Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant

Genetic effects of radiotherapy for childhood cancer

Radiation-induced heritable diseases have not been demonstrated in humans and estimates of genetic risks for protection purposes are based on mouse experiments. The most comprehensive epidemiologic study is of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors and their children, which found little evidence for inherited defects attributable to parental radiation. Studies of workers exposed to occupational radiation or of populations exposed to environmental radiation appear too small and exposures too low to convincingly detect inherited genetic damage. In contrast, survivors of childhood cancer form the largest group of people exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation before reproduction and offer unique advantages for studying trans-generation effects. A wide range of gonadal doses are possible, several comparison groups are readily available (including siblings), and there is a strong willingness among cancer survivors to participate in health studies. Cancer patients also have detailed medical records that facilitate both the accurate estimation of gonadal doses and the assessment of potentially confounding factors, such as intercurrent illness, personal and family medical histories, lifestyle characteristics such as tobacco use, and circumstances at delivery. An international study is nearing completion of over 25,000 survivors of childhood cancer in the United States and Denmark who gave birth to or fathered over 6,000 children. Doses to gonads are being reconstructed from radiotherapy records with 46% over 100 mSv and 16% over 1,000 mSv. Adverse pregnancy outcomes being evaluated include major congenital malformations, cytogenetic abnormalities, stillbirths, miscarriages, neonatal deaths, total deaths, leukemia and childhood cancers, altered sex ratio, and birth weight. The main analyses are based on dose-response evaluations. Blood studies of trios (cancer survivor, spouse or partner and offspring) have been initiated to evaluate mechanistic evidence for the transmission of any radiation-induced genetic damage such as minisatellite mutations. Markers of cancer susceptibility such as chromosomal radiosensitivity and genotype profile will also be examined. In the United States series to date, 4,214 children were born to cancer survivors among whom 157 (3.7%) genetic diseases were reported in contrast to 95 (4.1%) reported conditions among 2,339 children born to sibling controls. In the Denmark series the comparable figures were 82 (6.1%) birth defects among 1,345 children of cancer survivors and 211 (5.0%) among 4,225 children of sibling controls. Coupled with prior studies, these preliminary findings, if sustained by ongoing dose-response analyses, provide reassurance that cancer treatments including radiotherapy do not carry much if any risk for inherited genetic disease in offspring conceived after exposure.

Leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in children of male Sellafield radiation workers

Our objective was to investigate if there was (i) an excess risk of leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among children of male radiation workers at the Sellafield nuclear installation in Cumbria, northwest England; (ii) a dose-response relationship between fathers' preconceptional irradiation and their children's risk of leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; and (iii) whether any observed association could be explained by demographic factors. We performed a cohort study of live births, 1950-1991 in Cumbria, followed up to age 25 years or the end of 1991, comparing the risk of leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among all 9,859 children of male radiation workers to that among all 256,851 children of non-Sellafield fathers. Children of radiation workers had a higher risk of leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma than other children [rate ratio (RR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.1, p = 0.05]. Adjustment for population mixing greatly reduced the excess risk in the village of Seascale, adjacent to Sellafield, but had little effect elsewhere. The risk increased significantly with father's total preconceptional external radiation dose (RR(100mSv) = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, p = 0.05). This dose-response was not reduced by adjustment for population mixing. Although our 13 exposed cases included 10 considered previously (Gardner et al., BMJ 1990;300:423-34), we used a cohort rather than a case-control design, with wider temporal and geographic boundaries, and confirmed the statistical association between father's preconceptional irradiation and child's risk of leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that they reported. The possibility remains that paternal preconceptional irradiation may be a risk factor for leukaemia/non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and this effect may not be confined to Seascale.

Methodologic considerations for population-based research on fetal deaths: overcoming data gaps

Fetal deaths comprise a large component of perinatal mortality and remain an understudied pregnancy outcome, especially from a population perspective. Interpretation of the findings from clinical or community-based studies can be difficult without a clear understanding of fetal death at the population level. This article addresses the critical data gaps underlying population-based research on fetal deaths, including the magnitude and scope of the problem, the probability of occurrence, the populations at risk, and the importance of accounting for prior reproductive history. Suggestions are given for new avenues of population-based research such as prospective inquiry of couples attempting pregnancy and newer analytic and modeling strategies for assessing risk and for addressing the lack of independence in pregnancy outcomes.

Radiation and germline mutation at repeat sequences: Are we in the middle of a paradigm shift?

Two assumptions are commonly made in the estimation of genetic risk: (1) that the seven specific loci in the mouse constitute a suitable basis for extrapolation to genetic disease in humans, and (2) that mutations are induced by radiation damage (energy-loss events leading to double-stranded damage) occurring within the gene and are induced linearly with dose, at least at low doses. Recent evidence on the mutability of repeat sequences is reviewed that suggests that neither of these assumptions is as well founded as we like to think. Repeat sequences are common in the human genome, and alterations in them may have health consequences. Many of them are unstable, both spontaneously and after irradiation. The fact that changes in DNA repeat sequences can clearly arise as a result of radiation damage outside the sequence concerned and the likely involvement of some sort of signal transduction process mean that the nature of the radiation dose response cannot be assumed. While the time has not come to abandon the current paradigms, it would seem sensible to invest more effort in exploring the induction of changes in repeat sequences after irradiation and the consequences of such changes for health.

Environmental causes of human cancers

Epidemiological studies have clearly shown a causal association between tobacco exposure and various human cancers, hepatitis B and C infection and hepatocellular carcinoma, human papilloma viruses and cervical cancer, and the occupational origin of certain human cancers is well established. The identification of the environmental causes of human cancers has been a long and difficult process. Much remains to be understood about the role of specific components of the diet and the interaction of different risk factors in the aetiology of human cancers. Withstanding the progress made on the understanding of the cancer process and their potential impact in the therapy of cancer, primary prevention remains, in developed and developing countries, the most effective measure to reduce cancer mortality.

Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey

BACKGROUND

Some patients treated by transplantation of haemopoietic stem cells (peripheral blood or bone marrow) become permanently infertile, but others retain or recover fertility. We assessed the outcome of conception in women, and partners of men previously treated by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT).

METHODS

We sent questionnaires to 229 centres of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. We sought details about the original disease, transplant procedure, and outcome of conception for both male and female patients.

FINDINGS

199 centres gave information relating to 19412 allogeneic and 17950 autologous transplant patients. 232 (0.6%) patients conceived after SCT. Crude annual birth rate for 4-month survivors of SCT was lower than the national average for England and Wales at 1.7 per 1000 patients. 312 conceptions were reported in 113 patients (74 allograft) and partners of 119 patients (93 allograft). Most pregnancies were uncomplicated and resulted in 271 livebirths. 28 (42%) of 67 allograft recipients had caesarean section compared with 16% in the normal population (difference =26% [95% CI 15-38]), 12 (20%) of 59 had preterm delivery compared with a normal rate of 6% (14% [4-24]), and 12 (23%) of 52 had low birthweight singleton offspring compared with a normal rate of 6% (17% [6-29]).

INTERPRETATION

Pregnancy after SCT is likely to have a successful outcome. Pregnancies in allograft patients who have received total body irradiation should be treated as high risk for maternal and fetal complications.

Risk of stillbirth in offspring of men exposed to ionising radiation

Radiation genetic risk models are employed to predict the frequency of radiation-related stillbirths to partners of occupationally exposed male workers, using the incidence data recently reported by Parker et al from an epidemiological study of Cumbrian births. Expanding on previously developed conservative risk estimates suggests that, of the 130 observed stillbirths to partners of male radiation workers, 0.3 cases would be attributable to paternal preconceptional irradiation, in contrast to the 17.5 (95% confidence interval: 3.1 to 31.9) cases predicted by Parker et al from their preferred dose-response model. The incompatibility of the results reported by Parker et al with those from other investigations, both epidemiological and experimental, and the inability of the study to consider a number of factors which might affect stillbirth rates, particularly those relating to the mother, make it difficult to accept that paternal irradiation received occupationally could have contributed to a detectable increase in stillbirths.

Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study

BACKGROUND

There is some concern about the genetic effects of exposure to low-level ionising radiation, but the evidence is sparse and conflicting. Most work has concentrated on cancer in offspring and little has been done on adverse reproductive outcome. We aimed to assess whether the offspring of men and women who are occupationally exposed to ionising radiation are at increased risk of fetal death and congenital malformation.

METHODS

We analysed pregnancies reported by an occupational cohort of nuclear industry workers in the UK, employed at establishments operated by the Atomic Energy Authority, Atomic Weapons Establishment, and British Nuclear Fuels. Employment and radiation monitoring data supplied by employers was linked to each pregnancy.

FINDINGS

11,697 men and 1903 women reported one or more singleton pregnancy conceived after first employment within the nuclear industry, the men reporting a total of 23,676 singleton pregnancies and the women 3585. The risks of fetal death and congenital malformation were not related to whether the father had been monitored before conception or to the dose of radiation received. Among pregnancies reported by women, the risk of early (<13 weeks of gestation) miscarriage was higher if the mother had been monitored before conception (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6), but there was no trend with dose. The risk of stillbirth was also higher if the mother had been monitored before conception (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.6), but the finding was based on only 29 cases (13 exposed). The risk of any major malformation, or of specific groups of malformations, was not associated with maternal monitoring, or dose received, before conception.

INTERPRETATION

We found no evidence of a link between exposure to low-level ionising radiation before conception and increased risk of adverse reproductive outcome in men working in the nuclear industry. Similarly for women there was no evidence of an association between monitoring before conception and malformation in offspring. The findings relating maternal preconceptual monitoring to increased risk of fetal death are equivocal and require further investigation.

A comparison of the risk of stillbirth associated with paternal pre-conception irradiation in the Sellafield workforce with that of stillbirth and untoward pregnancy outcome among Japanese atomic bomb survivors

A comparison is made of the relative risks associated with paternal preconception irradiation of stillbirth and untoward pregnancy outcome (stillbirths, congenital malformations, neonatal deaths) in the offspring of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors and of stillbirth in the offspring of Sellafield workers. It is concluded that the pre-conception exposure risks of stillbirth in the offspring of Sellafield workers are statistically incompatible with the Japanese data at the 5% level. Other human and experimental data relating to the induction of congenital abnormalities are briefly reviewed.