Management of upper urinary tract calculi with ureteroscopic techniques

The role of stenting in relieving loin pain following ureteroscopic stone therapy for persisting renal colic with hydronephrosis

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively define the role of the double J-stent placement following ureteroscopic stone therapy in providing a pain-free postoperative period for patients with persisting loin pain and documented hydronphrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 27 patients (mean age: 38.59 years; range: 22-60 years) who had undergone ureteroscopic intervention due to ureteral stone. All of the patients reported loin pain which did not respond to medical therapy associated with various degrees of hydronephrosis documented by ultrasound and/or an excretory urogram. The patients were randomized to either a stented (18 patients) or stentless (nine patients) group following semirigid ureteroscopy (7.5/12 Fr) for the treatment of ureteral calculi (pneumatic lithotripsy). The mean diameter of the stones was 7.7 mm (range: 3-13 mm). Intra-operative balloon ureter orifice dilatation was routinely performed. All patients were evaluated between 0 and 6 days postoperative for loin pain and lower urinary tract symptoms.

RESULTS

Nine patients had loin pain in the first few days following the operation and were in need of intramuscular and/or intravenous analgesics. Of these, four were stented patients (4/18; 22.2%) and five were stentless patients (5/9; 55.5%). Lower urinary tract symptoms were not clinically significant and did not affect the quality of life in terms of loin pain, with the exception of one patient in whom the stent had dropped into the bladder.

CONCLUSION

We believe that stenting in patients with documented hydronephrosis manifesting in persisting renal colic is recommended. As ureteroscopic therapy may aggregate the edema of ureter mucosa, double J-stent placement may play an important role in offering patients a postoperative period free of loin discomfort. However, further prospective trials should be designed to evaluate the criteria for stentless ureterorenoscopy.

Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones

OBJECTIVE

The newer flexible ureteroscopes, 150-200-microm holmium YAG laser fibres and superflexible Dormia baskets have made it possible to reach and treat stones in all parts of the kidney. The object of this evaluation was to study the outcome of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL)-resistant kidney stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 38 consecutive patients (18 males, 20 females) participated in the study. All patients had undergone ESWL prior to RIRS without success. In all cases the stones could be reached with the endoscope. Calculi ranged in size from 3 to 20 mm (mean 9 mm). In 32 cases the stones were fragmented using a holmium YAG laser and in six the stones could be extracted using zero-tip Dormia baskets without fragmentation. Sixteen patients had lower calyceal calculi and eight had an abnormal anatomy of the upper urinary tract. Intravenous pyelography was performed 6-8 weeks after the treatment.

RESULTS

In all cases the stones could be reached and fragmented to some extent. After a single RIRS procedure, 22/38 patients (58%) were completely stone-free at follow-up, and four (11%) had residual fragments < or = 4 mm in size that were expected to pass spontaneously. Of the remaining 12 patients, who initially had larger stones (mean 11.3 mm), the residual fragments ranged in size from 5 to 15 mm. Three patients underwent an additional RIRS procedure, after which they were all completely stone-free, resulting in an overall success rate of 76%. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

RIRS is a safe procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate for ESWL-resistant renal stones. Patients with larger stones (> 10 mm), those with stones in the lower pole and those with an abnormal renal anatomy may require more than one procedure.

Stenting versus non-stenting after non-complicated ureteroscopic manipulation of stones in bilharzial ureters

BACKGROUND

Stents were used routinely after ureteroscopy to prevent postoperative ureteral obstruction. However, because of the recognized complications of stents, non-stenting is the new trend after uncomplicated ureteroscopy. The wall of the bilharzial ureter is characteristically thick and may be calcified. The aim of this study is to see if the non-stenting trend could be applied to ureteroscopic manipulation of stones in bilharzial ureters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 56 patients, with evidence of bilharzial lesions in the urinary tract, undergoing ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones were included. After successful uncomplicated stone fragmentation and extraction, patients were randomized into two groups. Group A includes 28 patients in whom double J 6-Fr polyurethane stents were placed for 3 weeks. Group B includes 28 non-stented patients. Postoperative fever, loin pain, lower urinary tract symptoms and change in the degree of hydronephrosis were reported.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients and stone size in both groups. The mean operative time was 43 +/- 14 min in group A and 38 +/- 11 in group B. There was no significant difference in the mean loin pain score, in the first postoperative 48 h, in both groups (4.4 +/- 0.8 in group A and 4.9 +/- 0.5 in group B). Patients in group A had, significantly, more flank pain with voiding (P < 0.01), voiding pain (P = 0.04), frequency (P = 0.01) and urgency (P = 0.04). Radiologic follow-up was available for 24 patients in group A and 23 patients in group B at the 3-month visit. Hydronephrosis had improved in all patients, in both groups, with no evidence of ureteral stricture.

CONCLUSION

Routine placement of stents after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones is unnecessary in bilharzial ureters. Moreover, it might be unadvisable because lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding loin pain are more in patients with ureteral stents and hydronephrosis is equally improved in stented and non-stented patients.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies

OBJECTIVE

Our extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) lithotripter with ultrasound localization technique was replaced in 1999 by a Storz SLX-MX lithotripter with both X-ray and ultrasound detection possibilities. Before replacing our lithotripter, most ureteric stones were treated with ureteroscopy (URS); subsequently, almost all patients underwent ESWL as primary treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the results of these two treatment strategies in all consecutive patients attending our hospital in 1998 and 2000 for ureteric stone treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated for ureteric stones in 1998 and 2000 were reviewed. In 1998, 173 ureteric stones were treated. Primary treatment was URS in 124 patients, push back/ESWL in 24, ESWL in 21 and open surgery in four. In 2000, 176 ureteric stones were treated: 158 with ESWL and 18 with URS. ESWL or URS monotherapy was defined as ESWL or URS, respectively as the only stone-treatment therapy, with or without the use of a ureteric catheter or nephrostomy tube. Treatment success was defined as a stone-free ureter.

RESULTS

In 1998, the success rate for URS monotherapy was 95%, with a retreatment rate (sessions per stone situation) of 1.06. Corresponding figures for ESWL monotherapy in 2000 were 90% and 1.69. All URS patients received general anaesthesia; ESWL patients received opiods. Complication rates were 6% for URS and 3% for ESWL. In the URS group, 4/8 complications were considered to be major.

CONCLUSION

ESWL should be considered the first-line treatment for ureteric stones because of its non-invasive nature, lack of a requirement for general anaesthesia and low complication rates.

New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones

OBJECTIVES

To determine the deterioration in the maximal active deflection and flow capabilities of a new-generation flexible ureteroscope (URS).

METHODS

We performed 50 ureterorenoscopies using the same URS: a Karl Storz 11278 AU1 Flex-X, which is capable of a 270 degree active deflection in the ventral and dorsal directions. Postoperatively, we evaluated the maximal active ventral and dorsal deflection, irrigation flow at 100 cm H2O, and the number of broken optical fibers.

RESULTS

The URS was used for a total of 76 hours, 15 minutes (average 95 minutes per procedure). The maximal ventral deflection had deteriorated from 270 degrees to 208 degrees at the last procedure. The maximal dorsal deflection had decreased from 270 degrees to 133 degrees. The irrigation flow at 100 cm H2O had decreased from 50 mL/min initially to 40 mL/min at the last procedure. The number of broken image fibers had reached six at the 50th procedure. One repair was necessary at the 50th procedure because of a laser perforation of the working channel.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for repair occurs less frequently with the new-generation of URSs, especially when they are used by an experienced endourologist. In the future, improvements in the durability of the flexible URS will still be key for widespread use of the technique and especially to limit damage by the laser to the working channel.

Ureteroscopic laser papillotomy to treat papillary calcifications associated with chronic flank pain

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy and durability of a novel approach using ureteroscopic laser papillotomy for the treatment of painful papillary calcifications. Chronic pain due to renal papillary calcifications has not been addressed by current techniques.

METHODS

Ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy and papillotomy were performed on patients with chronic pain and radiographically visible papillary calcifications without free collecting system calculi. The papillary urothelium overlying all cystic dilations and intraductal calcifications was vaporized. Treated patients answered a telephone survey to assess pain scores, duration of response, use of narcotics, and patient satisfaction. We reviewed the medical records to evaluate for procedure-related complications and serum creatinine measurements.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients who underwent laser papillotomy and responded to the telephone survey, 7 had bilateral procedures, yielding 27 renal units available for analysis. "Much less pain" was reported after 85% of the procedures, with a durable improvement reported after 59% of the procedures, at a median follow-up of 14.5 months. Significant improvements in the median pain scores were seen at 1 month (1.0, P <0.001), 6 months (2.0, P <0.001), and 1 year (1.5, P <0.001) compared with a median preoperative pain score of 9.0. The mean serum creatinine was unchanged after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopic laser papillotomy appears to be an effective treatment option for the chronic pain associated with papillary calcifications. Laser papillotomy offers hope to patients who would otherwise have been denied an attempt at treatment because of a lack of free calculi within the collecting system.

The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a modern ureteroscopy series, including the use of new technological advances, operative procedures, and potential complications, at a single institution and to compare our current experience with our prior published series and the current literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive ureteroscopies performed in 961 patients from December 1999 to February 2003 at our institution.

RESULTS

Semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 60.3% and 37.0% of the cases, respectively. In 2.6% of cases, a combination of both rigid and flexible ureteroscopes was required. The most common indications for ureteroscopy were as follows: stone, 57.9%; diagnostic, 20.6%; and urothelial carcinoma, 12.6%. Of the stones treated, 31.8% were proximal or middle and 59.1% distal. The overall, proximal, and distal stone-free rates were 91.7%, 87.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Average operative time was 81 minutes (range, 5-280 minutes). Average follow-up was 2.36 months (range, 1-24 months). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (18/961), including a 0.2% (2/961) incidence of ureteral strictures.

CONCLUSION

Current practice trends have shifted to an increased use of flexible ureteroscopes and more frequent ureteroscopic treatment of proximal calculi. Our single treatment stone-free rates are competitive with quoted shock wave lithotripsy success. In addition, there has been a decrease in ureteroscopic-associated complications in our series, with no ureteral avulsions. The improvements in treatment success and decrease in complications may be secondary to advances in ureteroscopic technology.

Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation

AIM

To investigate the causes and costs of flexible ureteroscope damage, and to develop recommendations to limit damage.

METHODS

The authors analysed repair figures and possible causes of damage to 35 instruments sent for repair to a leading UK supplier over a 1-year period, and calculated cost figures for maintenance of the instruments as opposed to repair and replacement costs.

RESULTS

All damages were handling-induced and therefore did not fall under the manufacturer's warranty: 28 % were damaged by misfiring of the laser inside the instrument; 72 %, mainly crushing and stripping of the ureteroscope shaft tube, were likely to have occurred during out-of-surgery handling, washing and disinfection. Seventeen (4 %) instruments were not repaired and consequently taken out of service due to the extensive costs involved. Eighteen (51 %) ureteroscopes were repaired at an average cost of 10 833 USD.

CONCLUSION

Damages to flexible ureteroscopes bear considerable costs. Most damages occur during handling between surgical procedures. Thorough adherence to handling procedures, and courses for theater staff and surgeons on handling flexible instruments may help to reduce these damages and prove a cost-saving investment. The authors provide a list of recommended procedural measures that may help to prevent such damages.

Ureteroscopic management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys

OBJECTIVES

To review our experience with ureteroscopy in treating patients with renal calculi in anomalous kidneys and to evaluate the efficacy of this approach.

METHODS

Eight patients with renal calculi in anomalous kidneys who were managed by ureteroscopic procedures were identified. Demographic information, preoperative stone burden, operative information (ureteroscope size, lithotrite used, instruments used, duration of surgery, complications, stenting), follow-up imaging, and complications were obtained from the medical record. This information was analyzed to determine the most frequently used instruments and stone-free rates.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 4 patients with horseshoe kidneys (HSK) and 4 patients with pelvic kidneys (PK) (6 male, 2 female, mean age, 50.6 years). The average preoperative stone burden of the 11 treated calculi was 1.4 cm, with 5 stones located in the renal pelvis, 2 in the upper pole, and 4 in lower pole calyces. A 7.5F flexible ureteroscope, holmium laser lithotripsy, and nitinol baskets and graspers were used in all patients. Six patients had complete clearance of the stone on postoperative imaging (75% HSK, 75% PK), with 88% of patients asymptomatic after their procedure. No patients required additional surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy and the use of nitinol baskets and graspers provides a reasonable alternative to shock wave lithotripsy in the management of patients harboring renal calculi in anomalous kidneys. In addition, ureteroscopy can be considered a primary option for managing select patients with symptomatic stones in PKs before a percutaneous surgical approach.

[Endoscopic treatment of pielo-uretheral lithiasis with Holmium-YAG laser. Two years of experience]

OBJECTIVE

To show the efficiency and safety of Holmium laser in the treatment of pyeloureteral lithiasis, based on our own experience since the introduction of this source of energy in our department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2002 to February 2004, we have carried out 198 ureterorenoscopies using Holmium laser to treat lithiasis located in the upper urinary tract. In all cases, a previous radiological study demonstrated the stone. Follow-up, where the efficacy of the treatment was assessed, was done with a scout x-ray after 3-4 weeks. We evaluated the localization and features of the lithiasis, technical aspects, results and complications of our series.

RESULTS

The most common localization of the lithiasis was the pelvic ureter (59%), with the number of treated cases in both the iliac and lumbar ureter being similar (16%). 70% of the lithiasis had a size between 0.5 and 1.5 cm, and 15% showed a diameter bigger than 1.5 cm. In 61.8% of cases, laser lithotripsy was carried out under spinal anaesthesia, being the average of the pulses used 2532 (confidence interval 95%), using a working power of 1 J in all cases. The overall efficacy of the procedure in terms of size and localization was 95.5%. The complication rate was scarce (2.19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Holmium laser lithotripsy is a very effective and safe procedure since in our experience it is 95.5% efficient for pyeloureteral lithiasis treatment and has a low rate of complications.

Semirigid ureteroscopy of the proximal ureter can be aided by external lower-abdominal pressure

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Smaller semirigid ureteroscopes with large working channels and excellent optics are widely available. Ureteroscopic treatment of upper-ureteral stones has become increasingly popular, although flexible ureteroscopy is more frequently the method of choice. Access to the upper ureter with a semirigid ureteroscope (SR-URS) can be challenging and hazardous, especially when negotiating the iliac vessels. We sought to determine whether lower-abdominal pressure (LAP) facilitated SR-URS access to the upper ureter for safe laser lithotripsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent ureteroscopic management of upper- ureteral stones were evaluated. Twenty-four (75%) were male; seventeen (53%) had a right-sided stone. The mean largest stone diameter was 10.2 +/- 4.6 mm. These 32 patients were compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent SR-URS procedures without the use of LAP.

RESULTS

Access to the upper ureter was possible in 30 patients (94%). The LAP was helpful in 18 patients (56%): it facilitated passage of the SR-URS in 16 patients (50%) and laser fiber placement in 11 cases (34%). Access to the upper ureter was possible in all women. The mean operative time was 54 minutes in the LAP group and 75 minutes in the matched cohort without LAP (P = 0.026). There were no significant deformities of the SR-URS and no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to popular practice, the upper ureter can be accessed safely and efficiently with a 7.5F SR-URS in nearly all patients. Lower-abdominal pressure can be helpful to negotiate passage of the endoscope over the iliac vessels or to place the laser fiber on stones.

Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral lithiasis with pneumatic lithotripsy: analysis of 287 procedures in a public hospital

Ureteroscopes and different lithotripsy methods have greatly improved the urologist's ability to treat ureteral stones, regardless of their location in the ureter. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotriptor in 287 patients with ureteral calculi. Ureteroscopic stone treatment was performed between October 1999 and May 2004. Of 221 patients with distal ureteral calculi, 209 (group 1), and 58 of 66 patients with upper ureteral calculi (group 2) were treated successfully by ureteroscopy alone. In group 1, seven migrated stones (to the upper urinary tract) were successfully treated by ESWL later. There were five-treatment failures due to ureteral perforation which consequently required open ureterolithotomy. In group 2, there were five patients with migrated stones; two of them were sent to a percutaneous nephrolithotomy center because of previously unsuccessful ESWL attempts. Three of these with migrated stones were treated by ESWL later. In three patients, we switched to open ureterolithotomy because of ureteral rupture that required surgical repair. Ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment modality for ureteral calculi.

Combined Ureterorenoscopy and Shockwave Lithotripsy for Large Renal Stone Burden: An Alternative to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and initial outcomes of a combination of ureterorenoscopy (URS) using holmium laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in a single outpatient session for the treatment of large renal stone burdens in patients refusing or unsuitable for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with a mean age of 52.7 years (range 34-81 years) having a mean stone burden of 847 mm2 (range 58 mm2-1850 mm2) were treated with combined URS laser lithotripsy and SWL as an alternative to PCNL. The SWL (mean 2800 shockwaves) was performed using the Storz Modulith SL-X, and flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy was performed either during or following SWL.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of the patients (13/14) were treated successfully on an outpatient basis. Two patients were rendered stone free after the initial procedure alone (14%). Overall, including secondary outpatient treatment with a second session of URS alone (N = 7) URS and SWL (N = 1), SWL (N = 1), or oral alkalinization therapy (N = 1), the stone-free rate was 76.9% (10/13). One patient was excluded secondary to death from unrelated causes after the initial procedure, and the success rate (residual fragments <4 mm) was 84.6% (11/13). The two treatment failures included one patient who required a third URS procedure and one patient who developed urosepsis necessitating nephrostomy-tube placement who underwent subsequent PCNL.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with traditional approaches using PCNL and second-look nephroscopy, single-session combined URS and SWL with a second outpatient procedure may offer equivalent results with decreased morbidity in carefully selected patients.

Treatment of Ureteral Stones Using Holmium:YAG laser

INTRODUCTION

There has been a steady increase in the number of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. In addition to its soft tissue applications Holmium:YAG laser has also been found an excellent intracorporeal lithotripter for all kinds of stones. We here present the results of patients treated with Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in our clinic.

METHODS

Between June 1997 and December 2002, 205 patients with a diagnosis of ureteric calculi were treated with ureteroscopy using Holmium:YAG laser as an intracorporeal lithotriptor. The stones were localized in the distal ureter in 158 patients (77), middle and proximal ureter in 47 patients (23). Stones ranged in size from 5 x 5 mm to 20 x 10 mm and the operation time was about 35 minutes (ranged 25-65 minutes). Follow-up evaluations have done at first and third months.

RESULTS

The ureteral stone could not be reached in 10 patients (4.8). Stone fragmentation or removal was accomplished in all other patients. Four patients (1.9) had proximal migration of the fragments and later treated with extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and three patients (1.5) had ureteral perforation. They were managed by double J stent placement. Two of the patients had ureteral obstruction on the third month of procedure. One of the patients was treated with open surgery. For the other one, ureteroscopic balloon dilatation was performed and catheterized by double J stent and there wasn't any complication after the removal of stent.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopic Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is a safe, technically feasible and efficacious treatment for ureteral stones.

Stent Positioning after Ureteroscopy for Urinary Calculi: The Question Is Still Open

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a study to assess the need for routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic stone removal using Lithoclast pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 104 patients, prospectively divided in two groups to receive (group A, 52 patients) or not (group B, 52 patients) a stent after stone removal, underwent ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral lithiasis. The procedure was performed with the patient under either general or epidural anesthesia. A semirigid ureteroscope (Wolf 8.9 Fr) was used in all cases and intracorporeal lithotripsy with ballistic energy was performed. In group A a double pigtail ureteral 4.8 or 6 Fr polyurethane stent was placed following ureteroscopy. All patients were closely evaluated on follow-up examinations. The outcomes measured were postoperative patient pain, lower urinary tract symptoms, the need for hospital care as a result of the postoperative pain and late postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The two patient groups were comparable with respect to the baseline variables of patient gender and age, stone location and mean stone size. Mean operative time plus or minus standard deviation (S.D.) in group A was 42 +/- 15 minutes (range 20-65) compared to 37 +/- 20 (range 15-60) in group B. Operative time was not significantly longer when a stent was placed (p = 0.17). At day 3 the mean visual analog pain score in group B was much higher than in group A (p = 0.01). Dysuria, hematuria and frequency/urgency were more prevalent in the stented group, although without statistically significant difference. Readmission to the hospital for unremitting pain was necessary in 12 of 104 patients (11.5%) all being in unstented group (p < 0.05). The incidence of anatomical ureteral narrowing on IVP at 6 months follow-up was not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, using Swiss Lithoclast ballistic energy to fragment stones, routine stent placement is advisable also after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy without ureteral dilation. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to assess the role of stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy, considering different energies sources, scopes, diameter and site of the stones in the ureter.

Safety and efficacy of same-session bilateral ureteroscopy

PURPOSE

Same-session ureteroscopy for bilateral urinary calculi would potentially reduce costs and the need for a second anesthetic compared with staged procedures. We sought to establish the safety and efficacy of same-session bilateral ureteroscopy relative to procedures for staged bilateral and multiple unilateral calculi in the context of contemporary instrumentation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 626 consecutive patients underwent ureteroscopy for calculi between January 1997 and August 2001. Among these, 34 patients with bilateral calculi (11 staged and 23 treated in one sitting) and 54 patients with multiple unilateral calculi in distinct locations were included in this study. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association of patient-specific and technical factors with postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Stone-free rates were similar in the two groups and ranged from 50% to 100% depending on stone location. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 (11%) and 3 (14%) of the patients treated for multiple unilateral and for bilateral calculi in a staged procedure, respectively, compared with 7 (29%) of those undergoing same-session bilateral ureteroscopy (P = 0.12). Logistic regression revealed that same-session bilateral ureteroscopy (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; P = 0.02) and absence of a postoperative stent (OR 1.7; P = 0.03) were associated with added morbidity. However, the cumulative risk of performing staged bilateral procedures (14% per procedure) approximated that of bilateral ureteroscopy in one sitting (29%).

CONCLUSION

Bilateral ureteroscopy carries an increased risk of postoperative morbidity. The risk is proportional to the number of renal units treated and may be assumed at once (e.g., same-session) or over time (e.g., staged) as it applies to patients requiring bilateral ureteroscopy.

Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath

Routine use of the ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopic procedures provides consistent, reliable, and unencumbered access to the upper tracts. The ureteral access sheath can be reliably and easily deployed if used properly and requires no special training. As such, it can be easily adopted into current urologic practice. Not only does the access sheath facilitate rapid, repeated, and atraumatic access to the upper tracts, but it also avoids back-loading over a superstiff guidewire, which may incur costly damage to the ureteroscope. The access sheath reduces overall costs and decreases operative times. Furthermore, application of a ureteral access sheath reduces the frustration associated with complex and some routine ureteroscopic procedures by optimizing irrigant flow to improve the surgeon's endoscopic vision while minimizing the intrarenal pressures that the kidney must tolerate. There is no evidence that the access sheath results in clinically significant ureteral ischemia, and extensive clinical use of the access sheath for long procedures has not resulted in increased stricture formation. Finally, the ureteral access sheath is useful for other procedures, such as PCNL, by improving visualization and minimizing the requirement for multiple percutaneous access sites. Winston Churchill said it best: "Give us the tools and we will finish the job." Industry has provided urologists with the tools in the form of advanced flexible ureteroscopes, the holmium laser, nitinol baskets, and the ureteral access sheath. Now it is up to urologists to finish the job.

Ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi

Although ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi is safe and effective. it is relatively inefficient compared with ESWL and PCNL. It should be considered primary therapy for patients with lower pole stones who have adverse ESWL characteristics and patients who are not suitable candidates for PCNL. There are also numerous clinical situations, as outlined previously, where the ureteroscopic approach is favored over other treatment modalities.

An update on ureteroscopic instrumentation for the treatment of urolithiasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ureteroscopic instruments, both endoscopic and working devices, continue to evolve. Changes in instrumentation have necessitated concurrent modifications in ureteroscopic techniques over the years. The safety and efficacy of the ureteroscopic approach for the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi, however, have continued to improve.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review emphasizes the recent advances in the major groups of instruments employed for ureteroscopy. Among the endoscopic instruments, the flexible ureteroscopes have undergone the most notable advances, benefiting from greatly improved deflection and durability. Progress has been made in adjunctive instruments as well. Current stone retrieval devices composed of nitinol-based wire technology are able to easily secure fragments from the most peripheral calices. The holmium laser is a versatile device with proven safety and effectiveness as an endoscopic lithotrite.

SUMMARY

The availability and coordinated use of the latest ureteroscopic instruments have resulted in better treatment outcomes, thus expanding the use of ureteroscopy as a first-line option for the treatment of calculi in appropriate cases. Urologists should be familiar with currently available instrumentation in order to optimize their equipment.

Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE

We report our experience with retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy (RIRL) for renal stones not alleviated by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 28 females and 53 males with a mean age of 53 years (range 18 to 86) were studied. They had been treated with a mean of 3.2 previous SWLs. Mean stone size was 9.2 mm (range 4 to 22) and the mean number of stones per patient was 1.27 (range 1 to 5) for a total of 103 stones overall. In 70 patients there was 1 stone. Rigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 8 and 67 cases, respectively, while a combined approach was used in 6. A holmium:YAG laser was used for fragmentation in 52 patients. Success was defined as stone-free status or residual fragments less than 3 mm.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 67%. RIRL yielded a 46% stone-free rate. Of the 44 patients 17 (39%) had residual stones less than 3 mm, while 13 required ancillary procedures. There were no residual ureteral stones. Original stone size correlated inversely with the success rate. Most failures involved lower pole stones, in that laser fiber deflection prevented reaching them in 9 cases. The procedure was interrupted due to extravasation or bleeding in 5 patients and 6 had postoperative urinary tract infections (16% overall complication rate).

CONCLUSIONS

RIRL effectively and safely alleviated upper tract stones unresponsive to earlier SWL. It can be considered salvage therapy in such cases. RIRL is well suited for treating stones less than 2 cm with better stone-free rates than SWL in the same circumstances. Residual stones were more likely in lower pole cases.

Advanced intrarenal ureteroscopic procedures

The role of flexible ureteroscopy in the management of intrarenal pathology has undergone a dramatic evolution, powered by improvements in flexible ureteroscope design; deflection and image quality; diversification of small, disposable instrumentation; and the use of holmium laser lithotripsy. This article reviews the application of flexible ureteroscopy for advanced intrarenal procedures.

Pediatric ureteroscopy

Endoscopic evaluation and management of the diverse conditions involving the upper urinary tract of children is now feasible and has been shown to be safe and efficacious. This modality should be considered an essential part of the armamentarium of any urologist involved in the care of children. Continued technological advances will allow the indications for pediatric ureteroscopy to evolve. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery that have been proved in adult patients can now be offered to pediatric patients. A thorough knowledge of available equipment and the anatomic and physiologic differences of pediatric patients will ensure a successful outcome with minimal morbidity.

Removal of asymptomatic ipsilateral renal stones following rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of flexible ureteroscopic removal of small (<1-cm) asymptomatic renal stone(s) following rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten female and nineteen male patients underwent rigid ureteroscopy and holmium lasertripsy for removal of ureteral stone(s). All had asymptomatic renal stone(s) on the same side, which were then removed using flexible ureteroscopy. The renal stones were either removed intact with a tipless Nitinol basket or fragmented with the laser to small pieces (<2 mm), with basket removal of larger fragments. The number and size of stones, total operative time, added time needed for flexible ureteroscopy, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Follow-up at 1 month included a plain abdominal film and renal ultrasonography or noncontrast CT scan.

RESULTS

Fifty-six renal stones with a mean size of 5.7 mm were treated. Fourteen patients had stones on the right side, and 15 had stones on the left. The mean total operative time was 56.5 minutes, with a mean added time of 16.7 minutes for flexible ureteroscopy. Stones were removed intact in 18 patients and fragmented in 8 patients, resulting in an immediate success rate of 90%. There were three failures. One-month follow-up confirmed all patients were either stone-free or had residual fragments <2 mm in diameter, with no new-onset hydronephrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of small asymptomatic renal stones at the time of ureteroscopy for ureteral stones appears safe and effective and requires little additional operative time.

Identifying patients who are suitable for stentless ureteroscopy following treatment of urolithiasis

PURPOSE

Foregoing ureteral stents following ureteroscopy for urinary calculi is an evolving practice. Randomized trials support stent omission in select cases though generalizability is unclear and criteria for stentless ureteroscopy are unknown. Therefore, we sought to identify significant clinical characteristics affecting postoperative morbidity in unstented patients to provide a context for future randomized trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 837 ureteroscopic procedures for urolithiasis performed at our institution from January 1997 through January 2002 a ureteral stent was not placed in 226 (32%). Among these patients 47 had no stone at the time of the procedure leaving 219 (26%) who were treated for urinary calculus disease. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association of 24 variables with postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Of the 219 patients treated with ureteroscopy 39 (18%) had a postoperative complication, which was obstructive in 26 (12%), infectious in 10 (5%), and related to patient co-morbidity in 3 (1%). Factors associated with postoperative morbidity included renal pelvic location (p = 0.02), lithotripsy (p = 0.03), bilateral procedure (p = 0.07), history of urolithiasis (p <0.0001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.06), recent/recurrent infection (p <0.0001), operative time 45 minutes or greater (p = 0.07), operative time 45 minutes or greater plus lithotripsy (p = 0.0004), operative time 45 minutes or greater plus ureteral dilation (p = 0.07) and bilateral stentless procedure (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple patient and operative factors may predispose a patient to postoperative morbidity after a stentless procedure. Future trials should prospectively validate the role of these factors in either promoting (e.g., history of urolithiasis) or preventing (e.g., preoperative stent) a postoperative complication in the setting of stentless ureteroscopy.

Urinary tract stones--Part II: current status of treatment

The majority of renal and ureteric stones are now managed by minimally invasive techniques, for example nephrostomy, ureteral stents, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A multi-disciplinary approach is necessary, and this review examines the status of modern stone therapy and the contribution of the radiology department.

A prospective randomized controlled trial on ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy

PURPOSE

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate whether postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 58 patients with unilateral ureteral stones were randomized into either stented or unstented groups. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy was performed using a semirigid ureteroscope (6.5/7Fr) and holmium laser without ureteral orifice dilation. There were no selection criteria regarding stone size, location, preoperative ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis. Endoscopic evidence of stone impaction or mucosal edema/damage did not exclude a patient from the study. Ureteral perforation on completion retrograde pyelogram was the only intraoperative criterion for study exclusion. Postoperative pain scores and symptoms were recorded. Excretory urography was performed to document stone-free status and stricture formation. Radionuclide scan was performed selectively to exclude functional obstruction when ureteral narrowing was found on excretory urogram.

RESULTS

Mean stone size +/- SD was 9.7 +/- 4.0 mm. (range 4 to 27). Proximal ureteral stones accounted for 43% of all stones. Stented and unstented groups were comparable with respect to demographic data, stone parameters, preoperative obstruction and hydronephrosis. There was no significant difference in operating time, laser energy used, stone impaction and mucosal edema/damage between the 2 groups. Postoperative pain and symptoms were more severe and frequent (p <0.05) in the stented group. However, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative sepsis and unplanned medical visits. The stone-free and stricture formation rates showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteral stenting is not necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Ureteral stent increases the incidence of pain and urinary symptoms but does not prevent postoperative urinary sepsis and unplanned medical visits. Severity of preoperative obstruction and intraoperative ureteral trauma were not shown to be determining factors for stenting.

Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity

OBJECTIVES

To assess methods to improve the longevity and durability of flexible ureteroscopes by using the ureteral access sheath, 200-microm holmium laser fiber, and nitinol baskets or graspers during routine ureteroscopic procedures. Despite adequate advances in fiberoptics and endoscope design, the decreased size of currently available flexible ureteroscopes makes damage inevitable after repeated use. However, new auxiliary tools may be able to enhance ureteroscope durability.

METHODS

The indications for performing flexible ureteroscopy were proximal ureteral stones (n = 32), renal calculi (n = 59), treatment of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (n = 3), evaluation of hematuria or filling defect (n = 7), and treatment of ureteral strictures or ureteropelvic junction obstruction (n = 8). Using four new 7.5F flexible ureteroscopes, we prospectively evaluated the number of passes of each ureteroscope until more than 20 optical fibers were broken, more than a 25 degrees loss of deflection in either direction had occurred, or the instrument sustained injury requiring repair by the manufacturer.

RESULTS

One hundred nine flexible ureteroscopic procedures (average 27.5 procedures per instrument; range 19 to 34) were performed with the four new flexible ureteroscopes before being sent for repair. Adjuncts to reduce scope damage during these procedures were the use of the ureteral access sheath (n = 109), nitinol devices allowing lower pole stone retrieval (n = 27), and the 200-microm holmium laser fiber for stone fragmentation, tumor ablation, and incision of ureteropelvic junction/ureteral stenoses (n = 91). The average number of passes until more than 20 optical fibers were broken was 15.3 (range 12 to 20), until more than a 25 degrees loss of deflection occurred was 50.3 (range 42 to 66), or until the scope required repair was 66.7 (range 46 to 82).

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible ureteroscopy will be used increasingly to manage upper urinary tract pathologic findings. Historically, the number of procedures performed before a flexible ureteroscope requires repair averaged 6 to 15. By incorporating the new ureteroscopic accessories, such as nitinol devices, a ureteral access sheath, and the 200-microm holmium laser fiber into common practice, one can reduce the strain on these fragile 7.5F endoscopes, thereby maximizing their longevity.

Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of the development of less powerful second- and third-generation shockwave lithotripters on surgical stone therapy in light of recent advances in ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. As such, we sought to identify current trends in the treatment of stone disease, both at our university medical center and nationally, and to contrast them with the corresponding data from 1990.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All urolithiasis procedures (ureteroscopy, SWL, open surgery, and percutaneous stone removal) performed in 1998 were compared with all urolithiasis procedures performed 8 years earlier (1990) at a single institution (Washington University, St. Louis). In addition, Medicare data for each year from 1988 through 2000 were collected from the Health Care Financing Administration to assess the national trends for open stone surgery, ureteroscopic stone removal, SWL, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

RESULTS

At Washington University, the number of percutaneous stone removals remained stable; however, the overall number of ureteroscopies increased by 53%, while the number of SWLs, decreased by 15%. The Medicare data likewise reflect a marked decrease in open stone surgery and a marked increase in ureteroscopic stone surgery with a slight increase in SWL. Utilization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this trend toward ureteroscopy is attributable to several factors: improved, smaller rigid and flexible ureteroscopes; the availability of more effective intracorporeal lithotripters (e.g., pneumatic and holmium laser), and the lack of development of lower cost, more effective SWL. This is an unfortunate trend, as we are moving away from the noninvasive treatment that was the hallmark of urolithiasis therapy at the beginning of the last decade toward more invasive endoscopic therapy. Increased research efforts in SWL technology are sorely needed.

Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children

PURPOSE

Ureteroscopy for treating urolithiasis in prepubertal children has become more common with the advent of smaller instruments. We reviewed our experience with ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in this cohort of patients as well as the literature using this treatment modality in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2000 we performed 27 ureteroscopic stone extractions in 25 children. Ureteroscopy was done in a manner similar to that in adults. Ureteral dilation was performed when necessary to access the ureter. A stent was placed postoperatively if there was significant ureteral trauma.

RESULTS

Of the 25 children 13 were male and 12 were female. Average age was 9.2 years (range 3 to 14). Stones were 2 to 12 mm. in greatest diameter (average 6). Of the 27 procedures the ureteral orifice was dilated before stone treatment in 15 (56%), while in 19 (70%) a stent was placed afterward. No intraoperative and 2 postoperative complications were identified. Overall 92% of the children were rendered stone-free after 1 procedure and 100% were stone-free after 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in prepubertal children is safe and effective. Routine ureteral dilation and ureteral stent placement are not always necessary in these patients.

Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients

PURPOSE

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for managing upper urinary tract calculi in a prospective cohort of 598 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy was performed in 598 patients between 1993 and 1999. Calculi were located in the distal ureter in 39.6% of cases, mid ureter in 18.6%, proximal ureter in 32.4% and kidney in 9.4%. Patients were treated on an outpatient basis with various flexible and semirigid endoscopes. Of the cases 59% were referred as previous treatment failures. Patients were assessed 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively with repeat plain x-ray and ultrasound or excretory urography for late obstructive complications.

RESULTS

The overall stone-free rate was 97%. As stratified by location, the stone-free rate was 98% in the distal ureter, 100% in the mid ureter, 97% in the proximal ureter and 84% in the kidney. Fragmentation was incomplete in 6% of cases and secondary intervention was required in 6%. The overall complication rate was 4%. New onset ureteral stricture developed postoperatively in 0.35% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is a highly effective and safe treatment modality for managing ureteral and a proportion of intrarenal calculi on an outpatient basis. The effectiveness and versatility of the holmium laser combined with small rigid or flexible endoscopes make it our modality of choice for ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy as a compromise in treating small and intermediate-size lower pole calculi. The optimal management of lower pole calculi remains controversial. Shock wave lithotripsy is associated with minimal morbidity but with suboptimal stone clearance rates. Conversely, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy has greater morbidity but stone-free rates greater than 90% regardless of size.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients underwent ureteroscopy for lower pole calculi 2 cm or less (mean 8.7 mm) during a 3-year period. To minimize confounding, 11 patients with additional calculi at other ipsilateral renal sites and 1 patient with large (2.4 cm each) bilateral calculi were excluded. Two patients with bilateral lower pole calculi and four who required a second procedure were included in the analysis. Thus, the final cohort consisted of 60 patients who underwent 66 procedures.

RESULTS

Of patients with follow-up longer than 1 month, 79% were stone free after a single procedure, and this improved to 88% after a second procedure in 4 patients. All 7 patients with follow-up less than 1 month had a reduction in stone burden after successful fragmentation. Overall, 8 patients required an auxiliary procedure. No intraoperative complications, and 7 (11%) postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy for lower pole calculi is associated with minimal morbidity and stone-free rates comparable to shock wave lithotripsy for smaller stones. The greatest utility of ureteroscopy is in the management of intermediate-size calculi, for which it has substantially higher stone-free rates and lower repeated treatment rates than does shock wave lithotripsy.

Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results

PURPOSE

The efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi was determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized, multicenter clinical trial was performed comparing shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for symptomatic lower pole only renal calculi 30 mm. or less.

RESULTS

Of 128 patients enrolled in the study 60 with a mean stone size of 14.43 mm. were randomized to percutaneous stone removal (58 treated, 2 awaiting treatment) and 68 with a mean stone size of 14.03 mm. were randomized to shock wave lithotripsy (64 treated, 4 awaiting treatment). Followup at 3 months was available for 88% of treated patients. The 3-month postoperative stone-free rates overall were 95% for percutaneous removal versus 37% lithotripsy (p <0.001). Shock wave lithotripsy results varied inversely with stone burden while percutaneous stone-free rates were independent of stone burden. Stone clearance from the lower pole following shock wave lithotripsy was particularly problematic for calculi greater than 10 mm. in diameter with only 7 of 33 (21%) patients becoming stone-free. Re-treatment was necessary in 10 (16%) lithotripsy and 5 (9%) percutaneous cases. There were 9 treatment failures in the lithotripsy group and none in the percutaneous group. Ancillary treatment was necessary in 13% of lithotripsy and 2% percutaneous cases. Morbidity was low overall and did not differ significantly between the groups (percutaneous stone removal 22%, shock wave lithotripsy 11%, p =0.087). In the shock wave lithotripsy group there was no difference in lower pole anatomical measurements between kidneys in which complete stone clearance did or did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Stone clearance from the lower pole following shock wave lithotripsy is poor, especially for stones greater than 10 mm. in diameter. Calculi greater than 10 mm. in diameter are better managed initially with percutaneous removal due to its high degree of efficacy and acceptably low morbidity.

Outpatient ureteroscopy: predictive factors for postoperative events

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors that can predict the postoperative events of outpatient ureteroscopy.

METHODS

The data of 329 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ureteroscopy from January 1996 to July 2000 were analyzed. Patient selection for outpatient surgery was based solely on their general medical status and social factors. Eighty-three percent of the procedures were therapeutic ureteroscopy. The reported postoperative events included sleep disturbances, postoperative pain score, emesis, unplanned admission, and other complications. These were compared with the various patient and operative factors. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictive factors for different postoperative events.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of ureteroscopic access to the pathologic site was 99.7%. Most of the therapeutic ureteroscopy performed was ureteroscopic lithotripsy (93%), with a stone-free rate of 91%. Ninety-seven percent of the operations were completed within 90 minutes, and 98% of patients were fit for discharge within 5 hours. Female patients reported more symptoms on the way home (25.8% versus 16%, P = 0.047) and more postoperative emesis (14.4% versus 2.1%, P <0.001). The postoperative pain score on day 1 was higher if the operation had lasted more than 60 minutes (2.4 versus 1.5, P = 0.002). Patients who received postoperative stenting had a higher postoperative pain score on day 3 (1.1 versus 0.4, P <0.001) and a higher complication rate compared with those who required no postoperative stenting (16.8% versus 4%, P <0.001). No predictive factors for unplanned admission were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopy can be successfully performed in an outpatient setting. Although the early postoperative pain was associated with nature of the operation (which could not be changed), the subsequent postoperative pain and complications were associated with ureteral stenting, which could be reduced by selective stenting. Unplanned admissions could not be predicted.

Upper and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective unrandomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open ureterolithotomy

OBJECTIVES

To review our experience of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and to compare the results with those from open surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1994 and mid-December 2000, 55 patients with large (mean 2.1 cm) upper and mid-ureteric calculi, and with normal renal values, underwent RPUL. In 22 patients, earlier attempts with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy had failed. These patients were compared with 26 (mean stone size 2.4 cm) who underwent open ureterolithotomy during the same period. The two groups had similar distributions for age, sex, stone size and stone location; most stones were calcium-based.

RESULTS

The mean operative duration and blood loss for RPUL and open surgery were 108.8 and 98.8 min, and 58.5 and 50.5 mL, respectively (not significant). The mean analgesic (pethidine) requirement and hospital stay for RPUL and open surgery were 41.1 and 96.9 mg, and 3.3 and 4.8 days, respectively (P<0.001). The duration of convalescence was significantly less after RPUL than open surgery (1.8 weeks vs 3.1). There were 10 conversions, which occurred early in the series, and one significant complication amongst patients who underwent RPUL.

CONCLUSIONS

RPUL is comparable with open surgery for operative duration and blood loss, but the laparoscopic procedure has significant advantages over open surgery for analgesia, hospital stay, recuperation and cosmesis. RPUL is a viable alternative for large upper and mid-ureteric calculi and in those patients where a previous attempt at endourological management has failed. However, the technique requires significant training and experience before good results can be obtained.