Perceptions of patients' self-efficacy for managing pain and lung cancer symptoms: correspondence between patients and family caregivers

Family caregivers and cancer pain management: a review

Due to the critical role of family caregivers in cancer pain management, this systematic review was undertaken to examine what is known about of their experiences and needs. Searches were conducted using electronic databases, and research reports from 1991 to 2007 were analyzed using a matrix method. Family caregivers were actively engaged in assisting with pain management and experienced significant needs and concerns related to this role. Myths and fears about opioid use remain widespread across cultures studied and across care settings. Family caregivers need education about pain management, training in problem-solving skills, and recognition from providers about their role in pain management. When clinicians better understand and respond to the needs of the family caregivers, they can enhance the quality of life and care outcomes for both patients and their caregivers.

Caregiver-assisted coping skills training for lung cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the United States and is associated with high levels of symptoms, including pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, and psychological distress. Caregivers and patients are adversely affected. However, previous studies of coping skills training (CST) interventions have not been tested in patients with lung cancer nor have systematically included caregivers.

OBJECTIVES

This study tested the efficacy of a caregiver-assisted CST protocol in a sample of patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-three lung cancer patients and their caregivers were randomly assigned to receive 14 telephone-based sessions of either caregiver-assisted CST or education/support involving the caregiver. Patients completed measures assessing pain, psychological distress, quality of life (QOL), and self-efficacy for symptom management; caregivers completed measures assessing psychological distress, caregiver strain, and self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms.

RESULTS

Patients in both treatment conditions showed improvements in pain, depression, QOL, and self-efficacy, and caregivers in both conditions showed improvements in anxiety and self-efficacy from baseline to four-month follow-up. Results of exploratory analyses suggested that the CST intervention was more beneficial to patients/caregivers with Stage II and III cancers, whereas the education/support intervention was more beneficial to patients/caregivers with Stage I cancer.

CONCLUSION

Taken together with the broader literature in this area, results from this study suggest that psychosocial interventions can lead to improvements in a range of outcomes for cancer patients. Suggestions for future studies include the use of three-group designs (e.g., comparing two active interventions with a standard-care control) and examining mechanisms of change.

Surgeons and their patients disagree regarding cosmetic and overall outcomes after surgery for high-energy lower extremity trauma

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether surgeons' and patients' perceptions of outcomes after high-energy lower-extremity trauma are similar and to identify factors associated with disagreement.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Eight level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Four hundred sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower extremity injuries and followed for 2 years.

INTERVENTION

Information collected on patients and injuries, functional and clinical outcomes, and surgeons' and patients' assessments of satisfaction with cosmetic and overall recovery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Satisfaction ratings compared with weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

We observed very poor agreement between surgeons' and patients' perceptions of cosmetic and overall outcomes. Surgeons and patients agreed on overall outcomes at a rate only 25% higher than expected by chance (kappa = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.34). The level of disagreement was even higher for cosmetic outcomes as surgeons and patients agreed at a rate only 17% higher than expected by chance (kappa = 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.26). Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with overall recovery if the patient had an Injury Severity Score >17, had a complication, or failed to return to work at 1 year. Patients were less satisfied than surgeons with overall recovery when the patient was dissatisfied with the quality of medical care. Surgeons were less likely than patients to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient sustained a traumatic amputation or experienced a complication. Patients were less likely than surgeons to be satisfied with cosmetic recovery if the patient was female or was dissatisfied with his or her medical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons' perceptions of patients' cosmetic and overall outcomes differed significantly from those of patients. Agreement was significantly worse for certain subgroups of patients. Further study of this discordance might improve our understanding of patient dissatisfaction and allow development of a more patient-centered care process.

Self care and end of life care in advanced cancer: literature review

BACKGROUND

Self care is a key feature of health care policy in the UK. It has been suggested that self care by patients with cancer improves quality of life, symptom management, and patient satisfaction. However, little is known about self care and end of life care.

OBJECTIVES

This review sets out to find out what is known about how people experiencing end of life care manage their illness themselves, in the advanced stages of their disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted; searching key databases; extracting relevant literature, using RefMan, NVIVO; grading, analysing, and appraising the literature.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included in the review. Themes identified were; interventions for end of life care; self care behaviours used by patients; factors that prevent patients to self care.

CONCLUSION

The nurses' role in supporting self care for people with advanced cancer is important. The review identifies various ways nurses can empower patients to self care related to oncology.

Prevalence rates for and predictors of self-reported adherence of oncology outpatients with analgesic medications

OBJECTIVES

Inadequate adherence with an analgesic regimen may be a reason why oncology patients experience unrelieved pain. However, only a limited number of studies have evaluated the prevalence rates for adherence and no studies have attempted to determine predictors of adherence in patients with cancer pain. On the basis of concepts from the Health Belief Model, the purposes of this study were to describe oncology outpatients' level of adherence with an analgesic regimen and to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of selected demographic variables, pain characteristics, barriers to pain management, and self-efficacy (SE) on adherence with an analgesic regimen.

METHODS

A descriptive, cross-sectional study recruited outpatients from oncology clinics in a large, tertiary referral cancer hospital in Norway. A sample of 174 oncology outpatients completed a demographic questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory, 2 self-reported adherence measures, the Barriers Questionnaire, and a SE questionnaire.

RESULTS

Only 41% of the patients were adherent with their analgesic regimen. In the regression analysis, 29.9% of the variance in adherence was explained. Higher adherence scores were associated with male sex, and also lower SE for physical function scores, higher average pain intensity scores, higher pain relief scores, and the use of strong opioid analgesics.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in pain management may occur if clinicians routinely assessed patients' level of adherence with their analgesics regimen.

Predictors of employment and lost hours from work in cancer caregivers

This cross-sectional, descriptive study identified variables associated with caregivers who (1) were employed and (2) reported lost hours from work due to care demands. Family caregivers (N=80) of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor participated in a 45-60 min telephone interview, answering questions regarding the impact of providing care on their emotional health and employment status. Younger caregivers were more likely to be employed. Caregivers were more likely to report lost hours from work when care recipients required assistance with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) and were closer to the time of diagnosis. Data suggest that interventions to assist caregivers in maintaining employment should target caregivers of persons with limitations in physical function and should include strategies to coordinate care to assist with IADLs.

The quality of life and self-efficacy of Turkish breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

Self-efficacy has a positive effect on health behaviors, symptom control, compliance with cancer treatment, and quality of life. This study aims to describe the quality of life and self-efficacy of Turkish breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The sample consisted of 141 patients. Data was gathered using a Patient Information Form, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B), a scale about Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. All quality of life dimensions were negatively affected at a significant level. Following commencement of chemotherapy, there was an increase in the negative effect on physical well-being, emotional well-being and additional concerns subscales and total FACT-B and their self-efficacy was negatively affected to a moderate degree. However, a significant degree of change did not occur in the self-efficacy. During treatment the physical symptoms and psychological distress increased and the activity level was negatively affected. The quality of life and self-efficacy were influenced by personal and medical characteristics, showing consistency with similar studies. Because there are negative effects of cancer and chemotherapy on patients' quality of life and self-efficacy, nurses need to focus on designing psychosocial interventions to improve their self-efficacy and quality of life.

Demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics are associated with average pain severity groups in a sample of oncology outpatients

Cut-points (CP) for pain severity are useful because they may help clinicians to identify patients with clinically significant pain. However, a need exists to evaluate whether different pain severity groups differ on selected demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics, as well as on factors that may be amenable to psychoeducational interventions such as self-efficacy for pain management, coping strategies, and barriers to pain management. In this cross-sectional study of 210 oncology outpatients with pain, an optimal CP of 4 was found using ratings of average pain intensity. The variables that provided a unique contribution to the prediction of membership in the >4 CP group were gender, presence of breakthrough pain, comorbidities, barriers to pain management, and total self-efficacy for pain management. In addition, patients in the >4 CP group reported lower scores on physical, role, cognitive, and global health function.

PERSPECTIVE

An average pain CP of >4 could be used to screen oncology outpatients with clinically significant pain. Clinicians must consider a number of demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics as part of their pain assessment procedures. The effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions aimed at barriers and patients self-efficacy for pain management need to be tested.

Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries

BACKGROUND

In health care, increased emphasis has been placed on patient-centered care, but to our knowledge little work has been conducted to understand the influences on patient satisfaction after surgery for the treatment of severe lower-extremity injury. Our purpose was to analyze how the patient's satisfaction with the outcome correlates with other measures of outcome (clinical, functional, physical impairment, psychological impairment, and pain) and with the sociodemographic characteristics of the patient, the nature of the injury, and the treatment decisions.

METHODS

Four hundred and sixty-three patients treated for limb-threatening lower-extremity injuries at eight level-I trauma centers were followed prospectively. Multivariate regression techniques were used to identify factors correlating with variation in patient self-reported satisfaction at two years after the injury. The outcomes that were tested in the model were pain, range of motion, muscle strength, self-selected walking speed, depression, anxiety, the physical and psychosocial scores of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), return to work, and the number of major complications. The patient characteristics that were tested in the model were age, sex, education, poverty status, insurance status, occupation, race, personality profile, and medical comorbidities. Injury severity was tested in the model with use of both the Injury Severity Score and a score reflecting the probability of amputation. The treatment decisions that were tested were amputation versus reconstruction and time to treatment.

RESULTS

No patient demographic, treatment, or injury characteristics were found to correlate with patient satisfaction. Only measures of physical function, psychological distress, clinical recovery, and return to work correlated with patient satisfaction at two years. Five of these outcome measures accounted for >35% of the overall variation in patient satisfaction; these were return to work (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.05), the physical functioning component of the SIP (p < 0.01), self-selected walking speed (p < 0.001), and pain intensity (p < 0.001). The absence of major complications and less anxiety were marginally significant (p < 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of lower-extremity injury is predicted more by function, pain, and the presence of depression at two years than by any underlying characteristic of the patient, injury, or treatment.

Family influences on heart failure self-care and outcomes

Many patient education guidelines for teaching heart failure patients recommend inclusion of the family; however, family-focused interventions to promote self-care in heart failure are few. This article reviews the state of the science regarding family influences on heart failure self-care and outcomes. The literature and current studies suggest that family functioning, family support, problem solving, communication, self-efficacy, and caregiver burden are important areas to target for future research. In addition, heart failure patients without family and those who live alone and are socially isolated are highly vulnerable for poor self-care and should receive focused attention. Specific research questions based on existing science and gaps that need to be filled to support clinical practice are posed.

Opioid-taking self-efficacy amongst Taiwanese outpatients with cancer

GOALS

The purpose of this study was to describe the level of opioid-taking self-efficacy amongst Taiwanese outpatients with cancer pain, and to examine the associations between various demographic and medical characteristics and opioid-taking self-efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Ninety-two outpatients who had taken prescribed opioid analgesics for cancer related pain in the past 1 week completed the Opioid-Taking Self-Efficacy Scale-CA (OTSES-CA). Details of the medical characteristics were obtained from the patients' medical record.

MAIN RESULTS

Results show patients in this study were moderately confident of being able to perform many of the key tasks associated with effective opioid-taking. However, for many key behaviours relating to tailoring medication regimens, acquiring help and managing treatment-related concerns, only around one third to slightly more than two fifths reported high confidence. Individuals with lower levels of education and who were experiencing more side effects from opioids reported lower confidence in taking their analgesics.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest it is important to understand how patients perceive their ability to perform key tasks associated with effective opioid-taking, to effectively tailor educational and supportive interventions. Patients with lower levels of education and with side effects of opioids may be at risk of lower self-efficacy, requiring particular attention.

Self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function in patients with lung cancer and their informal caregivers: associations with symptoms and distress

This study examined self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function in patients with lung cancer and their caregivers, and associations between self-efficacy and patient and caregiver adjustment. One hundred and fifty-two patients with early stage lung cancer completed measures of self-efficacy, pain, fatigue, quality of life, depression, and anxiety. Their caregivers completed a measure assessing their self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms and measures of psychological distress and caregiver strain. Analyses indicated that, overall, patients and caregivers were relatively low in self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function, and that there were significant associations between self-efficacy and adjustment. Patients low in self-efficacy reported significantly higher levels of pain, fatigue, lung cancer symptoms, depression, and anxiety, and significantly worse physical and functional well being, as did patients whose caregivers were low in self-efficacy. When patients and caregivers both had low self-efficacy, patients reported higher levels of anxiety and poorer quality of life than when both were high in self-efficacy. There were also significant associations between patient and caregiver self-efficacy and caregiver adjustment, with lower levels of self-efficacy associated with higher levels of caregiver strain and psychological distress. These preliminary findings raise the possibility that patient and caregiver self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function may be important factors affecting adjustment, and that interventions targeted at increasing self-efficacy may be useful in this population.

Partner-delivered reflexology: effects on cancer pain and anxiety

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of partner-delivered foot reflexology and usual care plus attention on patients' perceived pain and anxiety.

DESIGN

The experimental pretest/post-test design included patient-partner dyads randomly assigned to an experimental or control group.

SETTING

Four hospitals in the southeastern United States.

SAMPLE

42 experimental and 44 control subjects comprised 86 dyads of patients with metastatic cancer and their partners, representing 16 different types of cancer; 23% of patients had lung cancer, followed by breast, colorectal, and head and neck cancer and lymphoma. The subjects had a mean age of 58.3 years, 51% were female, 66% had a high school education or less, and 58% were Caucasian, 40% were African American, and 1% were Filipino.

METHODS

The intervention included a 15- to 30-minute teaching session on foot reflexology to the partner by a certified reflexologist, an optional 15- to 30-minute foot reflexology session for the partner, and a 30-minute, partner-delivered foot reflexology intervention for the patient. The control group received a 30-minute reading session from their partners.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Pain and anxiety.

FINDINGS

Following the initial partner-delivered foot reflexology, patients experienced a significant decrease in pain intensity and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

A nurse reflexologist taught partners how to perform reflexology on patients with metastatic cancer pain in the hospital, resulting in an immediate decrease in pain intensity and anxiety; minimal changes were seen in the control group, who received usual care plus attention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Hospitals could have qualified professionals offer reflexology as a complementary therapy and teach interested partners the modality.

Knowledge of and Barriers to Pain Management in Caregivers of Cancer Patients Receiving Homecare

Cancer treatment is increasingly being provided in outpatient settings, requiring many of the responsibilities for patient care to be undertaken by family caregivers. Pain is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms experienced by cancer patients and is a primary concern for the family caregiver. Caregivers struggle with many issues that lead to inadequate management of cancer pain. The purpose of this study was to determine pain management knowledge and examine concerns about reporting pain and using analgesics in a sample of primary family caregivers of cancer patients receiving homecare. The Barriers Questionnaire and the Family Pain Questionnaire were administered to 46 primary caregivers. Between 46% and 94% of the caregivers reported having at least some agreement with the various concerns that are barriers to reporting pain and using analgesics, and up to 15% reported having strong agreement. The areas of greatest concern were about opioid-related side effects, fears of addiction, and the belief that pain meant disease progression. Results showed that caregivers with higher pain management knowledge had significantly fewer barriers to cancer pain management, supporting the importance of increasing caregiver's knowledge of management of cancer pain.

Who's caring for whom? Differing perspectives between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers

Although clinicians and researchers often rely on family members 'reports of a wide range of dying patients' symptoms and care preferences, available data indicate divergences between the two. We used a national sample to analyze patient-caregiver pairs to explore areas of concordance and nonconcordance about physical symptoms, communication with physicians, caregiving needs, and future fears. We also assessed whether identifiable patient or caregiver characteristics were associated with nonconcordance. Our data were from a national, random sample of 988 terminally ill patients, of whom 893 had caregivers who were also interviewed. Frequencies and types of nonconcordance were computed for patient-caregiver pairs. Bivariate associations between patient and caregiver reports on each item were tested. Logistic and conditional logistic regression analyses assessed multiple predictors of nonconcordance for each item. Primary diagnoses included cancer (51.1 percent), heart disease (17. 7 percent), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10. 7 percent), and other diseases (20.5 percent). The proportion of concordant reports among pairs of patients and caregivers ranged from 53 percent to 66 percent. Among pairs showing nonconcordant responses, caregivers reported higher levels of pain and disability than patients, lower caregiving needs, and different fears about the future. Few demographic or clinical predictors were associated with nonconcordance. Concordance between patients 'and their caregivers' responses ranged widely, and there were important areas of nonconcordant responses. When responses differed, patients were more likely to express concern about domains that might impose on caregivers, while caregivers were more likely to express concern about patients 'physical suffering. Consistent sociodemographic or clinical predictors of nonconcordant responses were not found. These data suggest important ways that patient and caregiver reports of the same experience vary.

Predictors of distress in caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor

The purpose of this cross-sectional, descriptive study was to identify predictors of distress for family caregivers of persons with a primary malignant brain tumor (PMBT). The effect of the care recipient's functional, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric status on caregiver burden and depressive symptoms was examined through telephone interviews with 95 caregivers. Care recipients' neuropsychiatric status consistently affected caregivers' depressive symptoms and burden, and assisting with activities of daily living affected burden related to caregivers' schedules and health. The care recipient's cognitive status and need for assistance with instrumental activities of daily living did not affect any outcome variable. Results may help identify caregivers at risk for negative outcomes, and suggest interventions to improve caregivers' emotional health.

Measuring discord in treatment decision-making; progress toward development of a cancer communication and decision-making assessment tool

Families, as a unit, play an important role in the process of making decisions about care for and with adult cancer patients. Families often step in as the patient's advocate and primary decision-maker as the patient's condition deteriorates. How well caregivers fulfill that role may depend on the level of congruence between the family members and the patient. Disagreements may jeopardize processes of decision-making and treatment choice. To facilitate the clinical assessment process and to provide a tool for research, we are designing an instrument that can validly and reliably assess the level of family discord concerning the treatment of late stage cancer as they consider participation in clinical trials, palliative care and salvage treatment such as chemotherapy designed to decrease tumor burden without hope of cure. Development of the instrument is a four step process to develop and test the instrument: (1) formative interviewing with lung cancer patients and their family caregivers to identify and develop a comprehensive list of domains and items; (2) refinement of the items' wording with a sample of 43 patients and 67 family caregivers; (3) testing the reduced item pool to determine statistical and content validity and reliability with an initial of sample of 42 patients and their primary caregivers; (4) examination of the 30-item scale's properties with 160 lung cancer patients and their primary caregivers.

Psychosocial impact of parental cancer in adulthood: A conceptual and empirical review

This article reviews recent literature on the psychosocial aspects of parental cancer in adulthood. Overall, studies have shown that a sizable minority of adult children of cancer patients experience psychological distress in terms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Most research to date has focused on the first-degree female relatives of breast cancer patients, many of whom are daughters. Although distress reactions in this population are well documented, restrictive assumptions reflecting a vulnerability/deficit model of women limit scientific progress. In addition, the critical role of grown offspring caregivers of cancer patients deserves further investigation. Future research should examine the relations between intrapsychic and contextual factors that may influence psychological adjustment to parental cancer.

Management of common symptoms of advanced lung cancer

Disease-directed treatment of lung cancer reduces the morbidity and extends life for patients. However, as providers we must recognize that treating the symptoms of the disease may be as important as the treatment of the disease itself. This is particularly true in advanced disease and after disease-directed therapies have been exhausted. Aggressive assessment of symptoms and use of palliative therapies can significantly reduce the symptomatology of advanced lung cancer. Though the impact of these symptoms (ie, pain, dyspnea, and cachexia) are well known, they tend to be under-treated. In addition, simple maneuvers such as opiate rotation for pain relief are underutilized. The diagnosis of lung cancer and its associated symptoms may result in severe psychosocial stress for the patient and further exacerbate the symptoms in a vicious cycle. Understanding of coping strategies may aid the medical provider in assisting the patient during his or her illness.

Prostate cancer in African Americans: relationship of patient and partner self-efficacy to quality of life

This study examined the relationship between patient and partner ratings of self-efficacy for symptom control and quality of life (QOL) among 40 African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. Data analyses revealed that cancer survivors who had rated their self-efficacy for symptom control higher reported better QOL related to urinary, bowel, and hormonal symptoms and better general health QOL (i.e., better physical functioning and better mental health). Data analyses also revealed that partners who rated their self-efficacy for helping the patient manage symptoms as higher reported better QOL (i.e., less negative mood and less caregiver strain). Finally, exploratory analyses indicated that higher self-efficacy in patients was associated with less anxiety and caregiver strain in partners, and higher self-efficacy in partners was associated with better adjustment to bowel and hormonal symptoms and better mental health in patients. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed and future directions for research on self-efficacy in African American prostate cancer survivors are identified.

Psychometric update of the Functional Interference Estimate: a brief measure of pain functional interference

The Functional Interference Estimate (FIE) is a brief, 5-item self-report measure that assesses the degree to which pain interferes with daily functioning. While the FIE has demonstrated reliability and validity with a small normative sample, not much is known about its reliability and validity with a broad sample of individuals with pain. The current study presents FIE score means, variability estimates, reliability and validity data based on a large sample (n = 1,337) of primary care patients who report problematic pain. The FIE has excellent internal consistency and appears to have strong convergent validity with other well-established measures of function (e.g., SF-36 and Dartmouth COOP Charts). Because of its brevity and flexibility, the FIE may be a useful self-report measure of pain functional interference in clinical research on pain.

Psychological aspects of persistent pain: current state of the science

This article provides an overview of current research on psychological aspects of persistent pain. It is divided into 3 sections. In section 1, recent studies are reviewed that provide evidence that psychological factors are related to adjustment to persistent pain. This section addresses research on factors associated with increased pain and poorer adjustment to pain (ie, pain catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety and fear of pain, and helplessness) and factors associated with decreased pain and improved adjustment to pain (ie, self-efficacy, pain coping strategies, readiness to change, and acceptance). In section 2, we review recent research on behavioral and psychosocial interventions for patients with persistent pain. Topics addressed include early intervention, tailoring treatment, telephone/Internet-based treatment, caregiver-assisted treatment, and exposure-based protocols. In section 3, we conclude with a general discussion that highlights steps needed to advance this area of research including developing more comprehensive and integrative conceptual models, increasing attention to the social context of pain, examining the link of psychological factors to pain-related brain activation patterns, and investigating the mechanisms underlying the efficacy of psychological treatments for pain.

PERSPECTIVE

This is one of several invited commentaries to appear in The Journal of Pain in recognition of The Decade of Pain Research. This article provides an overview of current research on psychological aspects of persistent pain, and highlights steps needed to advance this area of research.

The role of the family in treatment decision making by patients with cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To examine family disagreements about treatment decisions for patients with advanced lung cancer.

RESEARCH APPROACH

Descriptive, qualitative study.

SETTING

A large comprehensive cancer center in Cleveland, OH.

PARTICIPANTS

37 patients with stage III or IV lung cancer and 40 caregivers (24 primary and 16 secondary) from 26 families were interviewed.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH

Open-ended audiotaped interviews were transcribed verbatim. NUD*IST (non-numerical unstructured data indexing, searching, and theorizing) computer software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia) was used to perform content analysis.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Vast differences in opinions between patients and family caregivers about treatment decisions and care.

FINDINGS

Sixty-five percent of families reported various family disagreements that mainly concerned routine treatment decisions, discontinuation of therapeutic treatment, and use of hospice care.

CONCLUSIONS

Family disagreements about treatment decisions for patients with advanced lung cancer are common and include a wide range of issues. Family members play an important role in the selection of patients' doctors, hospitals, treatment options, and provisions of care.

INTERPRETATION

The findings suggest that nurses need to be aware of differences of opinion between patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Knowledge of family disagreements about treatment decisions can help nurses' efforts to integrate families into decision-making processes in clinical settings to facilitate family communications and improve patients' and caregivers' satisfaction with treatment decisions.