The Innsbruck Hand Transplant Program: Update at 8 Years After the First Transplant

Traumatic and trauma-related amputations: Part II: Upper extremity and future directions

Trauma is the most common reason for amputation of the upper extremity. The morphologic and functional distinctions between the upper and lower extremities render the surgical techniques and decision-making different in many key respects. Acceptance of the prosthesis and the outcomes are improved by performing a transradial rather than a more proximal amputation. Substantial efforts, including free tissue transfers when necessary, should be made to salvage the elbow. Careful management of the peripheral nerves is critical to minimize painful neuroma formation while preserving options for possible future utilization in targeted muscle reinnervation and use of a myoelectric prosthesis. Rapid developments with targeted muscle reinnervation, myoelectric prostheses, and composite tissue allotransplantation may dramatically alter surgical treatment algorithms in the near future for patients with severe upper-extremity trauma.

[The reconstructive sequence in the 21st century. A reconstructive clockwork]

Mathes and Nahai introduced the conventional reconstructive ladder in 1982 to address tissue defects starting with primary and secondary closure of wounds followed by autologous skin grafting. Regional and local pedicled flaps, tissue expansion and free tissue transfer were further steps. Despite enormous achievements and refinements in these techniques, clinical situations and problems occur beyond the scope of these conventional reconstructive measures. Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) of partial faces or of unilateral or bilateral forearms and upper arms, are a novel part of transplantation medicine. The initially reported clinical results are encouraging, especially in light of the initial clinical reports of organ transplantation. However, short and long term problems such as potential tumor induction by immunosuppression and chronic rejection must be taken into consideration. Given the fact that patients receiving CTA have already undergone various reconstructive procedures before, patients often gain tremendous improvement in the quality of life. Robots such as the Da Vinci system for surgeons and the Penelope assistant robot have found their way into the surgical routine. While even microsurgical anastomosis has been accomplished using the Da Vinci system, the total amount of time and resources spent is beyond being practical at present. Regeneration and tissue engineering are of distinct interest in reconstructive surgery. Adipose-derived stem cell transfer is able not only to improve contour defects by volume effects, but also to improve the quality of the overlying skin. Therefore we would propose that these novel techniques, CTA, robotics, regeneration and tissue engineering should be considered as potential future integral cogs in the reconstructive mechanism for the 21st century with the patient being at the centre of the reconstructive efforts.