The antithrombotic and antiinflammatory mechanisms of action of aprotinin

Fatal pulmonary microthrombi during surgical therapy for end-stage heart failure: Possible association with antifibrinolytic therapy

BACKGROUND

Maintaining hemostasis in patients with end-stage heart failure undergoing cardiac surgery is always challenging. These patients have chronic hepatic insufficiency, resulting in derangement of coagulation. In addition, they are commonly receiving both systemic anticoagulation (warfarin or heparin) and antiplatelet therapy. The introduction of antifibrinolytics has had a significant effect on postoperative coagulopathy. We report fatal pulmonary microthrombi in patients receiving antifibrinolytics who developed suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures and right heart failure that was impossible to overcome despite insertion of a right ventricular assist device.

METHODS

We reviewed the surgical procedure and autopsy reports to identify patients with high pulmonary artery pressures caused by pulmonary microthrombi after a cardiac surgical procedure for end-stage heart failure. Patient demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected from a retrospective review of the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

We identified 9 patients (7 men and 2 women; mean age, 45 +/- 16 years) who died of pulmonary microthrombi after cardiac surgery between January 1997 and January 2004. Surgical procedures included 5 left ventricular assist device implantations, 2 heart transplantations, and 2 left ventricular reconstructions with mitral valve repair or replacement. Eight patients received aprotinin, and 1 patient received epsilon-aminocaproic acid immediately before and during cardiopulmonary bypass. All patients had severe suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures after protamine administration for heparin reversal, a complication that proved fatal in all cases. Intraoperative wedge biopsy of the lungs revealed multiple microthrombi within capillaries and in the small- and medium-sized pulmonary arterioles.

CONCLUSION

We report 9 cases for which fatal pulmonary microthrombi might be associated with the use of prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Mortally ill patients with multiorgan failure who are receiving systemic anticoagulation and undergoing surgical procedures require careful perioperative monitoring to identify potential hazards. Anticoagulation and antifibrinolytic therapy protocols may require adjustment in such patients.

Aprotinin Shows Both Hemostatic and Antithrombotic Effects During Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Hemostatic drugs are widely thought to be unnecessary and potentially detrimental in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG), despite well-established use in on-pump surgery. In a randomized, prospective OPCABG trial, we assessed efficacy and safety of aprotinin through a comprehensive assessment of graft patency and hematologic function.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to full-dose aprotinin or placebo. Heparin was titrated to a kaolin-based activated clotting time of greater than 300 seconds. Exclusionary criteria included creatinine greater than 2 mg/dL, conversion to on-pump CABG, and preoperative GPIIb/IIIa inhibition. Hematologic assessments were obtained preoperatively, at the end of surgery, and on days 1 and 3: mean platelet volume, thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment 1.2 assay), and aspirin resistance using a modified thrombelastography, whole blood aggregometry, 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 levels, and flow cytometry. Thrombotic events were defined as postoperative myocardial infarction by electrocardiography or elevated troponin I, clinical stroke by examination and head computed tomography, and bypass graft failure by multichannel computed tomography angiography on day 5.

RESULTS

Aprotinin was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative and postoperative blood loss compared with placebo but had no effect on transfusion rates. Patients treated with aprotinin had significantly fewer thrombotic events (3% versus 23%, p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test) and less postoperative aspirin resistance (20% versus 46%, respectively, p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Postoperative prothrombin fragment 1.2 level was reduced by aprotinin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin reduced perioperative bleeding after OPCABG. Preserved aspirin sensitivity in the aprotinin group may explain the observed reduction in thrombotic events and might be related to the suppression of perioperative and transmyocardial thrombin formation.

Aprotinin Reduces Bleeding and Blood Product Use in Patients Treated With Clopidogrel Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

An increased proportion of patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is being treated with clopidogrel, an irreversible platelet inhibitor. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin is known to augment bleeding, transfusion requirements, and reoperation rates after CABG. Aprotinin, a protease inhibitor, is approved for use in cardiac surgery to reduce bleeding. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not intraoperative use of aprotinin decreases bleeding and number of transfusions after CABG in patients treated with clopidogrel less than 5 days before surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients, with preoperative clopidogrel exposure less than 5 days before surgery, who underwent urgent CABG at our institution during 1 year (n = 33). Eighteen patients received a full-dose aprotinin regime intraoperatively whereas 15 patients not receiving aprotinin served as a control group.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with respect to baseline characteristics and operative data. Mean postoperative bleeding was 710 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 560 to 860) in the aprotinin group versus 1,210 mL (95% CI: 860 to 1550) in the control group (p = 0.004). The aprotinin group received fewer transfusions of packed red blood cells (0.9 U, 95% CI: 0.1 to 1.7, versus 2.7 U, 95% CI: 1.4 to 4.1; p = 0.01), platelets (0.1 U, 95% CI: 0 to 0.3, versus 0.6 U, 0.2 to 0.9; p = 0.02), and fewer blood product units (1.1 U, 95% CI: 0.1 to 2.0, versus 3.7 U, 95% CI: 2.1 to 5.4; p = 0.002). There were 3 reoperations for bleeding, all in the control group (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin reduces bleeding, transfusion requirements of packed red blood cells, platelets, and total blood units in patients on clopidogrel undergoing urgent CABG.

Aprotinin decreases the incidence of cognitive deficit following CABG and cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

Cognitive deficit after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) has a high prevalence and is persistent. Meta-analysis of clinical trials demonstrates a decreased incidence of stroke after CABG when aprotinin is administrated perioperatively. We hypothesized that aprotinin administration would decrease the incidence of cognitive deficit after CABG.

METHODS

Thirty-six ASA III-IV patients undergoing elective CABG were included in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study. Eighteen patients received aprotinin 2 x 10(6) KIU (loading dose), 2 x 10(6) KIU (added to circuit prime) and a continuous infusion of 5 x 10(5) KIU.hr(-1). A battery of cognitive tests was administered to patients and spouses (n = 18) the day before surgery, four days and six weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Four days postoperatively new cognitive deficit (defined by a change in one or more cognitive domains using the Reliable Change Index method) was present in ten (58%) patients in the aprotinin group compared to 17 (94%) in the placebo group [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.62, P = 0.005); (P = 0.01)]. Six weeks postoperatively, four (23%) patients in the aprotinin group had cognitive deficit compared to ten (55%) in the placebo group (95% CI 0.80-0.16, P = 0.005); (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this prospective pilot study, the incidence of cognitive deficit after CABG and cardiopulmonary bypass is decreased by the administration of high-dose aprotinin.

Evidence-based review of the role of aprotinin in blood conservation during orthopaedic surgery

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor with antifibrinolytic properties that has been approved as a blood-conserving drug in cardiac surgery by the United States Food and Drug Administration. On the basis of the current evidence from Level-I trials, we make a grade-A recommendation for use of the high-dose aprotinin regimen in hip and spine surgery. Because of conflicting data, the low-dose aprotinin therapy as well as the use of aprotinin in patients with cancer cannot be recommended (grade-I recommendation). High-quality randomized trials are necessary to determine the optimal (and minimal) therapeutic dose of aprotinin and the optimal time of aprotinin administration during surgery.

Medical haemostasis in acute hepatocyte injury and experimental liver trauma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to test the effectiveness of aprotinin to reduce bleeding in liver resection of guinea pigs with acutely injured hepatocyte using intraperitoneal d(+)Galactosamine.

METHODS

Thirty-two guinea pigs were divided equally into four groups. Group 1 was the control group. Group 2 received intraperitoneal D(+)galactosamine. Group 3 received intraperitoneal d(+)galactosamine prior to a standard liver resection. Group 4 received 10.000 KIU/kg aprotinin infusion via jugular catheter in 10 min prior to standard liver resection in pretreated animals with d(+)galactosamine. All of the measurements and surgical interventions were made 24 h after the administration of d(+)galactosamine. Bleeding amounts were recorded in groups 3 and 4 for 1 h by weighing the sponges placed into the abdomen. Liver function tests, histologic, haematologic and fibrinolytic parameters were measured.

RESULTS

Hepatocyte injury and hyperfibrinolysis were seen at the end of 24 h after application of d(+)galactosamine in groups 2, 3, and 4. Statistically significant amounts of bleeding from the resected livers were observed in group 3 and 4. In group 4, the bleeding was reduced (P < 0.05) and fibrinolytic parameters were normalized (P < 0.05) with aprotinin infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant bleeding diathesis and hyperfibrinolysis occurred in groups 2, 3, and 4, which had hepatocyte injury proved with histopathologic and haematologic tests. Prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in groups 3 and 4 were fivefold higher than that in the control group (P = 0.0001). The bleeding tendency according to high PT and aPTT levels were continued with application of aprotinin while reduction of bleeding was seen. Parenchymatous organ haemorrhage in acute liver failure or hyperfibrinolytic conditions could be reduced significantly with aprotinin without procoagulant effect.

Antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery: Current controversies

Antifibrinolytic agents play a prominent role in adult cardiac surgery. This article is a review of the modern published experience of antifibrinolytic agent use in adult cardiac surgery. The use of tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and aprotinin is examined during primary cardiac surgery, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, reoperative cardiac surgery, and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. In addition, the issues of vein graft patency and hypersensitivity reaction in the presence of antifibrinolytic agents are examined.

Antifibrinolytics in orthotopic liver transplantation: current status and controversies

This article reviews the current status and controversies of the 3 commonly used antifibrinolytics-epsilon-aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid and aprotinin-during liver transplantation. There is no general consensus on how, when or which antifibrinolytics should be used in liver transplantation. Although these drugs appear to reduce blood loss and decrease transfusion requirements during liver transplantation, their use is not supported uniformly in clinical trials. Aprotinin has been studied more extensively in clinical trials and appear to offer more advantages compared to two other antifibrinolytics. Because of the diverse population of liver transplant recipients and the potential adverse effects of antifibrinolytics, especially life-threatening thromboembolism, careful patient selection and close monitoring is prudent. Further studies addressing the risks and benefits of antifibrinolytics in the setting of liver transplantation are warranted.

Methods for improved hemorrhage control

Trauma is the leading cause of death from age 1 to 34 years and is the fifth leading cause of death overall in the USA, with uncontrolled hemorrhage being the leading cause of potentially preventable death. Improving our ability to control hemorrhage may represent the next major hurdle in reducing trauma mortality. New techniques, devices, and drugs for hemorrhage control are being developed and applied across the continuum of trauma care: prehospital, emergency room, and operative and postoperative critical care. This brief review focuses on drugs directed at life-threatening hemorrhage. The most important of these new drugs are injectable hemostatics, fibrin foams, and dressings. The available animal studies are encouraging and human studies are required.

Recombinant FVIIa in the management of uncontrolled hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa/NovoSeven) is a novel hemostatic agent originally developed to treat patients with hemophilia who had developed inhibitors. Several case reports have suggested that rFVIIa may be effective in treating patients without a pre-existing bleeding disorder who have uncontrolled bleeding.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data on the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in the treatment of massive hemorrhage were obtained retrospectively from the NovoSeven extended-use data collection system.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients received rFVIIa for uncontrolled bleeding, and in these patients, bleeding stopped or decreased in 32 (80%). Blood product usage was significantly decreased after rFVIIa administration. Thromboembolic events occurred in three patients with additional risk factors for thrombosis. Of 40 patients, 23 (57.5%) died. Bleeding was the direct cause of death in seven cases (all within 24 hr of administration of rFVIIa). The remaining 16 deaths were the result of sepsis, multi-organ failure, or the underlying disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study of data voluntarily submitted to a web-based drug surveillance program, we present preliminary results on the use of rFVIIa in nonhemophilia patients with bleeding. Although some efficacy is suggested, there was a high mortality rate from nonhemorrhagic causes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to properly assess the role of rFVIIa in the management of hemorrhage.

Current status of antifibrinolytics in cardiopulmonary bypass and elective deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in many physiologic derangements, including activation of the hemostatic and fibrinolytic pathways. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) adds a further insult to the coagulation systems because it involves more extreme hypothermia and organ ischemia related to blood stasis. The abnormalities induced by CPB disrupt the checks and balances in the hemostatic and fibrinolytic systems, resulting in a pathologic state that leads to excessive bleeding and other perioperative complications. Prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy can attenuate the response to this insult by restoring the delicate balance within these systems, potentially reducing the complication rate and improving patient outcomes.

Microvascular Inflammatory Response in Cardiac Surgery

Cardiac surgical procedures, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, elicit a systemic inflammatory response in patients that induces the elaboration of multiple cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and destructive enzymes. This inflammatory reaction involves multiple interdependent and redundant cell types and humoral cascades, which allows for amplification and positive feedback at numerous steps. This systemic inflammatory response ultimately results in a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, with multiple organ failure being the most severe form. Investigative efforts have focused on understanding the mechanism of this systemic inflammatory response syndrome in order to develop potential therapeutic targets to inhibit it, thereby possibly decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. Multiple therapeutic methods have been investigated, including pharmacologic inhibitors and modifications of surgical technique and the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Although studies have demonstrated that the use of these therapies in experimental and clinical settings has attenuated the systemic inflammatory response, they have failed to conclusively show clinical benefit from these therapies. These therapies may be too specific to minimize the deleterious effects of a systemic inflammatory response that results from the activation of multiple, interdependent, and redundant inflammatory cascades and cell types. Hence, further studies that investigate the molecular and cellular events underlying the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the resultant effects of anti-inflammatory therapies are warranted to ultimately achieve improvements in clinical outcome after cardiac surgical procedures.

Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass

Inflammation in cardiac surgical patients is produced by complex humoral and cellular interactions with numerous pathways including activation, generation, or expression of thrombin, complement, cytokines, neutrophils, adhesion molecules, mast cells, and multiple inflammatory mediators. Because of the redundancy of the inflammatory cascades, profound amplification occurs to produce multiorgan system dysfunction that can manifest as coagulopathy, respiratory failure, myocardial dysfunction, renal insufficiency, and neurocognitive defects. Coagulation and inflammation are also closely linked through networks of both humoral and cellular components including proteases of the clotting and fibrinolytic cascades, including tissue factor. Vascular endothelial cells also mediate inflammation and the cross talk between coagulation and inflammation. Novel antiinflammatory agents inhibit these processes by several mechanisms such as preventing proteolysis of the protease-activated receptor (aprotinin), inhibiting complement-mediated injury (pexelizumab), or inhibiting contact activation (kallikrein inhibitors). Surgery alone also activates specific hemostatic responses, activation of immune mechanisms, and inflammatory response mediated by the release of various cytokines and chemokines. Novel agents are under investigation to further improve outcomes in cardiac surgical patients.

Aprotinin: Antithrombotic and Vasoactive Mechanisms of Action

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that has been in clinical use since the late 1980s to reduce blood loss in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Its hemostatic mechanism of action is mediated predominantly through inhibition of plasmin, thus exerting a net antifibrinolytic effect. Compared to other antifibrinolytics, however, aprotinin provides an additional patient benefit at the level of improved platelet function and diminished inflammatory response to bypass. Recent work on platelets has identified a cell-associated target for aprotinin: the thrombin-receptor, protease-activated receptor 1. Selective blockade of the protease-activated receptor 1 limits thrombin-induced activation and consequent “exhaustion” of platelets in the bypass circuit, while maintaining the hemostatic activity of platelets in the pericardial cavity in response to nonproteolytic agonists, such as collagen, adenosine diphosphate and epinephrine. While no specific cellular receptors have as yet been identified to explain the antiinflammatory and vasoactive properties of aprotinin, awareness is growing that serine protease-sensitive receptors belonging to the protease-activated receptor family (1-4) may represent important aprotinin targets, since these receptors are expressed by all major cells of the vasculature and act as sensors of the coagulation, inflammatory and vasoactive pathways activated by major surgery or trauma. The possibility is discussed that endothelial protease-activated receptor 2, whose natural ligands are trypsin, tryptase and the ternary tissue factor-Vlla-Xa complex, may be targeted by aprotinin.

Aprotinin counteracts heparin-induced inhibition of platelet contractile force

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin interferes with heparin binding to platelets and decreases blood loss during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Heparin abolishes platelet force during CPB, and the extent of platelet force recovery after protamine administration appears to correlate with blood loss. This study assessed the effect of aprotinin on heparin suppression of platelet force.

METHODS

Platelet force was measured using the Hemodyne Hemostasis Analyzer. Clots were formed from platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by the addition of batroxobin and 10 mM CaCl(2). Clotting conditions included pH 7.4, ionic strength 0.15 M, fibrinogen level 1 mg/ml and 75,000 platelets/microl.

RESULTS

After 1200 s of clotting, force was reduced from 7110+/-1190 to 450+/-450 dyn by 0.2 U/ml of heparin. Platelet force in aprotinin [20 microg/ml (140 KIU/ml)] containing PRP was not suppressed by heparin addition (7480+/-2410 dyn). Aprotinin [40 microg/ml (280 KIU/ml)] addition to previously heparinized plasma counteracted heparin force suppression. Aprotinin (40 microg/ml) increased platelet force from 5630 to 11,138+/-562 in PRP devoid of heparin. Aprotinin did not affect thrombin activity, fibrin structure, platelet aggregation or secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin counteracts heparin suppression of platelet force and enhances platelet force in the absence of heparin. Aprotinin-heparin-platelet interactions may help explain aprotinin's ability to reduce blood loss during CPB.

Is the kaolin or celite activated clotting time affected by tranexamic acid?

BACKGROUND

During cardiopulmonary bypass, the activated clotting time is frequently used for determination of anticoagulation, and either Celite or kaolin are used as activators. If aprotinin is administered concomitantly, the Celite activated clotting time (C-ACT) becomes significantly higher than the kaolin activated clotting time (K-ACT). Therefore, insufficient anticoagulation using C-ACT in the presence of aprotinin is a major concern. Whether the application of tranexamic acid (TA), a pharmacologic alternative to aprotinin, has similar effects has not been studied before.

METHODS

An in vitro study using the blood of healthy volunteers was performed. Both C-ACT and K-ACT were measured at baseline, after adding TA, and after adding TA and heparin. In addition, 30 patients undergoing primary cardiac operations had simultaneous measurements of C-ACT and K-ACT after skin-incision, 5 minutes after the application of heparin and TA, every 30 minutes during cardiopulmonary bypass, and 10 minutes after the application of protamine.

RESULTS

In vitro, C-ACT and K-ACT correlated significantly at each measurement. Tranexamic acid had no influence on the activated clotting time. In vivo, C-ACT and K-ACT did not differ significantly, but at each time C-ACT tended to be greater than K-ACT (p = 0.086). The average difference between K-ACT and C-ACT was stable before and after the application of TA (p = 0.85) but the variability of the differences significantly increased during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of TA does not seem to differentially affect the mean C-ACT and K-ACT. No recommendation seems warranted to prefer one activator over the other in patients receiving TA.

New antiinflammatory and platelet-preserving effects of aprotinin

The clinical benefit of aprotinin with respect to improved hemostasis, platelet function, and inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery has been well documented, but these benefits have been overshadowed by the concern that such a potently hemostatic agent might also be prothrombotic. In this article, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of the basic mechanism of aprotinin that have led to the identification of new antiinflammatory targets and the discovery that aprotinin is, in fact, antithrombotic with respect to platelets. Its antithrombotic action is mediated by the selective blocking of the major thrombin receptor, the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), but not other receptors of platelet activation (ie, collagen, adenosine diphosphate [ADP], or epinephrine receptors). The selective targeting of PAR1 enables aprotinin to protect platelets from unwanted activation by thrombin generated during CPB surgery (consistent with a role in platelet-preservation), while permitting the participation of platelets in the formation of hemostatic plugs at wound and suture sites, where collagen, ADP, and epinephrine are most likely to be expressed. Aprotinin therefore exerts a subtle hemostatic yet antithrombotic mechanism of action, which, when allied with its multitiered antiinflammatory effect, makes this drug a valuable companion to cardiac surgery.