Psychiatric side effects and antiepileptic drugs: Observations from prospective audits

Epileptological aspects of juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (CLN3 disease) through the lifespan

PURPOSE

Juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (CLN3 disease) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder in childhood with survival until young adult age. Visual loss is followed by epilepsy, cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor symptoms. We have studied the evolution of electroencephalographic (EEG) and seizure characteristics.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were recruited via the Norwegian CLN3 disease parent association. Parents were interviewed. Medical records and EEG reports/recordings were collected. Electroencephalographic elements were classified according to Standardized computer-based organized reporting of EEG (SCORE). The evolution of EEG features along with seizure types was assessed by testing the difference in proportions with standardized normal deviate comparing findings below and above 15 years of age.

RESULTS

Mean age at study or death (n = 12) was 21.2 (10-39) years. Twenty-two patients had experienced seizures; the first was usually bilateral tonic-clonic (TC). Later, focal motor seizures frequently occurred, often with increasing multifocal and polymorphic features. Paroxysmal nonepileptic motor and autonomous symptoms were also suspected in several patients. Distinct myoclonic seizures were uncommon. In four patients, we identified episodes of bradycardia/sinus arrest. Electroencephalography showed progressive slowing of the background activity (p = 0.029). Focal epileptiform discharges were rare and mainly seen at age <10. Combined multifocal and bilateral epileptiform discharges increased in adolescence (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Seizure and EEG characteristics change with time in CLN3 disease. Tonic-clonic seizures are common at onset, and multifocal motor seizures increase with age. In contrast, focal epileptiform abnormalities are more common in childhood, compared to later multifocal and bilateral discharges. This seizure disorder belongs to the combined generalized and focal epilepsies. Paucity of myoclonic seizures does not warrant classification as a classic progressive myoclonic epilepsy. When attacks with only behavior arrest occur, cardiac conduction abnormalities should be considered.

Maternal epilepsy and behavioral development of the child: Family factors do matter

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to examine whether mothers with epilepsy experience family problems and to investigate the possible mediating role of distinct family factors in the relationship between maternal epilepsy and child behavioral problems, in which it is also investigated whether more proximal family factors mediate the more distal family factors.

METHODS

In an observational study, with children identified from the European Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy database in the Netherlands (EURAP-NL), parents completed questionnaires on maternal epilepsy, family factors (proximal, distal, contextual, global), and child behavior. Hierarchical multilevel regression analyses were performed to examine the relative contribution of epilepsy-related and family factors on child internalizing and externalizing problems.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and March 2018, the questionnaires were completed for 175 children. Mothers with epilepsy showed significantly more parenting stress and problems with parenting than mothers from the general population. Family factors were significantly associated with child behavioral problems. For internalizing problems, maternal epilepsy, global, contextual, and distal family factors were each found to have significant added value. Distal family factors contributed most to internalizing problems and showed a mediating role for epilepsy-related factors and previous added family factors in the model. Global, contextual, distal, and proximal factors were all found to be significant contributors to externalizing problems, with the factor most proximal to the child (quality of parent-child interaction) showing the largest effect.

DISCUSSION

Including family factors in research regarding children of mothers with epilepsy is important as they can have a contribution additional to the teratogenic risks of prenatal exposure to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Family factors, in particular distal and proximal family factors, can weaken or strengthen child development and may provide starting points for interventions.

Effect of brivaracetam on the anger levels of epilepsy patients. A prospective open-labelled controlled study

PURPOSE

The rate of brivaracetam-related behavioural adverse events is a current focus of discussion. This study aims to assess the effect of brivaracetam on anger levels in patients with epilepsy, adjusted by mood symptoms, history of psychiatric disorders and seizure response.

METHOD

Prospective analysis of 37 patients assessed for anger levels (STAXI-2), depression-anxiety (HADS) and quality of life (QOLIE-10) before adjunctive brivaracetam treatment and reassessed 3-6 months later. A control group following the same protocol of assessment was used for 1:1 comparison. A high percentage of mood stabilisers were included in this control group.

RESULTS

Brivaracetam was indicated for patients including focal onset (79%) and generalised epilepsies (21%). Nearly 60% of responders and no psychiatric adverse events were found. This was similar to controls. The overall results revealed that brivaracetam was assoiciated with better in anger levels, mood scores and quality of life at baseline. Prior use of levetiracetam or the presence of a psychiatric background did not influence the results. However, improvements in anger levels were seen in the brivaracetam responders.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that brivaracetam is not associated with an increased level of anger in patients with either focal or generalised epilepsies in the absence of psychiatric comorbidity. However, an improvement in anger levels is possibly influenced by a good seizure response.

Developments in depression in epilepsy: screening, diagnosis, and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Depression is one of the most frequent comorbidities in epilepsy affecting between 17% and 22% of patients, but it is still underdiagnosed and undertreated. Areas covered: This paper discusses recent advances about screening, diagnosis, and treatment of depression in epilepsy taking into account the heterogeneity of clinical scenarios where depression can occur. Expert opinion: A number of screening instruments are now validated for adults with epilepsy, and their psychometric properties are discussed but the NDDI-E is the most practical and cost-effective. Challenges in diagnosing depression in epilepsy are discussed including reasons for the atypical features of mood disorders in epilepsy. Psychological treatments and/or SSRIs are indicated, but the level of evidence is still low. Even if there is no reason to hypothesise that internationally accepted guidelines of treatment of depression outside epilepsy may not be valid, rigorous studies are needed in order to have proper outcome measures. Epilepsy centers should have well-defined care pathways for depression in order to provide access to mental health support when needed.

The neurology-psychiatry interface in epilepsy

Epilepsy and mental illness have a bidirectional association. Psychiatrists are likely to encounter epilepsy as comorbidity. Seizures may present as mental illness. Equally, the management of psychiatric conditions has the potential to destabilise epilepsy. There is a need for structured epilepsy awareness and training amongst psychiatrists. This paper outlines key considerations around diagnosis, treatment and risk while suggesting practical recommendations.

Levetiracetam for epilepsy: an evidence map of efficacy, safety and economic profiles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and economics of levetiracetam (LEV) for epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, OpenGrey.eu and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for systematic reviews (SRs), meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports and economic studies published from January 2007 to April 2018. We used a bubble plot to graphically display information of included studies and conducted meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 14,803 records were obtained. We included 30 SRs/meta-analyses, 34 RCTs, 18 observational studies, 58 case reports and 2 economic studies after the screening process. The included SRs enrolled patients with pediatric epilepsy, epilepsy in pregnancy, focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy and refractory focal epilepsy. Meta-analysis of the included RCTs indicated that LEV was as effective as carbamazepine (CBZ; treatment for 6 months: 58.9% vs 64.8%, OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.50-1.16; 12 months: 54.9% vs 55.5%, OR=1.24, 95% CI: 0.79-1.93), oxcarbazepine (57.7% vs 59.8%, OR=1.34, 95% CI: 0.34-5.23), phenobarbital (50.0% vs 50.9%, OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.51-2.82) and lamotrigine (LTG; 61.5% vs 57.7%, OR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.90-1.66). SRs and observational studies indicated a low malformation rate and intrauterine death rate for pregnant women, as well as low risk of cognitive side effects. But psychiatric and behavioral side effects could not be ruled out. LEV decreased discontinuation due to adverse events compared with CBZ (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.65), while no difference was found when LEV was compared with placebo and LTG. Two cost-effectiveness evaluations for refractory epilepsy with decision-tree model showed US$ 76.18 per seizure-free day gained in Canada and US$ 44 per seizure-free day gained in Korea.

CONCLUSION

LEV is as effective as CBZ, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital and LTG and has an advantage for pregnant women and in cognitive functions. Limited evidence supports its cost-effectiveness.

REGISTERED NUMBER

PROSPERO (No CRD 42017069367).

Mechanisms Underlying Aggressive Behavior Induced by Antiepileptic Drugs: Focus on Topiramate, Levetiracetam, and Perampanel

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are effective against seizures, but their use is often limited by adverse effects, among them psychiatric and behavioral ones including aggressive behavior (AB). Knowledge of the incidence, risk factors, and the underlying mechanisms of AB induced by AEDs may help to facilitate management and reduce the risk of such side effects. The exact incidence of AB as an adverse effect of AEDs is difficult to estimate, but frequencies up to 16% have been reported. Primarily, levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), which have diverse mechanisms of action, have been associated with AB. Currently, there is no evidence for a specific pharmacological mechanism solely explaining the increased incidence of AB with LEV, PER, and TPM. Serotonin (5-HT) and GABA, and particularly glutamate (via the AMPA receptor), seem to play key roles. Other mechanisms involve hormones, epigenetics, and “alternative psychosis” and related phenomena. Increased individual susceptibility due to an underlying neurological and/or a mental health disorder may further explain why people with epilepsy are at an increased risk of AB when using AEDs. Remarkably, AB may occur with a delay of weeks or months after start of treatment. Information to patients, relatives, and caregivers, as well as sufficient clinical follow-up, is crucial, and there is a need for further research to understand the complex relationship between AED mechanisms of action and the induction/worsening of AB.

Adjunctive lacosamide treatment for adult focal-onset epilepsy: focus on comorbid intellectual/developmental disorders and differing responses

Background

Data regarding lacosamide treatment as an adjunctive therapy in patients representative of a focal-onset epilepsy population including those with and without intellectual/developmental disorders (IDDs) are limited.

Purpose

To evaluate the retention rates of lacosamide in focal-onset epilepsy patients with and without IDD.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive electronic and paper medical records of patients diagnosed with focal-onset epilepsy who were treated with lacosamide in two tertiary epilepsy centers.

Results

One hundred and thirty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria were studied. Number of patients with IDD was 46 (33.8%). Median lacosamide dose was 300 mg/day. A total of 39 patients (28.7%) experienced side effects, and 22 of them (16.2%) discontinued lacosamide. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year retention rates of lacosamide in patients with IDD were 68%, 62%, and 53%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the retention rates were significantly lower in patients with IDD when compared to patients without IDD (P=0.04). Cox regression analysis showed that concomitant use of sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was the only independent predictor of retention rate of lacosamide treatment (P=0.03). In the subgroup of patients with IDD, the analysis was performed again and the number of background AEDs was the only predictor for the retention rate of lacosamide (P=0.04).

Conclusion

When compared to patients without IDD, retention rates of lacosamide adjunctive therapy were lower in patients with IDD. However, these rates were higher than the rates suggested with previously registered AEDs including lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therefore, irrespective of having comorbid IDD, we might suggest that lacosamide is a well-retained drug with a high efficacy profile in patients with focal-onset epilepsy.

Safety Profile of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Add-On Therapy in Adults with Refractory Focal-Onset Seizures: From Clinical Studies to 6 Years of Post-Marketing Experience

INTRODUCTION

Eslicarbazepine acetate was first approved in the European Union in 2009 as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the safety profile of eslicarbazepine acetate analyzing the data from several clinical studies to 6 years of post-marketing surveillance.

METHODS

We used a post-hoc pooled safety analysis of four phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies (BIA-2093-301, -302, -303, -304) of eslicarbazepine acetate as add-on therapy in adults. Safety data of eslicarbazepine acetate in special populations of patients aged ≥65 years with partial-onset seizures (BIA-2093-401) and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (BIA-2093-111) and renal impairment (BIA-2093-112) are also considered. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and serious adverse events were analyzed. The global safety database of eslicarbazepine acetate was analyzed for all cases from post-marketing surveillance from 1 October, 2009 to 21 October, 2015.

RESULTS

From a pooled analysis of four phase III studies, it was concluded that the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse drug reactions were dose dependent. Dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10% of patients) and the majority were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No dose-dependent trend was observed for serious adverse events and individual serious adverse events were reported in less than 1% of patients. Hyponatremia was classified as a possibly related treatment-emergent adverse event in phase III studies (1.2%); however, after 6 years of post-marketing surveillance it represents the most frequently (10.2%) reported adverse drug reaction, with more than half of these cases occurring with eslicarbazepine acetate at daily doses of 1200 mg. Other adverse drug reactions reported in post-marketing surveillance are seizure (5.8%), dizziness (4.1%), rash (2.6%), and fatigue (2.1%). The safety profile of eslicarbazepine acetate in renal and hepatic impairment subjects (phase I studies) and in elderly patients (phase III study) did not raise any specific concern.

CONCLUSION

After 6 years of post-marketing surveillance, eslicarbazepine acetate maintains a similar safety profile to that observed in pivotal clinical studies.

Characteristics of Children Hospitalized for Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures Due to Conversion Disorder Versus Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are a manifestation of conversion disorder among children but can be difficult to distinguish from epilepsy. We sought to identify characteristics that differentiate children with PNES from those with epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children admitted with epilepsy or PNES to 45 children's hospitals from 2004 to 2014. Children with PNES (n = 399) versus those with epilepsy (n = 13 241) were compared on demographic and clinical characteristics, testing, treatment, and health care use. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with PNES diagnosis.

RESULTS

Children with PNES were more likely to be female (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.0), older (aOR 3.8; 95% CI 2.7-5.3 for 14-16 years old), African American (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5-2.7), and have diagnosis codes for psychiatric disorders (aOR 7.1; 95% CI 5.6-9.1) and pain (aOR 2.6; 95% CI 1.9-3.4). They were also more likely to be admitted in the fall (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.8) or spring (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.6) versus summer. Total adjusted hospitalization costs were greater for children with epilepsy ($4724, 95% CI $4413-$5057 vs $5326, 95% CI $5259-$5393; P = .001); length of stay was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic and clinical characteristics differed among children with PNES versus those with epilepsy, including significantly increased odds of psychiatric and pain diagnoses among children with PNES. To better inform treatment and prognostication for children with PNES, research is needed to understand reasons for these differences, seasonal admission patterns, and the relationship between PNES and other psychiatric disorders.

Health-related quality of life in patients with poststroke epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Lesional epilepsy is an important long-term sequela of stroke. Data on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with poststroke epilepsy are limited. We investigated HrQoL in patients with epilepsy after ischemic stroke and identified independent HrQoL-determinants.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

All patients with acute ischemic stroke, who were permanent residents in the district Marburg-Biedenkopf (Hessia, Germany, reference population 240,000 inhabitants) were recruited within 12months in the population-based Marburg Stroke Register (MARSTREG). Follow-up visits were performed after 6, 12, and 24months, and patients who developed poststroke epilepsy were identified. Data on demographics, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), stroke severity (National Institute of Heath Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel-Index, modified Rankin Scale), depression (Geriatric Depression Scale), and HrQoL (EQ-5D and EQ VAS) were collected. A multiple regression analysis was performed to identify HrQoL-determinants.

RESULTS

Among the study participants (n=374), 23 (6.1%) developed poststroke epilepsy. The HrQoL of patients with poststroke epilepsy was reduced in comparison with patients without seizures (24-month follow-up: EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EuroQol-VAS): 55.3±10.7 versus 64.2±11.4, p=0.03). Seizure frequency, depression, and functional impairment (Barthel-Index) were identified as independent determinants of HrQoL. The adjustment of AEDs between 6-month and 24-month follow-ups resulted in decrease of seizure frequency by 40% and reduction of complications (dizziness by 27.8%, nausea by 52.2%, fatigue by 84.2%).

CONCLUSION

Lesional epilepsy is associated with decreased HrQoL in patients with stroke. We identified HrQoL-determinants, which would improve the management of patients with poststroke epilepsy. These determinants include proper adjustment of AEDs with reduction of seizure frequency, treatment of depression, and focused rehabilitation programs for poststroke epilepsy.

Eslicarbazepine acetate as a replacement for levetiracetam in people with epilepsy developing behavioral adverse events

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are a major cause of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a recognized first-line AED with good seizure outcomes but recognized with PBSEs. Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is considered to function similarly to an active metabolite of the commonly used carbamazepine (CBZ). Carbamazepine is used as psychotropic medication to assist in various psychiatric illnesses such as mood disorders, aggression, and anxiety.

AIM

The aim was to evaluate the psychiatric profile of ESL in people who had LEV withdrawn due to PBSEs in routine clinical practice to see if ESL can be used as a possible alternative to LEV.

METHODS

A retrospective observational review was conducted in two UK epilepsy centers looking at all cases exposed to ESL since its licensing in 2010. The ESL group was all patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy who developed intolerable PBSEs to LEV, subsequently trialed on ESL. The ESL group was matched to a group who tolerated LEV without intolerable PBSEs. Psychiatric disorders were identified from case notes. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) was used to outcome change in mood. Clinical diagnoses of a mental disorder were compared between groups using the Fisher's exact test. Group differences in HAM-D scores were assessed using the independent samples t-test (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

The total number of people with active epilepsy in the two centers was 2142 of whom 46 had been exposed to ESL. Twenty-six had previous exposure to LEV and had intolerable PBSEs who were matched to a person tolerating LEV. There was no statistical differences in the two groups for mental disorders including mood as measured by HAM-D (Chi-square test: p=0.28).

CONCLUSION

The ESL was well tolerated and did not produce significant PBSEs in those who had PBSEs with LEV leading to withdrawal of the drug. Though numbers were small, the findings suggest that ESL could be a treatment option in those who develop PBSEs with LEV and possibly other AEDs.

High spirituality may be associated with right hemispheric lateralization in Korean adults living with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Although it is known that epilepsy and spirituality are related, spirituality in epilepsy has received relatively little clinical and scientific attention. Therefore, we investigated which epilepsy-related factors are associated with high spirituality in Korean adults living with epilepsy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in two university hospitals in Korea. Spirituality was assessed using the 6-item Spirituality Self-Rating Scale (SSRS). The participants were categorized into high and low spirituality groups according to the median SSRS score. The presumptive seizure onset zone was determined based on the clinical semiology, electroencephalography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

RESULTS

Of the 180 participants, 61.7% declared that they had a religious affiliation. The median SSRS score was 15 (interquartile range: 7, 22). The high spirituality subgroup consisted of 92 (51.1%) participants. In the univariate analyses, the high spirituality group was significantly associated with female sex (p<0.05), older age (p<0.01), longer epilepsy duration (p<0.05), polytherapy (p<0.05), complex partial seizure (p<0.05), levetiracetam or topiramate usage (p<0.05), and a right-lateralized seizure onset zone. The multiple logistic regression analysis identified right hemispheric lateralization as the only independent factor associated with high spirituality (odds ratio: 2.410, 95% confidence interval: 1.051-5.528, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

High spirituality may be associated with right hemispheric lateralization but not with the temporal localization of the seizure onset zone in Korean adults with epilepsy.

Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: Drug Selection

Purpose of review The pharmacological treatment of patients with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities may sometimes represent a therapeutic challenge. This review is focused on the pharmacological management of patients with epilepsy and psychiatric problems in terms of rationalization of the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and the pharmacological management of the most clinically relevant psychiatric comorbidities, namely mood and anxiety disorders, psychoses, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recent findings Up to 8% of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy develop treatment-emergent psychiatric adverse events of AED regardless of the mechanism of action of the drug and this is usually related to an underlying predisposition given by the previous psychiatric history and the involvement of mesolimbic structures. Careful history taking, periodic screening for mood and anxiety disorders, low starting doses, and slow titration schedules can reduce the possibility of AED-related problems. A pragmatic checklist for the pharmacological management of patients with epilepsy and psychiatric disorders is presented. Summary patients should be informed of potential behavioral effects of AEDs but no drugs should be excluded a priori. Any psychiatric comorbidity should be addressed in the appropriate setting and full remission and recovery should always represent the first goal of any therapeutic intervention. Neurologists should be aware of the side effects of major psychotropic drug classes in order to fully counsel their patients and other health professionals involved.