Hemodynamic changes associated with reduction in total cholesterol by treatment with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pravastatin

Statins and blood pressure regulation

Hypertension and high serum cholesterol levels are two of the most relevant risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. A combined increase in both risk factors has been reported in a significant proportion of patients with coronary artery disease. Statins are the most widely used drugs to treat hypercholesterolemia, and they interact with blood pressure control in different populations of hypertensive patients. A significant reduction in blood pressure associated with the use of statins has been described in patients with untreated hypertension and in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs, particularly angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers. The effect of statins on blood pressure control has also been reported in diabetic patients. The mechanisms responsible for the hypotensive effect seem to be largely independent of the effect of statins on lipid profile, and are probably related to their interaction with endothelial function or angiotensin II receptors. The capacity of statins to improve blood pressure control could be a useful consideration for an integrated approach to better prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Pravastatin and the development of diabetes mellitus: evidence for a protective treatment effect in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

BACKGROUND

We examined the development of new diabetes mellitus in men aged 45 to 64 years during the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our definition of diabetes mellitus was based on the American Diabetic Association threshold of a blood glucose level of >/=7.0 mmol/L. Subjects who self-reported diabetes at baseline or had a baseline glucose level of >/=7.0 mmol/L were excluded from the analyses. A total of 5974 of the 6595 randomized subjects were included in the analysis, and 139 subjects became diabetic during the study. The baseline predictors of the transition from normal glucose control to diabetes were studied. In the univariate model, body mass index, log triglyceride, log white blood cell count, systolic blood pressure, total and HDL cholesterol, glucose, and randomized treatment assignment to pravastatin were significant predictors. In a multivariate model, body mass index, log triglyceride, glucose, and pravastatin therapy were retained as predictors of diabetes in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the assignment to pravastatin therapy resulted in a 30% reduction (P:=0.042) in the hazard of becoming diabetic. By lowering plasma triglyceride levels, pravastatin therapy may favorably influence the development of diabetes, but other explanations, such as the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug in combination with its endothelial effects, cannot be excluded with these analyses.

Effect of lipid reduction on the progression of renal disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that hyperlipidemia contributes to the progression of renal disease. A large trial has not been performed; however, a number of small, controlled trials have been reported. We examined the effects of antilipemic agents on glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria or albuminuria in patients with renal disease.

METHODS

We used Medline, abstracts from scientific meetings, and bibliographies from recent reviews and scientific reports to locate pertinent studies. Thirteen prospective controlled trials examining the effects of antilipemic agents on renal function, proteinuria, or albuminuria were included. Studies were published as full reports or abstracts and were at least three months in duration. For five of the studies, individual patient data were obtained. Other summary data were independently extracted from the published reports by two investigators and included study quality, subject characteristics, cause of renal disease, change in serum cholesterol, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and albuminuria.

RESULTS

There was a lower rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate with treatment compared with controls (treated controls, 0.156 mL/min/month; 95% CI, 0.026 to 0. 285 mL/min/month, P = 0.008). The study results were statistically homogeneous, and in a regression analysis, the effect of treatment on glomerular filtration rate did not correlate with study quality, the percentage change in cholesterol, the type of lipid-lowering agent, or the cause of renal disease. However, longer follow-up correlated with the amount of improvement in glomerular filtration rate from treatment (P = 0.007). There was a tendency for a favorable effect of treatment on protein or albumin excretion [Ln (treatment) - Ln (control) = -0.248, 95% CI, -0.562 to 0.064, P = 0. 077]. However, these results were statistically heterogeneous between studies (P < 0.001). No obvious explanation for this heterogeneity was apparent in a regression analysis examining potential reasons for differences in study results.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid reduction may preserve glomerular filtration rate and may decrease proteinuria in patients with renal disease.

Effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension and primary hypercholesterolemia

Certain hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, ie, statins, may cause vasodilation by restoring the endothelial dysfunction that frequently accompanies hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Several studies have found that a blood pressure reduction is associated with the use of statins, but conclusive evidence from controlled trials is lacking. After an 8-week placebo and diet run-in period, 30 persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and untreated hypertension (total cholesterol 6.29+/-0.52 mmol/L, systolic and diastolic blood pressure 149+/-6 and 97+/-2 mm Hg) were randomized in a double-blind manner to placebo or pravastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) in a crossover design. In 25 participants who completed the 32-week trial, pravastatin decreased total and LDL cholesterol (both -1.09 mmol/L, P=0.001), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-8 and -5 mm Hg, both P=0.001), and pulse pressure (-3 mm Hg, P=0.011) and blunted the blood pressure increase caused by the cold pressor test (-4 mm Hg, P=0.005) compared with placebo. It also reduced the level of circulating endothelin-1 (P=0.001). The blood pressure results were virtually unchanged in stratified analyses according to gender and age and in intention-to-treat analyses that included the 5 patients who dropped out of the study. When the participants were taking either placebo or pravastatin, blood pressure was not significantly correlated with total or LDL cholesterol or with circulating endothelin-1. Pravastatin decreases systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures in persons with moderate hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. This antihypertensive effect may contribute to the documented health benefits of certain statins.

Systemic arterial compliance is reduced in young patients with IDDM

Arterial elastic properties are altered with increasing age and in various disease states, including non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Whether young patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) have reduced arterial compliance before developing endothelial dysfunction or overt micro- and macrovascular disease is unclear. Systemic arterial compliance and endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in 25 individuals with uncomplicated IDDM (23 +/- 4 yr, 14 females and 11 males) and compared with 30 age-matched controls (15 females and 15 males). Arterial compliance was determined via simultaneous measurements of aortic blood flow and carotid arterial pressure. The relationship between arterial compliance and endothelial function (assessed by brachial artery FMD) was also examined. Arterial compliance was 29% lower in IDDM subjects compared with control subjects (0.46 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.07 arbitrary compliance units, P < 0.05). Blood pressure, lipid levels, and daily energy expenditure (a measure of physical activity levels) were not different between groups. Compliance in the IDDM group was not related to the integrity of endothelial vasodilator function, disease duration, or degree of glycemic control. Arterial compliance is reduced in young patients with IDDM before the development of overt micro- or macrovascular disease. Early assessment of arterial compliance may be useful in predicting the development of diabetic vascular complications.

Pravastatin sodium activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase independent of its cholesterol-lowering actions

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that pravastatin (PRA) activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS).

BACKGROUND

Pravastatin has been found to have clinical benefits beyond those predicted by its actions in reducing plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL). Both PRA and simvastatin (SIM) are equally effective in reducing LDL, but only PRA reduces platelet aggregation and is an effective vasodilator. Nitric oxide (NO) also inhibits platelet aggregation and vasodilates.

METHODS

We determined PRA and SIM effects on vasorelaxation in aortic rings and NO production by cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. Nitric oxide was measured by using a NO electrode and by an assay for conversion of hemoglobin to methemoglobin. Specificity of NOS activation was tested by using the NOS inhibitor nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 1 mmol/liter) in the presence or absence of excess L-arginine (L-ARG, 1 mmol/liter).

RESULTS

Endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation was maximal with acetylocholine (ACH, 100%), followed by PRA (62.8%) and then SIM (37.1%). Direct measurement of NO confirmed that vasorelaxation is due to NO release and showed that PRA and ACH had similar dose-dependent effects on NO production, while SIM was only 25% to 30% as effective. Methemoglobin assay confirmed these results and demonstrated their specificity for NOS activity. The L-NAME blunted the responses to 45% of initial values. Excess L-ARG reversed this effect and potentiated NO production to 133% of initial levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PRA and SIM activate eNOS, but SIM is much less effective. Clinical benefits with PRA not explained by LDL reductions may be the result of an independent action of PRA on eNOS activation.

Cholesterol, endothelial function and cardiovascular disease

Hypercholesterolaemia is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased risk of atheromatous disease. Although endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated early in the course of the disease process, it remains difficult to establish a causal relationship. Despite this, endothelial function has been used as a surrogate marker in small trials to identify and assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to reduce cardiovascular mortality, before large scale clinical trials are undertaken. Recently, arterial stiffness has emerged as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and may provide a link between hypercholesterolaemia, endothelial dysfunction, hypertension and stroke.