Nonoperative management of solid organ injuries. Past, present, and future

Management of acute appendicitis by an acute care surgery service: is operative intervention timely?

BACKGROUND

Trauma services are increasingly providing emergency surgery care by creating "acute care surgery" teams. We compared two periods at a Level I trauma center to determine if trauma service coverage would negatively impact timely management of acute appendicitis.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients admitted through the emergency department of a Level I trauma center who underwent appendectomies between March 2005 and May 2006 (Trauma period) were identified. During this period, the trauma service covered most surgical emergencies. Comparison was made with the earlier 15-month period (Pretrauma). Emergency department to operating room (OR) time, procedure length, and negative appendectomy rates were obtained.

RESULTS

In the Pretrauma period, 273 patients underwent appendectomy, compared with 279 in the Trauma period. Two-thirds (66%) of appendectomies in the Trauma period were performed by trauma surgeons. There was no difference in both periods with regard to mean emergency department to OR time (10.5 hours versus 9.9 hours; p = 0.4509), perforation rates (12% Pretrauma versus 7.5% Trauma; p = 0.1134), or negative appendectomy rates (17.9% Pretrauma versus 18.2% Trauma; p = 1.0). In the Trauma period, more appendectomies were completed laparoscopically (84.6% Trauma versus 66.6% Pretrauma; p < 0.0001), and mean OR time was shorter (57.4 minutes versus 67 minutes; p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing two periods with and without the trauma service coverage of surgical emergencies, no difference was found in emergency department to OR time, perforation rates, or negative appendectomy rates in the management of acute appendicitis. There was a decrease in operative time and an increase in the proportion of laparoscopic appendectomies in the Trauma period. Trauma services can effectively incorporate emergency surgical coverage of procedures, such as appendectomies, without compromising timely intervention.

Operative and nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults: a single-center report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Liver trauma, especially that as result of road traffic accidents, still remains a complicated problem in severely injured patients. The aim of this study was to extract useful conclusions from the management in order to improve the final outcome of such patients.

METHODS

Details for 86 patients with blunt hepatic trauma who were examined and treated in our department during a 6-year period were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed the severity of liver injury, associated injuries, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-nine liver injuries (57%) were of low severity (grades I and II), while 37 (43%) were of high severity (grades III, IV, and V). Liver trauma with associated injury of other organs was noted in 62 (72.1%) patients. Forty-three (50%) patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy within the first 24 h of admission. Thirty-five (71.4%) of the 49 patients with low-grade hepatic injuries were managed conservatively; no mortality occurred. Six (14%) of forty-three patients with liver trauma initially considered for conservative management required surgery due to hemodynamic instability. Five (13.5%) of 37 patients who were finally managed nonoperatively required adjunctive treatment for biloma, hematoma, or biliary leakage; no mortality occurred. The overall mortality rate was 9.3%; mortality rates of 5.8% and 3.5% were due to liver injuries and concomitant injuries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe hepatic injuries require surgical intervention due to hemodynamic instability. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results, while patients with hepatic trauma with associated organ injuries require surgery, because they continue to have significantly higher mortality.

Surgical management of blunt thoracic and abdominal injuries in Quebec: a limited volume

BACKGROUND

Trauma care of thoracic and abdominal injuries is currently in turmoil because of both a decrease in the number of these injuries and a concomitant increase in their nonsurgical management. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of thoracic and abdominal injuries in the province of Quebec and the number of associated surgical procedures.

METHODS

Patients with blunt thoracic or abdominal injuries taken to a tertiary trauma center in the province of Quebec from April 1, 1998 to March 31, 2002 were identified. Patients who were dead on arrival were excluded. Only patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2 for the thoracic or abdominal regions were included.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 16,430 blunt trauma patients were admitted to one of the four trauma centers. A total of 2,660 (16.2%) patients sustained thoracic and/or abdominal injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score >1. Among these, the median Injury Severity Score was 24 (range: 4-75) and the in-hospital mortality rate was 11.0%. There were 2,196 patients (82.5%) with thoracic injuries, 977 patients (36.7%) with abdominal injuries, and 520 patients (19.5%) with injuries to both regions. A surgical intervention was undertaken in 76 patients with thoracic injuries (3.5%) and in 414 patients with abdominal injuries (42.3%). On average, 4.7 thoracic and 28.8 abdominal trauma procedures were performed per center, yearly. Each trauma surgeon performed, on average, less than one thoracic and less than five abdominal trauma procedures yearly.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of blunt thoracic and abdominal injuries needing surgical intervention is low in Quebec tertiary trauma centers. The competence of general surgeons in trauma-related procedures might be compromised by such low patient volume unless they frequently perform non-trauma surgical procedures. We think that in Quebec, trauma care must be provided by surgeons who practice both acute emergency and elective surgical care in addition to trauma care. These findings should have an important impact on the development of on-going education and resident training programs.

Abdominal injuries

This article will give an overview of abdominal trauma and provide a broad framework for the initial management of injuries to the abdomen. Abdominal injury carries a high morbidity and mortality in all age groups, therefore a sound understanding of the patterns of injury, examination, investigations and resuscitation procedures is vital to the trauma surgeon's armamentarium.

A patient education tool for nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma

Blunt trauma is the primary mechanism of injury seen at Charleston Area Medical Center, a rural level I trauma center. Blunt abdominal trauma occurs as a result of various mechanisms. It can be safely managed nonoperatively and is considered to be the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients. Appropriate patient education before discharge will enable patients to identify complications early and seek appropriate medical care.

Injury in the Elderly and End-of-Life Decisions

The elderly constitute the fastest growing sector of the population of the United Stated and geriatric trauma patients are presenting for care with increasing frequency. These patients are challenging particularly because of their vulnerability to severe injury, limited physiologic response to stress, and frequent presence of comorbid medical conditions complicating care. Many elderly trauma victims require prolonged intensive care and some fail to improve or succumb despite the best efforts because of the extent of their injuries and their underlying disease. These patients may present profound ethical challenges for trauma surgeons as the goals of care shift from salvage to end-of-life care.

[Traumatic rupture of a horseshoe kidney]

One-third to one-half of all patients with horseshoe kidney are asymptomatic and the condition is found incidentally. This congenital renal anomaly has shown as a predisponent condition for renal injury in blunt abdominal trauma, but often the degree of injury has a nonoperative therapy. Horseshoe kidney rupture is an exceptional pathology that require a complete diagnostic study to make an adequate management when surgical therapy is indicated. We present a fifteen-year-old male with previously unsuspected horseshoe kidney that suffered an atypical right upper-pole and mesorrenal kidney rupture after low-velocity-impact blunt abdominal trauma. A correct presurgical diagnose let a deferred surgical approach with right lower pole and horseshoe renal isthmus preservation. The trauma conditions, an excesive clinic manifestation, a clinical investigation about known congenital simultaneous anomallies and typical radiological signs, can suggest this infrequent patology. Computed tomography provides the best radiological information.

Selective nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma

The management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma has evolved over the past two decades with increasing reliance on a non-operative approach. An in-depth understanding of the clinical and radiographic parameters used to determine those who may be eligible for this form of treatment is an essential component of modern trauma care. This case-based review highlights critical aspects of non-operative management and provides a framework for the role of the emergency medicine provider.

A new spleen-preserving technique using radiofrequency ablation technology

BACKGROUND

Splenic salvage is the ultimate goal of the treatment for splenic injury. We experimentally investigated a spleen salvage technique after spleen injury using radiofrequency ablation technology.

METHODS

A grade IV spleen trauma was produced in 10 white male Landrace pigs (the lower pole of the spleen was sharply divided at the level where the lower hilar vessel enters the organ) under general anesthesia. A Radionics Cooltip Radio Frequency needle was used to stop the bleeding in every case. The electrode was inserted in four to six different sites and each session lasted for 2 to 6 minutes.

RESULTS

All bleeding sites were controlled intraoperatively with no additional means. Postoperatively, all animals appeared clinically healthy, and at the time the animals were killed, no blood, pus, or other fluid was identified in the abdomen or chest. Subcapsular or perisplenic hematomas were not found either.

CONCLUSION

We believe that radiofrequency ablation may be used in splenic injury to stop bleeding, especially when blood transfusion or surgery is indicated. This procedure may reduce the frequency of open surgery for repair of the injury, the number of splenectomies, and the amount of blood transfusion required. The advantage of use under ultrasound or computed tomographic guidance or laparoscopically makes it even more appealing. Thus, we suggest that further study in human subjects is required to validate our results.

Laparoscopic treatment of blunt splenic injuries: initial experience with 11 patients

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative treatment of splenic injuries is the current standard of care for hemodynamically stable patients. However, uncertainty exists about its efficacy for patients with major polytrauma, a high Injury Severity Score (ISS), a high grade of splenic injury, a low Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and important hemoperitoneum. In these cases, the videolaparoscopic approach could allow full abdominal cavity investigation, hemoperitoneum evacuation with autotransfusion, and spleen removal or repair.

METHODS

This study investigated 11 hemodynamically stable patients with severe polytrauma who underwent emergency laparoscopy. The mean ISS was 29.0 +/- 3.9, and the mean GCS was 12.1 +/- 1.6. A laparoscopic splenectomy was performed for six patients, whereas splenic hemostasis was achieved for five patients, involving one electrocoagulation, one polar resection, and three polyglycolic mesh wrappings.

RESULTS

The average length of the operation was 121.4 +/- 41.6 min. There were two complications (18.2%), with one conversion to open surgery (9.1%), and no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure for evaluation and treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with splenic injuries for whom nonoperative treatment is controversial.

The impact of patient volume on surgical trauma training in a Scandinavian trauma centre

OBJECTIVE

Some of the problems faced in trauma surgery are increasing non-operative management of abdominal injuries, decreasing work hours and increasing sub-specialisation. We wanted to document the experience of trauma team leaders at the largest trauma centre in Norway, hypothesising that the patient volume would be inadequate to secure optimal trauma care.

METHODS

Patients registered in the hospital based Trauma Registry during the 2-year period from 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2002 were included.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1667 patients registered, 645 patients (39%) had an Injury Severity Score (ISS)>15. Abdominal injuries were diagnosed in 205 patients with a median ISS of 30. An average trauma team leader assessed a total of 119 trauma cases a year (46 patients with ISS>15) and participated in 10 trauma laparotomies.

CONCLUSION

Although the total number of trauma cases seems adequate, the experience of the trauma team leaders with challenging abdominal injuries is limited. With increasing sub-specialisation and general surgery vanishing, fewer surgical specialties provide operative competence in dealing with complicated torso trauma. A system of additional education and quality assurance measures is a prerequisite of high quality, and has consequently been introduced in our institution.

Moderne Diagnostik des Bauchtraumas

In case of suspected intra-abdominal injury, fast transport of the patient to a suitable hospital is of high priority. The initial clinical examination aims at identifying patients with potentially life-threatening bleeding that require emergency surgery. In patients with penetrating trauma, laparoscopy is favoured to exclude suspected perforation of the peritoneum. If a peritoneal perforation is identified, exploratory laparotomy is recommended to exclude or treat lacerations of the hollow viscus. Although clinical examination should be performed its sensitivity and specificity of up to 82% and 45%, respectively, are not sufficient as the sole screening method. For the further diagnostic workup, diagnostic peritoneal lavage has been completely replaced by abdominal ultrasound examination in Germany and many other countries. Focussing not only on the detection of free abdominal fluid but also searching for parenchymal organ lesions and performing repeated examinations increases accuracy up to 96%, with specificity of 99.8% and sensitivity of 72.1%. Computed abdominal tomography with a helical scanner with and without intravenous contrast media is currently the gold standard of imaging techniques to identify traumatic abdominal injuries. A sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 94.7% can be achieved. False negative findings must be expected with hollow organ injuries. Serial clinical and ultrasound examinations as well as lab testing in conjunction with repeated CT may help to identify such lesions. Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) with consecutive abdominal compartment syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction is a delayed complication from conditions such as severe intra-abdominal bleeding, major bleeding from pelvic ring fractures, and profuse fluid resuscitation. The IAP should be measured routinely in patients at risk, and decompression laparotomy may be indicated with pressures of higher than 20 mmHg.

U-stitching splenorraphy technique: experimental and clinical study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to describe the laboratory development and the subsequent clinical utility of the U-stitching technique for splenorraphy over the recent years in a general non-trauma hospital. Patients with splenectomies and patients treated conservatively during the same time period, are also presented.

METHODS

In the 15-year period from September 1988 until September 2003, 65 patients were diagnosed with splenic injury following admission to 2nd Department of Surgery, Democritus University Hospital, after blunt abdominal trauma. During the first 3 years, 14 patients were admitted; one of them was treated conservatively and 13 had splenectomies. Because computed tomography (CT) was not available at that time, these 14 patients form a control group. During the remaining 12-year period, 51 patients (39 male and 12 female; age, 4-82 years; mean, 31.1 years; SD, 19.7 years) were treated conservatively or surgically, either with splenectomy or with splenorraphy. Splenorraphy was performed using the U-stitching technique. This alternative splenorraphy technique was first tested on experimental models at 2nd Department of Surgery, Democritus University Hospital, then followed by successful clinical application. The medical records for these patients were reviewed to extract the data for the present study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (70.6% of 51 patients) were treated surgically; of these, 21 (41.2% of 51 patients) had splenectomy and 15 (29.4% of 51 patients) had splenorraphy. Non-operative treatment was initially given to 15 patients (29.4% of 51 patients). Two of them had delayed rupture of the spleen and underwent splenectomy (at 8 and 40 days). The total number of preserved spleens was 28 of 51 (54.9%). None of the patients with conservative treatment or splenorraphy died. One patient with splenectomy died later from overwhelming sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic salvage is now a treatment goal. If the patient is haemodynamically unstable and splenorraphy is possible, the U-stitching technique is a promising approach.

The Literature Increasingly Supports Expectant (Conservative) Management of Renal Trauma — A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The perfect degree of operative intervention in renal trauma is unknown. However, expectant management for most blunt renal trauma is the standard of care, and nonoperative management is increasingly accepted for stab wounds. The best treatment of gunshot wounds and vascular injuries is still unclear; however, recent data indicates that a trial of nonoperative therapy may be warranted in those not exsanguinating from the kidney. Conservative management has many benefits, the greatest of which is decreasing the rate of iatrogenic nephrectomy. We have reviewed the world's literature to determine the level of support for expectant management of renal injury.

METHODS

The English language literature concerning renal trauma was identified with the assistance of Medline, and additional cited works not picked up in the initial search were obtained. One hundred and ten citations were ultimately reviewed dating back to 1947.

RESULTS

Most modern citations support at least a trial of expectant management for renal trauma patients not exsanguinating from the kidney, and without ureteral or renal pelvis injuries. The treatment of renovascular injuries has less consensus, but it appears that 'conservative' management by the application of nephrectomy is often the best approach, although renovascular repair may be attempted in rare cases.

CONCLUSION

Dozens of papers going back as far as 50 years seem to support the wider use of nonoperative therapy of renal injuries, although for unclear reasons, this approach is not yet universally accepted.

What Price for General Surgery?

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the cost-benefit analysis of adding a full emergency general surgery (EGS) arm to a trauma/critical care (TCC) service with limited EGS activity in a Level I trauma center.

METHODS

Data on the composition, activity, and billings of a TCC were collected and compared before (January 1, 2002-June 30, 2003) and after (July 1, 2003-December 31, 2003) it assumed the care of all unassigned EGS patients. These included patient volume and demographics, service, procedures, on-call/service activity, and professional billings and collections. Data are means +/- SD or percentages. Intergroup comparisons were performed by using t test or chi2 as appropriate; significance was assumed for values of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Deploying an EGS arm increased coverage weeks (+52 weeks) and necessitated additional staffing (pre-EGS, n = 5; post-EGS, n = 6). Trauma operative volume remained constant (8.2 vs. 10.3 per month), EGS and elective case load increased (28.7 vs. 60 per month; p < 0.01), and the EGS case/consult ratio decreased from 0.81 to 0.64 (p < 0.01). This expanded activity was associated with reduced on-call nonclinical hours, from 3.2 +/- 0.9 to 1.1 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.01), and increased outpatient visits (68.6 vs. 91.1 per month; p < 0.01) and off-service time used for elective operations (22.3 vs. 76%; p < 0.01). Billings significantly increased in each arm compared with the pre-EGS study period (operating room, +44.8; intensive care unit, +12.5; outpatient, +48.7%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Integrating a full EGS into a TCC service encumbers increased nontrauma unscheduled clinical activity in the operating room, clinic, and floors, which resulted in enhanced billings. These beneficial effects were accrued at the expense of individual time and investment in recruiting additional faculty.

Selective non-operative management of liver gunshot injuries

BACKGROUND

In contrast to non-surgical treatment of blunt liver trauma, non-operative management (NOM) of liver gunshot injuries (LGSIs) is not widely accepted. This prospective study evaluated an experience of NOM of gunshot wounds to the liver.

METHODS

All patients presenting with LGSIs who were haemodynamically stable with no evidence of peritonism underwent a protocol of NOM.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (mean age 25 (range 13-50) years) were enrolled over a 36-month period. Fourteen had grade III injuries according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, whereas 11 and eight patients sustained major (AAST IV/V) and minor (AAST I/II) injuries respectively. NOM was successful in 31 of 33 patients. Two patients required delayed laparotomy for indications unrelated to the hepatic trauma. One patient died from necrotizing fasciitis, which appeared unrelated to the liver injury.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that, regardless of the grade of liver trauma, NOM is safe and effective in appropriately selected patients with LGSI treated in centres with suitable facilities.

Creating an emergency general surgery service enhances the productivity of trauma surgeons, general surgeons and the hospital

BACKGROUND

Several models that integrate trauma and emergency general surgery (EGS) have been proposed to provide a diverse and challenging operative practice for trauma surgeons and improve recruitment. In July 2002, our institution established a 24/7 EGS consult service, staffed primarily by critical care/trauma surgeons (CCTS). The objective of this report was to evaluate the impact of this new service on CCTS, general surgeons (GS) and the hospital.

METHODS

All admissions to CCTS and GS from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003 were reviewed by querying hospital and physician databases for demographics, diagnoses, operative intervention(s), and resource utilization. Data were analyzed using nonparametric methods.

RESULTS

[See ]. 9,405 admissions were identified, with GS and EGS admissions increasing over time. In July 2002, EGS became a separate service and captured 26% of GS admissions. Hospital-wide trauma admissions remained stable despite a slight decrease in trauma admissions to CCTS. A decrease in trauma operations by CCTS was offset by an increased EGS operative volume. EGS included "bread and butter" GS procedures including appendectomies and cholecystectomies and complex surgical procedures. EGS patients were often sicker with more than 50% requiring ICU admission compared with GS admissions of which only 10% required ICU care.(Table is included in full-text article.)

CONCLUSIONS

Departmental restructuring to include an EGS service: 1) increased CCTS volume despite decreased CCTS trauma admissions and operations; 2) increased elective GS volume; 3) generated increased use of ICU and operating room resources; and 4) demonstrated that CCTS with broad operative GS backgrounds and critical care knowledge can effectively staff an EGS service.

Trends in operative management of pediatric splenic injury in a regional trauma system

OBJECTIVE

Selective nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic injury became the standard of care in the late 1980s. The extent to which this practice has been adopted in both trauma centers and nontrauma hospitals has been investigated sporadically. Several studies have demonstrated significant variations in practice patterns; however, most published studies capture only a selective population over a relatively short time interval, often without simultaneous adjustment for confounding variables. The objective of this study was to characterize the variation in operative versus nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in children in nontrauma hospitals and in trauma centers with varying resources for pediatric care within a regionalized trauma system in the past decade.

METHODS

The study population included all children who were younger than 19 years and had a diagnosis of blunt injury to the spleen (International Classification of Diseases code 865.00-865.09) and were admitted to each of the 175 acute care hospitals in Pennsylvania between 1991 and 2000. The proportion of patients who were treated operatively was stratified by trauma-level certification and adjusted for age and splenic injury severity. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to generate probabilities of splenectomy by age, injury severity, and hospital type.

RESULTS

From 1991 through 2000 in Pennsylvania, 3245 children sustained blunt splenic injury that required hospitalization; 752 (23.2%) were treated operatively. Generally, as age and splenic injury severity increased, the proportion of patients who were treated operatively increased. Compared with pediatric trauma centers, the relative risk (with associated 95% confidence interval) of splenectomy was 4.4 (3.0-6.3) for level 1 trauma centers with additional qualifications in pediatrics; 6.2 (4.4-8.7) for level 1 trauma centers, 6.3 (5.3-7.4) for level 2 trauma centers, and 5.0 (4.2-5.9) for nontrauma centers. Significant variation in practice pattern was seen among hospital types and over time even after adjustment for age and injury severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The operative management of splenic injury in children varied significantly by hospital trauma status and over time during the past decade in Pennsylvania. Given the relative benefits of nonoperative treatment for children with blunt splenic injury, these results highlight the need for more widespread and standardized adoption of this treatment, particularly in hospitals without a large volume of pediatric trauma patients.

Embolization of an Acute Renal Arteriovenous Fistula following a Stab Wound: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Surgery has traditionally been the definitive form of invasive management for renal vascular injuries. There is a growing trend in the use of endovascular techniques as an alternative to surgery in the trauma setting. We present the case of a 24-year-old woman with an acute renal arteriovenous fistula caused by a stab wound in the left flank, which was successfully managed with selective arterial embolization. This represents only the second reported case of such an approach in the acute setting.

Integrating emergency general surgery with a trauma service: impact on the care of injured patients

BACKGROUND

There has been considerable discussion on the national level on the future of trauma surgery as a specialty. One of the leading directions for the field is the integration of emergency general surgery as a wider and more attractive scope of practice. However, there is currently no information on how the addition of an emergency general surgery practice will affect the care of injured patients. We hypothesized that the care of trauma patients would be negatively affected by adding emergency general surgery responsibilities to a trauma service.

METHODS

Our institution underwent a system change in August 2001, where an emergency general surgery (ES) practice was added to an established trauma service. The ES practice included emergency department and in-house consultations for all urgent surgical problems except thoracic and vascular diseases. There were no trauma staff changes during the study period. Trauma registry data (demographics, injuries, injury severity, and procedures) and performance improvement data (peer-review judgments for all identified errors, denied days, audit filters, and deaths) were abstracted for two 15-month periods surrounding this system change. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests provided between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

The trauma staff evaluated a total of 5,874 patients during the 30-month study. There were 1,400 (51%) trauma admissions in the pre-ES group and 1,504 (48%) in the post-ES group, of which 1,278 and 1,434, respectively, met severity criteria for report to our statewide database (Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study [PTOS]). There were 163 (12.7% of PTOS) deaths in the pre-ES group compared with 171 (11.9% PTOS) deaths in the post-ES group (p = not significant [NS]). There was one death determined to be preventable by the peer review process for the pre-ES group, and none in the post-ES group. Both groups had 10 potentially preventable deaths, with the remaining mortalities being categorized as nonpreventable (p = NS). Unexpected deaths by TRISS methodology were 36 (2.8%) and 41 (2.9%) for the two groups, respectively (p = NS). There was no difference in the number of provider-specific complications between the groups (23, [1.8%] vs. 19 [1.3%], p = NS). The addition of emergency surgery has resulted in an additional average daily workload of 1.3 cases and 1.2 admissions.

CONCLUSION

Despite an increase in trauma volume over the study period, the addition of emergency surgery to a trauma service did not affect the care of injured patients. The concept of adding emergency surgery responsibilities to trauma surgeons appears to be a valid way to increase operative experience without compromising care of the injured patient.

Diagnostic imaging of acute thoracic injury

In recent years, the advent of multidetector CT (MDCT) has begun to change the imaging approach to patients sustaining blunt or penetrating thoracic injury. The ability to directly detect some injuries that are often occult on chest radiography, such as pericardial hemorrhage, major thoracic vascular injury, small pneumothorax, and diaphragm tears, as well as the ability to better define the extent of other injuries, such as lung contusion and laceration, account for this transition. This article reviews current concepts of diagnostic imaging in acute chest trauma from both blunt force and penetrating mechanisms, emphasizing the spectrum of diagnostic imaging findings for various injuries, primarily based on multidetector MDCT.

Large Animal-Related Abdominal Injuries

BACKGROUND

This study investigated injuries to the abdominal area of the body caused by large animals, as well as the management of this problem.

METHODS

All the patients with large animal-related abdominal injuries over a 10-year period were identified retrospectively through the general surgery registrations.

RESULTS

Overall, 113 patients were hospitalized after large animal encounters during the 10-year study period, 33 (30%) of which had large animal-related abdominal injuries. These patients comprised 10 women (30%) and 23 men (70%) with a mean age of 56 +/- 14 years. Of the 33 patients, 31 (93.9%) sustained blunt injuries and 2 (6.1%) experienced penetrating abdominal trauma. The mean Injury Severity Score was 12.7 +/- 4.0, and the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 10.6 +/- 3.2. The mean intensive care unit stay was 0.8 +/- 2.2 days, and the total hospital length of stay was 7.3 +/- 5.6 days. Whereas 12 patients (36.4%) were managed nonoperatively, 21 patients (63.6%) required surgery. Laparotomy showed injuries to the jejunum in three patients (9.1%), to the ileum in 13 patients (39.4%), to the ileal mesenterium in 1 patient (3%), to the liver in 4 patients (12.1%), and to the spleen in 2 patients (6.1%). One patient died of myocardial infarction on the second day after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Large animal-related injuries to the abdominal area can be serious. Immediate transportation and early diagnosis of abdominal insults are important because of the frequencies of small bowel and mesenteric injuries, which are difficult to diagnose using currently available diagnostic tools.

Hollow visceral injury after blunt lower thoracic and abdominal trauma

The early diagnosis of hollow viscous injury after blunt abdominal trauma remains a challenge for physicians in the Emergency Department, although the early diagnosis of hollow viscous injury decreases morbidity and mortality. After a description of two cases of hollow viscous injury after blunt abdominal trauma, a literature review is performed concerning the indications and limitations of diagnostic imaging modalities. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma, computed tomography scan and diagnostic peritoneal lavage are described. On the basis of the review a proposal for maximal diagnostic accuracy is made.

Recent experiences with a multidisciplinary approach to complex hepatic trauma

BACKGROUND

The selection of an appropriate time to terminate damage control efforts when faced with haemorrhagic shock from severe hepatic trauma can be challenging. At our centre, trauma surgeons have increasingly been favouring an operative approach simply involving early perihepatic packing (without extensive use of intraoperative measures aimed at achieving definitive haemostasis) and temporary abdominal closure. This is often followed by hepatic arteriography with angioembolization, resuscitation, and early re-exploration under more optimal physiological conditions. This study describes the initial outcomes of this approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with high-grade liver injury requiring operative intervention due to refractory haemodynamic instability, presenting to our trauma centre between 1995 and 2001 were reviewed. Two treatment groups: definitive laparotomy (DL), and early packing (EP) with angioembolization and re-exploration were compared, using a retrospective audit.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were identified with severe liver injuries requiring operative intervention (DL 30, EP 7). Patient demographics between groups were similar. The EP group was found to have lower mortality (0% versus 36.7%), but increased length of hospital stay, transfusion requirements, and complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to complex hepatic trauma involving brief damage control laparotomy with perihepatic packing only, followed by angioembolization, and early re-exploration may confer a survival benefit over early operative attempts at definitive haemostasis but is associated with complications.

Redefining the future of trauma surgery as a comprehensive trauma and emergency general surgery service1 1No competing interests declared

BACKGROUND

Dwindling operative opportunities in trauma care may have a detrimental impact on career satisfaction among trauma surgeons and on career attractiveness to surgical trainees. Addition of emergency general surgery may alleviate some of these concerns.

STUDY DESIGN

The trauma service at our institution incorporated nontrauma emergency general surgery over a 3-year period. The institution's trauma registry and hospital perioperative database were queried. The changes in operative caseload are described. Current trauma faculty anonymously completed a Web-based questionnaire about the addition of emergency general surgery to the trauma service.

RESULTS

Operations for trauma decreased in 2002 compared with 1999, despite a higher number of penetrating injuries and total trauma contacts. Nontrauma general surgery operations performed by trauma faculty increased in proportion to coverage provided by the trauma service. In 2002, 57% of all cases performed by trauma surgeons were emergency general surgery, which accounted for 32% to 74% of an individual surgeon's caseload. In anonymously completed Web-based questionnaires, current trauma faculty expressed satisfaction with the combined trauma and emergency general surgery model.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined trauma and nontrauma surgery service increased operative caseloads and improved satisfaction of trauma surgeons. A comprehensive trauma and emergency general surgery service may be an attractive model for the future of trauma surgery and provide logistical and medical advantages to the emergency general surgery patient population.

Use of splenic artery embolization as an adjunct to nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury

BACKGROUND

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) has been used as an adjunct to the nonsurgical treatment of blunt splenic injuries since 1981. It is imperative to define the role of SAE in the management of splenic trauma and to establish a guideline for its use.

METHODS

In this study, 39 consecutive patients with blunt splenic ruptures were evaluated. All the patients were treated according to the authors' protocol, which included SAE as an adjunct. Angiographic study was performed for patients with any of the following presentations: recurrent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation, significant hemoperitoneum or extravasation of contrast media on computed tomography, grade 4 or 5 splenic injury, or progressive need for blood transfusion. Laparotomy was reserved for patients with unstable hemodynamics or failure of SAE.

RESULTS

Four patients were excluded from the study, and 6 of the 35 remaining patients (male-to-female ratio, 22:13) received SAE. One of the six SAE patients underwent operation because of persistent hemorrhage after SAE. Nonoperative treatment was successful for 31 patients. Splenic artery embolization increased the success rate for nonsurgical management from 74% (26 of 35 patients) to 89% (31 of 35 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Judicious use of SAE for patients with blunt splenic injury avoids unnecessary surgery and expands the number of patients who can retain their spleen.

Hepatic trauma: contemporary management

In the introduction, I posed several questions that were issues/controversies. The answers will probably be interpreted as equally controversial. I do not believe there is strong evidence that the incidence of liver injuries has increased. Diagnostic modalities have contributed to this seeming increase, as well as population increases and the concentration of severe liver injuries in trauma centers, now present in 35 states. I believe there are more blunt injuries now, relative to penetrating injuries. The peak of penetrating injuries occurred in the 1970s and 1980s and lasted almost 2 decades. I believe some authors are overly enthusiastic for nonoperative management. I am particularly critical of authors who do not include all components of the surgical armamentarium into their treatment of severe liver injuries. I also believe that the complications following nonoperative management are currently unacceptable, as documented in the references. I have shared with you the strategies for operative management, but there are equally good or better strategies in the surgical literature.

Evaluation and management of renal injuries: consensus statement of the renal trauma subcommittee

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal evaluation and management of renal injuries by review of the world's English-language literature on the subject.

METHODS

A consensus conference convened by the World Health Organization and the Societé Internationale d'Urologie met to critically review reports of the diagnosis and treatment of renal trauma. The English-language literature about renal trauma was identified using Medline, and additional cited works not detected in the initial search obtained. Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of renal trauma were made with reference to a five-point scale.

RESULTS

There were many Level 3 and 4 citations, few Level 2, and one Level 1 which supported clinical practice patterns. Findings of nearly 200 reviewed citations are summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Published reports on renal trauma still rely heavily on expert opinion and single-institution retrospective case series. Prospective trials of the most significant issues, when possible, might improve the quality of evidence that dictates the behaviour of practitioners.

Gunshot Wounds of Abdomen: Evaluation of Stable Patients with Triple-Contrast Helical CT

PURPOSE

To assess helical computed tomography (CT) with contrast material administered intravenously, orally, and rectally (triple contrast helical CT)) in the prospective evaluation of stable patients with abdominal gunshot wounds in whom there is no clinical indication for immediate exploratory laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted for 19 months. All patients met the following inclusion criteria: age of 16 years or older, hemodynamic stability, no clinical signs of peritoneal irritation, and signed consent to participate. Patients with obvious indications for laparotomy, such as gastrointestinal bleeding or evisceration, were excluded from the study. Forty-seven patients fulfilled the criteria and underwent abdominal triple-contrast helical CT. CT findings were evaluated by one of four radiologists for evidence of peritoneal penetration and injury to solid organs or hollow viscera. Patients were followed up clinically for 13 weeks. CT findings were compared with those at surgery and/or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

CT demonstrated abnormalities in 27 (57%) patients. Laparotomy was performed in 11 (23%) patients; 10 procedures were therapeutic and one was nontherapeutic. The remaining 20 patients had a negative CT scan. These patients were treated conservatively. One injury was missed at CT. For prediction of the need for laparotomy, sensitivity of CT was 96%; specificity, 95%; positive predictive value, 96%; negative predictive value, 95%; and accuracy, 96%.

CONCLUSION

In stable patients with gunshot wounds to the abdomen in whom there is no indication for immediate surgery, triple-contrast helical CT can help reduce the number of cases of unnecessary or nontherapeutic laparotomy (negative laparotomy) and can help identify patients with injuries that may be safely treated without surgery.

Effects of N-Acetylcysteine in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury during hemorrhagic shock

This article seeks to standardize an experimental model of liver ischemia-reperfusion in rats following hemorrhagic shock modulated by N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Twenty-seven adult Wistar rats were randomized into three groups: the HS-IR-Garm underwent hemorrhagic shock with selective hepatic ischemia followed by reperfusion; the HSIR + NAC-G, the same procedure plus NAC; and the control group, only venous catheterization. Blood was withdrawn for 10 minutes until MABP reached 35 mm Hg, which was maintained for 1 hour. The blood was then reinjected as required to maintain MABP at that level. Ringer's lactate solution was infused in a volume equivalent to three times the shed blood, over a period of 15 minutes. Half of the shed blood was reinfused over 5 minutes. HSIR + NAC-G received 150 mg/kg of NAC, during treatment of the shock, and again 10 minutes before reperfusion and continued for 30 minutes. Finally, both groups were subjected to 40 minutes of warm selective hepatic ischemia and reperfusion for 1 hour. Data were analyzed by nonparametric tests (P < or =.05). Liver enzyme levels were higher in HS-IR-G (DHL = 6094 +/- 1688, AST = 746 +/- 175, and ALT = 457 +/- 90) than in HSIR + NAC-G group (DHL = 2920 +/- 284, AST = 419 +/- 113, and ALT = 253 +/- 26). The values in the control group were lower than both experimental groups (DHL = 965 +/- 173, AST = 163 +/- 42, and ALT = 82 +/- 28). Our data showed that liver ischemia-reperfusion injury following hemorrhagic shock produces important hepatic damage and that NAC reduces injury in this rat model.

Is Pediatric Trauma Still a Surgical Disease? Patterns of Emergent Operative Intervention in the Injured Child

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management of many pediatric injuries has generated debate as to whether surgeons must be routinely involved in the early assessment and management of pediatric trauma. This study examines the frequency of operative intervention among injured children and evaluates potential predictors of emergent intervention.

METHODS

Pediatric (age < 18 years) patients were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank. Primary outcome measures were surgical intervention by specialty, time to intervention, and mortality. Prehospital factors were evaluated as predictors of emergent surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of trauma admissions underwent operative intervention, with 57% of these requiring emergent surgery. Patients needing emergent general or neurosurgical intervention were at increased risk of death. Requiring one type of emergent surgical intervention was predictive of needing a second type of emergent procedure. Predictors of emergent general surgical intervention were penetrating mechanism, increasing age, and the presence of shock or coma.

CONCLUSION

These data support the continued routine involvement of surgeons in the initial assessment and management of the injured child.

Conservative management of splenic trauma: history and current trends

Evolution of the present-day policy of conservative management of ruptured spleen has been hailed as one of the most notable advances in pediatric surgery. Until 1971, routine splenectomy used to be the sacrosanct treatment for splenic trauma. It was universally believed that non-operative management carried a high mortality of 90 to 100%. Sporadic reports of successful conservative treatment appeared in the early twentieth century, but regrettably, these were ignored. Likewise, experimental studies pointing to the danger of post-splenectomy sepsis were also disregarded. Dominant surgical opinion continued to practice removal of the injured spleen. In 1968, Upadhyaya and Simpson, based on a well-designed clinical analysis of 52 children made a convincing plea for conservative management. In 1971, Upadhyaya et al. presented results of a corroborative experimental study, which provided the conclusive evidence that isolated splenic tears are well tolerated and heal spontaneously by first intention. Seeing the surge of publications that followed this presentation, it becomes apparent that this study constituted the real turning point that changed the world opinion in favour of salvage of the ruptured spleen. By 1979, numerous authors had reported the safety of non-operative management in hundreds of children all over the world. Currently, the policy of routine splenectomy has been universally abandoned; and the reported salvage rate of ruptured spleen is more than 90%. This paper traces the historical perspectives in the management of injured spleen from the times of Aristotle to the present day.

Imaging of renal trauma

Trauma is a major cause of death and disability and renal injuries occur in up to 10% of patients with significant blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with penetrating trauma and hematuria, blunt trauma with shock and hematuria, or gross hematuria warrant imaging of the urinary tract specifically and CT is the preferred modality. If there is significant perinephric fluid, especially medially, or deep laceration, delayed images should be obtained to evaluate for urinary extravasation. Most renal injuries are minor, including contusions, subcapsular and perinephric hematoma, and superficial lacerations. More significant injuries include deep lacerations, shattered kidney, active hemorrhage, infarctions, and vascular pedicle and UPJ injuries. These injuries are more likely to need surgery or have delayed complications but may still often be managed conservatively. The presence of urinary extravasation and large devitalized areas of renal parenchyma, especially with associated injuries of intraperitoneal organs, is particularly prone to complication and usually requires surgery. Active hemorrhage should be recognized because it often indicates a need for urgent surgery or embolization to prevent exsanguination.

Congenital cleft spleen with CT scan appearance of high-grade splenic laceration after blunt abdominal trauma

The spiral computed tomography (CT) scan has made the diagnosis of traumatic injury increasingly rapid and accurate, especially in cases of solid parenchymal organ injury that follows blunt abdominal trauma. Nonetheless, this valuable method of diagnosis can be confounded when anatomical variances are encountered in the setting of concomitant associated injuries. We present here a case where a congenitally bi-lobed spleen was diagnosed by CT scan as an apparent high-grade splenic laceration, prompting emergent laparotomy.

Pediatric trauma is very much a surgical disease

OBJECTIVE

The evolution of nonoperative management of certain solid visceral injuries has stimulated speculation that management of the severely injured child is no longer a surgical exercise. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of injuries that require surgical evaluation is disproportionately high in children at risk of death or disability from significant injury.

METHODS

National Pediatric Trauma Registry data were queried for all patients with ICDA-9-CM diagnoses requiring at least surgical evaluation. Selected diagnoses included CNS: 800 to 804, 850 to 854; thoracoabdominal: 860 to 870; pelvic fracture: 808; and acute vascular disruption: 900 to 904. Operative intervention was identified by ICDA-9-CM operative codes less than 60 and selected operative orthopedic codes between 79.8 and 84.4. At-risk patients were identified as those with at least one of the following: Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15, Glasgow Coma Scale motor score less than 6, initial systolic blood pressure less than 90, or Injury Severity Scale score more than 10. The incidence of a surgical diagnosis in at-risk children was compared to the incidence in the population with no identifiable risk. Within the population undergoing surgical evaluation, resource utilization, as reflected by operative intervention and ICU days, and outcome, as reflected by mortality, were compared between the at-risk group and the group with no identifiable risk.

RESULTS

From 1987 to 2000, 87,424 records were complete enough for analysis. Of those, 48,687 (55.6%) patients sustained at least one injury requiring a surgical evaluation and 28,645 (32.7%) children were determined to be at risk. Mortality for at-risk children was 5.8% versus 0.02% for those with no identifiable risk. Of the children at risk, 24,706 (86.2%) had at least one injury requiring a surgical evaluation. Of the 58,779 children with no risk, 23,981 (40.8%) also had at least one injury requiring a surgical evaluation. Operative intervention for surgical injuries was required in 20.5% of cases (n = 10,015). Of these, 5,562 (56%) were at-risk children, and they had a mortality rate of 11.5%. Of the children not at risk, 4,453 required operative care, and they had a mortality of 0.1%. At-risk children undergoing surgery required an average of 5.02 days of ICU care compared to 1.2 for cases performed on children without risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These data clearly demonstrate the primacy of surgical pathology as the major determinant of outcome in pediatric injury. Operative intervention and the option of timely operative care remain major components of clinical management of children with injuries that pose a significant risk of morbidity or mortality.

The changing face of trauma management and its impact on surgical resident training

BACKGROUND

The management of trauma patients has become increasingly nonoperative, especially for solid abdominal organ injuries. However, the Residency Review Committee (RRC) still requires an operative trauma experience deemed essential for graduating general surgical residents. The purpose of this study was to review the trauma volume and mix of patients at two trauma centers and determine the major operative trauma cases available to residents involved in the care of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at the two trauma centers used by the Michigan State University surgery residency. Both of the trauma centers are American College of Surgeons verified. Surgical residents are involved with the care of every trauma patient at each of the hospitals. Cumulative data were collected and analyzed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 1999. Age, gender, mechanism of injury (blunt vs. penetrating), Injury Severity Score, length of stay, operative interventions, and patients managed nonoperatively were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 434 patients selected for this study from 2,340 patients admitted to the trauma services. Male patients accounted for 66% of patients and female patients accounted for 34% of patients. Blunt trauma was the mechanism in 89% of patients, with penetrating trauma accounting for the other 11% of patients. Of the total number of patients, motor vehicle crashes accounted for the majority of cases, 325 of 434 (75%). Overall, 85% (370 of 434) of patients were managed without an index trauma surgical procedure according to RRC guidelines. Only 14.7% (64 of 434) of patients underwent operative intervention that qualified as index trauma surgical cases identified by the RRC. The spleen and small bowel were the two most commonly injured organs found at laparotomy. Nonoperative intervention of many patients with solid abdominal organ injuries did not meet the operation requirements expected by the RRC.

CONCLUSION

Our residency program had 10 graduating chief residents over the 3-year time period. With only 64 operative trauma cases, this yields an average of 6.4 trauma cases per resident. This falls significantly short of the 16-case minimum requirement in trauma surgery established by the RRC. The operative trauma requirements established by the RRC for graduating residents may be unattainable in many residency programs because of the high incidence of blunt trauma and the changing patterns of trauma management.

A 10-year experience of complex liver trauma

BACKGROUND

Liver trauma is a relatively rare surgical emergency but mortality and morbidity rates remain significant. It is likely that surgeons outside specialist centres will have limited experience in its management; therefore best practice should be identified and a specialist approach developed.

METHODS

Data collected from 52 consecutive patients over a 10-year interval were examined to identify best practice in the management of these injuries.

RESULTS

The majority of injuries occurred as a result of road traffic accidents; 39 (75 per cent) of the 52 patients were stable at presentation to the referring hospital. In 36 patients (69 per cent) the liver injury was a component of multiple trauma. Ultrasonography, computed tomography or no radiological investigation was used in the referring hospital in 18 (35 per cent), 25 (48 per cent) and nine (17 per cent) patients respectively. Operative management was undertaken in the referring hospital in 26 patients (50 per cent). The overall mortality rate was 23 per cent (12 of 52 patients), and increased with increasing grade of severity. Eight of 26 patients managed surgically at the referring hospital died, compared with four of the 26 patients managed without operation (P not significant). The median time from arrival at the referring hospital to operation was 4 h for haemodynamically stable patients and 3 h for those who were haemodynamically unstable.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with liver trauma can be managed conservatively. Operative management carried out in non-specialized units is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Abdominal injuries should raise a high index of suspicion of liver injury, and the data suggest that computed tomography of the abdomen should precede laparotomy (even in some haemodynamically unstable patients) to facilitate discussion with a specialist unit at the earliest opportunity.

Current value of peritoneal tap in blunt abdominal trauma

This study aimed to establish the diagnostic value of paracentesis (peritoneal tap) in the assessment of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Paracentesis, using a four-quadrant puncture technique, was performed in blunt abdominal trauma victims presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary-care university medical centre. Pregnant patients, those under 18 or those having an abdominal scar were excluded from the study. All patients then underwent one of the following procedures as indicated: emergency ultrasound, abdominal computed tomography scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage or laparotomy. Paracentesis results were compared with the results of other tests and surgery in diagnosing haemoperitoneum. Haemoperitoneum was confirmed surgically in six of the seven patients with a positive paracentesis. Nine out of 65 patients with positive clinical findings but negative taps underwent surgical intervention, and abdominal bleeding was confirmed in eight. Three seriously injured patients died before diagnostic studies or laparotomy could be performed. In conclusion, a positive paracentesis result may be used to guide decision-making in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma if other diagnostic methods are unavailable. Its high false-negative rate limits its overall usefulness.