Relationship of sialyl-Lewis(x/a) underexpression and E-cadherin overexpression in the lymphovascular embolus of inflammatory breast carcinoma

Relevance of breast cancer cell lines as models for breast tumours: an update

The number of available breast cancer cell (BCC) lines is small, and only a very few of them have been extensively studied. Whether they are representative of the tumours from which they originated remains a matter of debate. Whether their diversity mirrors the well-known inter-tumoural heterogeneity is another essential question. While numerous similarities have long been found between cell lines and tumours, recent technical advances, including the use of micro-arrays and comparative genetic analysis, have brought new data to the discussion. This paper presents most of the BCC lines that have been described in some detail to date. It evaluates the accuracy of the few of them widely used (MCF-7, T-47D, BT-474, SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, Hs578T) as tumour models. It is concluded that BCC lines are likely to reflect, to a large extent, the features of cancer cells in vivo. The importance of oestrogen receptor-alpha (gene ESR1 ) and Her-2/ neu ( ERBB2 ) as classifiers for cell lines and tumours is underlined. The recourse to a larger set of cell lines is suggested since the exact origin of some of the widely used lines remains ambiguous. Investigations on additional specific lines are expected to improve our knowledge of BCC and of the dialogue that these maintain with their surrounding normal cells in vivo.

Cadherins in cancer

The presence of a functional E-cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion complex is a prerequisite for normal development and maintenance of epithelial structures in the mammalian body. This implies that the acquisition of molecular abnormalities that disturb the expression or function of this complex is related to the development and progression of most, if not all, epithelial cell-derived tumors, i.e. carcinomas. E-cadherin downregulation is indeed correlated with malignancy parameters such as tumor progression, loss of differentiation, invasion and metastasis, and hence poor prognosis. Moreover, E-cadherin has been shown to be a potent invasion suppressor as well as a tumor suppressor. Disturbed expression profiles of the E-cadherin/catenin complex have been demonstrated in histological sections of many human tumor types. In different kinds of carcinomas, biallelic downregulation of the E-cadherin gene, resulting in tumor-restricted decrease or even complete loss of E-cadherin expression, appears to be caused by a variety of inactivation mechanisms. Gene deletion due to loss of heterozygosity of the CDH1 locus on 16q22.1 frequently occurs in many carcinoma types. However, somatic inactivating mutations resulting in aberrant E-cadherin expression by loss of both wild-type alleles is rare and restricted to only a few cancer types. A majority of carcinomas thus seems to show deregulated E-cadherin expression by other mechanisms. The present evidence proposes transcriptional repression as a powerful and recurrent molecular mechanism for silencing E-cadherin expression. The predominant mechanisms emerging in most carcinomas are hypermethylation of the E-cadherin promoter and expression of transrepressor molecules such as SIP1, Snail, and Slug that bind sequence elements in the proximal E-cadherin promoter. Interestingly, complex differential expression of other cadherins seems to be associated with loss of E-cadherin and to reinforce effects of this loss on tumor progression. Multiple agents can upregulate and stabilize the E-cadherin/catenin complex. Especially for those tumors with transcriptional and thus reversible downregulation of E-cadherin expression, these drug agents offer important therapeutic opportunities.

Update on the management of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive manifestation of primary breast carcinoma, with the clinical and biological characteristics of a rapidly proliferating disease. The multidisciplinary management of IBC has changed in the past 3 decades and is presently clearly outlined in sequence, with preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy representing the mainstay of treatment. Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most effective cytotoxic agents in the management of primary breast cancer and should be the standard of treatment for women with IBC. Locoregional treatment includes radiotherapy with or without surgery and continues to play a major role after appropriate medical treatment. The many investigations into the particular molecular determinants of IBC development have provided several interesting new therapeutic targets. Combination regimens that include angiogenic modulators, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, and p53 modulators hold great promise in the medical management of IBC. Future therapeutic approaches should focus on these discoveries so that we can improve the overall prognosis for women with IBC.

Models of breast cancer: is merging human and animal models the future?

Survival rates of patients with early breast cancer in the United Kingdom and in the United States have improved steadily over the past 15 years. The only way to continue or even accelerate this progress, however, is the discovery and development of new preventative and therapeutic strategies. With the massive explosion in potential therapeutic strategies becoming available, in the postgenomic era, better and more representative breast cancer models are urgently required for preclinical trials. Development of better in vivo models of human breast cancer are thus of crucial importance in the development of new cancer therapeutics.