Breast cancer occurred after treatment for Hodgkin's disease: analysis of 133 cases

Subsequent malignant neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) studies

Survival of children diagnosed with cancer has improved markedly, because of improvements in chemotherapy and radiation treatment protocols, better diagnosis, and risk classification and improved supportive care. Significant numbers of survivors are now entering their 30s and 40s, and data indicate that excess mortality continues in this group at least as long as 25 to 30 years after treatment. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) is a large cohort study of 14,054 childhood cancer survivors who have been followed for over 13 years, with a median time from diagnosis now approaching 20 years. This cohort offers an extraordinary opportunity to study therapy-associated subsequent malignant neoplasms, and has allowed improved definition of incidence and risk factors for subsequent breast and thyroid cancer. The collection of genetic samples from members of the cohort has allowed the inclusion of studies of genetic susceptibility to subsequent malignant neoplasms in this population with a uniquely well-defined carcinogenic exposure. The planned formation of a new CCSS cohort, treated with more modern therapy, will allow the extension of these studies to younger populations and will define their experience of subsequent malignant neoplasms.

[Secondary breast cancer after treatment for Hodgkin's disease. About seven cases]

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic results of Hodgkin disease (HD) have improved by the use of combined radio-chemotherapy. However, this association can increase the risk of on-term effects including secondary cancers. In a retrospective study, we collected secondary breast cancer (BC) in patients previously treated with chemoradiotherapy for Hodgkin disease at Salah-Azaïz institute of Tunis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1975 and 2003, seven patients (six women and one man) treated for HD subsequently developed BC. Mean age at diagnosis of HD was 21 years (12-29). The first treatment was combined chemotherapy (MOPP-ABVD) and radiotherapy for all patients. Radiotherapy was delivered with cobalt 60 with large fields. The median dose was 41.3 Gy (2 Gy/fraction in 6 patients and 3.3 Gy in one).

RESULTS

The breast tumours occurred after a median delay of 204 months (132-276). According to the TNM classification, we showed two stage T2, one stage T3, two stage T4b and two stage T4d. The mean clinical size was 47 mm (25-80 mm). All patients had infiltrating carcinoma. Axillary node histological involvement was found in 6 cases. All patients were treated by mastectomy and chemotherapy. Only one patient had a locoregional irradiation. Median survival was 26.5 months (12-48). Four patients died and three are still alive at respectively 24, 31 and 144 months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

According to the previous data, breast cancer represents 6.3 to 9% of all second cancers occurring after HD treatment. We conclude that especially young women and girls treated for HD should be carefully monitored. We suggest that secondary BC be sometimes treated by conservative radiosurgical approach.

Primary prevention of breast cancer by hormone-induced differentiation

Breast cancer is a fatal disease whose incidence is gradually increasing in most industrialized countries and in all ethnic groups. Primary prevention is the ultimate goal for the control of this disease. The knowledge that breast cancer risk is reduced by early full-term pregnancy and that additional pregnancies increase the rate of protection has provided novel tools for designing cancer prevention strategies. The protective effect of pregnancy has been experimentally reproduced in virgin rats by treatment with the placental hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). HCG prevents the initiation and inhibits the progression of chemically induced mammary carcinomas by inducing differentiation of the mammary gland, inhibiting cell proliferation, and increasing apoptosis. It also induces the synthesis of inhibin, a tumor suppressor factor, downregulates the level of expression of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) by methylation of CpG islands, imprinting a permanent genomic signature that characterizes the refractory condition of the mammary gland to undergo malignant transformation. The genomic signature induced by hCG is identical to that induced by pregnancy and is specific for this hormone. Comparison of the mammary gland's genomic profile of virgin Sprague-Dawley rats treated daily with hCG for 21 days with that of rats receiving 17beta-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (Pg) (E2 + Pg) revealed that in hCG-treated rats 194 genes were significantly up-modulated (> 2.5 log2-folds) (p < 0.01) and commonly expressed, whereas these genes were not expressed in the E2 + Pg group. The genomic signature induced by hCG and pregnancy included activators or repressors of transcription genes, apoptosis, growth factors, cell division control, DNA repair, tumor suppressor, and cell-surface antigen genes. Our data indicate that hCG, like pregnancy, induces permanent genomic changes that are not reproduced by steroid hormones and in addition regulates gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms that are differentiation-dependent processes, leading us to conclude that hormonally induced differentiation offers enormous promise for the primary prevention of breast cancer.

Surviving childhood cancer: the impact on life

With modern therapies, most children diagnosed with cancer are expected to reach adulthood. Therefore, there are large and ever-increasing numbers of children and young adults in our population who are survivors of childhood cancer. Many of the therapies responsible for improved cancer survival rates can also damage normal cells and tissues. As more children survive cancer, the physical and emotional costs of enduring cancer therapy become increasingly important. Although most childhood cancer survivors are now expected to survive, they remain at risk for relapse, second malignant neoplasms, organ dysfunction, and a negative psychologic impact. Individual risk is quite variable and is dependent on multiple factors including the type and site of cancer, the therapy utilized, and the individual's constitution. The risks are likely to change as we learn more about the specific long-term effects of cancer therapy, develop more refined and targeted therapies, and develop and apply more effective preventative strategies or therapeutic interventions. Guidelines for long-term follow-up have been established and are available to help facilitate appropriate monitoring of and care for potential late effects.

Heterogeneity of ductal carcinoma in situ and its effects on management

Data derived from histopathological analysis, natural history, radiological characteristics, molecular markers, and clinical outcome indicate that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous disease, meaning that no one treatment strategy is best, but rather that treatment should be personalised and entail a systematic and rigorous multidisciplinary approach. Many women with DCIS will develop actual invasive carcinoma over time, whereas others-especially those with low-grade cancers-will not. At the moment, identification of patients at low risk of recurrence risk is very difficult (that is, such people for whom further treatment beyond lumpectomy is not needed). In this context, molecular profiling analysis is a promising method to guide management decisions. In this Review, various treatment strategies for DCIS will be reviewed, highlighting the limitations of randomised trials. Furthermore, discussions about the role of sentinel-node biopsy and tamoxifen in disease management; locoregional recurrence; and special clinical scenarios such as recurrent disease, DCIS after thoracic radiotherapy, ductal carcinoma with concurrent lobular carcinoma in situ, and DCIS in elderly people and in men will be presented.

Hormone replacement therapy: pathobiological aspects of hormone-sensitive cancers in women relevant to epidemiological studies on HRT: a mini-review

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has gained widespread and in some areas indiscriminate use. In reference to recent epidemiological studies which showed unexpected and controversial associations of HRT use with malignant tumours, here we review the current understanding of the dynamics of tumour growth. The pathomorphological characteristics and sex hormone sensitivity of cancers of the breast, endometrium, ovary and colon are discussed. The development of cancer from the first malignant tumour cell to clinical diagnosis takes many years. Hormones can influence tumour growth, but it is questionable whether hormones induce malignant tumours de novo. It is much more likely that hormones 'merely' promote the growth of already existing tumour cells. The long developmental process of tumours is in apparent contradiction to results of some epidemiological studies that describe an increased cancer risk, implying primary initiation, in HRT users within observation periods of 1-6 years. The mechanisms of initiation versus promotion of hormone-sensitive cancers, particularly breast cancer, are only partly understood. The conventional methods of epidemiological studies cannot detect potential risk factors without bias if they do not include a pathomorphological component on growth characteristics. The results of previous studies should be interpreted with great caution with regard to tumour biology.

Factors influencing treatment recommendations in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease: a survey of physicians

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore variation in practice patterns and identify factors associated with physicians' treatment decisions for early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

METHODS

We conducted a one-time mail survey of oncologists randomly selected from directories of national oncology societies (n = 207) and Hodgkin's disease experts (n = 147). The survey included questions on (i) physician factors, (ii) preferred treatment choices for six case scenarios of early-stage Hodgkin's disease that varied by patient factors, and (iii) thresholds for changing treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

The response rate was 50%. For non-bulky Hodgkin's disease, 69% of respondents chose combined modality therapy (CMT). On multivariate analysis, physician factors that independently predicted for choice of CMT included a high Hodgkin's disease case load (P = 0.02) and a high percentage of patients enrolled in clinical trials (P = 0.05). Radiation oncologists had a lower threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.02). More experience with second malignancy cases and longer time in practice were associated with a higher threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.04 and P = 0.008, respectively). In stratified analyses, treatment decisions of non-experts were significantly influenced by physician factors, but not by patient factors. Conversely, choices of Hodgkin's disease experts were insensitive to all physician factors, but experts were significantly more likely to select chemotherapy alone in young women and CMT in older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that physician factors including practice type and experience may in part explain variation in practice pattern for Hodgkin's disease therapy. Hodgkin's disease experts are more likely to tailor therapy according to individual patient factors.

Roles of radiation dose, chemotherapy, and hormonal factors in breast cancer following Hodgkin's disease

BACKGROUND

Female survivors of Hodgkin's disease (HD) have a strongly elevated risk of breast cancer, but factors responsible for the increased risk are not well known.

METHODS

We investigated the effects of radiation dose, chemotherapy (CT), and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study in The Netherlands in a cohort of 770 female patients who had been diagnosed with HD before age 41. Detailed treatment information and data on reproductive factors were collected for 48 case patients who developed breast cancer 5 or more years after diagnosis of HD and 175 matched control subjects. The radiation dose was estimated to the area of the breast where the case patient's tumor had developed and to a comparable location in matched control subjects. Relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer were calculated by conditional logistic regression. Statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The risk of breast cancer increased statistically significantly with radiation dose (P(trend) =.01); patients who received 38.5 Gy or more had an RR of 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 16) times that of patients who received less than 4 Gy. Patients who received both CT and radiotherapy (RT) had a statistically significantly lower risk than those treated with RT alone (RR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.91). Breast cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose among patients who received RT only (RR = 12.7, 95% CI = 1.8 to 86, for patients receiving > or =38.5 Gy) but not among patients treated with CT and RT. Sixty-nine percent of control subjects treated with RT and more than six cycles of CT, but only 9% of those who received RT alone, reached menopause before age 41. Reaching menopause before age 36 was associated with a strongly reduced risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer risk increases with increasing radiation dose up to at least 40 Gy. The substantial risk reduction associated with CT may reflect its effect on menopausal age, suggesting that ovarian hormones promote tumorigenesis after radiation has produced an initiating event.

Risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma: Mayo Clinic experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the overall risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women given supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 653 female patients who received supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, between 1950 and 1993 were abstracted, and follow-up questionnaires were mailed. In 4 patients, breast cancer was diagnosed before Hodgkin lymphoma was discovered.

RESULTS

The median age of 649 patients at supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy was 31.8 years (range, 2.6-86.5 years). The median duration of follow-up was 8.7 years (range, < 1-47.9 years). In 30 patients, breast cancer developed (bilaterally in 4 patients) after supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy; the median interval was 19.9 years (range, 0.7-423 years). The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 44.4 years (range, 27.5-70.8 years). The standardized morbidity ratio for breast cancer after supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy was 2.9 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.0-4.2) (P < .001). Breast cancer risk significantly increased 15 to 30 years after patients received supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy, and risk was inversely related to age at supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy until age 30 years. The standardized morbidity ratio for patients younger than 30 years at supradiaphragmatic radiation was 8.5 (95% CI, 53-13.1) vs 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5-2.2) for those aged 30 years or older (P < .001). Splenectomy increased breast cancer risk (P = .01). Breast cancer detection was by self-examination in 15 cancers, by mammography in 13, and by clinical examination in 4; in 2 cancers, the mode of detection was unknown. Modified radical mastectomy was used to treat breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The increased risk of breast cancer in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma given supradiaphragmatic radiation therapy appears to be limited to patients who are younger than 30 years at radiation therapy or to those who have undergone splenectomy.

Breast cancer in women after treatment for Hodgkin's disease

Although substantial progress has been made in the management of Hodgkin's lymphoma during the past 30 years, the development of secondary malignant diseases has emerged as a serious consequence of treatment. In particular, extended follow-up of patients with Hodgkin's disease has revealed an increased risk of breast cancer. We have systematically reviewed all published literature on breast cancer after treatment for Hodgkin's disease and show that high risk is particularly associated with treatment at a young age, mantle radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Breast cancers in this context differ from sporadic disease because they develop in younger women, are associated with a high incidence of bilateral disease, and are generally located near the midline of the body. The risk of breast cancer is lower in patients who receive newer, combined modality treatments for Hodgkin's disease. In this review we discuss a protocol for formal follow-up and screening of patients who have recovered from Hodgkin's disease to aid early diagnosis and ensure the possibility of effective management.

Second malignancy after Hodgkin disease treated with radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy: long-term risks and risk factors

The excess risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin disease is an increasing problem. In light of the long-term data, guidelines for follow-up of survivors of Hodgkin disease need to be redefined. In this study we attempt to analyze the long-term risks and temporal trends, identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors, and determine the prognosis of patients who develop a second malignancy after radiation treatment with or without chemotherapy for Hodgkin disease. Among 1319 patients with clinical stage I-IV Hodgkin disease, 181 second malignancies and 18 third malignancies were observed. With a median follow-up of 12 years, the relative risk (RR) and absolute excess risk of second malignancy were 4.6 and 89.3/10 000 person-years. The RR was significantly higher with combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (6.1) than with radiation therapy alone (4.0, P =.015). The risk increased with increasing radiation field size (P =.03) in patients who received combined modality therapy, and with time after Hodgkin disease. After 15 and 20 years, there was a 2.3% and 4.0% excess risk of second malignancy per person per year. The 5-year survival after development of a second malignancy was 38.1%, with the worst prognosis seen after acute leukemia and lung cancer. The excess risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin disease continues to be increased after 15 to 20 years, and there does not appear to be a plateau. Our analysis suggests that the risk may be reduced with smaller radiation fields, as are used in current trials of abbreviated chemotherapy and limited-field radiation therapy.