Holoenzyme Switching and Stochastic Release of Sigma Factors from RNA Polymerase In Vivo

Adaptation in bacterial flagellar and motility systems: from regulon members to 'foraging'-like behavior in E. coli

Bacterial flagellar motility and chemotaxis help cells to reach the most favorable environments and to successfully compete with other micro-organisms in response to external stimuli. Escherichia coli is a motile gram-negative bacterium, and the flagellar regulon in E. coli is controlled by a master regulator FlhDC as well as a second regulator, flagellum-specific sigma factor, σ^F. To define the physiological role of these two regulators, we carried out transcription profiling experiments to identify, on a genome-wide basis, genes under the control of these two regulators. In addition, the synchronized pattern of increasing CRP activity causing increasing FlhDC expression with decreasing carbon source quality, together with the apparent coupling of motility activity with the activation of motility and chemotaxis genes in poor quality carbon sources, highlights the importance of CRP activation in allowing E. coli to devote progressively more of its limited reserves to search out better conditions. In adaptation to a variety of carbon sources, the motile bacteria carry out tactical responses by increasing flagellar operation but restricting costly flagellar synthesis, indicating its capability of strategically using the precious energy in nutrient-poor environments for maximizing survival.

Cellular levels and activity of the flagellar sigma factor FliA of Escherichia coli are controlled by FlgM-modulated proteolysis

In Escherichia coli the flagellar regulon consists of more than 60 genes organized in three hierarchically and temporally regulated transcriptional classes. The flagellar sigma factor FliA (sigma(28)) is responsible for class 3 expression and, in the early phase of flagellar assembly, is inhibited by its anti-sigma factor FlgM. The flagellar hook basal body forms a type III secretion system capable of secreting both flagellar subunits and FlgM. This results in release and therefore activation of FliA and class 3 expression. Here we demonstrate that FliA is also subject to proteolysis which mainly depends on Lon protease. FlgM not only acts as an anti-sigma factor but also protects FliA from being degraded. Based on quantitative measurements over time upon experimental induction of the flagellar cascade as well as during the growth cycle of a motile strain, we show that FliA proteolysis increases in parallel to class 3 expression, i.e. correlates with FlgM secretion and the phase of highest activity of FliA. Thus, when FlgM is not available due to secretion or mutation, and with RNA polymerase interaction being only transient during the transcription initiation cycle, the proteases can degrade FliA. Experiments with a lon mutant indicate that Lon protease and FliA degradation maintain appropriate FliA : FlgM stoichiometry upon induction of the flagellar system and thereby contribute to timely shut-off of this system.

Stationary phase reorganisation of the Escherichia coli transcription machinery by Crl protein, a fine-tuner of sigmas activity and levels

Upon environmental changes, bacteria reschedule gene expression by directing alternative sigma factors to core RNA polymerase (RNAP). This sigma factor switch is achieved by regulating relative amounts of alternative sigmas and by decreasing the competitiveness of the dominant housekeeping sigma(70). Here we report that during stationary phase, the unorthodox Crl regulator supports a specific sigma factor, sigma(S) (RpoS), in its competition with sigma(70) for core RNAP by increasing the formation of sigma(S)-containing RNAP holoenzyme, Esigma(S). Consistently, Crl has a global regulatory effect in stationary phase gene expression exclusively through sigma(S), that is, on sigma(S)-dependent genes only. Not a specific promoter motif, but sigma(S) availability determines the ability of Crl to exert its function, rendering it of major importance at low sigma(S) levels. By promoting the formation of Esigma(S), Crl also affects partitioning of sigma(S) between RNAP core and the proteolytic sigma(S)-targeting factor RssB, thereby playing a dual role in fine-tuning sigma(S) proteolysis. In conclusion, Crl has a key role in reorganising the Escherichia coli transcriptional machinery and global gene expression during entry into stationary phase.

The molecular basis of selective promoter activation by the ?Ssubunit of RNA polymerase

Different environmental stimuli cause bacteria to exchange the sigma subunit in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and, thereby, tune their gene expression according to the newly emerging needs. Sigma factors are usually thought to recognize clearly distinguishable promoter DNA determinants, and thereby activate distinct gene sets, known as their regulons. In this review, we illustrate how the principle sigma factor in stationary phase and in stressful conditions in Escherichia coli, sigmaS (RpoS), can specifically target its large regulon in vivo, although it is known to recognize the same core promoter elements in vitro as the housekeeping sigma factor, sigma70 (RpoD). Variable combinations of cis-acting promoter features and trans-acting protein factors determine whether a promoter is recognized by RNAP containing sigmaS or sigma70, or by both holoenzymes. How these promoter features impose sigmaS selectivity is further discussed. Moreover, additional pathways allow sigmaS to compete more efficiently than sigma70 for limiting amounts of core RNAP (E) and thereby enhance EsigmaS formation and effectiveness. Finally, these topics are discussed in the context of sigma factor evolution and the benefits a cell gains from retaining competing and closely related sigma factors with overlapping sets of target genes.

The bacteriophage ?Q anti-terminator protein regulates late gene expression as a stable component of the transcription elongation complex

The Q protein of bacteriophage lambda (lambdaQ) is a transcription anti-terminator required for the expression of the phage's late genes under the control of promoter P(R'). To effect terminator read-through, lambdaQ must gain access to RNA polymerase (RNAP) via a promoter-restricted pathway. In particular, lambdaQ modifies RNAP by binding a specific DNA site embedded in P(R') and interacting with RNAP in the context of a specific paused early elongation complex. The resultant lambdaQ-modified transcription elongation complex is competent to read through downstream termination signals. Here we use a chromatin-immunoprecipitation assay to test the hypothesis that lambdaQ functions as a stable component of the transcription elongation complex. Our results indicate that, in vivo, the lambdaQ-modified transcription elongation complex contains Q as a stably associated subunit. Furthermore, we find that in the physiologically relevant context of an induced lambda lysogen, Q remains stably associated with RNAP as it transcribes at least 22 kb of the phage late operon. Thus, our findings suggest that the promoter-specific pathway leading to lambdaQ-mediated terminator read-through results in the formation of a highly stable lambdaQ-containing transcription elongation complex capable of traversing the entire late operon.

Region 1.2 of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit controls recognition of the -10 promoter element

Recognition of the -10 promoter consensus element by region 2 of the bacterial RNA polymerase sigma subunit is a key step in transcription initiation. sigma also functions as an elongation factor, inducing transcription pausing by interacting with transcribed DNA non-template strand sequences that are similar to the -10 element sequence. Here, we show that the region 1.2 of Escherichia coli sigma70, whose function was heretofore unknown, is strictly required for efficient recognition of the non-template strand of -10-like pause-inducing DNA sequence by sigma region 2, and for sigma-dependent promoter-proximal pausing. Recognition of the fork-junction promoter DNA by RNA polymerase holoenzyme also requires sigma region 1.2 and thus resembles the pause-inducing sequence recognition. Our results, together with available structural data, support a model where sigma region 1.2 acts as a core RNA polymerase-dependent allosteric switch that modulates non-template DNA strand recognition by sigma region 2 during transcription initiation and elongation.

The transition between transcriptional initiation and elongation in E. coli is highly variable and often rate limiting

We perform a genome-wide analysis of the transition between transcriptional initiation and elongation in Escherichia coli by determining the association of core RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the promoter-recognition factor sigma70 with respect to RNA transcripts. We identify 1286 sigma70-associated promoters, including many internal to known operons, and demonstrate that sigma70 is usually released very rapidly from elongating RNAP complexes. On average, RNAP density is higher at the promoter than in the coding sequence, although the ratio is highly variable among different transcribed regions. Strikingly, a significant fraction of RNAP-bound promoters is not associated with transcriptional activity, perhaps due to an intrinsic energetic barrier to promoter escape. Thus, the transition from transcriptional initiation to elongation is highly variable, often rate limiting, and in some cases is essentially blocked such that RNAP is effectively "poised" to transcribe only under the appropriate environmental conditions. The genomic pattern of RNAP density in E. coli differs from that in yeast and mammalian cells.

The sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase as a signal integrator and network master regulator in the general stress response in Escherichia coli

The sigmaS (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli is a key master regulator which allows this bacterial model organism and important pathogen to adapt to and survive environmentally rough times. While hardly present in rapidly growing cells, sigmaS strongly accumulates in response to many different stress conditions, partly replaces the vegetative sigma subunit in RNA polymerase and thereby reprograms this enzyme to transcribe sigmaS-dependent genes (up to 10% of the E. coli genes). In this review, we summarize the extremely complex regulation of sigmaS itself and multiple signal input at the level of this master regulator, we describe the way in which sigmaS specifically recognizes "stress" promoters despite their similarity to vegetative promoters, and, while being far from comprehensive, we give a short overview of the far-reaching physiological impact of sigmaS. With sigmaS being a central and multiple signal integrator and master regulator of hundreds of genes organized in regulatory cascades and sub-networks or regulatory modules, this system also represents a key model system for analyzing complex cellular information processing and a starting point for understanding the complete regulatory network of an entire cell.

Extensive functional overlap between sigma factors in Escherichia coli

Bacterial core RNA polymerase (RNAP) must associate with a sigma factor to recognize promoter sequences. Escherichia coli encodes seven sigma factors, each believed to be specific for a largely distinct subset of promoters. Using microarrays representing the entire E. coli genome, we identify 87 in vivo targets of sigma32, the heat-shock sigma factor, and estimate that there are 120-150 sigma32 promoters in total. Unexpectedly, 25% of these sigma32 targets are located within coding regions, suggesting novel regulatory roles for sigma32. The majority of sigma32 promoter targets overlap with those of sigma70, the housekeeping sigma factor. Furthermore, their DNA sequence motifs are often interdigitated, with RNAPsigma70 and RNAPsigma32 initiating transcription in vitro with similar efficiency and from identical positions. SigmaE-regulated promoters also overlap extensively with those for sigma70. These results suggest that extensive functional overlap between sigma factors is an important phenomenon.

The role of an upstream promoter interaction in initiation of bacterial transcription

The bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognizes promoters through sequence-specific contacts of its promoter-specificity components (sigma) with two DNA sequence motifs. Contacts with the upstream ('-35') promoter motif are made by sigma domain 4 attached to the flap domain of the RNAP beta subunit. Bacteriophage T4 late promoters consist solely of an extended downstream ('-10') motif specifically recognized by the T4 gene 55 protein (gp55). Low level basal transcription is sustained by gp55-RNAP holoenzyme. The late transcription coactivator gp33 binds to the beta flap and represses this basal transcription. Gp33 can also repress transcription by Escherichia coli sigma70-RNAP holoenzyme mutated to allow gp33 access to the beta flap. We propose that repression is due to gp33 blocking an upstream sequence-independent DNA-binding site on RNAP (as sigma70 domain 4 does) but, unlike sigma70 domain 4, providing no new DNA interaction. We show that this upstream interaction is essential only at an early step of transcription initiation, and discuss the role of this interaction in promoter recognition and transcriptional regulation.

Insights into transcriptional regulation and sigma competition from an equilibrium model of RNA polymerase binding to DNA

To explore scenarios that permit transcription regulation by activator recruitment of RNA polymerase and sigma competition in vivo, we used an equilibrium model of RNA polymerase binding to DNA constrained by the values of total RNA polymerase (E) and sigma(70) per cell measured in this work. Our numbers of E and sigma(70) per cell, which are consistent with most of the primary data in the literature, suggest that in vivo (i) only a minor fraction of RNA polymerase (<20%) is involved in elongation and (ii) sigma(70) is in excess of total E. Modeling the partitioning of RNA polymerase between promoters, nonspecific DNA binding sites, and the cytoplasm suggested that even weak promoters will be saturated with Esigma(70) in vivo unless nonspecific DNA binding by Esigma(70) is rather significant. In addition, the model predicted that sigmas compete for binding to E only when their total number exceeds the total amount of RNA polymerase (excluding that involved in elongation) and that weak promoters will be preferentially subjected to sigma competition.

Sigma and RNA polymerase: an on-again, off-again relationship?

In bacteria, a fundamental level of gene regulation occurs by competitive association of promoter-specificity factors called sigmas with RNA polymerase (RNAP). This sigma cycle paradigm underpins much of our understanding of all transcriptional regulation. Here, we review recent challenges to the sigma cycle paradigm in the context of its essential features and of the structural basis of sigma interactions with RNAP and elongation complexes. Although sigmas can play dual roles as both initiation and elongation regulators, we suggest that the key postulate of the sigma cycle, that sigmas compete for binding to RNAP after each round of RNA synthesis, remains the central mechanism for programming transcription initiation in bacteria.