Correlation of serum HE4 with tumor size and myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in laboratory medicine and an algorithm in renal disorders

Over the past three decades, cancer antigen (CA) 125 has been utilized for monitoring women who were treated for ovarian cancer. However, this tumor marker showed several limitations such as false elevation in benign pelvic diseases and, in turn, no alterations in ovarian tumors at early stages with a relatively high ratio. For more than ten years, the human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has become available for the routine laboratory repertoire, showing a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to that of CA125 in ovarian malignancies, but also in other types of tumors based on recently accumulated clinical data. Despite its remarkable diagnostic characteristics, in certain cases, the evaluation of HE4 results may be problematic when patients suffer from additional conditions that may alter HE4 level. Besides the direct effects of age and smoking, menopause status and decreased renal function also show a substantial impact on HE4 values, which should be considered in each patient. For this purpose, we attempted to create a new formula and an algorithm that may be helpful to predict the probability of the presence of ovarian tumor by using the concentrations of HE4 and CA125.

Surgical management of early endometrial cancer: an update and proposal of a therapeutic algorithm

In the last few years technical improvements have produced a dramatic shift from traditional open surgery towards a minimally invasive approach for the management of early endometrial cancer. Advancement in minimally invasive surgical approaches has allowed extensive staging procedures to be performed with significantly reduced patient morbidity. Debate is ongoing regarding the choice of a minimally invasive approach that has the most effective benefit for the patients, the surgeon, and the healthcare system as a whole.

Surgical treatment of women with presumed early endometrial cancer should take into account the features of endometrial disease and the general surgical risk of the patient. Women with endometrial cancer are often aged, obese, and with cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities that increase the risk of peri-operative complications, so it is important to tailor the extent and the radicalness of surgery in order to decrease morbidity and mortality potentially derivable from unnecessary procedures. In this regard women with negative nodes derive no benefit from unnecessary lymphadenectomy, but may develop short- and long-term morbidity related to this procedure. Preoperative and intraoperative techniques could be critical tools for tailoring the extent and the radicalness of surgery in the management of women with presumed early endometrial cancer. In this review we will discuss updates in surgical management of early endometrial cancer and also the role of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of lymph node status in influencing surgical options, with the aim of proposing a management algorithm based on the literature and our experience.

Prediction of Para-aortic Spread by Gross Pelvic Lymph Node Findings in Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma

Objective

Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases are rare in patients with endometrial carcinoma. We wanted to determine the reliability of macroscopic pelvic lymph node findings at surgery in predicting para-aortic space involvement in these patients.

Methods

We identified all women with surgically treated endometrial carcinoma at our institution between January 2008 and February 2013 (n = 854). One hundred seventeen patients received pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymph nodes were considered grossly positive based on size and morphology.

Results

In patients who underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy, grossly positive pelvic nodes predicted para-aortic metastasis with a sensitivity of 52.4% and specificity of 93.8%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.4 and 0.51, respectively. The predictive power of grossly positive pelvic nodes remained significant (odds ratio, 18; 95% confidence interval, 4.1–78; P < 0.0001) after correcting for deep myometrial invasion, poor tumor differentiation, and nonendometrioid histology as confounders. The whole sample of 854 patients was used for Bayesian calculations. The cutoff for a clinically useful test was set at the negative predictive value of 98.0%. The negative predictive value of the test (ie, grossly positive pelvic nodes at surgery in predicting the likelihood of para-aortic metastasis) was 99.7% for patients with superficial grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 98.0% for patients with deeply invasive grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas. For patients with grade 3 endometrioid and nonendometrioid carcinomas, the negative predictive values were 97.3% and 92.2%, respectively. For the whole study population, the value was 98.4%.

Conclusions

When uterine factors are used for risk stratification of endometrial carcinomas, selective para-aortic lymphadenectomy, based on gross findings of pelvic nodes, is feasible for patients with grade 1 to 2 endometrioid carcinomas, regardless of the depth of myometrial invasion. Similarly, gross findings of pelvic nodes can be used to evaluate the need for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the strategy of routine pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: current evidence

The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence on the role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. In 1988, the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommended surgical staging for endometrial cancer patients. However, 25 years later, the role of lymph node dissection remains controversial. Although the findings of two large independent randomized trials suggested that pelvic lymphadenectomy provides only adjunctive morbidity with no clear influence on survival outcomes, the studies have many pitfalls that limit interpretation of the results. Theoretically, lymphadenectomy may help identify patients with metastatic dissemination, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy, thus reducing radiation-related morbidity. Also, lymphadenectomy may eradicate metastatic disease. Because lymphatic spread is relatively uncommon, our main effort should be directed at identifying patients who may potentially benefit from lymph node dissection, thus reducing the rate of unnecessary treatment and associated morbidity. This review will discuss the role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer, focusing on patient selection, extension of the surgical procedure, postoperative outcomes, quality of life and costs. The need for new surgical studies and efficacious systemic drugs is recommended.

HE4 and CA125 levels in the preoperative assessment of endometrial cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study (ENDOMET)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 correlate with known high-risk prognostic factors for endometrial cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

SETTING

Three Danish tertiary gynecological oncology centers.

POPULATION

A total of 352 patients with endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia consecutively referred between 1 September 2009 and 1 January 2012.

METHODS

Preoperative blood samples were obtained from all patients. Biomarker levels were correlated with pathological characteristics of hysterectomy specimens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FIGO stage, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, lymph node metastases, and histological type and grade of tumor.

RESULTS

We found that both HE4 and CA125 were significantly positively correlated with histological grade (HE4: p = 0.002 and CA125: p = 0.027), lymph node metastases (HE4: p = 0.013 and CA125: p < 0.0001), myometrial invasion (p < 0.0001) and cervical involvement (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a significant increase was found with increasing FIGO stage for both markers (p < 0.0001). In a combined index including age, the diagnostic value increases. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves were higher for the index compared with the markers individually for all our endpoints. The calculated plots for the combined index may assist gynecologists in predicting the risk of deep myometrial invasion, cervical involvement and lymph node metastases. The analyses emphasize that the combined markers should be used in the prediction of prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that the markers are significantly elevated in patients with prognostic high-risk factors and may, therefore, be used as an additional tool in combination with imaging and clinical information when planning the treatment of endometrial cancer patients.

HE4 transcription- and splice variants-specific expression in endometrial cancer and correlation with patient survival

We investigated the HE4 variant-specific expression patterns in various normal tissues as well as in normal and malignant endometrial tissues. The relationships between mRNA variants and age, body weight, or survival are analyzed. ICAT-labeled normal and endometrial cancer (EC) tissues were analyzed with multidimensional liquid chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry. Levels of HE4 mRNA variants were measured by real-time PCR. Mean mRNA levels were compared among 16 normal endometrial samples, 14 grade 1 and 14 grade 3 endometrioid EC, 15 papillary serous EC, and 14 normal human tissue samples. The relationship between levels of HE4 variants and EC patient characteristics was analyzed with the use of Pearson correlation test. We found that, although all five HE4 mRNA variants are detectable in normal tissue samples, their expression is highly tissue-specific, with epididymis, trachea, breast and endometrium containing the highest levels. HE4-V0, -V1, and -V3 are the most abundant variants in both normal and malignant tissues. All variants are significantly increased in both endometrioid and papillary serous EC, with higher levels observed in grade 3 endometrioid EC. In the EC group, HE4-V1, -V3, and -V4 levels inversely correlate with EC patient survival, whereas HE4-V0 levels positively correlate with age. HE4 variants exhibit tissue-specific expression, suggesting that each variant may exert distinct functions in normal and malignant cells. HE4 levels appear to correlate with EC patient survival in a variant-specific manner. When using HE4 as a biomarker for EC management, the effects of age should be considered.

Serum HE4 as a prognostic marker in endometrial cancer--a population based study

OBJECTIVE

HE4 has emerged as a promising biomarker in gynaecological oncology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate serum HE4 as a biomarker for high-risk phenotypes in a population-based endometrial cancer cohort.

METHODS

Peri-operative serum HE4 and CA125 were measured in 373 patients identified from the prospective Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS). HE4 and CA125 were quantified on the ARCHITECT instrument in a clinically accredited laboratory. Receiver operator curves (ROC), Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Median CA125 and HE4 levels were higher in stage III and IV tumours (p<0.001) and in tumours with outer-half myometrial invasion (p<0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that HE4 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.76) was a better predictor of outer-half myometrial invasion than CA125 (AUC=0.65), particularly in patients with low-grade endometrioid tumours (AUC 0.77 vs 0.64 for CA125). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that elevated HE4 was an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival (HR=2.40, 95% CI 1.19-4.83, p=0.014) after adjusting for stage and grade of disease, particularly in the endometrioid subtype (HR=2.86, 95% CI 1.25-6.51, p=0.012).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate the utility of serum HE4 as a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer in a large, population-based study. In particular they highlight the utility of HE4 for pre-operative risk stratification to identify high-risk patients within low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer patients who might benefit from lymphadenectomy.

A critical review on HE4 performance in endometrial cancer: where are we now?

To date, no good marker for endometrial cancer (EC) that may be routinely used in clinical practice for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring is available; besides the use of tumour markers is not recommended by international guidelines. However, during the last years, an increasing interest in literature has been growing on human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) that demonstrated to be a useful clinical marker with high sensitivity and specificity even at early stage. However, published studies differ for some variables such as HE4 cut-off and sample size. Therefore, we assess this comprehensive review to gather all the evidence reported in literature on HE4 potential value in diagnosis, prognosis, and recurrence of EC. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/PubMed Central/MEDLINE predefined keywords from January 1952 to June 2013. We divided all the relevant studies into three different clinical issues: "Diagnosis", "Prognosis" and "Disease monitoring". The analysis of published data suggests that HE4 is the most accurate and sensitive EC marker identified to date. In particular, this new marker seems to have a good performance in diagnosis. The best cut-off of HE4 in diagnosis ranges between 50 and 70 pmol/L, resulting at least in 78.8 % of sensitivity and 100 % of specificity in all stages. Another important aspect to consider is HE4 capacity in predicting the stage of disease and myometrial involvement, which can help scheduling the appropriate timing of imaging and surgery in a more individualised fashion and as indicator of patients prognosis.

Predictive value of serum human epididymis protein 4 and cancer antigen 125 concentrations in endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of preoperative serum levels of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in the prediction of the presence of metastases in endometrial carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Preoperative sera were collected from 98 women with a diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. The concentrations of HE4 and CA125 were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated with the results of the final histopathologic report.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients had metastases (≥stage IIIA, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 classification). The serum concentrations of HE4 and CA125 were higher in the group with metastases than in the group without metastases (median [interquartile range], 148.6 pmol/L [71.6-219.1 pmol/L] vs 77.2 pmol/L [52.9-99.3 pmol/L]; P = .001; and 20.0 U/mL [10.1-70.8 U/mL] vs 4.3 U/mL [2.9-10.4 U/mL]; P < .001, respectively). By a multivariate analysis, the combination of HE4 and CA125 (a risk score algorithm) was the only predictive factor for the presence of metastases (odds ratio, 21.562; 95% confidence interval, 5.472-84.963; P < .001), and the grade was the predictor for a deep (≥50%) myometrial invasion by the tumor (odds ratio, 2.005; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-3.581; P = .019). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the combination of the markers to predict the presence of metastases were 71.4%, 89.5%, 55.6%, and 94.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A combination of preoperative HE4 and CA125 seems to be a better predictor of metastatic disease than either 1 alone in endometrial carcinoma.

The emerging role of HE4 in the evaluation of epithelial ovarian and endometrial carcinomas

HE4 (human epididymis protein 4) is overexpressed in both ovarian and endometrial cancers. Levels of the shed HE4 protein are elevated in sera from ovarian and endometrial cancer patients. HE4 is less frequently elevated than cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) in benign gynecologic conditions and is found in a fraction of endometrial and ovarian cancers that lack CA 125 expression. Consequently, HE4 has emerged as an important biomarker that complements CA 125 in discriminating between benign and malignant pelvic masses, monitoring response to treatment, and detecting recurrences of both ovarian and endometrial cancer. The "risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm" (ROMA) incorporates CA 125, HE4, and menopausal status to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses, and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to aid in referring patients who are likely to have ovarian cancer to specially trained gynecologic oncologists for surgery. HE4 also promises to augment the sensitivity of CA 125 for detecting early-stage ovarian cancer. In this review, we discuss the discovery and biologic significance of HE4 and evaluate available evidence regarding the utility of HE4 as a biomarker for ovarian and endometrial cancer.

HE4 (WFDC2) Promotes Tumor Growth in Endometrial Cancer Cell Lines

HE4, also known as WFDC2, is a useful biomarker for ovarian cancer when either used alone or in combination with CA125. HE4 is also overexpressed in endometrial cancer (EC), but its function in cancer cells is not clear. In this study, we investigate the role of HE4 in EC progression. An HE4-overexpression system was established by cloning the HE4 prototypic mRNA variant (HE4-V0) into a eukaryotic expression vector. Following transfection, stable clones in two EC cell lines were selected. The effects of HE4 overexpression on cell growth and function were measured with the use of cell proliferation assay, matrigel invasion, and soft agar gel colony formation assays. HE4-induced cancer cell proliferation in vivo was examined in a mouse xenograft model. HE4 overexpression significantly enhanced EC cell proliferation, matrigel invasion, and colony formation in soft agar. Moreover, HE4 overexpression promoted tumor growth in the mouse xenograft model. HE4 overexpression enhanced several malignant phenotypes in cell culture and in a mouse model. These results are consistent with our previous observation that high levels of serum HE4 closely correlate with the stage, myometrial invasion and tumor size in patients with EC. This study provides evidence that HE4 overexpression directly impacts tumor progression in endometrial cancer.

The role of novel biomarker HE4 in endometrial cancer: a case control prospective study

The aim of the study was to explore the clinical value of serum human epididymis secretory protein E4 (HE4) and CA125 in endometrial carcinoma. From January 2010 to April 2012, serum specimens were collected from consecutive cases of endometrial carcinoma and from cases of uterus benign disease (control group). The CA125 normal value is considered less than 35 U/mL. Two HE4 cutoff are considered: less than 70 pmol/L and less than 150 pmol/L. The specificity analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test for the CA125 and HE4 series. The level of statistical significance is set at p < 0.05. The sensitivity of CA125 in detecting endometrial cancer is 19.8 %, whereas the sensitivity of HE4 is 59.4 and 35.6 % for 70 and 150 pmol/L cutoff, respectively. Thus the specificity of HE4 is 100 % (positive predictive value = 100 %, negative predictive value = 71.52 and 61.31 % considering the two HE4 cutoff, respectively), whereas the CA125 specificity is 62.14 % (positive predictive value = 33.9 %, negative predictive value = 44.14 %) in detection of endometrial cancer. Combining CA125 and HE4, the sensitivity to detect endometrial cancer is 60.4 and 34.6 %, at HE4 cutoff of 70 and 150 pmol/L, respectively, with a specificity of 100 %. HE4 may be a new tool for preoperative evaluation and postoperative surveillance of endometrial cancer patients, with a positive predictive value = 100 %. HE4 at cutoff of 70 pmol/L yields the best sensitivity and specificity.