Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin beta, Puregon) yields higher pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization than urinary gonadotropins

A prospective and randomized study of ovarian stimulation for ICSI with recombinant FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH

A prospective and randomized study of ovarian stimulation with human recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (u-FSH-HP; Metrodin-HP) was conducted on patients submitted to an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program. A total of 120 patients aged 37 years or less were stimulated in a randomized manner with r-FSH (group I = 60 patients) or u-FSH-HP (group II = 60 patients). All received a fixed dose of FSH for 7 days and on the 8th day of stimulation the doses started to be adapted according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at the dose of 5000 IU to 10,000 IU was administered to both groups when at least one follicle presented a diameter > or = 17 mm. The ovarian response did not differ significantly between groups I and II in terms of number of follicles > or = 16 mm (group I = 6.2 +/- 3.2; group II = 6.7 +/- 2.9; p = 0.26), number of oocytes collected (group I = 10.7 +/- 6.8; group II = 10.5 +/- 5.7; p = 0.91), number of oocytes in metaphase II (group I = 9.2 +/- 5.8; group II = 8.2 +/- 4.8; p = 0.56) or number of immature oocytes (group I = 1.8 +/- 0.9; group II = 1.9 +/- 1.7; p = 0.62). The normal fertilization rate after ICSI did not differ significantly between treatments (group I = 69.4 +/- 25; group II = 66.5 +/- 23; p = 0.38). No cases of cancellation of ovarian stimulation or of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in either group. The total number of embryos obtained from patients who used r-FSH (group I = 6.3 +/- 4.5) was similar (p = 0.46) to the number obtained from patients who used u-FSH-HP (group II = 5.5 +/- 3.7), as also was the number of transferred embryos (group I = 2.8 +/- 0.8; group II = 2.6 +/- 0.9; p = 0.27). Implantation rate (26.1%) and clinical pregnancy rates per puncture (36.7%) and per embryo transfer (37.9%) were higher in patients who used r-FSH than in patients who used u-FSH-HP (19.5%, 31.7% and 32.2%, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant. The abortion rate (p = 0.32) did not differ between groups (group I = 4.5%, n = 1 versus group II = 15.7%, n = 3). Thus far, the data do not demonstrate significant differences in ovary stimulation with r-FSH versus u-FSH in patients whose indication for assisted reproduction was the male factor.

Follicular development and hormonal levels following highly purified or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone administration in ovulatory women undergoing ovarian stimulation after pituitary suppression for in vitro fertilization: implications for implantation potential

PURPOSE

The main goal in the present study was to compare follicular development and estradiol levels after ovarian stimulation in pituitary suppressed normally ovulating women undergoing IVF, using highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (u-FSH-HP) and recombinant FSH (rec-FSH). A secondary variable in our study was embryo implantation potential, which is closely related to appropriate follicular development and oocyte competence.

METHODS

For the main purpose of this study, 30 IVF patients (group 1) were treated during IVF consecutive cycles, using the same stimulation protocol, with u-FSH-HP in the first treatment study cycle and rec-FSH in the second one. As a control group (group 2) for implantation rates obtained in cycles treated with rec-FSH, 30 additional IVF patients were included who underwent a second IVF attempt again with u-FSH-HP.

RESULTS

The total dose of FSH used and ovarian response obtained in terms of estradiol plasma levels and the total number of growing follicles on the day of human chronic gonadotropin (HCG) injection were similar in both treatment cycles in group 1 but better follicular dynamics and oocyte maturity were obtained with rec-FSH. The implantation rate was significantly higher in rec-FSH treated cycles in patients in group 1 than in control women (group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

rec-FSH is more efficacious than u-FSH-HP when used in the same patient in inducing multiple follicular development in down-regulated cycles as indicated by ovarian performance and oocyte maturity. In addition, rec-FSH yields significantly higher implantation rates than u-FSH-HP when used in patients undergoing their second IVF attempt.

Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective in poor responders to highly purified follicle stimulating hormone

Ovarian stimulation in cases of poor ovarian responsiveness is an important challenge in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programmes. Despite improvements in oocyte number and quality, an ideal ovarian stimulation strategy has yet to be defined. Here, the results of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in 28 poor responders to highly purified FSH (FSH-HP) with high basal concentrations of FSH are reported. The protocols used on the FSH-HP and rFSH cycles were identical with the sole exception of the FSH preparation: triptorelin 0.1 mg/day (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, GnRH-agonist short protocol) and the starting FSH dose of 300 IU/day were administered from day 2 of the menstrual cycle. Ovarian outcome was classified as 'normal', 'intermediate' and 'poor', depending on the number of mature oocytes retrieved and the peak serum oestradiol concentration. Nine of the 28 subjects had an intermediate ovarian response to re-stimulation with rFSH. In the 26 patients who received human chorionic gonadotrophin on both cycles, re-stimulation resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the mean number of mature oocytes (2.4 +/- 1.4 versus 1.7 +/- 0.8), mean peak oestradiol concentration (606 +/- 252 versus 443 +/- 32 pg/ml) and fertilization rate (73.0 versus 53.3%). Four pregnancies were achieved. It is concluded that rFSH in a GnRH-agonist short protocol improves the ovarian outcome in poor responders to FSH-HP with high basal concentrations of FSH.

Gonadotrophin therapy for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of patients with PCOS remain anovulatory despite treatment with oral anti-oestrogen medications such as clomiphene citrate. In addition, about half of women with PCOS ovulating on anti-oestrogen treatment fail to conceive. Gonadotrophin stimulation is the next step in treatment for women who are "clomiphene resistant", however, results of gonadotrophin stimulation in women with PCOS are less successful. In PCOS associated with hypersecretion of LH, purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (u-FSH) preparations have theoretical advantages over the use of human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) preparations (containing both FSH and LH), but whether this claimed advantage extends into clinical practice remains uncertain. In addition, the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) to produce pituitary desensitisation prior to ovulation induction in PCOS has been claimed to increase the success rates of treatment as well as reduce complications such as OHSS and multiple pregnancy. Gonadotrophin preparations have also been administered via different routes (intramuscular or subcutaneous), or using different stimulation regimens and protocols (step-up or standard) in an attempt to improve efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of urinary-derived gonadotrophins as ovulation induction agents in patients with PCOS trying to conceive. In particular, to assess the effectiveness of (1) different gonadotrophin preparations, (2) the addition of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) to gonadotrophin stimulation and (3) different modalities of gonadotrophin administration.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy to identify RCTs consisted of (1) the Group's Specialised Register of Controlled Trials using the search strategy developed for the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group as a whole (see the Review Group details for more information), (2) additional specific electronic Medline searches and (3) bibliographies of identified studies and narrative reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs in which urinary-derived gonadotrophins were used for ovulation induction in patients with primary or secondary subfertility attributable to PCOS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty three RCTs were identified, 9 of which were excluded from analysis. The data were extracted independently by 2 authors. The following criteria were assessed: (1) the methodological characteristics of the trials, (2) the baseline characteristics of the studied groups and (3) the outcomes of interest: pregnancy rate (per cycle), ovulation rate (per cycle), miscarriage rate (per pregnancy), multiple pregnancy rate (per pregnancy), overstimulation rate (per cycle) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate (per cycle). Where suitable, meta-analysis was performed using Peto's OR with 95% CI with the fixed effect Mantel-Haentszel equation.

MAIN RESULTS

(1) A reduction in the incidence of OHSS with FSH compared to hMG in stimulation cycles without the concomitant use of a GnRH-a (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.08-0.46) and (2) a higher overstimulation rate when a GnRH-a is added to gonadotrophins (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.48-6.70).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although 14 RCTs were included in this review, few dealt with the same comparisons, all were small to moderate size and their methodological quality was generally poor. Any conclusions, therefore, remain tentative as they are based on a limited amount of data and will require further RCTs to substantiate them. In none of the comparisons was there a significant improvement in pregnancy rate but this may be due to the lack of power (i.e. insufficient patients randomised to demonstrate a significant difference between treatments). There was a trend towards better pregnancy rates with the addition of a GnRH-a to gonadotrophin stimulation and these interventions warrant further study. Despite theoretical advantages, urinary-derived FSH preparations did not improve pregnancy rates when compared to traditional and cheaper hMG preparations; their only demonstrable benefit was a reduced risk of OHSS in cycles when administered without the concomitant use of a GnRH-a. No conclusions can be drawn on miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates due to insufficient reporting of these outcomes in the trials.

Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the main source of exogenous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) for therapeutic use in infertility had been the urine of postmenopausal women. New developments have resulted in the production of FSH in vitro by recombinant DNA technology. The extremely high purity and batch-to-batch consistency of recombinant FSH (rFSH) make it an attractive alternative to urinary FSH (uFSH).

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of rFSH with uFSH in ovarian stimulation protocols in in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search strategies included on-line searching of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1985 to 1999, hand searching of bibliographies of relevant publications and reviews and abstracts of scientific meetings, peer consultation and contacting the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture the gonadotropins under consideration.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing rFSH with uFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF or ICSI treatment for infertility.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy per cycle started. Also considered were clinical pregnancy per cycle reaching oocyte retrieval and per cycle reaching embryo transfer (ET), ongoing pregnancy per cycle started, spontaneous abortion, multiple pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), number of follicles and serum estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration day, total dose of FSH, and number of oocytes retrieved. Common odds ratios (OR) and risk differences for rFSH relative to uFSH were calculated after testing for homogeneity of treatment effect across all trials. The fixed effects model was used, unless significant heterogeneity was present, in which case the random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

The overall odds ratio for clinical pregnancy per cycle started was 1.21 (95% confidence limits (CL) 1.04,1.42) for rFSH compared to uFSH. The risk difference was a 3.7% (0.8,6.7) absolute increase in clinical pregnancy rate with rFSH. The OR for ongoing pregnancy per cycle started was 1.29 (1.08,1.54). There was no significant difference between rFSH and uFSH in the rates of spontaneous abortion, multiple pregnancy or OHSS. The total dose of FSH was lower by 406 (185,627) IU with rFSH, but there was no significant difference in the number of follicles or serum estradiol on hCG day or in the number of oocytes retrieved.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review has demonstrated a statistically significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate with rFSH compared to uFSH, when used for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction. This benefit was observed only in standard IVF cycles and not in cycles in which ICSI was used.

Comparison of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone preparations in in-vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical study

A randomized comparison of two recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) preparations (Gonal-F and Puregon) in ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was carried out at the Infertility Clinic of the Family Federation of Finland. A total of 348 women (aged 22-43 years) suffering from infertility due to miscellaneous causes was recruited. Of these, 344 underwent stimulation using equal starting doses (150 IU/day: Gonal-F n = 164, Puregon n = 158 or 300 IU/day: Gonal-F n = 8, Puregon n = 14) after down-regulation with intranasal buserelin from the mid-luteal phase. Similar clinical pregnancy rates were achieved with both preparations; 33.5% per cycle and 37.4% per embryo transfer (24.5% one-embryo and 75.5% two-embryo transfers, n = 147) with Gonal-F (150 IU/day) and 32.9% per cycle and 36.4% per embryo transfer (30.1% one-embryo and 69.9% two-embryo transfers, n = 145) with Puregon (150 IU/day). The ongoing cumulative pregnancy rates after frozen-thawed embryo transfer were 35.4% with Gonal-F and 37.7% with Puregon. Six cycles were cancelled because of a low response (three in each group). Similar numbers of oocytes were obtained in both groups; 13.0 with 150 IU/day and 6.1 with 300 IU/day Gonal-F, and 12.4 with 150 IU/day and 7.1 with 300 IU/day Puregon. The fertilization and cleavage rates and the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (Gonal-F, 2.0% and Puregon, 0.7%) were also similar. Gonal-F and Puregon were equally and highly effective in stimulation for IVF and ICSI.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing 150 IU recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon((R))) and 225 IU highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone (Metrodin-HP((R))) in a fixed-dose regimen in women undergoing ovarian stimulation

A prospective, randomized, open, multicentre (n = 3) study was conducted to compare the efficacy and efficiency of a fixed daily dose of 150 IU (3x50 IU) recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (recFSH, Puregon((R))) and 225 IU (3x75 IU) highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH-HP, Metrodin-HP((R))) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation prior to in-vitro fertilization treatment. A total of 165 women were treated with FSH, 83 subjects with recFSH and 82 subjects with uFSH-HP. In the recFSH group a mean number of 8.8 oocytes were retrieved, compared with 9.8 in the uFSH-HP group (not statistically significant). In the recFSH group, a significantly lower total dose was required compared to the uFSH-HP group, 1479 versus 2139 IU, respectively (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval -747 to -572). Treatment with recFSH resulted in a significantly higher embryo development rate (69.6 versus 56.2%; P = 0.003) and more embryos accessible for the embryo freezing programme (3.3 versus 2.0; P = 0.02) compared to uFSH-HP. The vital pregnancy rate per cycle started was 30.2 versus 28.3% in the recombinant and urinary FSH group, respectively. It is concluded that treatment outcome of a fixed daily dose of 150 IU recFSH is comparable to a fixed daily dose of 225 IU uFSH-HP. However, a significantly lower total dose was needed in the recFSH group (nearly 700 IU less).

Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction

The recent availability of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), with its high level of purity and batch-to-batch consistency has made it an attractive alternative to urinary FSH (uFSH) for ovarian stimulation. Several trials have compared the two preparations, but none had sufficient power to detect a clinically meaningful difference in pregnancy rates. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical pregnancy rates per started cycle by pooling data from randomized trials which compared the use of rFSH and uFSH in treatment cycles using in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A thorough search of the literature identified 12 trials which met the inclusion criteria. In four trials, both IVF and ICSI were performed, in seven trials only IVF was performed and in one trial only ICSI was performed. Data were extracted and pooled using the principles of meta-analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. The common odds ratio and the risk difference (and their 95% confidence intervals), obtained by pooling the data using a fixed effects model, were 1.20 (1.02-1.42) and 3.7% (0.5-6.9%) respectively, in favour of rFSH. The pregnancy rate with the alpha preparation of rFSH was statistically significantly higher than with uFSH in IVF cycles. The overall conclusion from this meta-analysis is that the use of rFSH in assisted reproduction is preferred over uFSH.

Urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus recombinant FSH in clomiphene citrate-resistant, normogonadotropic,chronic anovulation: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of urinary FSH and recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant, normogonadotropic, chronic anovulation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

University-based infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Fifty-one women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Subjects were randomized to receive either urinary FSH (35 patients, 64 cycles) or recombinant FSH (16 patients, 32 cycles). A maximum of three cycles using the low-dose step-up protocol with the same gonadotropin were undertaken.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cumulative ovulation and pregnancy rates after three cycles, total gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation, and single follicle development rate.

RESULT(S)

Cumulative ovulation rates were 89.3% and 93.1% for the urinary FSH and recombinant FSH groups, respectively. The threshold and total doses of FSH and the duration of stimulation were similar between the two groups. Significantly more single follicle development was noted in the recombinant FSH group. The respective clinical pregnancy rates per noncanceled cycles in the urinary FSH and recombinant FSH groups were 23.2% and 27.6%. There were three sets of twins in the urinary FSH group. No case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was encountered.

CONCLUSION(S)

Urinary FSH and recombinant FSH are both efficient and safe for inducing ovulation with the low-dose step-up protocol.

Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone stimulation in poor responders with normal basal concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol: improved reproductive outcome

A total of 30 young infertile patients who exhibited a poor response in two previous consecutive cycles, despite having normal basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol concentrations, were invited to participate in a prospective randomized study comparing the clinical efficacy of recombinant (rFSH) and urinary (uFSH) follicle stimulating hormone. An evaluation of the total dose used (3800 IU versus 4600 IU, P < 0.05) and duration of treatment (10.2 days versus 13.2 days, P < 0.05) showed a significantly shorter treatment period as well as a significantly lower total dose of FSH required to induce ovulation successfully in the group of patients treated with rFSH. Significantly more oocytes (7.2 versus 5. 6, P < 0.05) as well as mature oocytes (5.9 versus 3.2, P < 0.01) were retrieved after rFSH treatment. In addition, significantly more good quality embryos were obtained (3.4 versus 1.8, P < 0.05) in the group of patients treated with rFSH and, as a result, higher pregnancy (33 versus 7%, P < 0.01) and implantation (16 versus 3%, P < 0.01) rates were achieved in these patients. It is concluded that rFSH is more effective than uFSH in inducing multifollicular development and achieving pregnancy in young low responders.

The role of luteinizing hormone in folliculogenesis and ovulation induction

OBJECTIVE

To review the physiologic, pathophysiologic, and clinical roles of LH in follicle and oocyte development and maturation and to assess the effects of LH content in exogenous gonadotropin preparations used for ovulation induction.

DESIGN

Critical review of the scientific literature devoted to folliculogenesis. Evaluation of comparison studies that used different gonadotropin preparations for ovulation induction.

CONCLUSION(S)

Folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation are complex processes that require the action of both LH and FSH. Luteinizing hormone is essential to provide the androgen substrate for estrogen synthesis, which in turn contributes to oocyte maturation and may play a relevant role in optimizing fertilization and embryo quality. Although the excessive LH secretion that is present in some disorders is detrimental to reproductive function, this is not applicable to ovulation induction with hMG because this menotropin does not increase daily plasma LH levels. The results of ovulation induction with hMG or FSH-only regimens did not differ in studies conducted in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and in most studies conducted in ovulatory women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques; conversely, hMG was clearly superior to purified FSH for the treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Miscarriage rates were not affected by the use of hMG. Thus, low but detectable LH concentrations positively influence the outcome of ovulation induction in patients with ovulatory disorders and women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

Outcome comparison of in vitro fertilization treatment with highly purified subcutaneous follicle-stimulating hormone (Fertinex, a urofollitropin) versus intramuscular menotropins

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate various outcome measures of stimulation with highly purified subcutaneous follicle-stimulating hormone (Fertinex, a urofollitropin) compared with first- and second-generation urinary human menopausal gonadotropin standards (Pergonal, Metrodin).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis was restricted to our most efficient in vitro fertilization age group (23-34 years). Data from Institute for Assisted Reproduction in vitro fertilization cycles 1 through 11 with Pergonal, Metrodin, or both were tabulated for hormonal values, oocyte quality, and embryo outcome as baseline data. Patients in cycles 12 through 13 were treated with Fertinex and Pergonal or Fertinex alone and then reviewed for the same parameters.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-eight in vitro fertilization records with embryo transfer were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer in an optimal age group were similar despite use of first- through third-generation urinary gonadotropin preparations: Pergonal and Metrodin, 67%; Metrodin, 64%; Fertinex and Pergonal, 62%; and Fertinex, 54%. There were no discernible differences in hormonal response, oocyte recovery, or embryonic growth.

CONCLUSION

Administered subcutaneously, the third-generation urinary gonadotropin preparation Fertinex is effective in in vitro fertilization treatment in young women.