Beyond the proteasome: trimming, degradation and generation of MHC class I ligands by auxiliary proteases

Identification of an HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopic peptide from human dystrophin: application in duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy

Dystrophin-based gene therapy treatments aimed at correcting the Duchenne muscular dystrophy phenotype require stable expression of normal dystrophin (DYST) protein in myocytes without immune responses, which would compromise long-term expression. To predict cytotoxic T-cell-mediated responses elicited by transgenes, we used here H-2-negative HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice and identified human DYST epitopes, which elicit HLA-A*0201-restricted cytotoxic T cell activities. Among a series of eight peptides predicted from the human DYST sequence, not shared with the endogenous mouse DYST sequence, four of them were able to bind to HLA-A*0201 molecules and to induce cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. After human DYST DNA transfer in muscle of HLA-A*0201 mice, only the human DYST1281 epitope, located in the spectrin-like repeat 9 domain, induced strong CD8(+) CTL responses. Using the corresponding human DYST1281 peptide/HLA-A*0201 tetramer, we detected human DYST1281-specific CD8(+) T cells in peripheral lymphoid organs and blood of HLA-A*0201 mice injected with human DYST DNA. Our results demonstrate that muscle injection with human DYST DNA systematically triggers CTL responses against this HLA-A*0201-restricted human DYST1281 peptide, which is present in long human DYST isoforms. Identification of such immunodominant human DYST epitopes and use of peptide/HLA tetramers will allow the immunomonitoring of CTL responses in HLA-phenotyped Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients undergoing gene therapy. Finally, the knowledge of HLA-A*0201-restricted human DYST peptides will be of importance to test, in mouse models, new immunomodulatory interventions allowing long-term engraftment of human dystrophin.

Vaccination strategies. An overview

Existing vaccines have contributed significantly to the reduction of the mortality and morbidity burdens of many infectious diseases. In many instances, however, the development of these vaccines has been empirical. Furthermore, the impressive progress in the field of vaccines has been mainly driven the progress in molecular biology and microbiology more than by the progress in immunobiology. Nevertheless, the new challenges vaccinology is facing nowadays can be approached through a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms behind the induction and the maintenance of efficacious immune responses triggered by vaccines. The new vaccination strategies aim at exploiting the new knowledge in the field of dendritic cells (DC; and their role in priming immune responses), in the field of antigen processing and presentation for the generation of antigen-specific cytolytic T cells, and in the field of induction and maintenance of immunological memory, with the ultimate goal of developing better vaccines with an enhanced safety and efficacy not only in children and adults, but also at neonatal age.

Re-evaluating the role of heat-shock protein-peptide interactions in tumour immunity

Early investigations into the immune surveillance of chemically-induced sarcomas led to two important concepts in tumour immunobiology: one, tumour rejection can be elicited by immune recognition of tumour antigens; and two, tumours express unique sets of antigens, which are known as tumour-specific antigens. The pioneering studies of Srivastava and colleagues led to the proposal that heat-shock proteins (HSPs) function as ubiquitous tumour-specific antigens, with the specificity residing in a population of bound peptides that identify the tissue of origin of the HSP. However, recent findings, including new data on the cell biology of peptide generation and trafficking, have called into question the specificity of tumour rejection that is induced by HSPs.

Transcriptional regulation of cytosol and membrane alanyl-aminopeptidase in human T cell subsets

Aminopeptidase inhibitors strongly affect the proliferation and function of immune cells in man and animals and are promising agents for the pharmacological treatment of inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. Membrane alanyl-aminopeptidase (mAAP) has been considered as the major target of these anti-inflammatory aminopeptidase inhibitors. Recent evidence also points to a role of the cytosol alanyl-aminopeptidase (cAAP) in the immune response. In this study we used quantitative RT-PCR to determine the mRNA expression of both cAAP and mAAP in resting and activated peripheral T cells and also in CD4+, CD8+, Th1, Th2 and Treg (CD4+ CD25+) subpopulations. Both mAAP and cAAP mRNAs were expressed in all cell types investigated, and in response to activation their expression appeared to be upregulated in CD8+ cells, but downregulated in Treg cells. In CD4+ cells, mAAP and cAAP mRNAs were affected in opposite ways in response to activation. The cAAP-specific inhibitor, PAQ-22, did not affect either cAAP or mAAP expression in activated CD4+ or CD8+ cells, whereas in activated Treg cells it markedly upregulated the mRNA levels of both aminopeptidases. The non-discriminatory inhibitor, phebestin, significantly increased the amount of mAAP and cAAP mRNA in CD4+ and that of cAAP in Treg cells.