National study of discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy among veterans

The 1-Year Treatment Course of New Opioid Recipients in Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND

Understanding opioid prescribing trends requires differentiating clinically distinct short- and long-term receipt patterns.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the one-year course of opioid receipt among new opioid recipients and determine the proportion with subsequent long-term opioid therapy. Discern variation in proportion with long-term therapy initiation by geographic region and across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical centers.

METHODS

Longitudinal course of opioid receipt was analyzed using a cabinet supply approach. Short-term receipt was defined as index treatment episode lasting no longer than 30 days; long-term therapy as treatment episode of >90 days that began within the first 30 days following opioid index date.

PATIENTS

All VHA pharmacy users in 2004 and to 2011 who received a new prescription for an opioid (incident opioid recipients) preceded by 365 days with no opioid prescribed.

RESULTS

The proportion of all incident recipients who met the definition for long-term therapy within the first year decreased from 20.4% (N = 76,280) in 2004 to 18.3% (N = 96,166) in 2011. The proportion of incident recipients with chronic pain was unchanged between 2004 and 2011. Hydrocodone and tramadol increased as a proportion of initial opioids prescribed. Median days initially supplied decreased from 30 to 20 days. A greater percentage of new opioid prescriptions were for 7 days or fewer (20.9% in 2004; 27.9% in 2011). The proportion of new recipients who initiated long-term opioid therapy varied widely by medical center. Medical centers with higher proportions of new long-term recipients in 2004 saw greater decreases in this metric by 2011.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of new opioid recipients who initiated long-term opioid therapy declined between 2004 and 2011.

The Pattern of Opioid Management by Australian General Practice Trainees

OBJECTIVE

With escalating opioid prescribing come individual and public health harms. To inform quality improvement measures, understanding of opioid prescribing is essential. We aimed to establish consultation-level prevalence and associations of opioid prescribing.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional secondary analysis from a longitudinal multisite cohort study of general practitioner (GP) vocational trainees: "Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training."

SETTING

Four of Australia's seventeen GP Regional Training Providers, during 2010-13.

SUBJECTS

GP trainees.

METHODS

Practice and trainee demographic data were collected as well as patient, clinical and educational data of 60 consecutive consultations of each trainee, each training term. Outcome factors were any opioid analgesic prescription and initial opioid analgesic prescription for a specific problem for the first time.

RESULTS

Overall, 645 trainees participated. Opioids comprised 4.3% prescriptions provided for 3.8% of patients. Most frequently prescribed were codeine (39.9%) and oxycodone (33.4%). Prescribing was for acute pain (29.3%), palliative care (2.6%) or other indications (68.1%). Most prescribing involved repeat prescriptions for pre-existing problems (62.7% of total). Other associations included older patients; prescriber and patient male gender; Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander status; rural and disadvantaged locations; longer consultations; and generation of referrals, follow-up, and imaging requests. Opioid initiation was more likely for new patients with new problems, but otherwise associations were similar. Trainees rarely reported addiction risk-mitigation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Most opioids were prescribed as maintenance therapy for non-cancer pain. Demographic associations with opioid analgesic prescribing resemble those presenting for opioid dependency treatment. Our findings should inform measures by regulators and medical educators supporting multimodal pain management.