Can a handwashing intervention make a difference? Results from a randomized controlled trial in Jerusalem preschools

Can the concept of Health Promoting Schools help to improve students' health knowledge and practices to combat the challenge of communicable diseases: Case study in Hong Kong?

Background

The growing epidemics of emerging infectious diseases has raised the importance of a setting approach and include the Health Promoting School (HPS) framework to promote better health and hygiene. Built on the concept of 'the' HPS framework, the Hong Kong Healthy Schools Award scheme includes "Personal Health Skills" as one of its key aspects to improve student hygiene knowledge and practices. This study examines the differences in student perceptions, knowledge and health behaviours between those schools that have adopted the HPS framework and those that have not adopted.

Methods

A cross-sectional study using multi-stage random sampling was conducted among schools with awards (HSA) and those schools not involved in the award scheme nor adopting the concept of HPS (non-HPS). For HSA group, 5 primary schools and 7 secondary schools entered the study with 510 students and 789 students sampled respectively. For the 'Non-HPS' group, 8 primary schools and 7 secondary schools entered the study with 676 students and 725 students sampled respectively. A self-administered questionnaire was used as the measuring instrument.

Results

Students in the HSA category were found to be better with statistical significance in personal hygiene practice, knowledge on health and hygiene, as well as access to health information. HSA schools were reported to have better school health policy, higher degrees of community participation, and better hygienic environment.

Conclusion

Students in schools that had adopted the HPS framework had a more positive health behaviour profile than those in non-HPS schools. Although a causal relationship is yet to be established, the HPS appears to be a viable approach for addressing communicable diseases.

Design of the Jerusalem Handwashing Study: meeting the challenges of a preschool-based public health intervention trial

BACKGROUND

Rates of communicable disease among young children are considerably higher in Israel than in other western countries. Strategies for reducing the disease rates are needed.

PURPOSE

The goal of the Jerusalem Handwashing Study (JHS) was to evaluate a preschool-based hygiene programme aimed at reducing illness absenteeism.

METHODS

The trial employed cluster randomization of preschools to intervention or control. The intervention programme was multifaceted, including various educational activities and environmental changes. The control group received the programme at the end of the study. A supplementary home component was tested using the innovative design strategy of an embedded individually-randomized trial. All-cause absenteeism and illness-related absenteeism was assessed by daily phone calls to the teachers, supplemented with phone calls to the parents to identify the cause of the absence. The primary endpoint was illness-related absenteeism. In an attempt to avoid bias, survey staff were blinded to the study design and the main outcome as well as intervention status. Validity checks were incorporated to assess the accuracy of educator absenteeism reports and were analysed for differences between the study arms. Observation of handwashing behaviour allowed assessment of behavioural change in the intervention group and spontaneous handwashing changes in the control group.

RESULTS

Cluster randomization with delayed implementation in the control group was a feasible and efficient strategy. The individually-randomized embedded sub-trial proved to be an efficient way to test a supplemental intervention component, and is particularly well-suited to programmes run in educational or other group settings, including workplaces, clinics, and community centres.

LIMITATIONS

The trial design did not permit analysis of the intervention effect on illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The techniques used in this trial made it possible for a rigorous study of a complex community-based health intervention to be carried out successfully. They should prove helpful to future researchers.

In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research

The overwhelming evidence about the role lifestyle plays in mortality, morbidity, and quality of life has pushed the young field of modern health promotion to center stage. The field is beset with intense debate about appropriate evaluation methodologies. Increasingly, randomized designs are considered inappropriate for health promotion research. We have reviewed criticisms against randomized trials that raise philosophical and practical issues, and we will show how most of these criticisms can be overcome with minor design modifications. By providing rebuttal to arguments against randomized trials, our work contributes to building a sound methodological base for health promotion research.