Fertility and tumor recurrence rate after conservative laparoscopic management of young women with early-stage borderline ovarian tumors

Results after laparoscopic management of serous borderline tumor of the ovary with peritoneal implants

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) with peritoneal implants.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients treated initially and/or for recurrent disease using a laparoscopic approach for a stage II or stage III BOT between January 2001 and January 2004.

RESULTS

Nine patients underwent a laparoscopic pure treatment of stage II/III serous borderline tumor. Three of them had a previous history of BOT. Three patients had a stage II and 6 a stage III disease. A conservative management was performed in 7 patients. Laparoscopic treatment of peritoneal implants included: omentectomy (or omental biopsies) in 4 patients and/or large peritoneal resection in 5 patients (pelvic peritoneum in all patients associated with peritonectomies of paracolic gutters in 2 and of the peritoneum of the right diaphragmatic peritoneum in 3). Implants were nonivasive in 8 patients. Each of implant had a size <5 mm. Four patients recurred, 3 of them had a borderline ovarian recurrence after conservative management. Two patients had peritoneal disease found during a second-look surgery (associated with ovarian recurrence in 1). Three spontaneous pregnancies were observed. All patients are alive without evidence of disease with a median time of follow-up of 35 months following the laparoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our series suggests that laparoscopic treatment of patients with BOT associated with small size non-invasive implants is feasible and seem to be safe. The main indication of this management consists in young patients treated conservatively to preserve their fertility.

Fertility after conservative treatment for borderline ovarian tumors: A French multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To examine fertility outcomes and determinants of fertility after conservative surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

SETTING

Thirteen specialized gynecologic units and one cancer center.

PATIENT(S)

In a study of women with borderline ovarian tumors, 162 of 360 women underwent conservative surgery; from these 162, we compared epidemiologic, surgical, and histological parameters between 21 women who conceived and 44 women who failed to conceive.

INTERVENTION(S)

Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fertility results and outcome.

RESULT(S)

Women undergoing conservative treatment were significantly younger and more likely to be nulliparous. Tumor size was significantly smaller in the conservative treatment group. Thirty pregnancies occurred in 21 (32.3%) of the 65 women who wished to conceive after conservative treatment. Twenty-seven pregnancies were spontaneous, whereas three occurred after ovarian stimulation and IUI (one case) or IVF (2 cases). Women who conceived did not differ from women who did not conceive in terms of the tumor recurrence rate or the mean time to recurrence (39.6 +/- 28.2 and 22.9 +/- 14.9 months, respectively). Age at initial treatment was the only determinant of fertility.

CONCLUSION(S)

Despite a high recurrence rate, our results confirm that conservative surgery for women with borderline ovarian tumors is an acceptable option and that fertility is preserved in nearly one third of cases.

Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy in the management of women with borderline ovarian tumors remains controversial. We therefore evaluated the adequacy of initial laparoscopic staging according to FIGO guidelines, by comparison with laparotomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a French retrospective multicenter study of 358 women with borderline ovarian tumors, we compared epidemiological characteristics, sonographic findings, serum tumor marker levels, and surgical and histological parameters between women undergoing laparoscopy and women undergoing laparotomy.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-nine (41.6%) of the 358 women underwent laparoscopy. Mean age, mean gestity and parity, and mean tumor size were higher in the laparotomy group. Forty-two women (28.2%) underwent laparoconversion, mainly for suspected ovarian cancer or large tumor volume. Conservative treatment and cyst rupture were more frequent in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P < 0.0001). The rate of complete staging was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P < 0.0001), with no difference between these latter two groups. No difference in the recurrence rate was noted between the groups, but a higher recurrence rate was observed after conservative treatment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors is associated with a higher rate of cyst rupture and incomplete staging. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative treatment. Whatever the surgical route, the rate of complete initial staging was low, emphasizing the need to respect treatment guidelines for borderline ovarian tumors.

Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the sonographic findings that distinguish borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) from both benign and invasive malignant tumors, thus allowing conservative treatment and laparoscopic management of these tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively transvaginal sonograms of 33 women who, when evaluated further by surgery and histology, were found to have BOT. Twenty-three were premenopausal and 10 were postmenopausal (mean age +/- SD, 45.8 +/- 15.7 years). For each mass, size and morphological features and power Doppler characteristics were evaluated. We compared these findings with those of 337 patients with benign ovarian tumors and those of 82 patients with invasive malignant ovarian tumors. Patients with dermoid cysts were not included in the study.

RESULTS

Of the 33 BOT, 15 were mucinous and 18 were serous cystadenomas. The presence of papillae, defined as a small number of solid tissue projections, 1-15 mm in height and 1-10 mm in width (base) and length (base), into the cyst cavity from the cyst wall, was significantly more frequent in BOT (48%) than it was in benign (4%) and invasive (4%) malignant tumors. Intracystic solid tissue (> 15 mm in height or > 10 mm in width or length) was observed in 48% of invasive malignant masses but in only 18% of BOT and in 7% of benign tumors (P < 0.001). No sonographically unilocular, hypoechoic, smooth-walled adnexal cysts were invasively malignant but three unilocular cysts with a diameter of > 6 cm were serous BOT. Although close attention was paid to the cyst wall at ultrasound examination we did not observe in these three cysts the very small papillae which were found at histological analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent diagnostic feature on imaging BOT is the presence of papillae within the cyst. However, neither papillae nor other sonographic features constituted highly sensitive sonographic markers of BOT.

Safety and efficacy of infertility treatment after conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors: A preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infertility treatment in a group of patients after conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University IVF unit.

PATIENT(S)

Five patients with previous conservative treatment of borderline ovarian tumor.

INTERVENTION(S)

Seventeen IVF cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Recurrence, IVF outcome.

RESULT(S)

At the time of diagnosis, the mean age of the patients was 32.2 +/- 6.9 years. The mean time elapsed between the initial diagnosis of a borderline tumor and the performance of IVF was 42.2 months. After IVF, the mean number of oocytes retrieved was 7.9 +/- 4.0 with a mean fertilization rate of 57.1% and a mean number of 3.1 +/- 1.4 day 3 embryos transferred. Six pregnancies were achieved in three of the five patients with a pregnancy rate per retrieval of 37.5% and per transfer of 42.9%. The mean follow-up time that elapsed since the first IVF cycle was 39.2 months (range 9-78 months). One patient had three recurrences 13, 27, and 43 months after her first IVF cycle, all of which remained histologically serous borderline tumor. All patients were without evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up.

CONCLUSION(S)

At a mean follow-up time of 39.2 months, our results suggest that IVF may be considered for patients with conservatively treated borderline tumors. Furthermore, overall IVF success rates were very satisfactory, suggesting no perceptible negative impact of prior borderline ovarian neoplasia on pregnancy rates after IVF.

Clinical outcome after laparoscopic pure management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a series of 34 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome after laparoscopic treatment of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients treated initially and/or for recurrent disease using a laparoscopic approach for BOT from 1984 to January 2002.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent laparoscopic pure treatment (without conversion by laparotomy and/or reassessment surgery by laparotomy) for BOT. Conservative treatment was performed in 31 (91%) patients. Median follow-up time was 45 months (range 6-228). Six (17%) patients recurred (in the remaining ovary following conservative surgery in five patients and in the peritoneum in one patient). Two port-site metastases were observed. None of the patients had recurrent disease in the form of ovarian carcinoma. Nine spontaneous pregnancies were observed in six patients from a group of 15 patients desiring pregnancy. All patients are alive today and disease-free.

CONCLUSION

These results seem to demonstrate that laparoscopic treatment can be safely performed in young patients with early stage BOT. Such a procedure is then feasible, but should be evaluated in patients with BOT and peritoneal implants.

Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of laparoscopic staging and/or surgery in the field of gynaecological oncology was pioneered in the early 1990s. The issue has been very controversial from the beginning, with some justification in view of the possible consequences of faulty cancer surgery. After more than 10 years, long-term follow-up and comparative studies, both of which are required in clinical oncological research, are now available.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of papers have confirmed the absence of significant adverse effects on survival after laparoscopic diagnosis or surgery in gynaecological cancers. New developments cover virtually all the basic techniques in cancer surgery, excluding major exenterative surgery. The use of an extraperitoneal technique for aortic dissections is emerging. New indications, such as radical vaginal trachelectomy, pelvic sentinel node identification, interval debulking surgery of adnexal malignancies, or the liberal use of surgical staging of uterine cancers, have been developed as a direct result of the availability of laparoscopic techniques.

SUMMARY

Continuing worldwide interest clearly demonstrates that laparoscopic techniques are now part of the armamentarium of the gynaecological oncologist. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence risk do not seem to be affected. Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic procedures is based on the reduction of hospital stay. Combined training in gynaecological oncology and in laparoscopic surgery is, more than ever, mandatory as a means of avoiding the risk of inadequate staging or the mismanagement of pelvic malignancies. The diversity of techniques, including laparotomy, laparoscopy, and vaginal surgery, allows the individualization of surgical approaches, whereby tumour size and local or general conditions can be taken into account.

Safety of conservative management and fertility outcome in women with borderline tumors of the ovary

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatment and the remaining chance of childbearing after surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

DESIGN

Gynecology department of a university teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Seventy-five women underwent surgical management in our institution between 1986 and 2001 for borderline tumors of the ovary.

INTERVENTION(S)

Fifty-nine patients were treated by radical, fertility-compromising surgery. The remaining 16 patients underwent conservative surgery, preserving the uterus and at least some functional ovarian tissue. Seven unilateral adnexectomies, one simple cystectomy, and two adnexectomies associated with contralateral cystectomy were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Recurrence, survival, and pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

The observed recurrence rates after radical and conservative surgery were 0.0% and 18.7%, respectively. No disease-related deaths occurred in any group; there is no significant difference in survival rates. We can report 12 pregnancies in 7 of 11 women who underwent fertility-sparing management and who wished to become pregnant.

CONCLUSION(S)

In certain circumstances, conservative management offers a safe solution for borderline tumors of the ovary. Recurrence is noted significantly more often after this type of treatment, but all cases of recurrent disease can be detected with close follow-up and can be treated accordingly. No significant change in survival rates was found. Moreover, the pregnancy rate in women desiring pregnancy, those treated conservatively, was as high as 63.6%.

Borderline ovarian tumours: a review of the recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Borderline tumors of the ovary are seen commonly in obstetrics and gynecology practices. This review will outline the most recent information regarding the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, pathology, and clinical management of these tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past, borderline ovarian tumors and invasive ovarian cancer were studied together, under the presumption that they represent a continuum of disease. This view is coming into question based on both epidemiological and molecular biological studies. Pathologists are increasingly able to identify poor prognostic histological features. This has not yet been translated into improved non-surgical therapy. Surgical management to excise all visible tumor remains the cornerstone of therapy. Because borderline ovarian tumors often occur in reproductive-age women, fertility is an important issue. Conservative surgery is safe in carefully selected patients.

SUMMARY

Our growing understanding of the relatively benign natural history of borderline ovarian tumors has allowed us to be more conservative in their surgical management, preserving fertility in many young women. A few women will be affected by a more virulent form of the disease with the potential to recur and cause death. The pathological features that identify patients with a poor prognosis are progressively being elucidated. Surgery remains the most effective therapy for these patients. Effective non-surgical therapies have yet to be identified. Hopefully, as molecular biological studies continue to expand our understanding of this disease as probably a separate carcinogenic process from invasive ovarian cancer, we will be able to employ this knowledge to design novel adjuvant therapies.