Spontaneous ovulation versus HCG triggering for timing natural-cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized study

Methods for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Frozen-thawed (FT) embryo transfer is a procedure used for the storage and transfer of excess embryos obtained during in vitro fertilization- intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. In recent years, improvements in laboratory conditions and limitations on the number of embryos to be transferred have led to a progressive increase in FT embryo transfer cycles. However, the best solution for endometrial preparation in these cycles is still a matter of debate. In this study, we aimed to review the current methods of endometrial preparation in FT embryo transfer cycles. In light of the current literature, it is hard to determine which method is the best for endometrial preparation. It is therefore necessary to conduct randomized controlled studies in a prospective design, which will also evaluate the above-mentioned factors.

Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.

The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate two methods of endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer: modified natural and artificial cycle with GnRH-agonist pituitary suppression.

METHODS

In this prospective, controlled randomized trial, a total of 236 patients undergoing infertility treatment were randomized in 1:1 ratio; 118 received a frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer in a modified natural cycle and 118 in an artificial cycle with GnRH-agonist pituitary suppression. In the artificial protocol, GnRH-agonist combined with estradiol valerate was administered. In the natural protocol, only final oocyte maturation was induced using human chorionic gonadotropin administration. The primary end-points were the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates; the secondary end-points were the cost-benefit in terms of drug cost and the number of visits and the woman psychological distress caused by the treatment.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rates between protocols. The number of clinical and ultrasound controls and the number of laboratory dosages and venous samplings were similar in both study groups. No significant differences were found between the groups in the anxiety and depression values before the start of treatment, on the days of progesterone administration, the blastocyst transfer, and pregnancy test.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study evidence that in case of frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer, both protocols are equally effective in terms of clinical outcomes, cost-benefit, and patient compliance. The choice of endometrial preparation protocol should be based on women menstrual and ovulatory characteristics or otherwise on patient need for cycle planning.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov with number NCT02378584.

Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes for a supplemented natural cycle with a programmed cycle protocol for frozen blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of frozen autologous blastocyst transfers, at a single academic fertility center (519 supplemented natural cycles and 106 programmed cycles). Implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth and birth weight were compared using Pearson's Chi-squared test, T-test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between natural and programmed frozen embryo transfers with respect to implantation (21.9 vs. 18.1 %), clinical pregnancy (35.5 vs. 29.2 %), and live birth rates (27.7 vs. 23.6 %). Mean birth weights were also similar between natural and programmed cycles for singletons (3354 vs. 3340 g) and twins (2422 vs. 2294 g)

CONCLUSION

Frozen blastocyst embryo transfers using supplemented natural or programmed protocols experience similar success rates. Patient preference should be considered in choosing a protocol.

Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity

STUDY QUESTION

Does prolonged exposure of the endometrium to hCG, as experienced after ovulation induction in an assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycle, affect functional measures of endometrial receptivity?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Prolonged endometrial hCG exposure detrimentally affects the manner in which the endometrium can respond to hCG secreted by the blastocyst.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Prolonged hCG exposure down-regulates endometrial LH-CG receptor (LHCGR) expression in a baboon model. HCG exposure during the proliferative phase of oocyte-donation cycles and frozen embryo transfer cycles is associated with a lower pregnancy rate.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

LHCGR was examined in endometria of women undergoing ART cycles (GnRH agonist/antagonist) and across the menstrual cycle in normally cycling fertile women. To determine whether prolonged hCG exposure affects the subsequent endometrial response to hCG, endometrial epithelial cells (HES cell line and primary cultures of human endometrial epithelial cells) were exposed to a low dose of hCG (0.5-5 IU) for up to 5 days, to mimic the chronic exposure during an ART cycle, and subsequently exposed to an acute 'blastocyst mimic' dose of hCG (20 IU).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Endometrial tissues were collected at hCG + 2 (n = 37) from women undergoing ART between August 2006 and August 2008, and across the cycle from women with known fertility (n = 40). LHCGR localization and staining intensity were determined by immunohistochemistry and semi-quantitative scoring. HES cells were treated with hCG as above and analyzed for LHCGR localization (immunocytochemistry), phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 (western immunoblotting), adhesion to trophoblast-like matrices (adhesion assays) and tight junction integrity (trans-epithelial resistance assessment).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Endometrial epithelial LHCGR staining was significantly lower in women stimulated with a GnRH agonist protocol who did not become pregnant in that cycle versus the natural menstrual cycle (P < 0.05). Chronic low-dose hCG exposure in vitro mediated a down-regulation and internalization of the LHCGR in endometrial epithelial cells. Prolonged exposure to chronic low-dose hCG (3-5 days) abrogated ERK 1/2 phosphorylation, adhesion to extracellular matrices and changes in tight junction integrity in response to a subsequent acute high dose (20 IU) of hCG.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Studies using cell lines and primary cultures of cells in vitro are not fully representative of the complex endometrial milieu in vivo.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These data reinforce the clinical observations that precocious or prolonged hCG exposure may detrimentally affect endometrial receptivity and provide a mechanistic basis for these clinical findings. The data appear to support the notion that in women for whom ART has not succeeded, a different, minimally stimulated approach without exposure to exogenous hCG may improve outcomes.