Acute effects of captopril on systemic and renal hemodynamics and on renal function in cirrhotic patients with ascites

Review article: the pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension

The pathogenesis of portal hypertension remains poorly understood. Similarly, pharmacological manipulation for the prevention and treatment of variceal haemorrhage has not fulfilled the promise of the 1980s. This article reviews current concepts in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and considers pharmacotherapy for the treatment of variceal bleeding.

Pathophysiology and treatment of ascites and the hepatorenal syndrome

Ascites indicates the accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, due to a wide range of causes. These causes can be classified according to the presence of portal hypertension, severe blood dyscrasia and peritoneal disease. Cirrhosis is the most frequent cause of ascites. The occurrence of ascites in cirrhosis is due to portal hypertension, which is responsible for the increase in hydrostatic pressure at the sinusoidal level and the alterations of splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics. These latter include increased splanchnic inflow, reduced systemic resistance and increased plasma volume and cardiac output. Portal hypertension also plays a major role in determining sodium retention, which occurs in the setting of increased RAA system and SNS activity. The mechanisms by which portal hypertension leads to the activation of antinatriuretic factors and sodium retention are not completely understood; three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain this relationship, namely the underfilling, the overflow and the peripheral arterial vasodilatation theories. In patients with cirrhosis and ascites, there is an overall activation of the renal prostaglandin system, which probably acts to maintain renal haemodynamics and GFR by counteracting the vasoconstricting effects of AII and noradrenaline on renal circulation. In advanced stages, ascites may become refractory to medical treatment and renal function shows a progressive impairment and eventually acute renal failure, the so-called HRS, due to a marked vasoconstriction of the renal arteries and the opening of the intrarenal-arteriovenous (A-V) shunts. In this condition, the reduced renal synthesis of vasodilating prostaglandins is probably of pathogenic importance. Treatment of ascites is usually based on bed rest, low-sodium diet and administration of aldosterone antagonists and loop diuretics. A sequential treatment of ascites based on the progressive addition of more potent drugs is the best way to relieve ascites while avoiding potentially dangerous side-effects. Patients who fail to respond to the above manoeuvres are said to have refractory ascites. Current treatment of this latter condition is mainly based on therapeutic paracentesis and the application of the LeVeen shunt, but long-term results are unsatisfactory.

Efficacy of low-dose captopril in addition to furosemide and spironolactone in patients with decompensated liver disease during blunted diuresis

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is activated by diuretics and involved in the diuretic resistance of cirrhotic patients with ascites and oedema. In previous studies relatively high doses of captopril (25-400 mg daily) were unsuccessful in promoting diuresis and natriuresis in these patients. We analyzed the efficacy of a low dose of captopril in eight patients with massive ascites resistant to therapy of salt/fluid restriction and increasing doses of spironolactone and furosemide. Mean duration of diuretic use was 73 days (range 7-240 days). After at least 3 days of observation on 80 mg furosemide and 100 mg spironolactone only, captopril was added. Four out of eight patients responded with an increase in natriuresis and diuresis; daily dose of captopril was 20.6 mg in responders and 26.5 mg in non-responders. After the addition of captopril the mean weight change was -7.5 kg in responders and +0.25 kg in non-responders. Mean urinary sodium output in responders increased from 72.8 (S.D. = 35.2) to 128.5 (63.5) mmol within 10 days. Increased diuresis in responders made diuretic reduction necessary: mean furosemide from 80 to 53.3 mg, and mean spironolactone from 100 to 68.1 mg. Creatinine clearances remained stable. High levels of plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and angiotensin-II were found in all patients. Non-responders showed more severe hyponatremia and higher vasopressin levels. Natriuretic atrial factor (NAF) was in the upper-normal range or slightly elevated in both groups. In non-responders we noticed low levels of cGMP in 24-h urine, compared with responders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Effect of captopril therapy on sodium and water excretion in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites]

Ascites in patients with cirrhosis of the liver frequently is refractory to diuretic treatment. It was postulated that vasoconstriction of the renal cortex, mediated by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS), may be one course of the disturbed sodium- and water-excretion in these patients. We therefore investigated in 14 cirrhotic patients with ascites under constant diuretic treatment the effects of low-dose captopril therapy on urinary sodium- and potassium-excretion, body weight, abdominal girth, serum-sodium, -potassium, creatinine-clearance, plasma-renin-activity (PRA), plasma-aldosterone (PA) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a control period of 4 days the patients received 2 x 6.25 mg/d captopril for 5 days and 4 x 6.25 mg/d for further 5 days. Treatment was followed by a second control period without captopril. PRA increased significantly after 2 days of captopril treatment. 2 x 6.25 mg/d captopril induced a significant increase in sodium excretion and a significant decrease of body weight. MAP decreased slightly but significantly without clinical signs of hypotension. 4 x 6.25 mg/d captopril resulted in a further reduction of body weight and a further enhancement of sodium excretion. Three days after withdrawal of captopril sodium output was significantly reduced again.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients low-dose captopril seems to be efficient in the treatment of ascites resistant to diuretics without causing major side effects.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perindopril in patients with hepatic cirrhosis

1. Perindopril, a new ACE inhibitor, is a prodrug requiring conversion into its active form perindoprilat by hydrolysis in the liver. 2. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of perindopril (8 mg oral) and perindoprilat (2 mg intravenously) were studied in a double-blind randomised crossover study in a group of patients with compensated biopsy-proven hepatic cirrhosis. 3. Blood pressure and heart rate responses were similar after the two routes of administration as were plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels following dosing. 4. The AUC of perindoprilat after oral administration of perindopril represented 46 +/- 4% of the total AUC of perindopril and its metabolite when expressed in molar terms. Comparison with the AUC of perindoprilat after its intravenous administration suggested that 30 +/- 6% of the oral dose of perindopril was converted to its active metabolite. 5. The findings are comparable with those in healthy subjects. It appears that the presence of relatively mild hepatic cirrhosis does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of perindopril.

Renal function and effective beta-blockade in cirrhosis with ascites. Relationship with baseline sympathoadrenergic tone

Renal function, plasma norepinephrine, renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone were determined in 17 cirrhotics with ascites, before and after effective beta-blockade (resting heart rate reduction greater than or equal to 20%) induced by oral propranolol. The drug lowered PRA (from 2.86 +/- 0.96 (S.E.) to 1.86 +/- 0.7 ng/ml/h; P less than 0.005) and plasma aldosterone (from 309.0 +/- 59.2 to 202.6 +/- 26.7 pg/ml; P less than 0.005). As expected, plasma norepinephrine (PNC) increased from 90.7 +/- 12.2 to 176.8 +/- 43 ng/l (P less than 0.01) in the 10 patients with normal basal values ('normal-PNC' group), but it decreased in 6 of the 7 patients with basal sympathoadrenergic hypertone ('high-PNC' group; mean value from 352.6 +/- 37.8 to 273 +/- 39.3 ng/ml (P = 0.06). Glomerular filtration rate and filtered sodium load did not change in the group as a whole and in 'normal-PNC' cirrhotics (from 83.2 +/- 7.1 to 81.4 +/- 7.8 ml/min, and from 11.63 +/- 0.96 to 11.45 +/- 1.14 mmol/min), but rose in 'high-PNC' patients (from 60.7 +/- 9.1 to 109.3 +/- 27.2 ml/min, and from 8.39 +/- 1.31 to 15.47 +/- 3.95 mmol/min; P less than 0.05). Renal sodium excretion increased from 2.45 +/- 0.75 to 3.16 +/- 1.01 mmol/h (P less than 0.01) in the group as a whole. Such an increase, however, was confined to 'high-PNC' cirrhotics. In this group, the tubular rejection fraction did not change and post-beta-blockade sodium excretion was correlated with the filtered sodium load (Rs = 0.83; P less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma human atrial natriuretic factor in cirrhosis and ascites with and without functional renal failure

Functional renal failure of cirrhosis (FRFC) is a usually fatal syndrome of acute renal failure occurring in patients with advanced liver disease. Although not conclusively proven, most evidence suggests that renal arterial and arteriolar vasoconstriction is the cause of the renal failure in these patients. However, the mediators of the vasoconstriction remain unknown. Human atrial natriuretic factor (hANF) is a hormone with potent natriuretic, diuretic, and vasorelaxant properties. A deficiency of hANF could lead to renal arterial vasoconstriction and avid renal sodium retention as seen in FRFC. This study was undertaken to determine if patients with FRFC are deficient in circulating hANF. Seven patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease and renal failure of unknown cause (FRFC) were compared with 7 patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease, ascites, and normal serum creatinine as well as with 14 healthy volunteers. Plasma hANF was measured by radioimmunoassay. Plasma hANF was 742 +/- 227 pg/ml (mean +/- SEM) in patients with FRFC compared with 360 +/- 70 pg/ml in patients with liver disease and normal serum creatinine (p greater than 0.05) and 28 +/- 5.7 pg/ml in healthy volunteers (p less than 0.005 vs. FRFC and chronic liver disease, ascites, and normal serum creatinine). Thus, FRFC is not caused by a deficiency of circulating hANF. The elevated plasma hANF levels in patients with chronic liver disease and continued sodium retention may suggest a renal insensitivity to the natriuretic effects of hANF.

Glucagon selectively increases splanchnic blood flow in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis

To delineate the circulatory effects of glucagon in cirrhosis, we infused two moderately supraphysiological doses of this hormone into 19 patients with cirrhosis and determined hemodynamic responses. Patients were divided into a group with good liver function (Pugh Class A, n = 8) and poorer function (Pugh Class B and C, n = 11). All patients received glucagon at 10 ng per kg per min for 20 min, then 20 ng per kg per min for a further 20 min. These doses raised serum glucagon levels to a similar degree in both groups of patients. Serum glucose levels also rose in both groups but to a lesser degree in Class BC patients. Serum noradrenaline and adrenaline remained unchanged in both groups. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, hepatic venous pressure gradient and hepatic blood flow were measured basally and during the second glucagon infusion. None of these measurements significantly changed in either group of patients. Azygos and renal venous blood flow were measured basally and during the first and second infusions. Azygos flow increased significantly only in Group A patients: basal, 0.32 +/- 0.03 liter per min; first infusion, 0.40 +/- 0.06 liter per min; second infusion, 0.49 +/- 0.07 liter per min. Corresponding values in Group BC patients were: 0.54 +/- 0.08, 0.54 +/- 0.08 and 0.52 +/- 0.08 liter per min. Renal blood flow did not change significantly. One patient with a portacaval shunt increased superior mesenteric venous flow from 0.78 liter per min to 0.95 liter per min with glucagon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis

Renal sodium and water retention and plasma volume expansion have been shown to precede ascites formation in experimental cirrhosis. The classical "underfilling" theory, in which ascites formation causes hypovolemia and initiates secondary renal sodium and water retention, thus seems unlikely. While the occurrence of primary renal sodium and water retention and plasma volume expansion prior to ascites formation favors the "overflow" hypothesis, the stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, vasopressin release and sympathetic nervous system associated with cirrhosis is not consonant with primary volume expansion. In this present article, the "Peripheral Arterial Vasodilation Hypothesis" is proposed as the initiator of sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Peripheral arterial vasodilation is one of the earliest observations in the cirrhotic patient and experimental animals with cirrhosis. Arterial vasodilators and arteriovenous fistula are other examples in which renal sodium and water retention occur secondary to a decreased filling of the arterial vascular tree. An increase in cardiac output and hormonal stimulation are common features of cirrhosis, arteriovenous fistula and drug-induced peripheral arterial vasodilation. However, a predilection for the retained sodium and water to transudate into the abdominal cavity occurs with cirrhosis because of the presence of portal hypertension. The Peripheral Arterial Vasodilation Hypothesis also explains the continuum from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis to the hepatorenal syndrome.

Effects of captopril on renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Blockade of angiotensin-converting enzyme has been variously reported to increase or to decrease sodium excretion in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. We administered captopril (50-150 mg) to 11 patients with cirrhosis and ascites to determine the effects on blood pressure, renal blood flow and sodium excretion. Plasma renin activity increased and mean blood pressure fell (by 14 mm Hg). Para-aminohippurate clearances increased from 321 +/- 53 to 559 +/- 83 ml/min (P less than 0.005), but inulin clearances were minimally altered (73 +/- 8 to 76 +/- 7 ml/min), suggesting preferential dilation of glomerular efferent arterioles. Despite unchanged glomerular delivery of sodium, urinary sodium excretion fell in all subjects (from 2.70 +/- 1.00 to 0.48 +/- 0.21 mEq/h), urinary volume was reduced (377 +/- 55 to 182 +/- 42 ml/h, P less than 0.005), and the natriuretic effect of furosemide was blunted. The antinatriuretic effect of captopril may be mediated by reduced angiotensin II-mediated sodium excretion, by decreased prostaglandin production, and/or by indirect effects of reduced blood pressure. Captopril impairs rather than promotes sodium excretion.

Effect of captopril on renin and blood pressure in cirrhosis

In hepatic cirrhosis neurohumoral vasoconstrictor systems are activated to compensate for circulatory disturbances. To study the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in more detail, angiotensin converting enzyme in 15 patients with advanced liver disease was inhibited with captopril after moderate sodium restriction. Captopril caused an increase in plasma renin activity (p less than 0.005) and a decrease in plasma aldosterone (p less than 0.025) from an elevated baseline, and a moderate drop in systolic (p less than 0.025) and diastolic (p less than 0.05) blood pressure. Hyperreninaemia after captopril was inversely related to the prevailing plasma sodium level (r = -0.66, p less than 0.01), and the changes in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were correlated with baseline plasma renin activity (r = 0.49, p less than 0.05 for systolic and r = 0.71, p less than 0.01 for diastolic blood pressure). No change occurred in heart rate or in stimulated plasma noradrenaline and vasopressin levels. The data suggest that in these cirrhotic patients the reactivity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was still intact, although it occurred at a higher level. They confirm the importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in arterial blood pressure regulation in cirrhosis.