Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4

Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP).

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:887-893.].

RISK OF MULTIPLE RECURRING RETINAL DETACHMENT AFTER PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR

PURPOSE

To evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of patients with retinal redetachments (re-RD) after surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METHODS

Medical records of eyes with re-RD after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery between 1999 and 2014 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Germany, were retrospectively evaluated. Data included preoperative and postoperative clinical findings, best-corrected visual acuity, presence and grade of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, surgical procedures, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-eight eyes of 2,457 developed a re-RD (13.3%). Of these 328 eyes, 242 eyes (73.8%) had only one re-RD, whereas 86 eyes (26.2%) had 2 or more re-RDs. Visible presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy during first redetachment surgery increased risk of re-RD with relative risk ratio of 1.46 (P = 0.05). Best-corrected visual acuity deteriorated with every additional re-RD (P < 0.001). Two hundred and thirty-seven eyes received oil endotamponde at least once. In 91 cases, oil endotamponade was left for long-term until last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Multiple re-RD (≥2 re-RDs) is an infrequent complication after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. After a first re-RD occurred, risk for multiple re-RD doubles compared with the risk of a first redetachment. Mean functional outcome is unfavorable, whereas predictability remains nevertheless poor because of the wide range of interindividual postoperative best-corrected visual acuity.

Key Factors to Improve the Outcome of Retinal Reattachment Surgery in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

INTRODUCTION

For management of complicated retinal detachments, a pars plana vitrectomy with temporary silicone oil (SO) fill is the method of choice. According to literature, the retinal redetachment rate varies between <10% and >70% with around 36% in our own group (retrospective data analysis, n = 119 eyes).

METHODS

The main goal was to reduce the retinal redetachment rate. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) and evaluation protocols (EVALPs) were developed to prospectively analyse risk factors. Lab analysis of SO was performed, and the role of surgical experience was evaluated and investigated with Eyesi®.

RESULTS

We achieved a significant reduction of the retinal redetachment rate (to 6.80%, n = 101, p = 0.002). After surgery with SO injection, neither further membrane peeling (in 16.5%) nor retinal laser coagulation (in 100%) during revision surgery had a significant effect on the reattachment rate (p = 0.167, p = 0.23), while extensive additional laser coagulation reduced visual acuity (p = 0.01). A 3-port approach had to be set up to complete SO removal. A difference in success rate depending on surgical experience was confirmed, and the performance in Eyesi correlated with that in the patients' eye.

CONCLUSIONS

A SOP- and EVALP-based management and new strategies to secure the surgical performance seem to be essential for successful surgery.

Risk factors of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with choroidal detachment in Chinese patients

AIM

To comprehensively analyze the risk factors of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) associated with choroidal detachment (CD).

METHODS

A total of 265 eyes of 265 consecutive cases of RRD were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had systemic and ophthalmologic examination. CD was diagnosed by indirect ophthalmoscopy, B-scan ultrasonography, and ultrasound biomicroscope (UBM). Each parameter was compared between patients of RRD and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with choroidal detachment (RRDCD). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors of CD.

RESULTS

There were 52 eyes (19.62%) with CD. Pseudophakia was more commonly seen in RRDCD (21.15% vs 6.10%, P=0.002). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was lower (8.60±3.62 vs 12.96±3.55, P<0.001), best-corrected visual acuity was worse [3.00 (2.00 to 3.00) vs 1.92 (1.22 to 3.00), P=0.001], and refractive error was more myopic [-4 (-9 to -2) vs -2 (-6 to 0), P=0.007] in RRDCD. Eyes with RRDCD had larger extent of retinal detachment (P=0.007). In RRDCD, 34.62% of eyes presented with multiple holes (P=0.044) and 25.00% with macular holes (P=0.012), compared with 20.66% and 14.08% in RRD. High myopia (P=0.039), low IOP (P=0.017), and larger extent of retinal detachment (P<0.001) were significant and independent risk factors for developing CD.

CONCLUSION

For CD in RRD, related factors include BCVA, IOP, lens status, refractive error, extent of retinal detachment, number of holes, and macular hole. Larger extent of retinal detachment, high myopia, and low IOP are significant and independent risk factors.

Sequential Hypothesis Testing to Characterise the Learning Curve and Monitor Surgical Performance in Retinal Detachment Surgery

PURPOSE

To characterise the learning curve of primary retinal detachment (RD) repair for trainee surgeons and monitor the outcomes of surgery for established surgeons.

PROCEDURES

Primary RD operations were analysed sequentially using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) and the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT).

RESULTS

359 analysed cases of primary RD were audited with a recurrent RD (ReRD) rate of 14.7%. The individual rate of ReRD ranged from 9.4 to 17.4% (p = 0.74). SPRT and CUSUM analyses showed that ReRD occurred at random when operated by senior surgeons but a learning curve was discernible for junior surgeons. There was a trend for a higher proportion of ReRD caused by untreated breaks in cases operated by junior surgeons (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

SPRT and CUSUM are useful methods to monitor surgical outcomes and should be included in audits of sequential operations such as RD. Trainee surgeons experience a quantifiable learning curve.

Effect of Serial Intrasilicone Oil Bevacizumab Injections in Eyes With Recurrent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Retinal Detachment

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of serial intrasilicone oil bevacizumab injections (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) on visual acuity (VA) and anatomic outcomes in eyes undergoing proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-related retinal detachment (RD) repair.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, historical-control pilot study.

METHODS

setting: Tertiary care center.

STUDY POPULATION

Nondiabetic eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and silicone oil tamponade with or without scleral buckling procedure (SBP) for recurrent RD due to PVR.

INTERVENTION

Intrasilicone oil injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab was performed intraoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 2, and 3.

OUTCOMES

Retinal reattachment rate, final VA, and rate of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation at month 6.

RESULTS

Twenty eyes of 20 patients were enrolled and compared to a historical control group composed of 35 age- and sex-matched controls. In the study group, logMAR VA improved from mean 1.78 ± 0.43 (Snellen 20/1205) to 1.43 ± 0.70 (Snellen 20/538, P = .04), retinal reattachment was achieved in 14 of 20 eyes (70%), and ERM formation was observed in 7 of 20 eyes (35%) at 6 months. In the control group, logMAR VA improved from mean 1.50 ± 0.74 (Snellen 20/632) to 1.43 ± 0.58 (Snellen 20/538, P = .64), retinal reattachment was achieved in 25 of 35 eyes (71%), and ERM formation was observed in 7 of 35 eyes (20%) at 6 months. No significant difference in final VA (P = .96), retinal reattachment rate (P = .75), or ERM formation (P = .33) was observed between groups. No intrasilicone oil injection-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial intrasilicone oil injections of bevacizumab did not improve retinal reattachment rate, improve final VA, or reduce ERM formation in patients undergoing PVR-related RD surgery.

Strategy for the management of diabetic macular edema: the European vitreo-retinal society macular edema study

Objective. To compare the efficacy of different therapies in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Design. Nonrandomized, multicenter clinical study. Participants. 86 retina specialists from 29 countries provided clinical information on 2,603 patients with macular edema including 870 patients with DME. Methods. Reported data included the type and number of treatment(s) performed, the pre- and posttreatment visual acuities, and other clinical findings. The results were analyzed by the French INSEE (National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies). Main Outcome Measures. Mean change of visual acuity and mean number of treatments performed. Results. The change in visual acuity over time in response to each treatment was plotted in second order polynomial regression trend lines. Intravitreal triamcinolone monotherapy resulted in some improvement in vision. Treatment with threshold or subthreshold grid laser also resulted in minimal vision gain. Anti-VEGF therapy resulted in more significant visual improvement. Treatment with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling alone resulted in an improvement in vision greater than that observed with anti-VEGF injection alone. In our DME study, treatment with vitrectomy and ILM peeling alone resulted in the better visual improvement compared to other therapies.