Safety of dose escalation by simultaneous integrated boosting radiation dose within the primary tumor guided by (18)FDG-PET/CT for esophageal cancer

Significant symptoms alleviation and tumor volume reduction after combined simultaneously integrated inner-escalated boost and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in a patient with unresectable bulky hepatocellular carcinoma: A care-compliant case report

BACKGROUND

Clinically, elderly patients with unresectable bulky hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are difficult to manage, especially in those with co-infections of hepatitis B and C virus. Herein, we reported such a case treated with radiotherapy (RT) by using combined simultaneously integrated inner-escalated boost and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (SIEB-VMAT). After RT, significant symptoms alleviation and durable tumor control were observed.

CASE SUMMARY

At presentation, an 85-year-old male patient complained abdominal distention/pain, poor appetite, and swelling over bilateral lower limbs for 1 month. On physical examination, a jaundice pattern was noted. Laboratory studies showed impaired liver and renal function. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 12.5-cm bulky tumor over the caudate lobe of the liver. Biopsy was done, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was reported histopathologically. As a result, AJCC stage IIIA (cT3aN0M0) and BCLC stage C were classified. Surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib were not recommended because of his old age, central bulky tumor, and a bleeding tendency. Thus, RT with SIEB-VMAT technique was given alternatively. RT was delivered in 26 fractions, with dose gradience as follows: 39 Gy on the outer Plan Target Volume (PTV), 52 Gy in the middle PTV, and 57.2 Gy in the inner PTV. Unexpectedly, cyproheptadine (a newly recognized potential anti-HCC agent) was retrospectively found to be prescribed for alleviating skin itching and allergic rhinitis since the last 2 weeks of the RT course (2 mg by mouth Q12h for 24 months).After RT, significant symptoms alleviation and tumor volume reduction were observed for 32 months till multiple bone metastases. Before and after RT, a large tumor volume reduction rate of 88.7% was observed (from 608.4 c.c. to 68.7 c.c.). No severe treatment toxicity was noted during and after RT. The patient died due to aspiration pneumonia with septic shock at 4 months after bone metastases identified.

CONCLUSIONS

SIEB-VMAT physically demonstrated double benefits of intratumor dose escalation and extra-tumor dose attenuation. Significant tumor regression and symptoms alleviation were observed in this elderly patient with unresectable bulky HCC. Further prospective randomized trials are encouraged to demarcate effective size of SIEB-VMAT with or without cyproheptadine.

Marker-based quantification of interfractional tumor position variation and the use of markers for setup verification in radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify interfractional esophageal tumor position variation using markers and investigate the use of markers for setup verification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five markers placed in the tumor volumes of 24 esophageal cancer patients were identified in computed tomography (CT) and follow-up cone-beam CT. For each patient we calculated pairwise distances between markers over time to evaluate geometric tumor volume variation. We then quantified marker displacements relative to bony anatomy and estimated the variation of systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ). During bony anatomy-based setup verification, we visually inspected whether the markers were inside the planning target volume (PTV) and attempted marker-based registration.

RESULTS

Minor time trends with substantial fluctuations in pairwise distances implied tissue deformation. Overall, Σ(σ) in the left-right/cranial-caudal/anterior-posterior direction was 2.9(2.4)/4.1(2.4)/2.2(1.8) mm; for the proximal stomach, it was 5.4(4.3)/4.9(3.2)/1.9(2.4) mm. After bony anatomy-based setup correction, all markers were inside the PTV. However, due to large tissue deformation, marker-based registration was not feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, the interfractional position variation of esophageal tumors is more pronounced in the cranial-caudal direction and in the proximal stomach. Currently, marker-based setup verification is not feasible for clinical routine use, but markers can facilitate the setup verification by inspecting whether the PTV covers the tumor volume adequately.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus vinorelbine versus cisplatin plus fluorouracil for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin/vinorelbine versus cisplatin/fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2012, 279 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) undergoing neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were reviewed. Through a matched case-control study, 57 patients treated with cisplatin/vinorelbine were matched 1:1 to patients who received cisplatin/fluorouracil according to age, sex, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, and pretreatment TNM stage.

RESULTS

Patient and disease-related characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 47.4% for the cisplatin/vinorelbine group and 28.1% for the cisplatin/fluorouracil group (P=0.034). Median overall survival (OS) in the cisplatin/vinorelbine group was significantly better compared with the cisplatin/fluorouracil group (52.8 vs. 25.2 months), with 3-year OS rates of 64.3% vs. 31.3%, respectively (P=0.001). However, cisplatin/vinorelbine was associated with a significantly higher rate of grade 3-4 leukopenia than cisplatin/fluorouracil (P=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that being female, age ⩾55 years, pCR after CRT, and chemotherapy with cisplatin/vinorelbine were independent positive prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin/vinorelbine might lead to a higher pCR rate and better survival outcomes than cisplatin/fluorouracil in esophageal SCC. The incidence of hematologic toxicity is increased with cisplatin/vinorelbine, but is tolerable and manageable. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this regimen.