Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique

Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review

Despite being first described two thousand years ago, the varicocele remains a controversial multifaceted disease process with numerous biological consequences including infertility, hypogonadism, and chronic orchidalgia. The underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood and likely include hypoxia, oxidative stress, hyperthermia, anatomical aberrations, and genetics as primary components. Despite a high prevalence amongst asymptomatic fertile men, varicoceles paradoxically also represent the most common correctable cause for male infertility. In this systematic review we discuss the rich historical aspects of the varicocele and the contemporary data regarding its clinical manifestations. We performed a systematic literature review with the goal of comparing outcomes and complication rates of each of the major surgical approaches as they relate to infertility and pain. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant systematic literature review for manuscripts focused on varicocele and its biological consequences. We identified 112 studies suitable for qualitative analysis and included 56 of these for quantitative analysis, with an emphasis on infertility and chronic pain outcomes. Taken together, the clinical work to date suggests that the highest fertility rates and the lowest complication rates are associated with the microsurgical subinguinal surgical approach to varicocelectomy. In all, 26-40% of patients undergoing varicocelectomy will successfully achieve short-term spontaneous pregnancy, and up to 90% of all patients undergoing varicocelectomy for pain will have improvement and/or resolution of their symptoms. Taken together, the data support an ongoing role for varicocelectomy in both of these clinical arenas.

Varicocelectomy with primary gubernaculum veins closure: A randomised clinical trial

To evaluate the effect of microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with testicular delivery on semen parameters. A total of 416 patients, diagnosed with grade III varicocele, were randomised into two groups. One group underwent microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy without testicular delivery. For the other group, testicular delivery and ligation of gubernacular and all collateral veins were performed. A semen analysis was performed before and 6 months after the procedure. Mean age of the patients in the case and control groups was 27.3 ± 6.1 years and 25.9 ± 4.6 years respectively (p = .1). The total number of recurrence after 6 months in the conventional and testicular delivery groups was 13 (6.5%) and 3 (1.5%) (p < .05). No case of hydrocele formation was observed in any of the groups. All sperm parameters were improved 6 months after the surgery in both groups. But comparing the mean improved difference between the two groups revealed a significant difference in improvement in sperm motility for patients who had undergone varicocelectomy with testicular delivery (p = .05). Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is a safe and efficient technique with a minimum chance of post-operative complications and recurrence and also may have role in improvement of sperm motility compared with conventional techniques.

Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis

Objective

To evaluate the detailed vascular anatomy of the spermatic cord during subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy and to assess the outcome of the cases with regard to varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation.

Patients and methods

In all, 100 varicocele cases including 74 left-sided and 26 bilateral, comprising 126 spermatic cord units with clinically palpable varicoceles underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy. Detailed description of vascular anatomy of the spermatic cords was reported. The number of spermatic, cremasteric, and inguinal veins was recorded. A record of testicular arteries and lymphatics was noted. Testicular delivery was done in all the cases and assessment of the gubernacular veins was reported. The patients underwent clinical evaluation, as well as scrotal Doppler ultrasonography, to detect varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation. The mean (range) postoperative evaluation period was 6 (3–12) months.

Results

The mean number of spermatic veins was 14 on both sides. The mean number of spermatic arteries on both sides was 1.3. For lymphatics, the mean number was around three on both sides. The gubernacular veins were noted in 75% of the cases on the left side (mean number of 1.2) and in 85% on the right-side, (mean number of 1). The mean number of cremasteric veins on the left and right sides was 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. Finally, inguinal floor vessels were noted in 9% on the left-side and were not seen in the right-side cases. The incidence of varicocele recurrence was 2% and for hydrocele that was not clinically significant was 0.07%.

Conclusion

Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy accurately evaluated the detailed vascular anatomy of the spermatic cord, achieving excellent surgical outcome with minimal varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy should be the ‘gold standard’ for varicocelectomy.

Varicoceles: prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men

Varicocele, or dilation of the pampiniform venous plexus, affects up to 15% of men. However, few of these men encounter problems with fertility. This discrepancy between men with varicocele and the number of adversely affected men has led to abundant research to identify the mechanisms for formation of varicocele as well as the pathologic mechanisms by which varicoceles affect fertility potential. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of varicocele in adults, the anatomic features of varicocele, the leading theories as to how varicocele can negatively affect fertility potential, and finally, the current literature on the impact of varicocele on testosterone production.

Recurrence rates in pediatric patients undergoing microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine if testicular delivery during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) reduces varicocele recurrence rates in pediatric patients. Testicular delivery during MSV enables ligation of the gubernacular veins, which is thought to reduce the likelihood of varicocele recurrence. However, recent studies have suggested that testicular delivery during MSV does not offer any beneficial effect and, therefore, may be optional or unnecessary.

METHODS

A total of 58 pediatric patients with grade II (nine, 15.5%) or III (49, 84.5%) varicocele met inclusion criteria. Of these 58 patients, 25 (43%) underwent MSV with testicular delivery and 33 (57%) underwent MSV without testicular delivery. Varicocele recurrence, testicular size change, and complications including edema, pain, paresthesia, hydrocele, and testicular atrophy were assessed to evaluate the effects of testicular delivery during MSV.

RESULTS

Recurrence rates were 20% and 6.1% in patients who underwent MSV with and without testicular delivery, respectively. Univariate analysis of primary endpoints demonstrated significantly decreased recurrence, scrotal pain, and temporary paresthesia in patients who underwent MSV without testicular delivery compared to those with testicular delivery. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated that recurrence was significantly associated with testicular delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Testicular delivery to enable ligation of the gubernacular veins during MSV resulted in a higher recurrence rate in pediatric patients. Further investigation including prospective studies with long-term follow-up is needed to determine if testicular delivery during MSV is an unnecessary procedure in pediatric patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Microsurgically Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair and Simultaneous Male Fertility Procedures: Rationale, Technique and Outcomes

PURPOSE

Inguinal herniorrhaphy is the most common general surgical procedure. It is associated with frequent complications such as recurrence in 2.0% to 14.1% of cases with mesh as well as postoperative hematoma in 4.5% of cases, reduced sensation in 0% to 42.8%, chronic postoperative pain in 5.1%, vasal injury in 0.1% to 0.53% and infection in 3% to 6%. Drawing on our experience with the operating microscope for varicocelectomy, vasectomy reversal and repair of iatrogenic vasal obstruction from hernia repair, we applied the operating microscope for inguinal hernia repair. This study describes the rationale, technique and outcomes of microsurgically assisted inguinal hernia repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 291 microsurgically assisted inguinal hernia repairs were performed in 253 men by the same urologist (MG). Simultaneous microsurgical varicocelectomy or other testicular procedures were performed in 83% of cases. All were open repairs through an inguinal incision with the vas deferens, ilioinguinal nerve, genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve, and spermatic vasculature identified and preserved. Median followup was 8.6 months. Outcomes were assessed by examination, pain reporting and pathology reports.

RESULTS

Chronic postoperative pain, sensory loss, infection, hematoma, vasal injury and recurrence were assessed. The incidence of hematoma was 0.85%. No recurrent hernia, chronic postoperative pain, sensory loss, infection or vasal injury was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an operating microscope the complications of inguinal hernia repair, such as vasal obstruction, testicular atrophy, recurrence, infection, hematoma, chronic postoperative pain and loss of sensation, are minimized. Microsurgically assisted hernia repair is a promising technique, especially when performed by a urologist who simultaneously performs microsurgical varicocelectomy or procedures involving spermatic cord structures or the testis.

A review of varicocele repair for pain

A dilation of the pampiniform venous plexus in the scrotum above the testicle, called a varicocele, affects approximately 15% of the general male population. While the majority is asymptomatic, pain results in up to 10% of cases of varicoceles. The pain associated with varicoceles is typically mild and is described as heavy, achy, or dull—and is usually isolated to the testicle or spermatic cord. Guidelines clearly recommend varicocele repair in males with varicoceles, infertility, and an abnormal semen analysis. While chronic, severe pain is an additional indication for repair, a careful evaluation to rule out other etiologies in addition to a period of conservative management are necessary prior to surgical treatment because of the high incidental prevalence of varicoceles in the general population. Several techniques for varicocele repair have been described, including retroperitoneal, laparoscopic, inguinal, and subinguinal. Additionally, recent adjuncts to improve visualization and identification of critical structures including the operating microscope and microvascular Doppler ultrasound have improved success and complication rates. With careful patient selection, outcomes of varicocele repair with regard to pain are excellent, with over 90% of patients experiencing symptomatic relief. After failure of conservative treatments, a varicocele associated with pain should be considered for repair, and the microsurgical subinguinal approach is the gold standard surgical treatment, offering excellent outcomes while minimizing risk of complications.

Varicocelectomy: Modified loupe-assisted versus microscopic technique – A prospective comparative study

Abstract objective

To compare our novel loupe-assisted varicocelectomy (LV) technique to the ‘gold standard’ demanding microscopic varicocelectomy (MV) technique for the management of varicoceles.

Patient and methods

Our LV technique, featuring testicular delivery and proximal spermatic cord occlusion using a tourniquet, has not been used before nor to our knowledge has it been reported in the literature. In the LV group, inguinal incision was done prior to testicular delivery and spermatic cord occlusion. Pampiniform and gubernacular veins were identified then tackled. Proximal spermatic cord occlusion helped in identifying those veins, and not confusing them with other cord structures that should be preserved. In all, 95 infertile men were included in this prospective, comparative study; and divided into LV and MV groups. They were followed-up for 1 year, pregnancy achievement, improvements in semen parameters, and complication rates were assessed.

Results

Both groups had statistically significant pregnancy rates and negligible complication rates. However, LV cost 33% less than MV and was quicker to perform. We did not find that the MV technique was better than our simple, more cost-effective, less time-consuming LV technique.

Conclusion

Our novel LV technique has similar success and complication rates as the ‘gold standard’ MV technique for the management of varicoceles, and is more cost-effective and less time consuming.

Comparison of response to treatment of unilateral and bilateral varicocelectomy

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to compare the results of unilateral and bilateral varicocele surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In two referral hospitals, the data of 180 patients who were treated with unilateral and bilateral microscopic varicocelectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Sperm parameters and spontaneous pregnancy rates were compared in patients who underwent bilateral and unilateral microscopic varicocelectomy.

RESULTS

The mean age was 29.6 (17-46) years. While 82 patients underwent unilateral varicocelectomy (Group I), 98 patients underwent bilaterally varicocelectomy (Group II). Forty (48.8%) spontaneous pregnancies occurred in Group I and 59 (60.2%) in Group II. When we analyzed sperm parameters, the rate of increase in the number of sperm in spermiograms was 17% in Group I and 27.5% in Group II. The rate of increase in sperm mobility was 58.5% and 50% in Group I and II, respectively. The improvement rate in sperm morphology was 46.3% in Group I and 56.1% in Group II. There were no significant differences between all these parameters.

CONCLUSION

In light of our results, although pregnancy rates seemed to be higher in patients who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy, these results were not statistically significant. Improvement rates in sperm parameters were similar between the patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral varicocelectomy.

The application of laparoscopic Doppler ultrasound during laparoscopic varicocelectomy in infertile men

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefits of laparoscopic Doppler ultrasound (LDU) application during laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV), and to compare the surgical outcomes and complications between LDU-assisted LV (LDU-LV) and conventional LV for infertile patients with varicoceles; 147 infertile patients were randomly divided into two groups. Operative and postoperative parameters, semen parameters, and the pregnancy rate were compared. There were no differences in baseline demographics. The operative time was significantly longer in LDU-LV group than LV group. The incidence of postoperative hydrocele was 1.4% (1/72) in LDU-LV group versus 10.7% (8/75) in LV group, which showed a significant difference (P < 0.05). However, other surgical outcomes, such as postoperative hospital stay, postoperative recurrence, and testicular atrophy, were similar between the two groups. Sperm concentration and sperm motility were significantly increased in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.01), and they were higher in LDU-LV than LV group in 12 months after surgery (34.21 ± 6.36 vs 29.99 ± 6.04 for concentration, P < 0.05; 40.72 ± 8.12 vs 37.31 ± 6.12 for motility, P < 0.05). Sperm morphology was comparable between the two groups. The pregnancy rate showed no significant difference (44.4% of the LDU-LV vs 37.3% of the LV, P > 0.05). In conclusion, compared with LV, LDU-LV could safely and effectively ligate all spermatic veins and preserve spermatic arteries without leading to high varicocele recurrence and postoperative hydrocele. Given the benefits that sperm counts as well as sperm motility favoring LDU-LV, we recommend that LDU should be routinely used as an effective tool to improve outcomes and safety of laparoscopic varicocelectomy.

A Novel Approach of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With a "Pulling" Strategy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel approach of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy with a "pulling" strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two male patients with varicocele were enrolled in this study. Twenty-six patients underwent conventional microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy, whereas the remaining 26 patients accepted our novel approach of treatment. In this method, with a subinguinal incision, we dissociated the spermatic cord from the external ring. And thus we pulled the spermatic cord down and away from the external ring and exposed the spermatic cord that initially was proximal to the external ring in the surgical field. The remainder of the procedure was similar to that of the conventional method. Follow-up was made at 1 and 3 months. Postoperative complications were recorded and sperm parameters were evaluated by semen analysis.

RESULTS

Fewer vein branches were ligated in the novel method group compared with the conventional method group (6.9 ± 2.1 vs 9.8 ± 2.2, P < .001; t = -5.316). There was no significant difference in the number of testicular arteries or lymphatic ducts between the 2 groups. The mean microsurgical operative time in the novel method group was significantly shorter than that in the conventional method group (34.7 ± 6.5 minutes vs 45.7 ± 8.8 minutes, P < .001; t = -5.621). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar for the 2 groups. There was no significant difference regarding semen quality improvement between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that our novel approach of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy with a "pulling" strategy significantly reduces the number of internal veins to ligate and shortens operating time, with no increase in complications. It is a safe and effective method of varicocele treatment.

Effect of Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocele Repair on Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain in Men with Grade II-III Lesions

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in patients with grade II-III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with grade II-III varicocele and chronic dull scrotal pain that had a microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair were included in the study. They were followed-up for 6-12 months including pain assessment and scrotal examination.

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients, 28 (97%) reported complete resolution of pain with no palpable varicocele on scrotal examination. No cases of testicular atrophy or hydrocele formation were reported.

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that microsurgical varicocele repair should be considered in patients with grade II-III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

Recurrent varicocele

Varicocele recurrence is one of the most common complications associated with varicocele repair. A systematic review was performed to evaluate varicocele recurrence rates, anatomic causes of recurrence, and methods of management of recurrent varicoceles. The PubMed database was evaluated using keywords “recurrent” and “varicocele” as well as MESH criteria “recurrent” and “varicocele.” Articles were not included that were not in English, represented single case reports, focused solely on subclinical varicocele, or focused solely on a pediatric population (age <18). Rates of recurrence vary with the technique of varicocele repair from 0% to 35%. Anatomy of recurrence can be defined by venography. Management of varicocele recurrence can be surgical or via embolization.

Oxidation-reduction potential of semen: what is its role in the treatment of male infertility?

The diagnosis of male infertility relies largely on conventional semen analysis, and its interpretation has a profound influence on subsequent management of patients. Despite poor correlation between conventional semen parameters and male fertility potential, inclusion of advanced semen quality tests to routine male infertility workup algorithms has not been widely accepted. Oxidative stress is one of the major mediators in various etiologies of male infertility; it has deleterious effects on spermatozoa, including DNA damage. Alleviation of oxidative stress constitutes a potential treatment strategy for male infertility. Measurement of seminal oxidative stress is of crucial role in the identification and monitoring of patients who may benefit from treatments. Various tests including reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay, total antioxidant capacity (TAC) assay or malondialdehyde (MDA) assay used by different laboratories have their own drawbacks. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) is a measure of overall balance between oxidants and antioxidants, providing a comprehensive measure of oxidative stress. The MiOXSYS™ System is a novel technology based on a galvanostatic measure of electrons; it presents static ORP (sORP) measures with static referring to the passive or current state of activity between oxidants and antioxidants. Preliminary studies have correlated sORP to poor semen qualities. It is potentially useful in prognostication of assisted reproductive techniques outcomes, screening of antioxidants either in vivo or during IVF cycles, identification of infertile men who may benefit from treatment of oxidative stress, and monitoring of treatment success. The simplified laboratory test requiring a small amount of semen would facilitate clinical application and research in the field. In this paper, we discuss the measurement of ORP by the MiOXSYS System as a real-time assessment of seminal oxidative stress, and argue that it is a potential valuable clinical test that should be incorporated into the male infertility workup and become an important guide to the treatment of oxidative stress-induced male infertility.

Clinical Outcomes of Varicocele Repair in Infertile Men: A Review

Varicoceles are a major cause of impaired spermatogenesis and the most common correctable cause of male infertility. They are found in approximately 40% of men with primary infertility and 80% of men with secondary infertility, although they also occur in 12% of men with normal semen parameters. The presence of a varicocele does not always affect spermatogenesis, as it has been reported that only 20% of men with documented varicoceles suffer fertility problems. However, varicocele repair appears to have beneficial effects in men with impaired semen parameters and palpable varicoceles. Currently, the main procedures employed for varicocele repair are microsurgical subinguinal or inguinal varicocelectomy, laparoscopic varicocelectomy, and radiological percutaneous embolization. Microsurgical varicocelectomy appears to be the optimal treatment in most cases, whereas the other procedures are useful only in specific cases. After treatment, it typically takes 3 to 6 months for patients' semen parameters to improve; thus, other therapies, including assisted reproductive technology, should be considered if infertility persists after this interval, especially in older couples. Controversies still remain regarding how varicoceles in certain subgroups, such as adolescents or men with azoospermia, should be treated. Due to their relatively high prevalence rate among the general population, varicoceles can occur concomitantly with other conditions that cause impaired spermatogenesis. Further studies are necessary in order to identify the patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. In this review, we sought to summarize the issues currently associated with varicocele treatment in infertile men.

Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors

Spermatogenesis is an extraordinary complex process. The differentiation of spermatogonia into spermatozoa requires the participation of several cell types, hormones, paracrine factors, genes and epigenetic regulators. Recent researches in animals and humans have furthered our understanding of the male gamete differentiation, and led to clinical tools for the better management of male infertility. There is still much to be learned about this intricate process. In this review, the critical steps of human spermatogenesis are discussed together with its main affecting factors.

Leg ischemia post-varicocelectomy

Varicocelectomy is the most commonly performed operation for the treatment of male infertility. Many surgical approaches are used as each of them has advantages over the other and is preferred by surgeons. Vascular injury has never been reported as a complication of varicocelectomy apart from testicular artery injury. We present a 36-year-old male who developed leg ischemia post-varicocelectomy due to common femoral artery injury. He was successfully treated by using a vein graft.

The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery

Varicoceles had been recognized in clinical practice for over a century. Originally, these procedures were utilized for the management of pain but, since 1952, the repairs had been mostly for the treatment of male infertility. However, the diagnosis and treatment of varicoceles were controversial, because the pathophysiology was not clear, the entry criteria of the studies varied among centers, and there were few randomized clinical trials. Nevertheless, clinicians continued developing techniques for the correction of varicoceles, basic scientists continued investigations on the pathophysiology of varicoceles, and new outcome data from prospective randomized trials have appeared in the world's literature. Therefore, this special edition of the Asian Journal of Andrology was proposed to report much of the new information related to varicoceles and, as a specific part of this project, the present article was developed as a comprehensive review of the evolution and refinements of the corrective procedures.

[Evolution of the therapeutic management of varicoceles: Analysis of French national coding database (2006-2014)]

OBJECTIVE

The varicocele is a venous abnormality frequently found in humans (1/10). Although the recommendations for management of this pathology are clear, two therapeutic options can be discussed: surgery or radiological embolisation. We wanted to study the evolution of the therapeutic management of varicocele using the French national coding database.

METHODS

Analysis of database from the "Agence technique de l'information sur l'hospitalisation" (ATIH) (number of surgical procedures and interventional radiology used in the treatment of varicocele for the period 2006-2014). The common classification of medical procedures (CCAM) was used to extract the codes for surgery and radiological embolisation. Then we recorded the corresponding "Groupes homogènes de malades" (GHM), excluding those with a different primary diagnosis of varicocele cure.

RESULTS

The number of surgical procedures and radiological embolisation performed for the treatment of varicocele increased from 3626 to 4007 procedures (+10.5%) between 2006 and 2014. While the frequency of interventional radiology (embolization pampiniform plexus) increased by 73.9%, surgery procedures (by direct approach or laparoscopy) decreased by 31.4% throughout the study (2006-2014). Thus in 2006, 60.2% of therapeutic procedures were performed surgically and 39.8% by radiological embolisation. In 2014, 37.4% of therapeutic procedures were performed surgically and 62.6% by embolization.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of French national database has confirmed a change in the therapeutic management of varicocele between 2006 and 2014. The minimally invasive treatment by radiological embolisation is currently favored in France and surgery pushed into the background. In 2014, more than one therapeutic management out of two was performed in interventional radiology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

My indications for treatment of the adolescent varicocele (and why?)

What to do with the adolescent varicocele? With merging the information obtained from an extensive review of the literature with our own clinical research, I believe that we already have knowledge enough to say that the adolescent with a varicocele often is in the midst of a progressive disease process. Strong evidence already exists that well more than the majority of Tanner 5 boys with a varicocele and 20% asymmetry will already have abnormally low total motile sperm counts (TMCs) and likely abnormally low sperm concentration as well. There are now many studies in addition to common sense to support the value of % asymmetry as a marker of future abnormal sperm parameters. While we know that some boys at lower Tanner stages who present with asymmetry will have catch-up growth during adolescence, we also know that almost all boys with 15% asymmetry or greater in conjunction with a Doppler detected peak retrograde flow (PRF) of 38 cm/s or greater will end up with greater than 20% asymmetry on follow-up. There also are some boys of concern with less asymmetry but instead have small testes bilaterally, perhaps as a result of the left varicocele slowing the growth of the right testicle and/or an associated undetected or overlooked palpable right varicocele that is also negatively affecting the right testicle. Fortunately, we now have another marker available, i.e., total testicular volume (TTV), to assist in decision making for the adolescent falling into this scenario. Once markers are in place in an early Tanner stage boy with a varicocele that indicate that abnormal semen parameters will likely be present when a Tanner 5 stage of development is reached, there is no reason to wait until the child is older so that a semen analysis can be comfortably requested for the documentation. One argument in favor of waiting is that abnormal semen parameters in a Tanner 5 male usually are reversible. However, how do we know that once abnormal parameters are reversed they then will stay normal in a testicle that already has incurred damage. In other words, I feel it is best to operate once the indicators are in place. We do not want to be suddenly surprised when that individual when older has difficulty fathering a child at a time in life when surgery might be too late to resolve what has taken years to develop. Within this manuscript I will try to document my reasons for the aforementioned rationale.

Practice patterns in the surgical approach for adolescent varicocelectomy

Objective

To describe practice patterns in the choice of surgical approach for adolescent varicocelectomy using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.

Methods

Hospitals enrolled in the PHIS database that reported all outpatient surgeries by CPT code from 2003 to 2012 were included. Patients at least 10 years of age whose records contained both the ICD-9 code for varicocele (456.4) and a CPT code for varicocelectomy [55550 (laparoscopic), 55530 (open inguinal), 55535 (open abdominal)] were identified. Microsurgical approach was identified by the add-on CPT code 69990. Comparisons among surgical approaches were made using one-way ANOVA, and time trend was evaluated with linear regression.

Results

A total cohort of 2528 patients was identified from 38 hospitals. Laparoscopic approach was utilized in 53.6 % of patients. (n = 1354) Microsurgical approach was reported in only 2 % (n = 23) of open varicocelectomies. A subgroup analysis was performed including only those hospitals that reported varicocelectomies in every year of the study period. (n = 587) In this subgroup, 57 % of cases were performed laparoscopically (n = 333), and the trend in laparoscopic cases within this subgroup remained stable over the study period (r² = 0.00, p = 0.97).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy was the most commonly reported surgical approach in this cohort, and the distribution of surgical approaches appeared to remain stable between 2003 and 2012. While subinguinal microsurgical repair has become the gold standard for management of varicocele in adults with infertility, this technique does not appear to be widely adopted in adolescents, though use of an operating microscope is likely underreported in the PHIS database.

Microsurgical Spermatic Cord Denervation as a Treatment for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain: A Multicenter Open Label Trial

PURPOSE

We prospectively evaluated the results of microsurgical spermatic cord denervation in a series of patients with chronic scrotal content pain in a multicenter study, including 1 center in Germany and 3 centers in Chile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients with chronic scrotal content pain more than 3 months in duration were prospectively selected for standardized operative microsurgical spermatic cord denervation as pain treatment. In all patients preoperative management included a positive response to a spermatic cord block test with local anesthesia. Pain severity was assessed using an analog visual pain scale (range 0 to 10) for 30 consecutive days. A total of 52 testicular units were operated on using a subinguinal approach. In all cases a surgical microscope was used to identify the arteria testicularis.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications were observed and no testicular units were lost. Two reoperations were performed, including 1 for hematocele and 1 for hydrocele. Six months after surgery 40 patients (80%) were completely pain-free. In 6 patients (12%) intermittent testicular discomfort persisted, which could be managed by acetaminophen on demand. Four patients (8%) had no change in pain severity after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

After proper selection of patients microsurgical spermatic cord denervation seems to be a safe and efficient procedure to treat chronic scrotal content pain. Considering the limitations of the study, a randomized, controlled trial with longer followup is highly warranted.

Microsurgical Varicocele Repair on Men with Grade III Lesions and Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgical varicocele repair in patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was based on 8 patients with grade III left-sided varicocele and chronic dull scrotal pain for whom a microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair was performed. The 1-year follow-up included pain assessment and scrotal examination.

RESULTS

Of the 8 patients, 7 (88%) reported complete resolution of pain with no palpable varicocele on scrotal examination. No cases of testicular atrophy or hydrocele formation were reported.

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that microsurgical varicocele repair may benefit patients with grade III lesions and chronic dull scrotal pain.

Prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy to treat varicocele-associated male infertility

The present study identified prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy for the treatment of varicocele-induced male infertility. All varicoceles were diagnosed and graded by physical examination and ultrasound. Pre- and postoperative analysis of semen specimens measured sperm density, morphology and motility. 'Responder' and 'non-responder' status was determined by semen analyses at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Varicocele Grades 1, 2 and 3 were found in 16, 36 and 28 patients, respectively; 49 patients (61.3%) were responders based on improved seminograms. Significant postoperative increases were noted in sperm density (from 18.20 ± 14.76 × 10(6) to 32.36 ± 24.81 × 10(6)mL(-1); P<0.001), sperm morphology (from 57.21 ± 17.35% to 62.66 ± 15.18%; P=0.006) and percentage motility (from 29.89 ± 14.71% to 50.92 ± 19.30%; P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age (odds ratio (OR) 0.56; P<0.001) and preoperative sperm density (OR 1.22; P=0.001) had significant unfavourable and favourable associations, respectively, with the likelihood of successful varicocelectomy. Furthermore, a preoperative sperm density of 12 × 10(6)mL(-1) as a cut-off point was able to predict successful varicocelectomy with a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 77.4% (area under the curve=0.85; P<0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.92). Age and preoperative sperm density are prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy. The results of the present study may allow clinicians to predict surgical improvement in fertility in patients with varicocele.

Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion

This document discusses the evaluation and management of varicoceles in the male partners of infertile couples, and presents the controversies and recommendations regarding this condition. This document replaces the ASRM Practice Committee document titled "Report on Varicocele and Infertility," last published in 2008, and was developed in conjunction with the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology (Fertil Steril 2008;90:S247-9).

Magnification-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy with testicular delivery in children: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of magnification-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy (MASV) with testicular delivery in children with severe varicocele.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 23 children 15 years or younger (mean age, 12.3±1.8 years) who underwent MASV with testicular delivery and ligation of all collateral veins except arteries and deferential veins between January 2010 and January 2014. All patients had grade 3 varicocele on the left side. Varicocelectomy was decided upon due to scrotal hypotrophy (n=14, 60.9%), the existence of mass (n=6, 26.1%, including 1 recurrent case), and discomfort (n=3, 13.0%). The preservation of internal spermatic artery (ISA) was successful in 8 patients (34.8%). The mean follow-up time was 10.8±6.6 months.

RESULTS

The surgical success rate of varicocelectomy was 100%. The overall symptom resolution rate was 91.3%. The scrotal mass and discomfort disappeared, but testicular catch-up growth did not occur in 2 among 14 patients with scrotal hypotrophy. The left testis volume increased from 6.5±4.3 mL to 10.6±7.5 mL (p=0.003). There were no significant inter-group differences in terms of the surgical success rate, symptom resolution, and catch-up growth between the ISA preservation group and the ligation group. None of the subjects demonstrated testicular atrophy or hydrocele after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MASV with testicular delivery is an effective and safe method for children with severe varicocele.

Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?

The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative difference in anatomic details between loupe-assisted and microscopic varicocelectomy within the same spermatic cord. Between April 2011 and August 2011, 26 men with 33 sides containing grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. First, one surgeon performed the open inguinal varicocelectomy under × 3.5 loupe magnification. The presumed vascular channels and lymphatics were isolated and marked without ligation. Another surgeon then microsurgically dissected and checked the same spermatic cord using an operating microscope to judge the results in terms of the ligation of the internal spermatic veins and the preservation of the arteries and lymphatics. There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.51 vs 0.97), internal spermatic veins (5.70 vs 4.39) and lymphatics (3.52 vs 1.61) between the microscope and loupe-assisted procedures (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, in varicocele repair with loupe magnification, an average of 1.30 ± 1.07 (43/33) internal spermatic veins per side were missed, among the overlooked veins, 1.12 ± 0.93 (37/33) were adhered to the preserved testicular artery, as well as 0.55 ± 0.79 lymphatics and 0.36 ± 0.55 arteries that were to be ligated. In conclusion, microscopic varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries and lymphatics and could ligate more veins than the loupe-assisted procedure. To some degree, loupe magnification is inadequate for the reliable identification and dissection of the tiny vessels of the spermatic cord, as most of the overlooked veins were adhered to the preserved testicular artery.

Microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy

This study was conducted to introduce a simple modification that can facilitate microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) especially for surgeons inexperienced in microsurgical technique. A single surgeon performed microsurgical intermediate subinguinal varicocelectomy (MISV) on 52 patients with 61 cases between September 2010 and August 2012. Patient age, varicocele grade, operation time, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and 3-month follow-up results were analyzed. Patient mean age was 28 years (range, 15-69 years), and there were 9 bilateral cases. The mean operative time was 51 minutes (range, 34-109 minutes). We compared the first 31 cases to the second 30 cases, to assess investigator experience on operating times. The mean number of ligated veins was 5 (range, 3-10) in internal spermatic vein, 1 (range, 0-4) in external spermatic vein, and 1 (range, 0-3) in gubernacular vein. In 28 patients, the average postoperative sperm concentration at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than the preoperative sperm concentration (28.5±18.2×10(6)/mL versus 10.5±23.0×10(6)/mL; P=0.003). Mean motility improved after MSIV (65.7%±18.2% versus 47.2%±21.7%; P=0.004). In conclusion, MISV appears comparable with MSV in terms of the high success rate, low complication rate, and low postoperative pain; and it can be easily accomplished by inexperienced surgeons.

Antegrade venography identifies parallel venous duplications in the majority of adolescents with varicocele

PURPOSE

We performed intraoperative antegrade venography to assess the prevalence of internal spermatic venous malformations in adolescents with varicocele.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 2-year period 58 adolescent males with visible or palpable varicocele underwent antegrade venography before varicocele surgery. Antegrade venography was performed through a scrotal incision. A vein within the pampiniform plexus was cannulated and up to 1.75 mg/kg iohexol 300 mg/ml was injected to outline the entire length of the internal spermatic vein. The radiographs were reviewed and classified according to Bähren and Murray criteria.

RESULTS

Of the patients 43 (74.1%) demonstrated parallel duplications (Murray classification type P) of the internal spermatic vein. This rate is higher than the 2% reported based on retrograde venography. Of the patients with parallel duplications 21 (48.8%) showed duplications arising superior to the iliac crest (subtype A) and 22 (51.2%) had a combination of proximal duplications (subtypes B and C). Ten patients (17.2%) had a single internal spermatic vein, 2 (3.4%) had lumbar collaterals and 3 (5.2%) had renal collaterals.

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel duplication of the internal spermatic vein is a common finding on antegrade venography. The various levels of duplication need to be identified before treatment of varicocele to maximize the success of the procedure.

Low body mass index might be a predisposing factor for varicocele recurrence: a prospective study

We investigated the possible relationship between body mass index (BMI) score and varicocele recurrence in an infertile patient population. A total of 255 primary infertile male patients (138 with varicocele and 117 for control) were included in this study. Height and weight measurements, clinical examination for varicocele, determination of serum hormone levels and spermiogram were performed in all cases. The BMI score was calculated, and patients with varicocele were operated with subinguinal technique and re-examined for recurrences. The varicocele group had significantly lower weight and the BMI score than the control group (P < 0.001). Varicocele recurrences were found in 22 patients (16% of them) after the operations. The BMI score was significantly lower in the recurrent group than in the nonrecurrent and control groups (P < 0.001). 73% of the recurrent, 50% of the nonrecurrent and 25% of the control group patients' BMI scores were under 25 kg m(-2) (P < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the BMI score was found as a determinant for varicocele recurrence (P = 0.027; OR: 1.25). It is concluded that BMI score lower than 25 kg m(-2) significantly increases the recurrence rate after varicocele operation, and it can be used as an objective indicator for microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies

Varicocele is defined as abnormally dilated scrotal veins. It is present in 15 % of normal males and in 40 % of males with infertility. This disorder is a challenge for the physicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment, as the pathophysiology of varicocele is not yet completely understood. For this reason, accurate diagnostic criteria and clear indications for treatment in asymptomatic adolescents or adults with clinical or subclinical varicocele are still not defined. Ultrasonography (US) is considered the best method for calculating the volume of the testicles, measuring vein diameter and monitoring the growth of the testis in adolescent patients. Color-Doppler US is the method of choice for detecting spermatic vein reflux and for classifying the grade of varicocele. Various classification systems have been published with recommendations on how to perform US imaging of the scrotum. Currently, color-Doppler US and spectral analysis are the most effective, non-invasive diagnostic procedures as they allow detection of subclinical varicocele associated with infertility. Various techniques are used in the treatment of varicocele including open surgery, laparoscopic procedures and interventional radiology. However, there is no consensus among physicians on which technique is the most effective in terms of outcome and complication rates. This review shows that color-Doppler US is currently the most widely employed diagnostic method for detection and classification of varicocele caused by venous reflux, as it is reliable and easily performed. The review also highlights the role of varicocelectomy in the management of adult male infertility.

Trans-scrotal varicocelectomy in adolescents: clinical and surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The gold standard to treat varicocele in adolescents is still under discussion. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of trans-scrotal varicocelectomy and show the results obtained by using local anesthesia in combination with preoperative sedation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and January 2012, this surgical and anesthesiology procedure was proposed to study patients. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were created. Patients received trans-scrotal varicocelectomy with lymphatic and artery sparing technique under local anesthesia with mild sedation anesthesia. Patients were followed for 6 months after surgery, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated with this technique. Three patients required additional sedation with propofol. None had recurrence of varicocele, and one patient showed post-operative hydrocele. All patients were discharged within 24h following surgery. Three patients used ibuprofen and paracetamol for two days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthesia in the pediatric age group could be used for varicocelectomy with mild sedation anesthesia.

[Variocele in adolescents]

Up to 20% of adolescents have a varicocele. Often a varicocele is an incidental finding during a physical examination. However, adolescents with a varicocele might suffer from pain or they may have noticed a difference in the volume of the testes. The diagnostic investigation of the ejaculate in adolescents is difficult because no age-dependent spermiogram standard values exist. Endocrinological tests are also difficult because of the physiological variability of testosterone and gonadotropins during adolescence. The difference in testes volume normalizes in half of the boys without any therapy during maturation. Most adolescents with a varicocele have a normal semen analysis. The sperm parameters are the most important factor for treatment decision making.If sperm concentration, motility, and morphology are normal, active surveillance with regular control examinations are recommended even if the volume of the testis is divergent. Pathologic sperm parameters should lead to an operative treatment. The microsurgical subinguinal technique is the method of choice due to the low complication and reoperation rates. The sperm concentration, morphology, and motility increase postoperatively as well as the volume of the testis. It is not clear whether the improved sperm parameters lead to improved spontaneous pregnancy rates later in life. Whether scrotal pain decreases after operative therapy is uncertain because of the subjectivity of pain.Until now there are only a few studies with small and very heterogeneous case numbers so that no clear recommendation for the treatment of a varicocele in adolescents can be made. The difficulty in the treatment decision-making is preventing reduced fertility, while avoiding overtreatment.

Intravenous methylene blue venography during laparoscopic paediatric varicocelectomy

INTRODUCTION

One of the challenges of varicocele surgery is to prevent hydrocele formation while still ensuring success. Methylene blue has been used to identify and preserve lymphatic vessels, and venography has been a standard component of sclerotherapy and percutaneous retrograde techniques. The authors have combined both approaches during laparoscopic varicocelectomy and report their experience.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed of adolescents with idiopathic varicocele and spontaneous venous reflux on Doppler ultrasound. A pampiniform plexus vein was cannulated via scrotal incision before creating the pneumoperitoneum. A mixture of methylene blue and Omnipaque™ was injected into the pampiniform plexus with fluoroscopic screening. Laparoscopic selective vein ligation was then performed using 5mm endoscopic clips or a bipolar vessel sealing device such as Plasmakinetic™ or Ligasure™. Venography was repeated to confirm complete ligation of the internal testicular veins. Patients were followed-up at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery with clinical examination and Doppler ultrasound. Data are presented as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic selective vein ligation with venography and methylene blue injection. The median age was 14.7 (14.6-15.7) years. The recurrence rate was 12%. No patients developed a hydrocele. The length of surgery was 120 (100-126) minutes.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative intra-venous methylene blue injection and venography helps to identify venous duplications of the internal testicular veins and enhances the success rate of laparoscopic selective vein ligation. This approach prevents hydrocele formation but has a 12% recurrence rate, which appears to be higher than some techniques described in the literature.

Dilemma of adolescent varicocele: long-term outcome in patients managed surgically and in patients managed expectantly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of adolescent varicocele in the case of surgical versus conservative management.

METHODS

173 adolescent patients presenting with varicocele were evaluated clinically and sonographically to define varicocele grade and testicular volume. The patients were divided into 2 groups: A (53) with testicular size discrepancy >20% and bilateral varicoceles; B (120) unilaterally affected patients with testicular size discrepancy <20%, who were randomly allocated into 2 equal sub-groups (B1 & B2) of 60 patients. Group A & B1 patients underwent 3× loupe magnified inguinal varicocelectomy while B2 patients were conservatively managed.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 14.3 years with mean testicular volume of 11.75 mL and 10.15 mL for right and left testicles, respectively. There were no significant differences between sub-groups B1 & B2 for age, mean testicular volume, size discrepancy and varicocele grade. Mean follow-up of group A & B1 patients was 78 months showing grade I varicocele recurrence (4 cases), catch-up growth in 70% of cases and normal semen analysis in all cases. Mean follow-up of group B2 patients was 79 months showing catch-up growth in 50% of cases and normal semen analysis in all but 1 case. Four cases were shifted to surgical treatment due to reduction of testicular size (2 cases), varicocele upgrade (1 case) and oligoasthenospermia (1 case). At the last follow-up, the mean testicular volume for groups A, B1 & B2 was 16.2, 16.45 & 16.3 mL for right testes and 14.7, 15.6 & 15.2 mL for left testes, respectively. There was significantly better catch-up growth in sub-group B1 compared to B2 but the testicular volume was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Although adolescent varicocelectomy was associated with a higher percentage of patients showing testicular catch-up growth, the mean testicular volume was not significantly different. Further studies are needed to report on paternity among those patients.

Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with testicular delivery

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate our approach to the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with testicular delivery.

DESIGN

An instructional video demonstrating the surgical procedure in a step-by-step manner, highlighting useful surgical techniques.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Patients with male factor infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

After appropriate patient selection and counseling, varicocelectomy is performed with a subinguinal approach utilizing the surgical microscope. The patient is under general anesthesia and we employ an operating microscope. The patient is positioned supine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Not applicable.

RESULTS

A 2.5-cm subinguinal incision was made and the testicle was then delivered. Through the operating microscope at 10-20X magnification, internal spermatic veins were identified and ligated. Smaller veins were taken with electrocautery. The testicular artery was identified using the microdoppler probe. We employ hydrodissection in identifying and isolating the testicular artery. The spermatic cord is then repeatedly examined until no veins other than deferential veins remain. The gubernaculum is also thinned sufficiently so that veins on both sides can be identified and ligated. Testicular delivery was performed and external spermatic veins as well as gubernacular veins ligated.

CONCLUSION(S)

Varicoceles are found in up to 15% of all men, and in up to 40% of infertile men. Varicoceles have negative effects on testicular function. Varicocelectomy improves testicular function and may halt the accelerated rate of decline in testicular function associated with varicoceles. Sperm parameters, serum testosterone levels, and pregnancy rates have all been shown to improve following varicocelectomy. Use of the operating microscope, the microdoppler probe, and black and white sutures aid in efficiency. Testicular delivery is useful to ligate external spermatic veins as well as gubernacular veins.

Current issues in varicocele management: a review

The most common cause of male infertility is varicocele, and varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. In this article we reviewed the concept of varicocele in terms of its diagnosis, method of treatment, indications for treatment, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors. Physical examination is an essential diagnostic tool in the evaluation of a patient with a varicocele. However, as it depends on subjective findings, standardization of the physical examination method is needed. Various methods for treatment of varicocele exist, including open surgical, laparoscopic, microscopic surgical, and radiologic treatment such as embolization. Among these treatment approaches, microscopic inguinal or subinguinal varicocelectomy has superior outcomes, with a low complication rate. The influence of the treatment of varicocele on fertility is still a controversial issue and a difficult question to address, because there are limitations to performing a randomized control study, and previous studies had a heterogeneity of subjects and high dropout rate. However, there is robust evidence that varicocelectomy improves semen parameters as a surrogate marker of the potential for fertility. To date, general indications for treatment of varicocele are limited in patients with proven infertility, clinical palpable varicocele, and abnormal semen characteristics. Recently, it was shown that some symptoms other than infertility could be an indication for varicocelectomy because these symptoms are frequently related to deterioration of semen parameters. Varicocele in the adolescent presents a more difficult decision regarding whether to treat. A testicular size discrepancy of more than 20% is helpful for treatment decisions. Various prognostic factors were noted in several studies without, however, a consistent consensus.

Comparison of laparoscopic and microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in terms of postoperative scrotal pain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In this study, 2 different varicocelectomy methods were compared with regard to postoperative scrotal pain, length of operation, and complications.

METHODS

Forty varicocele patients, who visited our clinic because of infertility or scrotal pain between 2008 and 2009, were enrolled in this clinical study. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy was performed on 20 patients in Group I, and laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed on 20 patients in Group II. Following surgery, the patients were assessed for postoperative requirements for analgesia; return to normal activity; varicocele recurrence; hydrocele formation; scrotal pain at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7; and other complications.

RESULTS

Mean age was 24.2 +/- 3.4 years in Group I and 25.1 +/- 2.1 years in Group II. Mean pain scores at postoperative 1, 3, and 7 days in Group I were (5.20 +/- 1.14, 4.60 +/- 0.97, and 3.50 +/- 0.97, respectively) significantly higher than those of Group II (0.70 +/- 0.82, 0.60 +/- 0.84, and 0.10 +/- 0.32, respectively). Time to return to normal activity was significantly shorter in Group II (3.7 +/- 2.1 days) compared with Group I (6.8 +/- 3.4 days) (p = 0.028). However, the number of recurrences and hydroceles, as a complication of varicocelectomy, was 2 times higher in Group II (10%) than in Group I (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that laparoscopic varicocelectomy is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure. Furthermore, reduced postoperative discomfort and earlier return to normal activity are additional advantages of this method.

Dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children

INTRODUCTION

The ideal method for varicocelectomy in children remains controversial. We present our experience with dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LSLV) in children, which overcomes the limitations of previously described techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive LSLVs were performed on children with a mean age of 15 years over a 4-year period. Varicocele grade was 3 in 21 cases and grade 2 in 4. Indications for intervention were hypotrophy in 12, pain in 11 cases and family preference in 2. A scrotal injection of lymphatic dye was utilized to spare at least one lymphatic and the remaining spermatic vessels were divided.

RESULTS

Lymphatic sparing was accomplished in all cases. Operative time varied from 30 to 140 min (mean 85 ± 26). No perioperative complications were noted. On average follow-up of 13 months a residual varicocele was noted in 2 cases, with no hydrocele and resolution of pain. Mean testicular volume difference diminished from 33% pre to 18% postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This multi-surgeon experience demonstrates that dye-assisted LSLV is easily accomplished with promising results. It appears that preservation of a single spermatic lymphatic vessel is sufficient, although in some cases a second dye injection is required to visualize the lymphatics.