Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 4. The genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revisited

Yeast mitochondrial biogenesis: a model system for humans?

Recently, our knowledge of yeast mitochondrial biogenesis has considerably progressed. This concerns the import machinery that guides preproteins synthesized on the cytoplasmic ribosomes through the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes, as well as the inner membrane insertion machinery of mitochondrially encoded polypeptides, or the proteins participating in the assembly and quality control of the respiratory complexes and ATP synthase. More recently, two new fields have emerged, biosynthesis of the iron-sulfur clusters and dynamics of the mitochondrion. Many of the newly discovered yeast proteins have homologues in human mitochondria. Thus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven a particularly suitable simple organism for approaching the molecular bases of a growing number of human mitochondrial diseases caused by mutations in nuclear genes identified by positional cloning.

SRC1: an intron-containing yeast gene involved in sister chromatid segregation

Analysis of a three-member gene family in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has allowed the discovery of a new gene that comprises two contiguous open reading frames previously annotated as YML034w and YML033w. The gene contains a small intron with two alternative 5' splicing sites. It is specifically transcribed during G(2)/M in the cell cycle and after several hours of meiosis induction. Splicing of the mRNA is partially dependent on NAM8 but does not vary during meiosis or the cell cycle. Deletion of the gene induces a shortening of the anaphase and aggravates the phenotype of scc1 and esp1 conditional mutants, which suggests a direct role of the protein in sister chromatid separation.

An integrated approach for finding overlooked genes in yeast

We report here the discovery of 137 previously unappreciated genes in yeast through a widely applicable and highly scalable approach integrating methods of gene-trapping, microarray-based expression analysis, and genome-wide homology searching. Our approach is a multistep process in which expressed sequences are first trapped using a modified transposon that produces protein fusions to beta-galactosidase (beta-gal); non-annotated open reading frames (ORFs) translated as beta-gal chimeras are selected as a candidate pool of potential genes. To verify expression of these sequences, labeled RNA is hybridized against a microarray of oligonucleotides designed to detect gene transcripts in a strand-specific manner. In complement to this experimental method, novel genes are also identified in silico by homology to previously annotated proteins. As these methods are capable of identifying both short ORFs and antisense ORFs, our approach provides an effective supplement to current gene-finding schemes. In total, the genes discovered using this approach constitute 2% of the yeast genome and represent a wealth of overlooked biology.

A genomic view of yeast membrane transporters

The yeast membrane transporters play crucial roles in functions as diverse as nutrient uptake, drug resistance, salt tolerance, control of cell volume, efflux of undesirable metabolites and sensing of extracellular nutrients. A significant fraction of the many transporters inventoried after sequencing of the yeast genome has been characterised by classical experimental approaches. Post-genomic analysis has allowed a more extensive characterisation of transporter categories less tractable by genetics, for instance of transporters of intracellular membranes or transporters encoded by multigene families and displaying overlapping substrate specificities. A complete view of the role of membrane transporters in the metabolism of yeast may not be far off.

Gene dosage affects the expression of the duplicated NHP6 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nhp6Ap and Nhp6Bp, which are 87% identical in sequence, are moderately abundant, chromosome-associated proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In wild type cells Nhp6Ap is present at three times the level of Nhp6Bp. The effects of altering NHP6A or NHP6B gene number on the expression of its partner has been examined using Northern blots and reporter genes. Deletion of NHP6A led to a three-fold increase in NHP6B synthesis while an extra copy of NHP6A reduced NHP6B expression two-fold. Changes in the NHP6B gene copy number caused more moderate changes in NHP6A synthesis. The regulation of one NHP6 gene by the other uses a mechanism that detects the level of Nhp6 protein (or RNA) rather than gene number, since overexpression of Nhp6B protein from a single gene led to a dramatic decrease in NHP6A synthesis. Deletion analysis showed that the regulatory element involved in gene dosage compensation maps to a 190 bp segment in the NHP6B promoter. The simplest model, that each Nhp6 protein can act as a transcriptional repressor at the other NHP6 gene, is not true since purified Nhp6A protein does not bind specifically to the NHP6B promoter region. Instead, Nhp6p appears to interact with or through another protein in regulating transcription from the NHP6 genes.

Surveying Saccharomyces genomes to identify functional elements by comparative DNA sequence analysis

Comparative sequence analysis has facilitated the discovery of protein coding genes and important functional sequences within proteins, but has been less useful for identifying functional sequence elements in nonprotein-coding DNA because the relatively rapid rate of change of nonprotein-coding sequences and the relative simplicity of non-coding regulatory sequence elements necessitates the comparison of sequences of relatively closely related species. We tested the use of comparative DNA sequence analysis to aid identification of promoter regulatory elements, nonprotein-coding RNA genes, and small protein-coding genes by surveying random DNA sequences of several Saccharomyces yeast species, with the goal of learning which species are best suited for comparisons with S. cerevisiae. We also determined the DNA sequence of a few specific promoters and RNA genes of several Saccharomyces species to determine the degree of conservation of known functional elements within the genome. Our results lead us to conclude that comparative DNA sequence analysis will enable identification of functionally conserved elements within the yeast genome, and suggest a path for obtaining this information.