Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials

Novel connexin40 missense mutations in patients with familial atrial fibrillation

AIMS

This research was aimed at screening connexin40, a cardiac gap junction protein alpha 5, for genetic defects in patients with familial atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

The subjects included 218 unrelated families with lone AF and 200 ethnically matched unrelated healthy individuals as controls. The entire coding region of the connexin40 gene was sequenced initially in 218 unrelated probands with familial AF. The relatives of mutation carriers and 200 controls were subsequently genotyped for the presence of mutations identified in probands.

RESULTS

Three novel connexin40 mutations, p.V85I, p.L221I, and p.L229M, were identified in 3 of 218 unrelated AF families, respectively. These heterozygous missense mutations co-segregated with AF in the families and were absent in the 200 unrelated control subjects. A cross-species alignment of connexin40 protein sequences revealed that the altered amino acids were completely conserved evolutionarily.

CONCLUSION

The findings expand the spectrum of mutations in connexin40 linked to AF and provide new insight into the molecular aetiology involved in the pathogenesis of AF.

Dronedarone: a review of characteristics and clinical data

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and hospitalization in the United States. Amiodarone is generally considered as the agent with the best efficacy for maintaining normal sinus rhythm. Despite its efficacy, amiodarone use is often limited by its extensive side effect profile. Dronedarone is a noniodinated benzofuran derivative of amiodarone that has been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration to reduce cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with AF or atrial flutter. Structural modification of dronedarone was introduced to shorten the half-life, decrease lipophilicity, and minimize noncardiovascular toxicity as compared to amiodarone. This article reviews the pharmacology, adverse effects, and clinical evidence available to date of the use of dronedarone in the management of AF.

Pharmacologic Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common arrhythmias in everyday clinical settings. Pharmacologic cardioversion (CV) is a simple and widely used strategy for the treatment of these arrhythmias, and many drugs are currently available. The choice of drug is strongly influenced by the time elapsed from atrial fibrillation onset and by a patient's clinical subset. Electrical direct-current CV is the treatment of choice in long-lasting forms; nevertheless, some agents also show efficacy in this setting. In addition, promising results come from studies on the efficacy and safety of new antiarrhythmic drugs and from therapeutic approaches that reduce the need for hospitalization and improve quality of life.

Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiarrhythmic Drugs

This article describes the pharmacology of antiarrhythmic medications. Although these medications are broadly considered in terms of their blockade of either sodium or potassium channels, they act by a variety of pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Elimination may be via hepatic metabolism or renal mechanisms, or a combination. In particular, interactions between antiarrhythmic medications and other drugs that interfere with hepatic metabolism by P450 enzymes is a source for toxicity.

Effect of restoration of sinus rhythm by extensive antiarrhythmic drugs in predicting results of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), an extensive antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy using class III AADs and class I AADs might be more effective in restoring sinus rhythm than class I or III AADs alone. However, the significance and efficacy of this treatment before radiofrequency catheter ablation is unclear. The present study included 51 consecutive patients with long-lasting persistent AF (>12 months) in whom > or =2 previous AADs had failed to restore sinus rhythm (SR). Before performing extensive pulmonary vein isolation, extensive AAD therapy for >3 months was attempted. Before ablation, AF had converted to SR in 33 patients (65%; SR group) and had continued in 18 (35%; AF group). The left ventricular ejection fraction had increased (p <0.01) in association with the improved left atrial diameter (p <0.05) and brain natriuretic peptide plasma level (p <0.001) in the SR group. However, these parameters had not improved in the AF group. The AF-free rate without any AADs at 14 months after a single ablation procedure was greater in the SR group (61%) than in the AF group (22%; hazard ratio 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.63; p = 0.013). No restoration of SR with extensive AAD therapy (odds ratio 4.493, 95% confidence interval 1.143 to 17.658; p <0.05) and sustained AF lasting for >3 years (odds ratio 4.574, 95% confidence interval 1.027 to 20.368; p <0.05) before ablation were associated with AF recurrence after ablation. In conclusion, restoration of SR with improved cardiac function and structural remodeling after extensive AAD therapy might predict favorable outcomes after ablation in patients with long-lasting, persistent AF.

Optimizing the management of atrial fibrillation: focus on current guidelines and the impact of new agents on future recommendations

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia encountered in everyday clinical practice. It affects ~2.3 million individuals in the United States, and the prevalence is expected to increase ~2.5-fold over the next 40 years. Atrial fibrillation accounts for more than 2 million hospitalizations each year and contributes to nearly 67 000 deaths. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of AF has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Recent treatment guidelines have heightened our awareness of the challenges involved in the treatment of AF and provided useful recommendations for its diagnosis and management. Because AF is usually associated with multiple comorbid conditions, greater emphasis must be placed on individualizing treatment. This review focuses on current treatment guidelines for patients with AF, assessing the benefits and shortcomings of current pharmacologic options and discussing new agents and trials that may provide better opportunities to improve and individualize patient management.

Procainamide and survival in ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVES

Procainamide is an antiarrhythmic drug of unproven efficacy in cardiac arrest. The association between procainamide and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was investigated to better determine the drug's potential role in resuscitation.

METHODS

The authors conducted a 10-year study of all witnessed, out-of-hospital, ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) cardiac arrests treated by emergency medical services (EMS) in King County, Washington. Patients were considered eligible for procainamide if they received more than three defibrillation shocks and intravenous (IV) bolus lidocaine. Four logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) describing the relationship between procainamide and survival.

RESULTS

Of the 665 eligible patients, 176 received procainamide, and 489 did not. On average, procainamide recipients received more shocks and pharmacologic interventions and had lengthier resuscitations. Adjusted for their clinical and resuscitation characteristics, procainamide recipients had a lower likelihood of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.75). Further adjustment for receipt of other cardiac medications during resuscitation negated this apparent adverse association (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study of out-of-hospital VF and pulseless VT arrest, procainamide as second-line antiarrhythmic treatment was not associated with survival in models attempting to best account for confounding. The results suggest that procainamide, as administered in this investigation, does not have a large impact on outcome, but cannot eliminate the possibility of a smaller, clinically relevant effect on survival.

Pulmonary vein isolation for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is an established yet evolving nonpharmacologic intervention for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with medical therapy remain in question.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized, controlled trials comparing PVI and medical therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. The primary end point in this analysis was freedom from recurrent AF at 12 months. The relative efficacy of PVI was estimated using random-effects modeling according to intention to treat. We identified 6 trials that randomized a total of 693 patients with AF to PVI or control. PVI was associated with markedly increased odds of freedom from AF at 12 months of follow-up (n=266/344 [77%] versus n=102/346 [29%]; odds ratio, 9.74; 95% CI, 3.98 to 23.87). When we excluded the trial that only enrolled patients with persistent AF (Q-statistic, 2.485; P=0.647 after exclusion), PVI was associated with even greater odds of AF-free survival (15.78; 95% CI, 10.07 to 24.73). PVI was associated with a decreased hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (14 versus 93 per 100 person-years; rate ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.23). Among those randomly assigned to PVI, 17% required a repeat PVI ablation before 12 months. The rate of major complications was 2.6% (n=9/344) in the catheter ablation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a nonablation treatment strategy, PVI results in dramatically increased freedom from AF at 1 year. Although the procedure can be associated with major complications, the risk of these complications is comparable to other interventional procedures.

Use of intravenous flecainide in horses with naturally-occurring atrial fibrillation

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY

It has been reported that i.v. flecainide has a high efficacy for the treatment of experimentally-induced acute atrial fibrillation (AF) in horses and that its use is associated with minimal toxic side effects.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to study the efficacy of i.v. flecainide as a treatment for atrial fibrillation in horses with naturally-occurring AF.

METHODS

Ten horses with naturally-occurring AF were treated with 2 mg/kg bwt flecainide i.v. at a rate of 0.2 mg/kg bwt/min. In 3 horses, the infusion was continued at 0.05-0.10 mg/kg bwt/min until a total dose of 3.0 mg/kg bwt had been administered. Heart rate, QRS duration and average interval between fibrillation waves were measured before, during and following flecainide infusion. If conversion to normal sinus rhythm was not achieved, horses were treated with quinidine sulphate per os at a dose of 22 mg/kg bwt given every 2 h.

RESULTS

None of the horses with chronic AF (n = 9) converted to sinus rhythm with flecainide i.v. The only horse treated successfully had acute AF of 12 days' duration. The QRS duration and fibrillation cycle length increased significantly (P = 0.006 and 0.002, respectively) during and following flecainide infusion. Heart rate did not increase significantly over time however, 3 horses developed heart rates in excess of 100 beats/min. Two horses developed a potentially dangerous ventricular dysrhythmia during the first 15 mins of treatment. Quinidine sulphate given per os restored sinus rhythm in 8 out of 9 horses, with minimal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although flecainide might be efficacious in cases of acute AF, it was not possible to restore sinus rhythm in horses with naturally-occurring chronic AF at the dosages used in this study. In 2 horses, 2.0 mg/kg bwt flecainide was associated with potentially dangerous dysrhythmias.

POTENTIAL CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Intravenous administration of 2 mg/kg bwt flecainide is unlikely to convert chronic AF in horses and could induce dangerous dysrhythmias.

Incidence and economic burden of suspected adverse events and adverse event monitoring during AF therapy

OBJECTIVE

Rhythm- and rate-control therapies are an essential part of atrial fibrillation (AF) management; however, the use of existing agents is often limited by the occurrence of adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate suspected adverse events and adverse event monitoring, and associated medical costs, in patients receiving AF rhythm-control and/or rate-control therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Integrated Healthcare Information Systems National Managed Care Benchmark Database from 2002-2006. Patients hospitalized for AF (primary diagnosis), and who had at least 365 days' enrollment before and after the initial (index) AF hospitalization, were included in the analysis. Suspected AF therapy-related adverse events and function tests for adverse event monitoring were identified according to pre-specified diagnosis codes/procedures, and examined over the 12 months following discharge from the index hospitalization. Events/function tests had to have occurred within 90 days of a claim for AF therapy to be considered a suspected adverse event/adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS

Of 4174 AF patients meeting the study criteria, 3323 received AF drugs; 428 received rhythm-control only (12.9%), 2130 rate-control only (64.1%), and 765 combined rhythm/rate-control therapy (23.0%). Overall, 50.1% of treated patients had a suspected adverse event and/or function test for adverse event monitoring (45.5% with rate-control, 53.5% with rhythm-control, and 61.2% with combined rhythm/rate-control). Suspected cardiovascular adverse events were the most common events (occurring in 36.1% of patients), followed by pulmonary (6.1%), and endocrine events (5.9%). Overall, suspected adverse events/function tests were associated with mean annual per-patient costs of $3089 ($1750 with rhythm-control, $2041 with rate control, and $6755 with combined rhythm/rate-control).

LIMITATIONS

As a retrospective analysis, the study is subject to potential selection bias, while its reliance on diagnostic codes for identification of AF and suspected adverse events is a source of potential investigator error. A direct cause-effect relationship between suspected adverse events/function tests and AF therapy cannot be confirmed based on the claims data available.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of suspected adverse events and adverse event monitoring during AF rhythm-control and/or rate-control therapy is high. Costs associated with adverse events and adverse event monitoring are likely to add considerably to the overall burden of AF management.

Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, and amiodarone for acute ventricular rate (VR) control in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitating hospitalization.

DESIGN

Randomized control trial.

SETTING

Acute emergency medical admission unit in a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty adult patients with acute AF and rapid VR (>120 bpm).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, or amiodarone for VR control.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary end point was sustained VR control (<90 bpm) within 24 hours; the secondary end points included AF symptom improvement and length of hospitalization. At 24 hours, VR control was achieved in 119 of 150 patients (79%). The time to VR control was significantly shorter among patients in the diltiazem group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) with the percentage of patients who achieved VR control being higher in the diltiazem group (90%) than the digoxin group (74%) and the amiodarone group (74%). The median time to VR control was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3 hours, 1-21 hours) compared with the digoxin (6 hours, 3-15 hours, p < 0.001) and amiodarone groups (7 hours, 1-18 hours, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the diltiazem group persistently had the lowest mean VR after the first hour of drug administration compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05). The diltiazem group had the largest reduction in AF symptom frequency score and severity score (p < 0.0001). In addition, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3.9 +/- 1.6 days) compared with digoxin (4.7 +/- 2.1 days, p = 0.023) and amiodarone groups (4.7 +/- 2.2 days, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with digoxin and amiodarone, intravenous diltiazem was safe and effective in achieving VR control to improve symptoms and to reduce hospital stay in patients with acute AF.

[Dronedarone: the new antiarrythmic agent?]

Dronedarone is recommended as the successor drug to amiodarone because a faster onset of effects and less side effects are to be expected. This review describes the pharmacological properties of this multi-channel blocker and summarizes the results from recent studies proving successful antiarrhythmic therapy using dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Effects of Chronic Gap Junction Conduction–Enhancing Antiarrhythmic Peptide GAP-134 Administration on Experimental Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs

Background— Abnormal intercellular communication caused by connexin dysfunction may contribute to atrial fibrillation (AF). The present study assessed the effect of the gap junction conduction–enhancing antiarrhythmic peptide GAP-134 on AF inducibility and maintenance in a dog model of atrial cardiomyopathy.

Methods and Results— Twenty-four dogs subject to simultaneous atrioventricular pacing (220 bpm for 14 days) were randomly assigned to placebo treatment (PACED-CTRL; 12 dogs) or oral GAP-134 (2.9 mg/kg BID; PACED-GAP-134; 12 dogs) starting on day 0. UNPACED-CTRL (4 dogs) and UNPACED-GAP-134 (4 dogs) served as additional control groups. Change in left atrial (LA) systolic area from baseline to 14 days was calculated using transoesophageal echocardiography. At 14 days, animals underwent an open-chest electrophysiological study. PACED-CTRL dogs (versus UNPACED-CTRL) had a shorter estimated LA wavelength (8.0�1.4 versus 24.4�2.5 cm, P <0.05) and a greater AF vulnerability (mean AF duration, 1588�329 versus 25�34 seconds, P <0.05). Oral GAP-134 had no effect on AF vulnerability in UNPACED dogs. Compared with PACED-CTRL dogs, PACED-GAP-134 dogs had a longer estimated LA wavelength (10.2�2.8 versus 8.0�1.4 cm, respectively, P <0.05). Oral GAP-134 did not significantly reduce AF inducibility or maintenance in the entire group of 24 PACED dogs; in a subgroup of dogs (n=11) with less than 100% increase in LA systolic area, oral GAP-134 reduced AF induction from 100% to 40% and mean AF duration from 1737�120 to 615�280 seconds ( P <0.05).

Conclusions— Oral GAP-134 reduces pacing-induced decrease in LA wavelength and appears to attenuate AF vulnerability in dogs with less atrial mechanical remodeling. Gap junction modulation may affect AF in some circumstances.

Benzofuran derivatives and the thyroid

Amiodarone and dronedarone are two clinically important benzofuran derivatives. Amiodarone has been used widely for treating resistant tachyarrhythmias in the past three decades. However amiodarone and its main metabolically active metabolite desethylamiodarone can adversely affect many organs, including the thyroid gland. Amiodarone-induced thyroid disorders are common and often present as a management challenge for endocrinologists. The pathogenesis of amiodarone-induced thyroid dysfunction is complex but the inherent effects of the drug itself as well as its high iodine content appear to play a central role. The non-iodinated dronedarone also exhibits anti-arrhythmic properties but appears to be less toxic to the thyroid. This review describes the biochemistry of benzofuran derivatives, including their pharmacology and the physiology necessary for understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in their actions. The known effects of these compounds on thyroid action are described. Recommendations for management of amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis are suggested. Dronedarone appears to be an alternative but less-effective anti-arrhythmic agent and it does not have adverse effects on thyroid function. It may have a future role as an alternative agent in patients being considered for amiodarone therapy especially those at high risk of developing thyroid dysfunction but not in severe heart failure.

[Potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly: a list adapted to French medical practice]

Drug induced adverse effects are frequently encountered in geriatrics. Their occurrence can be limited by an adapted prescription. Potentially inappropriate medications are drugs with an unfavourable benefit to risk ratio when other safer or more efficient therapeutic alternatives are available. An expert consensus allowed us to establish a new list of potentially inappropriate medications for people aged 75 or over, taking into account French prescribing habits. The drugs or the drug-classes proposed in this list are, generally speaking, and when possible, to be avoided in the elderly, but can be prescribed at times, under special clinical conditions, provided that the benefit to risk ratio is assessed. The French list proposed here could be considered as (i) an epidemiological tool for evaluating the quality of drug prescription in geriatrics and as (ii) a prescription guide suggesting an alternative treatment whenever a therapeutic alarm is raised. This guide could be used both as a base for the education of prescribers and as a way of increasing patients awareness. This French list should be kept up-to-date so as to remain adapted to the evolution of the knowledge on the effect of drugs in the elderly and of the pharmaceutical market.

Role of late sodium current in modulating the proarrhythmic and antiarrhythmic effects of quinidine

BACKGROUND

Quinidine is used to treat atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmias. However, at low concentrations, it can induce torsade de pointes (TdP).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of late sodium current (I(Na)) as a modulator of the arrhythmogenicity of quinidine in female rabbit isolated hearts and cardiomyocytes.

METHODS

Epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potentials (MAPs), ECG signals, and ion channel currents were measured. The sea anemone toxin ATX-II was used to increase late I(Na).

RESULTS

Quinidine had concentration-dependent and often biphasic effects on measures of arrhythmogenicity. Quinidine increased the duration of epicardial MAP (MAPD(90)), QT interval, transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), and ventricular effective refractory period. Beat-to-beat variability of MAPD(90) (BVR), the interval from peak to end of the T wave (Tpeak-Tend) and index of Tpeak-Tend/QT interval were greater at 0.1 to 3 micromol/L than at 10-30 micromol/L quinidine. In the presence of 1 nmol/L ATX-II, quinidine caused significantly greater concentration-dependent and biphasic changes of Tpeak-Tend, TDR, BVR, and index of Tpeak-Tend/QT interval. Quinidine (1 micromol/L) induced TdP in 2 and 13 of 14 hearts in the absence and presence of ATX-II, respectively. Increases of BVR, index of Tpeak-Tend/QT interval, and Tpeak-Tend were associated with quinidine-induced TdP. Quinidine inhibited I(Kr), peak I(Na), and late I(Na) with IC(50)s of 4.5 +/- 0.3 micromol/L, 11.0 +/- 0.7 micromol/L, and 12.0 +/- 0.7 micromol/L.

CONCLUSION

Quinidine had biphasic proarrhythmic effects in the presence of ATX-II, suggesting that late I(Na) is a modulator of the arrhythmogenicity of quinidine. Enhancement of late I(Na) increased proarrhythmia caused by low but not high concentrations of quinidine.

A systematic review of randomized trials comparing radiofrequency ablation with antiarrhythmic medications in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent arrhythmia seen in clinical practice. Until recently, antiarrhythmic medications have been the only commonly employed treatment for maintaining sinus rhythm. However, antiarrhythmic medications have a modest long-term efficacy and the potential for serious side effects. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is now emerging as a viable alternative to antiarrhythmic medications in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Several randomized trials comparing RF ablation with antiarrhythmic medications have now been published.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of published randomized trials comparing RF ablation with antiarrhythmic medications in the treatment of AF.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed and two authors independently abstracted the data from trials. A statistical analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (BIOSTAT, Englewood, NJ, USA).

RESULTS

A total of six trials were identified. Overall, RF ablation reduced the risk of AF recurrence by 65% at 1 year compared with antiarrhythmic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with AF, RF ablation reduced the risk of AF recurrence at 1 year by 65% compared with antiarrhythmic medications.

The Drug And Pace Health cliNical Evaluation (DAPHNE) study: a randomized trial comparing sotalol versus beta-blockers to treat symptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients with brady-tachycardia syndrome implanted with an antitachycardia pacemaker

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are mainly treated by pharmacologic therapy for rate control or rhythm control. The aim of our study was to compare sotalol (S) versus beta-blocking agents (BB) in terms of prevention of ATA, cardioversions (CVs), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (H) in patients paced for bradycardia-tachycardia form of sinus node disease (BT-SND).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-five patients (67 males, aged 73 +/- 7 years) were enrolled in a prospective, parallel, randomized, single-blind, multicenter study. All patients received a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker; after 1 month, 66 patients were randomly assigned to BB (62 +/- 26 and 104 +/- 47 mg/d for atenolol and metoprolol, respectively) and 69 patients to S (167 +/- 66 mg/d).

RESULTS

After an observation period of 12 months, the percentage of patients free from ATA recurrences was 29% in both BB and S group. Cardioversion and H were significantly (P < .01) fewer in the 12 months after implantation than in the 12 months before both in patients treated with S (CV 69.4% vs 22.2%, H 91.7% vs 33.3%) and in patients treated with BB (CV 58.5% vs 17.1%, H 82.9% vs 26.8%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a nonsignificant trend toward a lower incidence of the composite end point (CV + H) among BB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the complex context of "hybrid therapy" in patients with BT-SND implanted with a modern dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker device delivering atrial antitachycardia pacing, no differences were found between the use of beta-blocker and the use of S, at the relatively low dose achieved after clinical titration, in terms of prevention of cardiovascular H or need for atrial CV.

NORMAL QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER THE COX MAZE PROCEDURE FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation(AF) has been shown in numerous studies to significantly decrease patient quality of life. The Cox-Maze procedure has excellent long-term efficacy in curing AF. However, it is unknown whether this procedure improves long-term quality of life in these patients. The purpose of this study was to examine late quality of life in patients that underwent a lone Cox-Maze procedure. METHODS: Between 1987 and 2003, 163 patients underwent a Cox-Maze procedure for lone AF at our institution. Of these, 68 patients agreed and completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Survey. Scores from the age-matched general US population were normalized to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 to facilitate comparison. Collected data were compared to the norm-based score for each domain using a one-sample t-test. Four patients were removed from analysis because of AF recurrence. RESULTS: There were 52 males(81%). Mean age was 52.6±9.5 years. Preoperatively, 37 patients(58%) had paroxysmal and 25 patients(39%) had persistent or permanent AF. The mean duration of AF before surgery was 9.8±8.2 years. There was no statistical difference in norm-based scores between the Cox-Maze procedure group and the age-matched general US population in any of the eight health domains at a mean follow-up of 8.7±3.7 years. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the Cox-Maze procedure cures atrial fibrillation in the majority of patients, and that those patients that are cured obtain a normal quality of life as compared to the general population at late follow-up.

Pharmacological modulation of gap junction function with the novel compound rotigaptide: a promising new principle for prevention of arrhythmias

Existing anti-arrhythmic therapy is hampered by lack of efficacy and unacceptable side effects. Thus, ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation remains the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with myocardial infarction. In atrial fibrillation, rhythm control with conventional ion channel blockers provide no therapeutic benefit relative to rate control. Several lines of research indicate that impaired gap junctional cell-to-cell coupling between neighbouring cardiomyocytes is critical for the development of cardiac re-entry arrhythmias. Rotigaptide is the first drug that has been developed to prevent arrhythmias by re-establishing gap junctional intercellular communication. During conditions with acute cardiac ischaemia, rotigaptide effectively prevents induction of both ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmia. Moreover, rotigaptide effectively prevents ischaemia reperfusion arrhythmias. At the cellular level, rotigaptide inhibits ischaemia-induced dephosphorylation of Ser297 and Ser368, which is considered important for the gating of connexin43 gap junction channels. No drug-related toxicity has been demonstrated at plasma concentrations 77,000 times above therapeutic concentrations. In rats and dogs, rotigaptide reduces infarct size following myocardial infarction. A series of phase I trials has been completed in which rotigaptide has been administered intravenously to ~200 healthy persons. No drug-related side effects have been demonstrated in healthy human beings. Clinical safety, tolerability and efficacy in patients with heart disease are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials. Rotigaptide represents a pioneering pharmacological principle with a highly favourable preclinical and clinical safety profile, which makes this molecule a promising drug candidate for the prevention of cardiac arrhythmias.

Safety considerations in the pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation

The pharmacological management of atrial fibrillation (AF) requires careful consideration from a safety perspective. This article focuses primarily on maintenance therapy using antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The foremost safety issue for AADs is the propensity of class IA and III agents to cause torsade de pointes arrhythmias. Class IA drugs, particularly quinidine, can induce torsade de pointes at low or subtherapeutic doses, but higher doses are not necessarily associated with an increased incidence. 'Pure' class III drugs such as dofetilide induce torsade de pointes in a dose-related manner, but some class III agents with more complex actions such as amiodarone have a markedly lower potential to cause this arrhythmia. The risk of torsade de pointes precludes the use of class IA and 'pure' class III agents in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and bradycardia. Class IC agents may cause sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias and are generally precluded in ischaemic and structural heart disease. Advanced heart failure patients may be treated with amiodarone or dofetilide, but most other AADs are unsuitable. The most important extracardiac toxicities occurring with AADs are those of amiodarone. Drug interactions are a significant safety issue in the management of AF, including pharmacokinetic interactions in which plasma levels of the AAD are raised - increasing the risk of proarrhythmia - and concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval. Notwithstanding these considerations, most patients with AF can be considered for rhythm control, provided there is adequate pre-treatment assessment and protocols for initiation, dosing and monitoring are followed with care.

Drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently diagnosed arrhythmia. Prevalence increases with age, and the overall incidence is expected to increase as the population continues to age. Choice of pharmacologic therapy for atrial fibrillation depends on whether or not the goal of treatment is maintaining sinus rhythm or tolerating atrial fibrillation with adequate control of ventricular rates. New antiarrhythmic drugs are being tested in clinical trials. Drugs that target remodeling and inflammation are being tested for their use as prevention of AF or as adjunctive therapy.

Effects of azimilide on the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-operated K+ current and experimental atrial fibrillation in guinea-pig hearts

Effects of azimilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, on the acetylcholine (ACh) receptor-operated K+ current (I K.ACh) and the delayed rectifier K+ current (IK) were examined in guinea-pig atrial cells using patch-clamp techniques. Effects of azimilide on experimental atrial fibrillation (AF) were also examined in isolated guinea-pig hearts. In single atrial myocytes, azimilide inhibited both the rapid (IKr) and slow component of IK (IKs). Azimilide inhibited the I K.ACh induced by carbachol (CCh, 1 microM), adenosine (10 microM), and intracellular loading of GTPgammaS (100 microM) in a concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 values of azimilide for inhibiting the CCh-, adenosine-, and GTPgammaS-induced I K.ACh were 1.25, 29.1, and 20.9 microM, respectively, suggesting that azimilide inhibits I K.ACh mainly by blocking the muscarinic receptors. Azimilide concentration-dependently (0.3 - 10 microM) prolonged the action potential duration (APD) in the absence and presence of muscarinic stimulation. In isolated hearts, perfusion of CCh shortened the duration of the monophasic action potential (MAP) and effective refractory period (ERP) of the left atrium and lowered the atrial fibrillation threshold (AFT). Addition of azimilide inhibited the induction of AF by prolonging the duration of MAP and ERP. The I K.ACh inhibition by azimilide may at least in part contribute to the effectiveness to prevent parasympathetic-type AF.

New antiarrhythmic treatment of atrial fibrillation

Antiarrhythmic pharmaceutical development for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is moving in several directions. The efficacy of existing drugs, such as carvedilol, for rate control and, possibly, suppression of AF, is more appreciated. Efforts are being made to modify existing agents, such as amiodarone, in an attempt to ameliorate safety and adverse effect concerns. This has resulted in promising data from the deiodinated amiodarone analog, dronedarone, and further work with celivarone and ATI-2042. In an attempt to minimize ventricular proarrhythmia, atrial selective drugs, such as intravenous vernakalant, have demonstrated efficacy in terminating AF in addition to promising data in suppression recurrences when used orally. Several other atrial selective drugs are being developed by multiple manufacturers. Other novel therapeutic mechanisms, such as drugs that enhance GAP junction conduction, are being developed to achieve more effective drug therapy than is offered by existing compounds. Finally, nonantiarrhythmic drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, high-mobility group coenzyme A enzyme inhibitors and omega-3 fatty acids/fish oil, appear to have a role in suppressing AF in certain patient subtypes. Future studies will clarify the role of these drugs in treating AF.

Management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disorder, and confers a substantial mortality and morbidity from stroke, thromboembolism, heart failure, and impaired quality of life. With the increasingly elderly population in the developed world, as well as improvements in the management of myocardial infarction and heart failure, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation is increasing, resulting in a major public-health problem. This Review aims to provide an overview on the modern management of atrial fibrillation, with particular emphasis on pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Irrespective of a rate-control or rhythm-control strategy, stroke prevention with appropriate thromboprophylaxis still remains central to the management of this common arrhythmia. Electrophysiological approaches could hold some promise for a curative approach in atrial fibrillation.

A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation

The appropriate treatment for the restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset is still the subject of controversy. In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of procainamide, propafenone, and amiodarone, administered intravenously, for the conversion of recent-onset AF. We enrolled 362 consecutive patients (183 men; age 34 to 86 years; mean 65+/-10) with AF duration of no >48 hours. Of these patients, 89 were given procainamide, 91 propafenone, 92 amiodarone, and 90 placebo. Treatment was considered successful if conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved within the 24-hour study period. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the 4 groups. The treatment was successful in 61 of the 89 patients who received procainamide (68.53%; median time 3 hours), 73 of the 91 patients who received propafenone (80.21%; median time 1 hour), 82 of the 92 patients who received amiodarone (89.13%; median time 9 hours), and 55 of the 90 patients who received placebo (61.11%; median time 17 hours; p<0.05 for all medicated groups vs placebo; p<0.05 for amiodarone and propafenone vs procainamide). In conclusion, all 3 medications, when administered intravenously, are effective in the restoration of sinus rhythm in recent-onset AF. Amiodarone and propafenone are more effective whereas procainamide and propafenone are faster.

Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic drug. The safety and efficacy of oral versus intravenous (i.v.) Amiodarone in the treatment of AF of recent onset (duration <48 h) was investigated.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 223 patients with symptomatic AF, of whom 110 received 600 mg oral Amiodarone (Group A) in three divided doses and 113 received i.v. Amiodarone (5 mg/kg over 30 min followed by 1000 mg over the next 24 h) (Group B). Digoxin was administered to all patients, who had not previously received it. All patients were monitored for 24 h.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 85.45% of group A and 82.30% in group B (p=NS). Mean time of cardioversion in group A was 20+/-4.5 h and in group B was 12+/-8 h (p<0,001). However, blood pressure (BP) in group A remained stable for the observation period, whereas it fell significantly in group B. Treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients in either group, however 13 patients in group B developed superficial phlebitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both forms of the drug are extremely efficient in restoring sinus rhythm in AF of recent onset, although the i.v. form acts quicker. The oral form of the drug does not alter significantly the patients' BP.

The role of amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation after ibutilide has failed to restore sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND

Ibutilide is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that is used for the cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias, but it can cause torsades de pointes. Amiodarone is also used for the cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and prolongs the QT interval but rarely causes torsades de pointes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 51 consecutive patients with recent onset atrial fibrillation in whom the administration of ibutilide failed to restore sinus rhythm. In those patients we decided to proceed to intravenous administration of amiodarone. The QT intervals were measured on 12-lead ECG. After 11 +/- 5 h of the administration of the amiodarone, 42 patients (82%) were on sinus rhythm. There was no episode of non-sustained torsades de pointes or hypotension that followed the administration of the two antiarrhythmic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of amiodarone in the case of ibutilide failure may be a useful adjunct to current cardioversion protocols for recent onset atrial fibrillation.