKP, and the postarthroscopy paper) were excluded from the primary analyses because only graphical data were reported. Of the remaining 17 data sets (from 15 studies), weighted mean QA in 352 ACLd patients was 87.3% on the involved side, 89.1% on the uninvolved side, and 91% in control participants. The QA failure prevalence ranged from 0% to 100%. Weighted mean QA in 99 total ACLr patients was 89.2% on the involved side, 84% on the uninvolved side, and 98.5% for the control group, with prevalence ranging from 0% to 71%. Thirty-eight patients with AKP averaged 78.6% on the involved side and 77.7% on the contralateral side. Bilateral QA failure was commonly reported in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Quadriceps activation failure is common in patients with ACLd, ACLr, and AKP and is often observed bilaterally.