Prospective evaluation of unilateral adrenal masses in patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer

Incidentalomas. A disease of modern technology

The optimal strategy for hormonal screening of a patient with any incidentally discovered adrenal or pituitary mass is unknown. Our review of the endocrinologic literature supports the view that such patients are at slightly increased risk for morbidity and mortality. There is a benefit of early diagnosis for at least for some of the disorders, suggesting the importance of case finding. The data in Tables 1 and 4 illustrate that clinically diagnosed hormone-secreting adrenal and pituitary tumors are far less common than incidentalomas. From a clinical perspective, our ability to determine accurately those at increased risk among the vast majority who are not at increased risk is poor. Given the limitations of diagnostic tests, effective hormonal screening requires a sufficiently high pretest probability to limit the number of false-positive results. This condition is met to varying degrees in the patient with an adrenal mass or small incidentally discovered pituitary mass but no signs or symptoms of hormone excess. Even the more common lesions such as pheochromocytoma and prolactinoma are relatively rare. Subjecting patients to unnecessary testing and treatment carries its own set of risks. Initial costs aside, testing may result in further expense and harm as false-positive results are pursued, producing the cascade effect described by Mold and Stein as a "chain of events (which) tends to proceed with increasing momentum, so that the further it progresses the more difficult it is to stop." The extensive evaluations performed in some patients with incidentally discovered masses may reflect the unwillingness of many physicians to accept uncertainty, even in the case of extremely unlikely diagnoses. This unwillingness may be driven, in part, by fear of potential malpractice liability, the failure to appreciate the influence of prevalence data on the interpretation of diagnostic testing, or other factors. Indeed, the major justification for further evaluation of these patients is not so much to avoid morbidity and mortality for rate patients who truly are at increased risk but rather to reassure those in whom further testing is negative (and to reassure ourselves). Physicians must take care not to create inappropriate anxiety in patients by overemphasizing the importance of an incidental finding unless it is associated with a realistic clinical risk. Our recommendations utilize currently available information to minimize the untoward effects of the cascade. As evidence accumulates, recommendations may need to be revised. The benefit of diagnosis of one of these adrenal or pituitary disorders must be considered in the context of the patient's overall condition. Studies are needed to analyze the utility in clinical practice of hormonal screening for these common radiologic findings. We need to use these studies to identify the critical gaps in our knowledge and to adopt the epidemiologic methods of evaluation of evidence that have been applied to preventive measures. We must be careful to recognize lead-time bias in which survival can seem to be lengthened when screening simply advances the time of diagnosis, lengthening the period of time between diagnosis and death without any true prolongation of life. Length bias refers to the tendency of screening to detect a disproportionate number of cases of slowly progressive disease and to miss aggressive cases that, by virtue of rapid progression, are present in the population only briefly. Endocrinologists must avoid the pitfalls of overestimation of disease prevalence and of the benefits of therapy resulting from advances in diagnostic imaging. Clinical judgment based on the best available evidence should be complemented and not replaced by laboratory data.

Does resection of adrenal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer improve survival?

BACKGROUND

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carries a dismal prognosis, which is minimally affected by chemotherapy. Solitary brain metastases from NSCLC have been resected with 5-year survivals of 10% to 30%. The objective of this study was to determine if resection of isolated adrenal metastases improves survival.

METHODS

Isolated adrenal metastases were found in 14 patients with NSCLC. Eight patients had resection after cis-platinum-based chemotherapy, and 6 received chemotherapy alone.

RESULTS

Median survival in the surgical group was significantly greater than that in the chemotherapy group (31 versus 8.5 months; p = 0.03). All patients in the chemotherapy group were dead by 22 months. Three-year actuarial survival in the surgical group was 38%. No difference in locoregional stage, size of adrenal metastases, patient age, or performance status was present between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term disease-free survival is possible after resection of isolated adrenal metastases from NSCLC. Resection of isolated adrenal metastases should be considered if the primary NSCLC is resectable.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the left adrenal gland

BACKGROUND

We reported the application of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in the local staging of lung cancer. Up to 16% of patients with lung cancer may have adrenal masses. The role of EUS in the characterization of the adrenal gland, as well as EUS-guided FNA of the adrenal gland, has not been described.

METHODS

The adrenal gland was characterized by EUS in 30 of 31 (97%) patients. EUS-guided FNA of an adrenal was performed in one patient. Anatomic correlation and ex vivo images were obtained.

RESULTS

The average dimension was 2.5 cm (range 1.4 to 3.5) x 0.8 cm (range 0.3 to 1.4) with two morphologic types: "seagull" and "elliptical." One patient with lung cancer and a left adrenal mass with a nondiagnostic CT-guided FNA underwent EUS-guided FNA, which established the diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Surgery was avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

The left adrenal can be imaged by EUS in almost all patients. EUS-guided FNA may be useful when applied to left adrenal metastatic tumors for tissue diagnosis.

Successful treatment of solitary extracranial metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after resection of non-small cell lung carcinoma is generally associated with a poor outcome and is treated with either systemic agents or palliative irradiation. Recently, long-term survival has been reported after resection of isolated brain metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma, but resection of other metastatic sites has not been explored fully.

METHODS

We have identified 14 patients who had solitary extracranial metastases treated aggressively after curative treatment of their non-small cell lung carcinoma. The histology was squamous carcinoma in 5, adenocarcinoma in 8, and large cell carcinoma in 1. Initially, 3 patients had stage I, 5 stage II, and 6 stage IIIa disease.

RESULTS

The sites of metastases included extrathoracic lymph nodes (six), skeletal muscle (four), bone (three), and small bowel (one). The median disease-free interval before metastases was 19.5 months (range, 5 to 71 months). Complete surgical resection of the metastatic site was the treatment in 12 of 14 patients. Two patients received only curative irradiation to the metastatic site, with complete response. The overall 10-year actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 86%. To date, 11 patients are alive and well after treatment of their metastases (17 months to 13 years), 1 has recurrent disease, 1 died of recurrent widespread metastases, and 2 died of unrelated causes.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival is possible after treatment of isolated metastases to various sites from non-small cell lung carcinoma, but patient selection is critical.