Intrapulse temporality between pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F 2α and circulating concentrations of progesterone before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis in heifers

Induction of PGFM pulses and luteolysis by sequential estradiol-17β treatments in heifers

The effects of sequential induction of PGFM pulses by estradiol-17β (E2) on prominence of PGFM pulses and progesterone (P4) concentration were studied in heifers. Three treatments of vehicle (n = 12) or E2 (n = 12) at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg were given at 12-h intervals beginning on Day 15 postovulation. Blood samples were collected every 12 h from Days 13-24 and hourly for 12 h after the first and third treatments. On Day 15, all heifers were in preluteolysis and on Day 16 were in preluteolysis in the vehicle-treated heifers (n = 11) and either preluteolysis (n = 4) or luteolysis (n = 8) in the E2-treated heifers. Peak concentration of induced PGFM pulses during preluteolysis on Day 15 was greater (P < 0.04) than for pulses during preluteolysis on Day 16. The interval from ovulation to the beginning of luteolysis was shorter (P < 0.04) in the E2-treated heifers than in the vehicle-treated heifers. An E2-induced PGFM pulse was less prominent (P < 0.008) in heifers in temporal association with a transient resurgence in P4 than in heifers with a progressive P4 decrease. The hypothesis that repeated E2 exposure stimulates increasing prominence of PGFM pulses was not supported. Instead, repeated exposure reduced the prominence of PGFM pulses, in contrast to the stimulation from the first E2 treatment. Reduced prominence of a PGF(2α) pulse during luteolysis can lead to a transient resurgence in P4 concentration.

Luteolysis and associated interrelationships among circulating PGF2α, progesterone, LH, and estradiol in mares

The changing concentrations and temporal relationships among a PGF2α metabolite (PGFM), progesterone (P(4)), LH, and estradiol-17β (E(2)) before, during, and after luteolysis were studied in 10 mares. Blood samples were collected every hour for ≥4 d beginning on day 12 after ovulation. The luteolytic period extended from a decrease in P(4) at a common transitional hour (Hour 0) at the end of preluteolysis and beginning of luteolysis to a defined ending when P(4) reached 1 ng/mL. The length of luteolysis was 22.9 ± 0.9 h, contrasting with 2 d in published P(4) profiles from sampling every 6 to 24 h. In mares with complete data for Hours -40 to -2 (n = 6), PGFM concentrations remained below assay sensitivity (n = 2) or two or three small pulses (peak, 29 ± 4 pg/mL) occurred. During luteolysis, the pulses became more prominent (peak, 193 ± 36 pg/mL). Rhythmicity of PGFM pulses was not detected by a pulsatility program during preluteolysis but was detected in seven of nine mares during luteolysis and postluteolysis combined. The nadir-to-nadir interval for LH pulses and the peak-to-peak interval between adjacent pulses were longer (P < 0.05) during preluteolysis than during luteolysis (nadir to nadir, 5.2 ± 0.3 h vs 3.6 ± 0.4 h; peak to peak, 9.4 ± 1.0 h vs 4.7 ± 0.5 h). Unlike reported findings in cattle, concentrations of P(4) decreased linearly within the hours of each PGFM pulse during luteolysis, and a positive effect of an LH pulse on P(4) and E(2) concentration was not detected. The reported balancing of P(4) concentrations between a negative effect of PGF2α and a positive effect of LH in heifers was not detected in mares.

Effect of dose of estradiol-17β on prominence of an induced 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2α) (PGFM) pulse and relationship of prominence to progesterone, LH, and luteal blood flow in heifers

Various doses of estradiol-17β (E(2)) were used in heifers to induce a pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2α) (PGFM). The effect of E(2) concentration on the prominence of PGFM pulses and the relationship between prominence and intrapulse concentration of progesterone (P(4)), LH, and luteal blood flow were studied. A single dose of 0 (vehicle), 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1 mg of E(2) was given (n = six/group) 14 d after ovulation. Blood samples were collected, and luteal blood flow was evaluated hourly for 10 h after the treatment. The 0.05-mg dose increased and the 0.1-mg dose further increased the prominence of the induced PGFM pulse, compared with the 0.0-mg dose and the 0.01-mg dose. The PGFM pulses were subdivided into three different prominence categories (<50, 50 to 150, and >150 pg/mL at the peak). In the 50 to 150 category, P(4) concentration increased (P < 0.05) between -2 h and 0 h (0 h = peak of PGFM pulse). In the >150 category, P(4) decreased (P < 0.05) between -1 h and 0 h, LH increased (P < 0.05) at 1 h, and luteal blood flow apparently decreased (P < 0.05) at 2 h of the PGFM pulse. The novel results supported the following hypotheses: (1) an increase in E(2) concentration increases the prominence of a PGFM pulse, and (2) greater prominence of a PGFM pulse is associated with a greater transient intrapulse depression of P(4) at the peak of the PGFM pulse. In addition, the extent of the effect of prostaglandin F(2α) on the increase in LH and changes in blood flow within the hours of a PGFM pulse was related positively to the prominence of the PGFM pulse.

Effect of luteinizing hormone oscillations on progesterone concentrations based on treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in heifers

Close temporality has been reported between the episodic secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (P4) during the midluteal phase and preceding the beginning of luteolysis in cattle. In the present studies, the relationship between LH and P4 was examined by blocking LH oscillations with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, acyline. In a titration study, the minimal single acyline dose for blocking LH oscillations in heifers was 3 μg/kg. The main experiment compared LH and P4 concentrations and oscillations between a group treated with acyline on day 15 after ovulation (n = 8) and a control group (n = 4). Concentrations of P4 in blood samples collected every 8 h on days 13 to 18 indicated that acyline treatment did not alter the time that luteolysis began or the length of the luteolytic process. In blood samples collected every hour for 24 h beginning at the hour of treatment, acyline reduced the LH concentrations and blocked LH oscillations. The hourly LH means were 0.06 to 0.08 ng/mL, comparable to the mean concentration at the nadirs of LH oscillations in controls (0.07 ng/mL). During the hourly sampling, the GnRH antagonist produced the following P4 responses: (1) lower P4 concentrations, (2) fewer and reduced prominence of P4 oscillations, and (3) increased length and variability in the interval between the peaks of P4 oscillations. Results indicated that LH oscillations affect both the prominence and the rhythmicity of P4 oscillations during preluteolysis but not the onset and length of luteolysis.

Concomitance of luteinizing hormone and progesterone oscillations during the transition from preluteolysis to luteolysis in cattle

The temporal relationships of episodes of luteinizing hormone (LH) oscillations, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2α (PGFM) pulses, and progesterone (P4) fluctuations during the latter portion of preluteolysis and the early portion of luteolysis were characterized. In Experiment 1, the detection of LH episodes in blood samples collected every 15 min for 8 h was compared with detection in the samples collected every hour in 4 heifers. The number of independently detected episodes/heifer (total = 7) was the same for the 15-min and hourly collection intervals. In Experiment 2, blood samples were collected every hour (n = 7 heifers) and retrospectively assigned to 15 h before and 15 h after the transitional hour between preluteolysis and luteolysis. During preluteolysis, compared with luteolysis, the amplitude of LH oscillations was greater (0.28 ± 0.03 vs 0.18 ± 0.03 ng/mL; P < 0.02) and the interval between peaks of LH oscillations was shorter (3.3 ± 0.3 h vs 4.3 ± 0.6 h; P < 0.04). The LH peaks occurred at the same hour as the peak of a P4 fluctuation in 77% and 29% of LH oscillations (P < 0.0009) during preluteolysis and luteolysis, respectively. In preluteolysis, synchrony between LH and P4 episodes occurred consistently during the P4 rebound after the peak of a PGFM pulse. In luteolysis, the LH peak preceded the peak of the P4 rebound. On a temporal basis, the hypothesis was supported that episodic LH accounts, at least in part, for the reported P4 rebound that occurs after the P4 suppression at the peak of a PGFM pulse.