A medical report from the stone age?

Injection therapies for soft-tissue disorders

Local injection therapies are used in the management of a variety of musculoskeletal pain syndromes and include the local infiltration of substances such as corticosteroid and/or anaesthetic, dry needling and neural blockade. Although commonly used, the rationale for their use in many conditions is arguable and evidence of efficacy is often lacking. In this chapter, a number of common injection therapies for soft-tissue-mediated pain are described. The reasoning for their use, potential mechanisms of action and unwanted effects are discussed. The literature relating to their documented effects is critically reviewed. Practical suggestions for their utilization in the management of soft-tissue conditions are given and proposals are made for future research in this important area.

Acupuncture: evidence for its use in chronic low back pain

Back pain is a major economic burden in the UK, with increasing numbers of patients seeking complementary therapies, such as acupuncture, as a means to supplement traditional medical treatments. Studies to date have produced conflicting results relating to the efficacy of acupuncture and thus this systematic review will provide a concise summary of the clinical scenario in Western countries. A search of various electronic databases identified 11 articles consisting of three case studies, five randomized controlled trials, and two cross-over trials. Systematic examination of these articles did not provide definitive evidence to support or refute the use of acupuncture in the treatment of low back pain. In an era of increasing demands for evidence-based practice and professional accountability, the absence of irrefutable scientific evidence places nurses and medics in a vulnerable position.

Tattoos as risk factors for transfusion-transmitted diseases

BACKGROUND

Several infectious diseases have been found to be associated with tattooing, including some transfusion-transmitted diseases (TTDs). Information on tattooing has been included in screening interviews of prospective blood donors and may be a reason for deferral.

METHODS

Review of articles identified through Medline (and other computerized data bases) using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and textwords for "tattooing," "transfusion", "hepatitis", "human immunodeficiency virus", "acquired immunodeficiency syndrome", "syphilis", "Chagas disease", "infection", "risk factors", and their combinations.

RESULTS

There is strong evidence for the transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and syphilis by tattooing. Tattooing may also transmit the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), although convincing evidence is still lacking. There is little or no evidence that other TTDs can be transmitted by tattooing. Epidemiologic studies to date have shown a large variation in odds ratio estimates of the association between tattooing and HBV, HCV, and HIV infections.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are required to clarify the risk of tattoos in transmitting infectious diseases through blood transfusions. A reassessment of tattoos as a screening criterion among blood donors is justified.