Prevalence of anaphylactic reactions to aprotinin: analysis of two hundred forty-eight reexposures to aprotinin in heart operations

Protease inhibitors in the treatment of hereditary angioedema

Deficiency of C1 Inhibitor leads to unopposed activation of complement, with localized, unpredictable, and sometimes life-threatening attacks of angioedema. Treatment with plasma-derived C1 Inhibitor rapidly aborts attacks, and may be lifesaving, but is expensive, requires use of a pooled blood product, may need to be repeated and may not be effective in autoantibody mediated angioedema. The antifibrinolytic agents aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are useful for prophylaxis and treatment of angioedema, likely by inhibiting plasmin. Specific drugs to replace the deficient C1 Inh have not been reported. The kallikrein inhibitor DX-88 (Dyax) has received orphan drug status in Europe and is undergoing clinical trial in Europe and the USA.

Vasopressin for treatment of shock following aprotinin administration

PURPOSE

To describe the utility of vasopressin in the treatment of acute distributive shock clinically compatible with the diagnosis of aprotinin anaphylaxis.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 57-yr-old female patient underwent repeat cardiac surgery to treat prosthetic valve endocarditis. She had received aprotinin during her first surgery 60 days ago. Despite a negative test dose of i.v. aprotinin 20,000 KIU, when aprotinin loading was initiated during the repeat surgery, the patient developed bronchospasm and hypotension secondary to acute distributive shock. Bronchospasm responded to inhaled salbutamol and ipatropium. The hypotension was refractory to high doses of phenylephrine. Two doses of i.v. vasopressin 5 U reversed the vasodilation and reestablished normal blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Vasopressin, in association with alpha-agonists, can reverse acute refractory distributive shock following aprotinin administration.

Impact of tranexamic acid vs. aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion requirements after cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

INTRODUCTION

Aprotinin (AP) reduces blood loss and transfusions after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but may sensitise patients and is expensive. Tranexamic acid (TA) has less side-effects, but data regarding its efficacy are controversial. The aim of our prospective, randomised, double-blind study was to compare the impact of AP vs. TA on drainage blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing first time CABG on CPB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty adult patients were randomised to receive either high-dose AP according to Hammersmith or a total of 2 g TA. Perioperative blood products were transfused in a standardised fashion. Blood loss was measured up to 24 h. Demographic and clinical patient data were collected until hospital discharge.

RESULTS

The data from 118 patients (TA: n = 58, AP: n = 60) who completed the study according to protocol were analysed. Blood loss at 24 h postoperation in TA patients was significantly higher (896 +/- 354 ml) as compared to AP patients (756 +/- 347 ml; p = 0.03). TA patients received 1.5 +/- 1.5 units of red blood cells (AP: 1.5 +/- 1.7, p = 1.0), 1.3 +/- 2.0 units of fresh frozen plasma (AP: 1.0 +/- 2.0, p = 0.38) and 0.5 +/- 1.4 units of platelets (AP: 0.2 +/- 0.7, p = 0.15). Clinical data, including perioperative myocardial infarction rate, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and mortality, were not significantly different between either group.

CONCLUSION

Our data show a difference in blood loss between TA and high-dose AP. Although statistically significant, it has little clinical relevance, because perioperative transfusion requirements were similar for both groups. Thus, TA appears to be a cost-effective alternative to AP in primary CABG patients.

Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period

Anesthesiologists use a myriad of drugs during the provision of an anesthetic. Many of these drugs have side effects that are dose related, and some lead to severe immune-mediated adverse reactions. Anaphylaxis is the most severe immune-mediated reaction; it generally occurs on reexposure to a specific antigen and requires the release of proinflammatory mediators. Anaphylactoid reactions occur through a direct non-immunoglobulin E-mediated release of mediators from mast cells or from complement activation. Muscle relaxants and latex account for most cases of anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Symptoms may include all organ systems and present with bronchospasm and cardiovascular collapse in the most severe cases. Management of anaphylaxis includes discontinuation of the presumptive drug (or latex) and anesthetic, aggressive pulmonary and cardiovascular support, and epinephrine. Although a serum tryptase confirms the diagnosis of an anaphylactic reaction, the offending drug can be identified by skin-prick, intradermal testing, or serologic testing. Prevention of recurrences is critical to avoid mortality and morbidity.

Efficacy of aprotinin in children undergoing craniofacial surgery

OBJECT

This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy of aprotinin in reducing the need for blood transfusions in 39 children undergoing reconstructive craniofacial surgery.

METHODS

Two demographically similar groups--a total of 39 patients with a mean age of 1.2 +/- 1.2 years--were studied. The efficacy of aprotinin (240 mg/m2 administered intravenously over 20 minutes, followed by infusions of 56 mg/m2/hr) was compared with that of an equal infusion of 0.9% saline (placebo). Patients in the aprotinin group received less blood per kilogram of body weight than patients in the placebo group (32 +/- 25 ml/kg compared with 52 +/- 34 m/kg, respectively; p = 0.04). Those patients in whom aprotinin was administered experienced less change in their hematocrit levels during surgery (aprotinin -33 +/- 13% compared with placebo -44 +/- 9%, p = 0.01). Each patient underwent a transfusion as per study protocol, and there was no significant change in hematocrit levels from the beginning to the end of surgery. The surgical faculty judged blood loss in patients in the aprotinin group to be significantly less than usual (p = 0.03). The use of aprotinin was also associated with reduced blood transfusion requirements during the first 3 postoperative days (p = 0.03). There was no adverse event reported in either the aprotinin or placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin decreased blood transfusion requirements in pediatric patients undergoing craniofacial reconstruction, thereby reducing the risks associated with exposure to banked blood components.

Influence of heparin dosage on hemostasis under combined use of Nafamostat mesilate during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

OBJECTIVE

Nafamostat mesilate (NM) is a guanidine acid derivative which is synthesized in Japan as an antifibrinolytic drug. It has been successfully used to decrease blood loss and blood product requirement in cardiac operations. As there have been some reports that insufficient heparinization might induce the coagulopathic state in aprotinin-treated patients undergoing deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest (DHCA), we have reviewed 16 consecutive patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement using DHCA and the associated use of NM.

METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups; a Normal-dosage Group (n = 8) who received 3 mg/kg of heparin, and a Low-dosage Group (n = 8) who received 1.5 mg/kg of heparin. The Celite-activating clotting time was maintained at longer than 1,000 seconds in both groups. Blood loss, transfusion requirements and the volume of postoperative mediastinal tube drainage were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

We observed no adverse effects of NM and no significant difference in transfusion requirements between both groups. There was a significant difference in blood loss during the operation between the two groups (p < 0.05) (Low-dosage Group 1,973 +/- 959 ml vs Normal-dosage Group 1,059 +/- 704 ml).

CONCLUSIONS

NM was a safe antifibrinolytic drug. Adequate heparinization was necessary to reduce hemorrhage in patients undergoing aortic arch replacement using DHCA and the associated use of NM.

Pharmacotherapeutic considerations in anesthesia

This article focuses on new findings leading to improved understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of potential drug interactions between anesthetic drugs or techniques and cardiovascular medications in patients scheduled for surgery. Only the most frequently used drugs are reviewed. Elective surgery provides the luxury to consider these risks and alter therapy accordingly. Under urgent circumstances, however, the increased risks associated with these agents should be anticipated with the goal to minimize adverse effects while maintaining optimal cardiovascular function in the perioperative period.

Transfusion-sparing hemostatic agents

A variety of agents are available to improve hemostasis and reduce blood loss in multiple clinical settings. These agents are most commonly used to reduce bleeding when an underlying hemostatic defect is present. Some new agents offer the potential to decrease blood loss even in the absence of an obvious underlying hemostatic defect. The authors discuss the use of a variety of products to reduce bleeding and minimize transfusion of blood products in the setting of clotting factor deficiency or inhibition, platelet deficiency and/or dysfunction, increased fibrinolysis, therapeutic anticoagulation, and coagulopathies caused by dilution and consumption in the setting of trauma and surgery. The authors primarily focus on the available pharmaceuticals.

Anesthetic and perfusion issues in contemporary pediatric cardiac surgery

As the fields of pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery advance in complexity and in accountability for clinical and economic outcomes, several issues traditionally associated with the operating room are becoming important to physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists who take care of children after cardiac surgery. The article discusses the concepts of "fast track" cardiac surgery, regional anesthetic techniques, coagulopathies and bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass, intraoperative ultrafiltration, and mechanical circulatory assist devices.

Risk of anaphylaxis from aprotinin re-exposure during LVAD removal and heart transplantation

Aprotinin has been shown to reduce transfusion requirements in re-operative cardiac surgery and in implantation of long-term left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, it is an antigenic polypeptide and re-exposure is associated with a small incidence of anaphylaxis. This report describes 2 cases of anaphylactic response to aprotinin when the agent was employed for both the LVAD implant and for the subsequent explant and cardiac transplant. Early re-exposure to just the test dose was associated with a significant incidence of anaphylaxis.

Safety and efficacy of methods for reducing perioperative allogeneic transfusion: a critical review of the literature

A number of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic technologies are in current use to minimize perioperative homologous blood use. Clinical trials, many of them randomized controlled trials, have been done evaluating these approaches and have demonstrated their efficacy. However, data on safety has relied mostly on case reports, uncontrolled studies, and, for the pharmacologic agents, extrapolation from the nonsurgical setting. In this review I analyze the data from the randomized trials and the lower-level evidence studies to provide the best estimates in safety with these alternatives. In general, these alternatives are safe with proper dosing and monitoring of effects. With aprotinin, the primary concern is anaphylaxis, and this predominantly with re-exposure. With aprotinin and with the anti-fibrinolytics, increased venous thromboembolic risk has not been a consistent finding. Tranexamic acid use intraoperatively is advantageous, but postoperative use appears to have no advantage and may be associated with renal dysfunction. DDAVP is low-risk, provided it is not overused, which can induce hyponatremia. Autologous predonation probably has similar risks as homologous blood with respect to transfusion errors and bacterial infection. As with most medical interventions, we must be vigilant to prevent human error.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss and the need for transfusion in orthognathic surgery

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (n= 15 in each group) showed that patients given aprotinin intravenously (200 ml, [2000000 kallikrein inactivator units] before the operation and then 50 ml per h until the end of the operation) during simultaneous maxillary Le Fort 1 and mandibular sagittal split osteotomies, lost 52% less blood than controls (calculated by subtracting the volume of saline irrigant used from the volume of blood collected in the aspirator bottle and surgical drains). Patients given aprotinin lost a mean (SD) of 473 (190) ml compared with 986 (356) ml in controls. They also required significantly less transfused blood (1 was given 2 units in the aprotinin group compared with 9 given a mean of 1.5 units (range 1-4) in the control group). There were no complications attributable to this drug.

A standardized multidisciplinary approach reduces the use of allogeneic blood products in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

Individual and institutional practices remain an independent predictor factor for allogeneic blood transfusion. Application of a standardized multidisciplinary transfusion strategy should reduce the use of allogeneic blood transfusion in major surgical patients.

METHODS

This prospective non randomized observational study evaluated the effects of a standardized multidisciplinary transfusion strategy on allogeneic blood products exposure in patients undergoing non-emergent cardiac surgery. The developed strategy involved a standardized blood conservation program and a multidisciplinary allogeneic blood transfusion policy based mainly on clinical judgement, not only on a specific hemoglobin concentration. Data obtained in a first group including patients operated from September 1997 to August 1998 (Group pre: n=321), when the transfusion strategy was progressively developed, were compared to those obtained in a second group, including patients operated from September 1998 to August 1999 (Group post: n=315) when the transfusion strategy was applied uniformly.

RESULTS

Patient populations and surgical procedures were similar. Patients in Group post underwent acute normovolemic hemodilution more frequently, had a higher core temperature at arrival in the intensive care unit and presented lower postoperative blood losses at day one. Three hundred forty units of packed red blood cells were transfused in 33% of the patients in Group pre whereas 161 units were transfused in 18% of the patients in Group post (P <0.001). Pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, mortality and morbidity were not different among groups.

CONCLUSION

Development of a standardized multidisciplinary transfusion strategy markedly reduced the exposure of cardiac surgery patients to allogeneic blood.

Aprotinin Use in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that inhibits kal likrein and plasmin. Aprotinin's plasmin inhibition accounts for its antifibrinolytic and platelet-sparing effects, which are important factors for its homeostatic efficacy. The kallikrein inhibition occurs at higher plasma levels and is the mecha nism accounting for its anti-inflammatory actions. Aprotinin has relatively large acquisition costs, but these costs are offset by potential reductions in transfusions and intensive care costs. This review summarizes the pediatric literature and develops generalized recommendations for the effica cious use of aprotinin.

Role of aprotinin in the management of patients during and after cardiac surgery

Management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery has evolved in recent years as more is understood about the physiological changes and responses that occur during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In particular, our understanding of the mechanisms involved in haemostasis and in the inflammatory response to bypass surgery, has allowed significant refinements in patient management. Improvements in the pharmacological conservation of blood loss have been striking, particularly with the development of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer). Aprotinin represents a significant improvement, especially for patients at high risk, since it reduces the need for allogeneic and (sometimes scarce) blood products. However, in view of its cost, making an appropriate selection of patients most at risk of serious blood loss is a major consideration in the use of aprotinin. While its mechanisms of action are not well understood, the use of aprotinin also appears to reduce inflammatory response to CPB.

High-dose aprotinin modulates the balance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses during coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

To rule out the effect of high-dose aprotinin in respect to the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators induced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

University-affiliated cardiac center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

In group A patients (n = 10), high-dose aprotinin was administered (2 x 106 KIU pre-CPB, 2 x 10(6) KIU in prime, 500,000 KIU/hr during CPB). In group C patients (n = 10), placebo was used instead. Proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6, anti-inflammatory IL-1-receptor antagonist, and clinical parameters were measured 8 times perioperatively. The values are presented as mean +/- SEM.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Four hours after CPB, IL-6 concentration reached the maximum value, being significantly lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (615 +/- 62 pg/mL v 1,409 +/- 253 pg/mL; p = 0.019). On the first postoperative day, the concentration of IL-6 in group A patients remained lower (219 +/- 24 pg/mL v 526 +/- 123 pg/mL; p = 0.015). In contrast, IL-1-receptor antagonist concentration was higher in group A patients as compared with group C patients after CPB (13,857 +/- 4,264 pg/mL v 5,675 +/- 1,832 pg/mL; p = 0.03). Total postoperative blood loss was lower in group A patients as compared with group C patients (648 +/- 64 mL v 1,284 +/- 183 mL; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose aprotinin treatment reduced the inflammatory reaction and postoperative blood loss. The anti-inflammatory reaction was significantly enhanced in these patients, which suggests that the physiologic reaction of the organism to reduce the deleterious effects from CPB is more pronounced by using high-dose aprotinin.

Preservation of collagen-induced whole blood platelet aggregation by tranexamic acid therapy in primary cardiac valve surgery

Haemostatic disorder is one of the most common complications following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion requirement in cardiac surgery. It had been thought that tranexamic acid inhibited fibrinolysis alone following CPB. In the present study, the haemostatic effects of tranexamic acid (20 mg/kg body weight bolus after induction of anaesthesia followed by continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/h), including fibrinolysis and platelet function, were investigated in 22 patients (tranexamic acid group n = 12; control group n = 10) undergoing primary cardiac valve surgery. Fibrinolysis following CPB was reduced significantly in the tranexamic acid group. Following protamine administration, the reduction of collagen-induced whole blood platelet aggregation was mitigated significantly in the tranexamic acid group compared with the control group (36% reduction in the tranexamic acid group vs 58% in the control group; p = 0.011), although platelet counts did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, tranexamic acid not only inhibits fibrinolysis directly, but also may preserve platelet function following CPB.

Management of bleeding and coagulopathy after heart surgery

Mechanisms of bleeding common to virtually all patients after heart surgery are platelet dysfunction, enhanced fibrinolysis, dilution of all components of the coagulation system, and the presence of heparin and protamine. The use of warfarin is increasing in patients with heart disease requiring surgery. The replenishment of vitamin K-dependent factors beyond a normal prothrombin time is not assessable, and the dilution associated with cardiopulmonary bypass can reach coagulopathic levels. Optimal preoperative preparation is required and intraoperative therapy initiated when indicated. Individualized heparin and protamine dosing, antifibrinolytic drug administration, minimization of blood loss and dilution, and minimal time on cardiopulmonary bypass are basic adjuncts to meticulous surgical hemostasis. When bleeding is observed in the postoperative period, a sequential assessment of the probable cause leads to initial therapy while laboratory test results are obtained. Ongoing assessment for hemodynamic instability caused by accumulated mediastinal blood is needed while managing the bleeding patient. A chest radiograph and transesophageal echocardiogram can be useful in diagnosing cardiac tamponade.

Cancer treatment with inhibitors of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasmin

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator-plasmin system plays an important role in many normal physiological processes including clot lysis, wound healing, embryogenesis and tissue remodelling. It is also involved in the pathogenesis of human malignancy through its ability to mediate tumour cell growth, invasion and metastatic dissemination. Interfering with this system is an appealing approach for experimental therapy of malignancy for several reasons. This concept is supported by a wealth of preclinical data. Evidence exists suggesting a role for this system in several major human tumour types. Preliminary evidence suggests that agents which block this pathway are effective in therapeutic doses that are already defined and relatively non-toxic. This form of treatment is not likely to carry cross-resistance with other types of cancer therapy and should be applicable to both localised and advanced tumours. Since heterogeneity in responsiveness among various tumour types is expected, clinical effects in given tumours would provide a basis for interpreting mechanisms of tumour progression in vivo and for future development of drugs with improved efficacy. Inhibition of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator-plasmin system remains a promising, but largely untested, area of experimental cancer therapeutics.

Tranexamic acid compared with high-dose aprotinin in primary elective heart operations: effects on perioperative bleeding and allogeneic transfusions

OBJECTIVE

Since excessive fibrinolysis during cardiac surgery is frequently associated with abnormal perioperative bleeding, many authors have advocated prophylactic use of antifibrinolytic drugs to prevent hemorrhagic disorders. We compared the effects of tranexamic acid (a synthetic antifibrinolytic drug) with aprotinin (a natural derivative product with antifibrinolytic properties) on perioperative bleeding and the need for allogeneic transfusions.

METHODS

In a single-center prospective randomized unblinded trial, 1040 consecutive patients undergoing primary, elective cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass received either high-dose aprotinin or tranexamic acid. The aprotinin group (518 patients) received 280 mg in 20 minutes before the skin incision, 280 mg in the priming solution of the extracorporeal circuit, and a continuous infusion of 70 mg/h throughout the operation. The tranexamic acid group (522 patients) received 1 g in 20 minutes before the skin incision, 500 mg in the priming solution of the extracorporeal circuit, and a continuous infusion of 400 mg/h during the operation. Postoperative bleeding, perioperative transfusions, and hematologic variables were evaluated at fixed times. Postoperative thrombotic complications, intubation time, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Postoperative bleeding was similar in the 2 groups: aprotinin 250 mL (150-400 mL) versus tranexamic acid 300 mL (200-450 mL) (median and 25th-75th quartiles), median difference of 50 mL (95% confidence intervals, 0-50 mL). The number of transfusions and the outcome did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid and aprotinin show similar clinical effects on bleeding and allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing primary elective heart operations. Since tranexamic acid is about 100 times cheaper than aprotinin, its use is preferable in this type of patient.

Anaesthesia for patients with a transplanted organ

Increasing numbers of individuals leading normal lives have transplanted organs. They may appear in any hospital for treatment of trauma or general diseases. Common anaesthesia methods can be used for these patients, but safe conduct of anaesthesia requires knowledge of the immunosuppression, risk factors, and altered physiology or drug actions. This article reviews the anaesthesia-related literature on patients with transplanted organs.

Anesthesia for heart or single or double lung transplantation in the adult patient

Providing an anesthetic for patients undergoing heart or a single or double lung transplantation may represent a challenge even to the most experienced anesthesiologist. Patients with end-stage cardiac dysfunction have an impaired response to beta-agonist due to receptor downregulation. These patient will have isolated left ventricular dysfunction secondary to ischemic heart disease or present with biventricular failure with or without significant pulmonary hypertension. Increasingly, more patients have undergone prior major cardiac procedures and are at risk for significant perioperative bleeding. Patients undergoing single or double lung are particularly challenging because most of these procedures are performed without the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass. The anesthesiologist must be proficient at the management of one-lung ventilation techniques and have a rational physiologic approach to the management of intraoperative hypoxemia and auto-PEEP.

The significance of preformed aprotinin-specific antibodies in cardiosurgical patients

Acute hypersensitivity reactions are serious complications of reexposure to aprotinin. Previous contact via infusions or fibrin tissue adhesives can induce specific antibodies. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the preoperative prevalence of aprotinin-specific antibodies in patients scheduled for cardiac operations. Sera of 520 consecutive cardiosurgical patients were collected preoperatively and screened retrospectively for aprotinin-specific IgG using a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive sera were analyzed also for aprotinin-specific IgA (ELISA) and IgE (fluorescence enzyme immunoassay). The histories of all patients were reviewed with focus on aprotinin preexposure. Of 520 patients, 22 (4%) had specific IgG. Only three of these had a documented aprotinin preexposure. Of 448 patients exposed to aprotinin intraoperatively, 15 had preformed specific antibodies. The only patient presenting with severe anaphylaxis was positive for both IgG and IgE, and had a recent IV preexposure in cardiovascular surgery. The presence of aprotinin-specific IgG alone seems not to induce adverse reactions on exposure. Exposure history alone is not sensitive enough to identify patients with aprotinin-specific antibodies.

IMPLICATIONS

Anaphylaxis on IV reexposure to aprotinin is a medical emergency. The clinical significance of preformed aprotinin-specific IgG remains questionable, whereas preformed IgE was present in the only patient who suffered from severe anaphylaxis on reexposure to aprotinin. Preformed antibodies are not reliably predicted by exposure history.

[Allergic risk of aprotinin]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the risk of anaphylactic reaction with the administration of aprotinin, either by i.v. route or as a biological sealant application and to propose updated guidelines in accordance with current data of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Search in the Medline data base of articles in French, English and German, published since 1960, using following key words: aprotinin, allergy, anaphylaxis.

STUDY SELECTION

All categories of articles on this topic have been selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles have been analysed for history, incidence and mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions, symptomatology, factors of risk, diagnosis and precautions of use.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aprotinin is widely used for decreasing preoperative bleeding, especially in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. This heterologue protein can cause anaphylactic reactions in 0.5 to 5.8% of patients, depending of the inclusion criteria. They are mediated by IgG and IgE antibodies. Aprotinin has also a direct, non specific, histaminoliberation effect. The clinical presentation includes various degrees of severity, up to cardiac arrest. Documented factors of risk are a previous parotinin administration, 15 days to 6 months before, and intolerance to beef meat, white of egg, cheese and milk. The immediate biological diagnosis is obtained on assessing the degranulation of basophiles (histamine) and mastocytes (tryptase), as well as the concentration of anti-aprotinin antibodies (RAST IgE), with a test of inhibition. The secondary assessment, six weeks later, includes prick-tests and intradermoreactions if the former are negative. The mean precaution consists to search factors of risk at preanaesthetic assessment. The predictive value of systematic prick-tests has not yet been validated. Anti H1 and anti H2 premedication is inefficient. A test dose can trigger a severe reaction.

CONCLUSION

Considering a significant anaphylactic risk, aprotinin administration becomes only licit after a careful evaluation of the benefit-risk ratio.

Low-dose aprotinin is ineffective to treat excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled clinical experience at our institution suggested that low-dose aprotinin could control excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of low-dose aprotinin in the treatment of hemorrhage after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were included. Forty-four patients (26%) bled significantly in the intensive care unit (>100 mL/h) and received either aprotinin (200,000 KIU bolus + 100,000 KIU/h for 8 hours) or placebo in addition to our standard management of excessive bleeding.

RESULTS

Median bleeding before study drug administration was not different between aprotinin (200 mL) and placebo (212.5 mL) groups. Bleeding decreased significantly with time and similarly in both groups. Ninety-five percent of patients required transfusions in both groups. Median blood products transfused were 13 and 8 units per patient in the aprotinin and placebo groups respectively (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine administration of low-dose aprotinin as part of the treatment protocol to control hemorrhage after CPB does not reduce bleeding or transfusion requirements and, therefore, cannot be recommended.

[Anaphylactic shock after a test-dose of aprotinin in pediatric orthopedic surgery]

A case of severe anaphylactic shock in a 28-month-old child following a testing-dose of aprotinin during major orthopaedic surgery is reported. Two months earlier, aprotinin had been administered during a similar controlateral surgical procedure. The grade III anaphylactic accident required a 48 h treatment in an intensive care unit. The outcome was favourable. The pin-prick tests were positive for aprotinin, substantiating the diagnosis of anaphylactic shock, whereas the test with specific IgE was negative. The value of current diagnostic tools for aprotinin allergy is discussed. The administration of a testing-dose in a patient previously treated with aprotinin cannot be recommended. Considering the risk for allergy, aprotinin should only be administered for recognized indications such as major orthopaedic surgery. Before any readministration of this agent an assessment by an allergist-anaesthetist is essential for determination of the risk-benefit ratio.

Reduction of blood loss and transfusion requirement by aprotinin in posterior lumbar spine fusion

Aprotinin reduces blood loss in many orthopedic procedures. In posterior lumbar spine fusion, blood loss results primarily from large vein bleeding and also occurs after the wound is closed. Seventy-two patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion were randomly assigned to large-dose aprotinin therapy or placebo. All patients donated three units of packed red blood cells (RBCs) preoperatively. Postoperative blood loss was harvested from the surgical wound in patients undergoing two- and/or three-level fusion for reinfusion. The target hematocrit for RBC transfusion was 26% if tolerated. Total (intraoperative and 24 h postoperative) blood loss, transfusion requirements, and percentage of transfused patients per treatment group were significantly smaller in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (1935 +/- 873 vs 2809 +/- 973 mL per patient [P = 0.007]; 42 vs 95 packed RBCs per group [P = 0.001]; 40% vs 81% per group [P = 0.02]). Hematological assessments showed an identically significant (a) intraoperative increase in both thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT) and in activated factor XII (XIIa) and (b) decrease in activated factor VII (VIIa), indicating a similar significant effect on coagulation in patients of both groups (P = 0.9 for intergroup comparisons of postoperative VIIa, XIIa, and TAT). Intraoperative activation of fibrinolysis was significantly less pronounced in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 for intergroup comparison of postoperative D-dimer levels). No adverse drug effects (circulatory disturbances, deep venous thrombosis, alteration of serum creatinine) were detected. Although administered intraoperatively, aprotinin treatment dramatically reduced intraoperative and 24-h postoperative blood loss and autologous transfusion requirements but did not change homologous transfusion in posterior lumbar spine fusion.

IMPLICATIONS

In our study, aprotinin therapy significantly decreased autologous, but not homologous, transfusion requirements in posterior lumbar spine fusion.

Aprotinin in fibrin tissue adhesives induces specific antibody response and increases antibody response of high-dose intravenous application

BACKGROUND

In cardiac operations, aprotinin therapy is used either locally as a component of commercially available fibrin tissue adhesives, intravenously, or combined. Our aim was to examine the formation of aprotinin-specific antibodies with regard to the application mode.

METHODS

Sera of 150 patients who had undergone cardiac operations and were receiving aprotinin therapy for the first time were sampled before the operation and at medians of 3.5 and 13.3 months after the operation. Aprotinin-specific IgG including all subgroups and aprotinin-specific IgE were analyzed. Aprotinin was given locally (as contained in fibrin sealant; n = 45; median dose, 6000 KIU), intravenously (n = 46; 2.000 x 10(6) KIU), and combined (n = 59; 2.012 x 10(6) KIU).

RESULTS

At 3.5 months, the prevalence of aprotinin-specific IgG antibodies was 33% (15/45 patients) after local, 28% (13/46 patients) after intravenous, and 69% (41/59 patients) after combined exposure (P =.0001). At 13.3 months, the prevalence of aprotinin-specific IgG antibodies was 10% (4/41 patients) after local, 31% (13/42 patients) after intravenous, and 49% (28/57 patients) after combined exposure. Total aprotinin dose was similar in patients who were antibody positive and negative. Before the operation, no aprotinin-specific antibodies were detected. Aprotinin-specific IgE were not found after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Local aprotinin contact induces a specific immune response and reinforces that of intravenous exposure. The antibody spectrum is identical to the immune response induced by intravenous exposure. Any exposure should be documented. For use in cardiac operations as a hemostyptic, the necessity itself and alternatives for aprotinin as a stabilizing agent merit consideration.

Retrospective analysis of effect of low-dose aprotinin priming on allogeneic blood transfusion in repeated cardiac operations

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate efficacy of low-dose aprotinin priming therapy on the requirement of allogeneic transfusion and to identify risk factors for allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing repeated cardiac operations. The present study includes a critical review of 124 consecutive charts of patients undergoing elective repeat cardiac surgery. We examined the effect of low-dose aprotinin priming therapy on blood loss, amounts of mediastinal drainage following intensive care unit (ICU) administration and the number of units of blood products given during the perioperative period. The rate of nonallogeneic transfusion was not affected by low-dose aprotinin priming therapy, although aprotinin reduced the amount of allogeneic transfusion and the amount of mediastinal drainage 12 h following ICU admission. In conclusion, low-dose aprotinin priming therapy is effective in reducing blood loss and the amount of allogeneic transfusion. However, it failed to improve the rate of cardiac reoperations without allogeneic blood transfusion.

Severe anaphylactic reaction after primary exposure to aprotinin

Aprotinin is widely used to prevent bleeding and reduce blood transfusions after open heart surgical procedures. Because it is a foreign protein, aprotinin has allergenic potential. We report a case of near-fatal anaphylactic reaction to primary aprotinin exposure in a child successfully treated using cardiopulmonary bypass support. The possibility of an allergic reaction must be considered whenever this drug is used.

A retrospective study of the effects of small-dose aprotinin on blood loss and transfusion needs during total hip arthroplasty

Aprotinin is a proteinase inhibitor that reduces blood loss in total hip arthroplasty when administered in large doses. Little is known about the capability of smaller doses of aprotinin in reducing blood loss and transfusion needs in this surgical setting. We reviewed the medical records of 372 patients who had undergone unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia during a 6-year period (1989 to 1994) at our institution. Successively, 193 patients had and 179 patients had not received aprotinin in a dose of 20,000 kallikrein inhibitor units per kilogram body weight intravenously before surgery. Neither the volume of red blood cells lost nor that of red blood cells transfused during hospitalization differed significantly between the patients who had and those who had not received aprotinin (520 +/- 406 vs. 549 +/- 394 mL and 463 +/- 379 vs. 475 +/- 367 mL; P = 0.49 and P = 0.76 respectively). These results suggest that small-dose aprotinin was not effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion needs in patients undergoing unilateral primary total hip replacement.

The efficacy and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The serine protease inhibitor aprotinin has received much attention in cardiac surgical practice as a pharmacologic intervention to improve the hemostatic derangement associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. This review highlights the major studies undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin use in both primary and repeat coronary artery bypass graft surgical procedures.

METHODS

There have been at least 45 controlled studies in more than 7,000 patients in a variety of patient populations. These have ranged from primary coronary artery bypass graft and valve operations to complex reoperation procedures, including aortic arch reconstructions and thoracic organ transplantation. The recently completed International Multicenter Graft Patency Experience trial, the largest study to date, involved 870 patients at 13 international sites. The study examined the effects of aprotinin on graft patency, incidence of myocardial infarction, and blood loss in patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft operations with cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies in approximately 5,000 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft or valve operations reported 33% to 66% reduction in blood loss with full-dose aprotinin therapy; 15 of the same studies reported significant reductions in transfusion requirements, ranging from 31% to 85%. The recently completed International Multicenter Graft Patency Experience study observed a significant reduction in thoracic-drainage volume of 43% (p < 0.0001) and a 49% (p < 0.001) reduction in the requirement for allogeneic blood transfusions. Aprotinin did not affect the occurrence of definite myocardial infarction (aprotinin, 2.9% versus placebo, 3.8%) or mortality (aprotinin, 1.4% versus placebo, 1.6%). There was no observed difference in the patency of internal mammary artery bypass grafts from all study sites in aprotinin- versus placebo-treated patients (aprotinin, 98.2% versus placebo, 98.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the risks and costs associated with excessive bleeding and transfusions and the limited supply of banked blood, aprotinin represents an important and safe approach to blood conservation.