Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases

Sonohysterographic endometrial sampling and hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy: a comparative study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the quantity and quality of endometrial tissue sampled at saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) with that obtained by directed endometrial biopsy by operative hysteroscopy in patients with diffusely thickened and/or inhomogeneous endometrium at SCSH. A secondary aim was a comparison of the extent of procedure-related pain.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients with diffusely thickened (> 4 mm) and/or inhomogeneous endometrium at SCSH were prospectively recruited. Endometrial sampling was performed at the end of SCSH using the same 4.7-mm intrauterine catheter that had been used for saline instillation. These samples were compared to directed endometrial biopsies obtained with the guidance of an office 5-mm hysteroscope. After hysteroscopy, an extended guided curettage was performed under general anesthesia, providing specimens that were considered the gold standard for histological diagnosis. Endometrial specimen area (mm(2)), histologic concordance and procedure related pain (10-cm VAS) were compared for the two techniques.

RESULTS

The median age of 88 pre- and of 40 post-menopausal patients was 41 (interquartile range, 34-48) years and 57 (interquartile range, 52-67) years, respectively. The median area of endometrial specimen obtained by SCSH was 25.1 (interquartile range, 12.4-52.3) mm(2) and was not significantly different from that obtained by hysteroscopy (16.9 (interquartile range, 10.0-52.7) mm(2)). The K values of the two different techniques for typical hyperplasia (n = 61) and for premalignant and malignant lesions (n = 26) were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. Procedure-related pain was not significantly different between pre- and postmenopausal patients for both sampling techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

SCSH with sampling proved to be as good as and as tolerable as hysteroscopic biopsy in cases with diffusely thickened and/or inhomogeneous endometrium. Both these imaging and biopsy techniques should be considered a reliable outpatient procedure in the management of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis

Adenomyosis, the heterotopic presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, has traditionally been diagnosed by the pathologist in hysterectomy specimens. However, the recent development of high-quality non-invasive techniques such as transvaginal sonography (TVS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and hysteroscopy has renewed interest in diagnosing adenomyosis in the office prior to any treatment. Hysteroscopy offers the advantage of direct visualization of the uterine cavity, and since nowadays it is performed in the office, it can be offered as a first-line diagnostic tool for evaluation of uterine abnormalities in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and/or infertility. The available data clearly indicate that high-quality mini-hysteroscopes, saline as a distension medium, and atraumatic insertion technique are essential for the success of office hysteroscopy. The procedure is indicated in any situation in which an intrauterine anomaly is suspected; it is immediately preceded by a physical exam and a TVS to evaluate uterine characteristics, and it is followed by a second TVS to take advantage of the intracavitary fluid for a contrast image of the uterus. Although diagnostic hysteroscopy does not provide pathognomonic signs for adenomyosis, some evidence suggests that irregular endometrium with endometrial defects, altered vascularization, and cystic haemorrhagic lesion are possibly associated with the entity. In addition to the direct visualization of the uterine cavity, the hysteroscopic approach offers the possibility of obtaining endometrial/myometrial biopsies under visual control. Since they can be performed in the office, the combination of TVS, fluid hysteroscopy and contrast sonography is therefore a powerful screening tool for detecting endometrial and myometrial abnormalities in association with adenomyosis.

Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

A randomized, controlled study was performed to compare vaginoscopic versus traditional (speculum with or without tenaculum) hysteroscopy in terms of pain score and procedure time.

METHODS

Three hundred patients were randomized in two groups: Group A, diagnostic hysteroscopy with vaginoscopic approach (150 patients) and Group B, diagnostic hysteroscopy with traditional approach (150 patients). All procedures were performed using a semi-rigid 3.5-mm minihysteroscope with a 0 degrees grade optic. Patients of each group were divided into three subgroups according to their reproductive status: fertile nulliparous (FN), fertile multiparous (FM) and post-menopausal (MEN) women. Women were asked to rate their degree of pain during four phases of the procedure: introduction of hysteroscope (Group A) or speculum (Group B) into the vagina (Phase I) and progression through cervical canal up to internal uterine orifice (IUO) (Phase II), inspection of uterine cavity (Phase III) and performing of endometrial biopsy (Phase IV). A total pain score was calculated for each group. For each patient, the duration of hysteroscopy was recorded from the introduction to the extraction of the scope (Group A) or of the speculum (Group B).

RESULTS

Although the median total pain scores were 2 in each group, the 95% confidence interval for vaginoscopic hysteroscopy (1.86-2.01) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that for traditional hysteroscopy (2.10-2.26). Comparison between the corresponding phases of the procedure showed the only significant difference during Phase I of the procedure [Group A: 1 (95% CI 1.0-1.18) versus Group B: 2 (95% CI 2.3-2.8); P < 0.05]. No significant differences in terms of duration of the procedure were observed between the two approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

When surgeons using vaginoscopic hysteroscopy with a semi-rigid minihysteroscope were compared with those using traditional approach and the same instrumentation, the operating times and the patients' pain scores were similar.

Vaginoscopic versus conventional approaches to outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: a two-centre randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND

To compare the tolerability and feasibility of the transvaginal and standard approaches in outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy.

METHODS

This randomized prospective trial was carried out in two centres to compare the transvaginal (n = 200) and conventional (n = 200) approaches during outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients were randomized by a computer-generated list. The main outcome measure was pain during the examination, measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 10 (0 = lowest, 10 = highest). Secondary criteria were ease of instrument passage through the cervix, investigation quality and its duration. For data analysis, we used the chi-squared test or Fischer's exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for quantitative variables.

RESULTS

Median VAS was rated at 0.5 for the vaginoscopic and 2 for the standard (P < 0.0001) approaches. The approaches did not differ significantly in investigation quality, procedure duration or ease of cervical passage (although the latter was more often easy transvaginally).

CONCLUSIONS

The transvaginal approach is better tolerated than the conventional technique in outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy.

[Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy]

Vaginoscopic hysteroscopy permits to avoid several painful gestures of classical office hysteroscopy. The aim of this article is to describe the advantages such vaginoscopic approach. Six studies were thus selected, dealing with vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. The diameter of the hysteroscope, always a rigid one, was between 3.5 and 5 mm, and CO(2) or saline infusions were indifferently used. Failure rate is inferior to 5%. One study, comparing pain induced by vaginoscopic versus classical hysteroscopy, concluded that vaginoscopic approach was less painful.

Hysteroscopy and Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer

The main aim of investigating women with abnormal uterine bleeding is to exclude serious intrauterine pathology, particularly endometrial cancer. Endometrial assessment has traditionally been achieved by obtaining tissue for histological analysis utilising blind in-patient dilatation of the cervix and curettage of the endometrium under general anaesthesia. This procedure is now generally accepted as outmoded practice associated with unnecessary morbidity and cost and has been largely replaced by minimally invasive out-patient or 'ambulatory' diagnostic modalities. These modalities include transvaginal ultrasonography, out-patient hysteroscopy and miniature endometrial biopsy. The most controversial debate has centred on how best to image the uterine cavity with advocates of hysteroscopy and ultrasonography holding apparently implacable views. However, the concept of hysteroscopy and ultrasonography as competing tests may be misplaced, and perhaps they should be viewed as complementary diagnostic tools. To help us answer such questions requires an appraisal of the available evidence. In this way, a more rational approach to investigating women for endometrial cancer is possible based on the clinical and economic performance of hysteroscopy and ultrasonography. This review assesses the evidence and suggests approaches available to gynaecologists for the diagnostic work-up of women suspected to have endometrial cancer utilising hysteroscopy and ultrasonography.

Detection of chronic endometritis at fluid hysteroscopy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Chronic endometritis is a subtle condition that is difficult to detect; however, it may cause abnormal uterine bleeding and infertility. Few data exist about the appearance of chronic endometritis at fluid hysteroscopy and about the value of diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy in the detection of this condition. In our experience, at fluid hysteroscopy chronic endometritis is characterized by consistent association of stromal edema and either focal or diffuse hyperemia; in some cases, this finding is associated with endometrial micropolyps (less than 1 mm in size). This study attempted to describe diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis at fluid hysteroscopy and assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluid hysteroscopy in the detection of this condition.

DESIGN

Retrospective Study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Nine hundred-ten women in whom hysteroscopy was indicated.

INTERVENTIONS

Fluid hysteroscopy followed by endometrial biopsy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of fluid hysteroscopy in the detection of chronic endometritis, based on the association of edema; hyperemia; and, if present, micropolyps were calculated. Based on the presence of hyperemia and edema, chronic endometritis was diagnosed in 158 patients (17.4%); in 61 patients (6.7%), micropolyps also were present. Histology confirmed the diagnosis in 101 patients (63.9% of positive cases at hysteroscopy) and was positive in 9 additional cases not detected by hysteroscopy. Chronic endometritis at histology was found in approximately 30% of infertile women and 35% of cases related to abnormal uterine bleeding. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of hysteroscopy for chronic endometritis based on detection of only hyperemia and edema were 91.8%, 92.9%, 63.9%, and 98.8%, respectively; the diagnostic accuracy was 92.7 %. The combination of hyperemia, edema, and micropolyps had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 55.4%, 99.9%, 98.4%, 94.5%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 93.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluid hysteroscopy is very reliable in diagnosing no inflammation, while detection of micropolyps is a very reliable sign of inflammation. When performing hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding or infertility, signs of chronic endometritis should always be sought.

Diagnostic minihysteroscopy with vaginoscopic approach: Rationale and advantages

Diagnostic hysteroscopy still is considered an invasive and painful technique. In recent years, a new technique based on the employment of minihysteroscopes with fluid distention and vaginoscopic approach has been proposed in order to improve feasibility and reduce pain and side effects. Size reduction of the hysteroscope is of greatest importance for reducing pain and risk of vasovagal reaction. In conclusion, the best approach in terms of ease, reliability, acceptability, and safety to patients in whom intrauterine exploration is indicated should be simple diagnostic hysteroscopy using a small-diameter, rod lens hysteroscope with a single-flow diagnostic sheath, vaginoscopic approach, and fluid distention. In this way in about 90% of patients, a correct diagnosis and proper choice for eventual subsequent operative strategy can be obtained, without discomfort and risk.

Development of a thinner and more flexible type of minihysteroscope with a controlled 90-degree bendable tip for vision-guided endometrium biopsy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the uterine cavity is limited with rigid 5-mm hysteroscopes because of the need for cervical dilatation, reduced movements inside the uterus, and no option for vision-guided biopsy. In cooperation with PolyDiagnost GmbH, Pfaffenhofen, Germany, a new type of flexible minihysteroscope with bendable tip was developed and evaluated.

DESIGN

Prospective and parallel observational interindividual evaluation of flexible minihysteroscope and standard hysteroscope for diagnostic hysteroscopy (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Obstetrics and gynecology department of a university clinic.

PATIENTS

Nine women, average age 65.0 years (range 46-89 years), with indications for diagnostic hysteroscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

After defining requirements, a novel, thinner, and more flexible minihysteroscope, 18-cm long with a 2.67-mm outer diameter, was developed with straight zero-degree scope, 70-degree vision field, and 6000-pixel resolution. Two working channels, 1.2 mm and 0.55 mm, allow suction-irrigation and introduction of a 1.0-mm biopsy forceps or cytology brush. The tip of the instrument is 90-degree stageless bendable to both sides. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed with flexible minihysteroscope followed by standard rigid hysteroscopy to verify results.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From July 2003 through March 2004, both procedures were performed in nine patients with identical visual and histologic results. No complications occurred. No cervix-dilating instruments were necessary for introduction of the flexible minihysteroscope. Visualization of the entire uterine cavity is improved with the flexible scope because a bendable tip allows better peripheral vision (e.g., of the openings of the tubes). However, movement of the tip should be performed carefully due to potential risk of uterine perforation.

CONCLUSION

This new flexible minihysteroscope is less invasive compared with standard rigid hysteroscopy, which supports performance of ambulatory hysteroscopy and makes increased movements and vision-guided biopsy inside the uterine cavity possible.

Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the 'no-touch' technique

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether outpatient hysteroscopy using the 'no-touch' technique confers any advantages in terms of patient discomfort over the traditional technique.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Outpatient hysteroscopy clinic in a large university undergraduate teaching hospital.

POPULATION

All women referred for outpatient hysteroscopy in a 12-month period.

INTERVENTIONS

Women were randomised to undergo either traditional saline hysteroscopy requiring the use of a speculum and tenaculum, or a 'no-touch' vaginoscopic hysteroscopy which does not require a speculum or tenaculum. Each group was further subdivided to have hysteroscopy with either a 2.9-mm or 4-mm hysteroscope. Patients were asked to complete pre- and postprocedure questionnaires ranking pain scores.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The relative success of each of these techniques, requirement for local anaesthetic and pain scores at different times during the hysteroscopy were recorded at the end of the procedure. The time taken to carry out each procedure was also measured.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty women were recruited in this study: 60 were randomised to traditional hysteroscopy and 60 to 'no-touch' hysteroscopy. The overall success rate for hysteroscopy was 99%. There was no significant difference in the requirement for local anaesthetic between the two groups, but those who underwent 'no-touch' hysteroscopy with a 2.9-mm hysteroscope had the lowest requirement of local anaesthetic (10% compared with 27% in the no-touch hysteroscopy with a 4-mm hysteroscope group). The time taken to perform hysteroscopy and biopsy was significantly shorter with 'no-touch' hysteroscopy (5.9 vs 7.8 min; difference 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-3.1). There were no differences in pain scores between the groups at different times during hysteroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

'No-touch' or vaginoscopic hysteroscopy is significantly faster to perform than the traditional technique. Although there was no difference in pain scores between the two techniques, local anaesthetic requirements were least in those who underwent 'no-touch' hysteroscopy with a narrow bore hysteroscope.

Vaginohysteroscopy, a patient-friendly technique for outpatient hysteroscopy: experience of the first 100 cases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of the vaginoscopic approach for office hysteroscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

SUBJECTS

Unselected, consecutive 100 patients scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy.

INTERVENTION

Hysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach using a 5-mm rigid hysteroscope with single inflow channel, and normal saline for distension.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful hysteroscopy by the vaginoscopic approach; operative time; and degree of pain experienced.

RESULTS

The vaginoscopic technique was successful in 79% of the patients. The median operative time was 120 seconds in successful cases and 360 seconds in those in which the vaginoscopic approach was unsuccessful and had to be performed by the conventional technique with or without dilatation, the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). The procedure took < or = 2 minutes in 91.1% (72/79) of the successful cases. No pain or mild pain was experienced by 97.5% (77/79) of patients in whom vaginohysteroscopy was successful.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopy with the vaginoscopic approach is the ideal method for outpatient hysteroscopy. It is feasible, quick, and very well tolerated, obviating the need for any analgesia or local anesthesia.

Endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of chronic endometritis

BACKGROUND

At fluid hysteroscopy the presence of endometrial micropolyps (less than 1 mm of size) is a frequent finding. Although their origin is still unknown, in our experience they are associated with stromal edema, endometrial thickening and periglandular hyperhaemia that suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. This study will aim to describe these lesions and evaluate their inflammatory significance by comparing hysteroscopic and histological findings.

METHODS

820 women underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of the micropolyps presence for the diagnosis of chronic endometritis were calculated.

RESULTS

Micropolyps were found in 96 cases (11.7% of all hysteroscopies); in 90 (93.7%) of these cases histology confirmed the presence of chronic endometritis. In women without micropolyps, chronic endometritis was significantly less frequent (78 cases, 10.8%) (P < 0.000001). The likelihood of chronic endometritis for women with micropolyps was very high (odds ratio 124.2, confidence interval 50.3-205.4). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 54%, 99%, 94% and 89%, respectively; the diagnostic accuracy was 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy is significantly associated with endometrial inflammation and can be considered a reliable diagnostic sign for this pathology.

Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic hysteroscopy is not widely performed in the office setting, one of the reasons being the discomfort produced by the procedure. This randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effects of instrument diameter, patient parity and surgeon experience on the pain suffered and success rate of the procedure.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo office diagnostic hysteroscopy either with 5.0 mm conventional instruments (n=240) or with 3.5 mm mini-instruments (n=240). Procedures were stratified according to patient parity and surgeon's previous experience. The pain experienced during the procedure (0-10), the quality of visualization of the uterine cavity (0-3) and the complications were recorded. The examination was considered successful when the pain score was <4, visualization score was >1 and no complication occurred.

RESULTS

Less pain, better visualization and higher success rates were observed with mini-hysteroscopy (P <0.0001, P <0.0001 and P <0.0001, respectively), in patients with vaginal deliveries (P <0.0001, P <0.0001 and P <0.0001, respectively) and in procedures performed by experienced surgeons (P=0.02, P=NS and P=NS, respectively). The effects of patient parity and surgeon experience were no longer important when mini-hysteroscopy was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate the advantages of mini-hysteroscopy and the importance of patient parity and surgeon experience, suggesting that mini-hysteroscopy should always be used, especially for inexperienced surgeons and when difficult access to the uterine cavity is anticipated. They indicate that mini-hysteroscopy can be offered as a first line office diagnostic procedure.

Outpatient hysteroscopy and ultrasonography in the management of endometrial disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is to inform the ongoing debate about the choice between ultrasound and hysteroscopy in the management of endometrial disease presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding using information provided from recently published literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness, using 4 or 5 mm cut-offs to define abnormality, is a good test for excluding endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding. In contrast, hysteroscopy is a good test for detecting endometrial cancer, but less effective at excluding serious disease. The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing intracavity pathology such as submucous fibroids and polyps is improved with saline instillation to levels of accuracy comparable to that of outpatient hysteroscopy. Miniaturization of hysteroscopes and ancillary instrumentation (e.g. development of bipolar intrauterine systems) has facilitated 'see and treat' outpatient hysteroscopy, so that it should no longer be considered simply an outpatient diagnostic modality. Preliminary cost-effectiveness studies have supported the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial disease, but further, more comprehensive studies are required comparing ultrasound and outpatient hysteroscopy.

SUMMARY

Recently published research has provided the clinician with high-quality data regarding the accuracy of ultrasound and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial disease. Despite this, controversy remains regarding the relative roles of these uterine imaging modalities. Future research needs to be directed towards providing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness data in order to resolve the ongoing debate and guide best clinical practice.