Extravasation management: clinical update

Use of allogeneic platelet gel in the management of chemotherapy extravasation injuries: a case report

The allogeneic platelet (PLT) gel offers to be a valid supportive measure in the management of chemotherapy extravasation injuries. We report a case of a 58-year-old patient with multiple myeloma enrolled for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. As pretransplant therapy, the patient received induction therapy with bortezomib, adriblastina, and desametazone. A port was inserted in the vein on the back of the hand. After three cycles, the patient reported rapid development of redness, pain, and necrotic tissue in the left hand, and a diagnosis of extravasation was addressed. The patient presented a raw area on the back of the hand caused by cytotoxic/chemotherapeutic drug leakage because of the malposition of venous access devices. Skin ulcer was debrided, and the wound was reconstructed with a combination of local random rotational flap and abdomen skin graft. Two weeks later, a 20% skin flap necrosis was observed. In the context of wound healing, topical plasma-rich PLT gel is able to accelerate the regeneration and repair of tissue, so it was set out to assess PLT gel efficacy in this case. The PLT gel was applied topically once every 5 days, for a duration of 60 days on average. There were no adverse reactions observed during the topical therapy. Complete wound healing was observed after 12 PLT-rich plasma applications. No ulcer recurrence was noted in the patient during the follow-up period of 2–19 months.

Extravasation injuries: a review

Extravasation injuries are common emergencies in clinical practice. If they are not recognized and treated promptly, they can lead to deleterious functional and cosmetic outcomes. There is a vast range of agents involved in these injuries and marked paucity of evidence to support their specific management. Following an extensive literature review, we outline management principles for clinicians involved in the care of patients with extravasation injuries. Key parameters in deciding appropriate management plans include the volume/toxicity of the agent, the necrosis interval of the injury, patient-related factors, as well as the facilities and expertise available in the setting of individual cases of extravasation.

Safe management of chemotherapy: infusion-related complications

The following is a reprint from Chapter 8 in Chemotherapy and Biotherapy Guidelines and Recommendations for Practice (Fourth Edition) by Martha Polovich, PhD, RN, AOCN®, MiKaela Olsen, MS, RN, AOCNS®, and Kristine B. LeFebvre, MSN, RN, AOCN® (Eds.).

Extravasation of Noncytotoxic Drugs: A Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Extravasation is a potential complication associated with intravenous therapy administration. Inadvertent leakage of medications with vesicant properties can cause severe tissue necrosis, which can lead to devastating long-term consequences. Recognizing potential agents is an essential step in mitigating the risk of extravasation.

DATA SOURCE

A literature search was carried out using PubMed with the following key words: extravasation, soft tissue injury, phlebitis, and infiltration, from January 1961 through January 2014.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The publications were screened manually and reviewed to identify reports for medications that included synonyms of the International Nonproprietary Name, while excluding antineoplastic agents, radiographic contrast material, investigational or nonmarketed drugs, and animal data, to yield 70 articles. Furthermore, reference citations from publications were also reviewed for relevance and yielded 4 articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We discovered 232 cases of extravasation involving 37 agents (in order of frequency): phenytoin, parenteral nutrition, calcium gluconate, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, dopamine, dextrose solutions, epinephrine, sodium bicarbonate, nafcillin, propofol, norepinephrine, mannitol, arginine, promethazine, vancomycin, tetracycline, dobutamine, vasopressin, sodium thiopental, acyclovir, amphotericin, ampicillin, cloxacillin, gentamicin, metronidazole, oxacillin, penicillin, amiodarone, albumin, furosemide, lipids, lorazepam, immunoglobulin, morphine, and sodium valproate. Potential properties contributing to extravasation include the following: pH, osmolarity, diluent, vasoactive properties, and inactive ingredients. Antidotes and supportive care agents used in the management of these cases of extravasation include hyaluronidase, phentolamine, terbutaline, topical anesthetics (such as lidocaine and prilocaine cream), topical antimicrobials (such as silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine), topical debridement agents (collagenase ointment), topical steroids, and topical vasodilators (nitroglycerin).

CONCLUSION

Data on the management of noncytotoxic extravasations is sparse, consisting primarily of case reports and anecdotal evidence. Fortunately, this adverse outcome is preventable and identification of vesicant agents plays a pivotal role. The intent of this review is to provide a reference identifying noncytotoxic vesicants and the management of extravasations associated with specific agents.

Incidence, risk factors and treatment outcomes of extravasation of cytotoxic agents in an outpatient chemotherapy clinic

OBJECTIVE

Extravasation, the accidental leakage of an anticancer agent from a vessel into the surrounding tissues, can lead to irreversible local injuries and severe disability. Despite its considerable clinical importance, evidence-based information on extravasation in chemotherapy is lacking. This study characterized the clinical features of extravasation and identified issues to be resolved in current cancer chemotherapy performed in outpatient settings.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who received chemotherapy and sustained extravasation in our Outpatient Chemotherapy Clinic from April 2007 to August 2012. Chemotherapy administration and extravasation management procedures were standardized using the in-house chemotherapy guideline.

RESULTS

Among 43 557 patients who received chemotherapy, 35 (0.08%) experienced extravasation. The duration between the start of infusion and extravasation was >2 h in 28 (80.0%) patients. The severity of extravasation was Grades 1, 2 and 3 in 28, 2 and 5 patients, respectively-three of whom were associated with port trouble. The contributing factor for extravasation was walking in 11 (31.4%) patients. All extravasations were cured without surgical intervention by management according to our guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of extravasation is as low as 0.08%, using our in-house chemotherapy guideline. Extravasation from implanted ports tends to be severe.

Hyaluronidase for treatment of intravenous extravasations: implementation of an evidence-based guideline in a pediatric population

PURPOSE

To describe the implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based guideline, Hyaluronidase for Treatment of IV Extravasations, in a pediatric population.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence of hyaluronidase efficacy suggests that timely administration will decrease the severity of tissue damage caused by extravasations, and result in cost savings. Implementation of this guideline increased user knowledge, incident reporting, and initiation of treatment, and decreased the average time to treatment administration.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Implementation strategies facilitate integration and sustained use of evidence-based treatments in clinical practice. Processes that promote evidence-based treatment are expected to improve outcomes and are therefore an important component of evaluation.

Update on immununosuppressive therapies for dogs and cats

Treatment of immune-mediated disease in dogs and cats continues to evolve as new therapies are introduced or adapted from human medicine. Glucocorticoids remain the first-line therapy for many of the immune-mediated or inflammatory diseases of cats and dogs. The focus of this article is to provide an update on some of the common immunosuppressive therapies used in small animal veterinary medicine. The goals of therapy are to induce disease remission through the inhibition of inflammation and the modulation of lymphocyte function.

Dexrazoxane efficacy for anthracycline extravasation: use in UK clinical practice

Extravasation is recognised as a major complication of administering intravenous chemotherapy treatment. Of the agents involved in extravasation, anthracyclines are associated with the greatest risk to patients because they are vesicant agents, having the potential to cause blistering and ulceration. If not identified and left untreated, anthracycline extravasation can lead to more serious complications such as tissue necrosis and functional impairment. Dexrazoxane (Savene(®) ) is the only licensed antidote for the treatment of anthracycline extravasation and clinical evidence has shown Savene(®) to be highly effective for preventing the need for surgery following anthracycline extravasation, allowing full recovery in the majority of patients. To date, there have been eight published studies reporting a total of 102 cases of Savene(®) use. Here, we review the published data on the efficacy of Savene(®) and present an analysis of 12 UK case studies. All UK oncology centres where Savene(®) has been used to manage anthracycline extravasation were contacted by SpePharm UK, who requested case studies for this publication. All of the cases received, including two from our own experience of using Savene(®) have been included in the analysis.

Management of cytotoxic extravasation - ASORS expert opinion for diagnosis, prevention and treatment

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic extravasation is a rare but potentially serious and painful complication of intravenous drug administration in oncology. Literature is anecdotal, and systematic clinical trials are scarce. The German working group for Supportive Care in Cancer (ASORS) has prepared an expert opinion for the diagnosis, prophylaxis and management of cytotoxic extravasation based on an interdisciplinary expert panel.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Pubmed search was conducted for diagnosis, risk factors, symptoms, prophylaxis, and treatment of extravasation by the respective responsible expert. A writing committee compiled the manuscript and proposed the level of recommendation. In a consensus meeting, 13 experts reviewed and discussed the current practice in diagnosis and management of cytotoxic extravasation. In a telephone voting among the experts, the level of recommendation by ASORS was determined.

RESULTS

Every effort should be made to reduce the risk of extravasation. Staff training, patient education, usage of right materials and infusion techniques have been identified to be mandatory to minimalize the risk of extravasation. Extravasation must be diagnosed as soon as possible, and specific therapy including antidotes dependent on the extravasated drug should be initiated immediately. An extravasation emergency set should be available wherever intravenous cytotoxics are applied. Documentation and post-treatment follow-up are recommended.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a literature- and expert-based consensus recommendation to avoid cytotoxic extravasation. It also provides practical management instructions which should help to avoid surgery and serious late effects.

Medication wrong route administration: a poisons center-based study

OBJECTIVES

To describe clinical effects, circumstances of occurrence, management and outcomes of cases of inadvertent administration of medications by an incorrect parenteral route.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center consecutive review of parenteral route errors of medications, reported to our center between January 2006 and June 2010. We collected demographic data and information on medications, route and time of administration, severity of symptoms/signs, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight cases (68 adults, 10 children) were available for analysis. The following wrong administration routes were recorded: paravenous (51%), intravenous (33%), subcutaneous (8%), and others (8%). Medications most frequently involved were iodinated x-ray contrast media (11%) and iron infusions (9%). Twenty-eight percent of the patients were asymptomatic and 54% showed mild symptoms; moderate and severe symptoms were observed in 9% and 7.7%, respectively, and were mostly due to intravenous administration errors. There was no fatal outcome. In most symptomatic cases local nonspecific treatment was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Enquiries concerning administration of medicines by an incorrect parenteral route were rare, and mainly involved iodinated x-ray contrast media and iron infusions. Most events occurred in adults and showed a benign clinical course. Although the majority of exposures concerned the paravenous route, the occasional severe cases were observed mainly after inadvertent intravenous administration.

The efficacy of saline washout technique in the management of exfoliant and vesicant chemotherapy extravasation: a historical case series report

This report presents the results from a historical case series of cytotoxic drug extravasations managed by saline washout; its purpose is to assess the efficacy of the procedure based on patient outcome. Eighty-nine patients were identified as having experienced a vesicant or exfoliant extravasation from incident reports filed over a 10-year period, from 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2011. Outcome was measured against the need for further surgical treatment being required. Of the 89 cases assessed for efficacy of saline washout one patient experienced a wound infection, which was treated effectively with oral antibiotics. There were no other complications reported and no patients required further treatment with surgical debridement. The majority of patients had no deferral of treatment as chemotherapy could be continued in their unaffected arm immediately following saline washout procedure. For patients where cannulation in their opposite arm for continuation of treatment was not advisable chemotherapy was delayed between 3 and 7 days. Hospitalisation as a result of the extravasation or subsequent treatment was not required in any of the 89 cases. Results indicate that saline washout technique is a safe and effective management strategy for the treatment of both vesicant and exfoliant chemotherapy extravasation.

Challenging the distal-to-proximal cannulation technique for administration of anticancer therapies: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Distal-to-proximal technique has been recommended for anticancer therapy administration. There is no evidence to suggest that a 24-hour delay of treatment is necessary for patients with a previous venous puncture proximal to the administration site.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify if the practice of 24-hour delay between a venous puncture and subsequent cannulation for anticancer therapies at a distal site is necessary for preventing extravasation.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted with 72 outpatients receiving anticancer therapy via an administration site distal to at least 1 previous venous puncture on the same arm in a tertiary cancer center in Australia. Participants were interviewed and assessed at baseline data before treatment and on day 7 for incidence of extravasation/phlebitis.

RESULTS

Of 72 participants with 99 occasions of treatment, there was 1 incident of infiltration (possible extravasation) at the venous puncture site proximal to the administration site and 2 incidents of phlebitis at the administration site.

CONCLUSION

A 24-hour delay is unnecessary if an alternative vein can be accessed for anticancer therapy after a proximal venous puncture.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Infiltration can occur at a venous puncture site proximal to an administration site in the same vein. However, the nurse can administer anticancer therapy at a distal site if the nurse can confidently determine that the vein of choice is not in any way connected to the previous puncture site through visual inspection and palpation.

Extravasation of antineoplastic agents: prevention and treatments

The extravasation of antineoplastic agents is an unwanted and distressing situation that can easily occur. It may cause severe and irreversible local injuries. Left untreated, vesicant chemotherapy extravasation can potentially cause tissue necrosis, functional impairment and permanent disfigurement. This article provides a review of current literature regarding recommendations on the prevention and treatment of extravasation of antineoplastic agents.

Extravasation injuries

Extravasation injuries occur under a wide variety of circumstances in the inpatient setting. Prevention remains the ideal treatment for these iatrogenic injuries. When extravasation injuries do occur, they must be diagnosed and treated promptly to minimize the amount of soft tissue injury. Initial management is similar among vesicant extravasates. Although evidence is limited to guide management for specific extravasates, it is paramount to be aware of the described treatments and principles.

The ongoing challenges with renal vascular access

Renal vascular access is pivotal in the care of the haemodialysis patient; however, it remains a significant challenge to maintain vascular access in the dialysis population. There are a number of renal vascular accesses in use: arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter, with the arteriovenous fistula being the ideal choice. Poor vascular access can lead to serious consequences for patients, resulting in morbidity and even mortality. There are also significant cost implications for healthcare providers in terms of hospital admissions, and other associated costs for patients who are admitted late for vascular access referral or as a result of associated complications of vascular access. The nurse and other members of the healthcare team are fundamental in the management of a patient's renal vascular access.