Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone.

RESULTS

EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

Potency preservation after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results

We sought to assess potency preservation after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT, or transperineal prostate implantation. Patients with more advanced disease are commonly treated with hormonal therapy, which can cause impotence, and were consequently excluded from the analysis. Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California, Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10.0 ng/ml or less, a Gleason score of 6 or less, and a 1997 AJCC clinical stage T1bN0M0 to T2bN0M0. One patient was not evaluable. None of the 51 evaluable patients had diabetes mellitus. In 40 patients, the prostate gland only was irradiated to a total dose of 66 to 79.2 Gy by using daily 1.8-Gy fractions. In 11 patients, the prostate and seminal vesicles were treated to 44 to 55.8 Gy. Lymph nodes were not included in the clinical target volume. The median age was 68 years, and the median length of follow-up was 15 months. Potency in this study is defined as an erection sufficient for vaginal penetration. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to describe potency as a function of time after 3D-CRT. Of the 51 evaluable patients, 35 (69%) were potent, 15 were impotent, and 1 was sexually inactive before 3D-CRT. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the potency preservation rates 1, 2, and 3 years after 3D-CRT are 100%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, total radiation dose, and a history of transurethral resection of the prostate did not significantly affect potency preservation rates. Three (43%) of 7 patients who became impotent after 3D-CRT and used sildenafil were subsequently able to achieve erections sufficient for vaginal penetration. The preliminary results reported herein suggest that approximately two thirds of prostate cancer patients will retain their potency 3 years after 3D-CRT. Further follow-up is necessary to assess long-term potency after 3D-CRT. Sildenafil should be considered in patients who develop radiation-induced impotence.

Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by static segmented beams allows the dose to the main portion of the prostate target to escalate while keeping the maximal dose at the anterior rectal wall at 72 Gy. The value of such IMRT plans was analyzed by comparison with non-IMRT plans using the same beam incidences.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a planning study on the CT data of 32 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Three fields in the transverse plane with gantry angles of 0 degrees, 116 degrees, and 244 degrees were isocentered at the center of gravity of the target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles). The geometry of the beams was determined by beam's eye view autocontouring of the target volume with a margin of 1.5 cm. In study 1, the beam weights were determined by a human planner (3D-man) or by computer optimization using a biological objective function with (3D-optim-lim) or without (3D-optim-unlim) a physical term to limit target dose inhomogeneity. In study 2, the 3 beam incidences mentioned above were used and in-field uniform segments were added to allow IMRT. Plans with (IMRT-lim) or without (IMRT-unlim) constraints on target dose inhomogeneity were compared. In the IMRT-lim plan, target dose inhomogeneity was constrained between 15% and 20%. After optimization, plans in both studies were normalized to a maximal rectal dose of 72 Gy. Biological (tumor control probability [TCP], normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]) and physical indices for tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities were computed, as well as the probability of the uncomplicated local control (P+).

RESULTS

The IMRT-lim plan was superior to all other plans concerning TCP (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan had the worst TCP. Within the 3D plans, the 3D-optim-unlim had the best TCP, which was significantly different from the 3D-optim-lim plan (p = 0.0003). For rectal NTCP, both IMRT plans were superior to all other plans (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan was significantly better than the IMRT-lim plan (p < 0.0001). Again, 3D-optim-unlim was superior to the other 3D plans (p < 0. 0007). Physical endpoints for target showed the mean minimal target dose to be the lowest in the IMRT-unlim plan, caused by a large target dose inhomogeneity (TDI). Medial target dose, 90th percentile, and maximal target dose were significantly higher in both IMRT plans. Physical endpoints for the rectum showed the IMRT-unlim plan to be superior compared to all other plans. There was a strong correlation between the 65th percentile (Rp65) and rectal NTCP (correlation coefficient > or =89%). For bladder, maximal bladder dose was significantly higher in the IMRT-unlim plan compared to all other plans (p < or = 0.0001).P+ was significantly higher in both IMRT-plans than in all other plans. The 3D-optim-unlim plan was significantly better than the two other 3D plans (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

IMRT significantly increases the ratio of TCP over NTCP of the rectum in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, constraints for TDI are needed, because a high degree of TDI reduced minimal target dose. IMRT improved uncomplicated local control probability. In our department, IMRT by static segmented beams is planned and delivered in a cost-effective way. IMRT-lim has replaced non-modulated conformal radiotherapy as the standard treatment for prostate cancer.

Three-dimensional conformal therapy or standard irradiation in localized carcinoma of prostate: preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison

PURPOSE

We present preliminary results of a nonrandomized comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) and standard radiation therapy (SRT) in localized carcinoma of the prostate in two groups of patients with comparable prognostic factors treated during the same period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1992 and December 1997, 146 patients were treated with 3D CRT and 131 with SRT alone for clinical stage T1c or T2 histologically confirmed carcinoma of the prostate. None of these patients received hormonal therapy. Mean follow-up for all patients is 3 years (range, 1-6 years). For 3D CRT, 7 intersecting fields were used (Cerrobend blocking or multileaf collimation) to deliver 68-73.8 Gy to the prostate; 3D dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the planning target volume, bladder, and rectum were obtained. SRT consisted of bilateral 120 degrees rotational arcs, with portals with 2-cm margins around the prostate to deliver 68-70 Gy to the prostate. The criterion for chemical disease-free survival was a postirradiation prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (Tandem-R, Hybritech) value following the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology guidelines. Symptoms during treatment were quantitated weekly, and late effects were assessed every 4-6 months.

RESULTS

DVHs showed a two-thirds reduction in normal bladder or rectum receiving 70 Gy or more with 3D CRT. Higher 5-year chemical disease-free survival was observed with 3D CRT (91% for T1c and 96% for T2 tumors) compared with SRT (53% and 58%, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in chemical disease-free survival in patients with Gleason score of 4 or less (p = 0.83), but with Gleason score of 5-7, the 5-year survival rates were 96% with 3D CRT and 53% with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In 111 patients with pretreatment PSA of 10 ng/mL or less, treated with 3D CRT, the chemical disease-free rate was 96% vs. 65% in 94 patients treated with SRT (p < or = 0.01). In patients with PSA of 10. 1-20 ng/mL, the chemical disease-free survival rate for 26 patients treated with 3D CRT was 88% compared with 40% for 20 patients treated with SRT (p = 0.05). The corresponding values were 71% and 26%, respectively, for patients with PSA levels of greater than 20 ng/mL (p = 0.30). On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for chemical failure were pretreatment PSA (p = 0. 023), nadir PSA (p = 0.001), and 3D CRT technique (p = 0.033). Moderate dysuria and difficulty in urinating were reported by 2-5% of patients treated with 3D CRT in contrast to 6-9% of patients treated with SRT; moderate urinary frequency and nocturia were reported by 18-24% treated with 3D CRT and 18-27% of patients in the SRT group. The incidence of moderate loose stools/diarrhea, usually after the 4th week of treatment, was 3-5% in the 3D CRT patients and 8-19% in the SRT group. Late intestinal morbidity (proctitis, rectal bleeding) was very low (1.7%) in the 3D CRT group in contrast to the SRT patients (8%).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional CRT spares more normal tissues, yields higher chemical disease-free survival, and results in less treatment morbidity than SRT in treatment of Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a dose response exists for biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/mL and to identify the patient subgroups affected.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 5/89 and 10/97, 488 T1-T3 NX-0 M0 prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/mL were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) alone. Median and mean pretreatment PSA values were 6.3 and 6.2, respectively. Gleason scores of 2-6 and 7-10 were noted in 386 and 102 men, respectively. AJCC 1992 palpation T1-T2AB tumors were noted in 415 patients. Perineural invasion (PNI) was noted in 60 men. Mean and median age was 67 and 68 years, respectively. Dose to the center of the prostate ranged from 6260 cGy to 8409 cGy with a mean and median of 7423 cGy and 7278 cGy, respectively. Patients were stratified into three groups according to dose: <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy. Median dose in these three groups was 7067 cGy, 7278 cGy, and 7734 cGy, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to determine differences in bNED control (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [ASTRO] Consensus Guidelines definition of failure) by dose group for the entire cohort, for 310 good prognosis patients (T1-T2A, Gleason score 2-6, absence of PNI), and for 178 poor prognosis patients (T2B-T3 or Gleason score 7-10 or presence of PNI) (1). Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to determine if dose was an independent predictor of bNED control. Median follow-up was 36 months.

RESULTS

A dose response was not demonstrated for the entire group of patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL. Doses of <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy were associated with 5-year bNED control rates of 73%, 86%, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.12). MVA demonstrated prognosis group (p = 0. 038) to be the only independent predictor of bNED control. Good prognosis patients had a 5-year bNED of 85% and no dose response was seen. The subgroup of poor prognosis patients demonstrated a 5-year bNED control rate of 81% and a dose response was seen for those receiving > or =7600 cGy, compared to the two lower dose groups (94% vs. 75% vs. 70%; p = 0.0062). MVA for the poor prognosis subset demonstrated dose (p = 0.01) to be the only independent predictor for improved bNED control.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor prognosis subset of PSA < or =10 ng/mL prostate cancer patients benefit from dose escalation. A dose response is not demonstrated for prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL and other favorable features.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose-response

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to use the outcome of a dose escalation protocol for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) of prostate cancer to study the dose-response for late rectal toxicity and to identify anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical factors that correlate with late rectal bleeding in multivariate analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven hundred forty-three patients with T1c-T3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT with prescribed doses of 64.8 to 81.0 Gy. The 5-year actuarial rate of late rectal toxicity was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A retrospective dosimetric analysis was performed for patients treated to 70.2 Gy (52 patients) or 75.6 Gy (119 patients) who either exhibited late rectal bleeding (RTOG Grade 2/3) within 30 months after treatment (i.e., 70.2 Gy-13 patients, 75. 6 Gy-36 patients) or were nonbleeding for at least 30 months (i.e., 70.2 Gy-39 patients, 75.6 Gy-83 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to correlate late rectal bleeding with several anatomic, dosimetric, and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A dose response for >/= Grade 2 late rectal toxicity was observed. By multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly correlated with >/= Grade 2 late rectal bleeding for patients prescribed 70.2 Gy: 1) enclosure of the outer rectal contour by the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice (i.e., Iso50) (p < 0.02), and 2) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.05). After 75.6 Gy, the following factors were significant: 1) smaller anatomically defined rectal wall volume (p < 0.01), 2) higher rectal D(max) (p < 0.01), 3) enclosure of rectal contour by Iso50 (p < 0.01), 4) patient age (p = 0.02), and 5) history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04). In addition to these five factors, acute rectal toxicity was also significantly correlated (p = 0.05) with late rectal bleeding when patients from both dose groups were combined in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

A multivariate logistic regression model is presented which describes the probability of developing late rectal bleeding after conformal irradiation of prostate cancer. Late rectal bleeding correlated with factors which may indicate that a greater fractional volume of rectal wall was exposed to high dose, such as smaller rectal wall volume, inclusion of the rectum within the 50% isodose on the isocenter slice, and higher rectal D(max).

Acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level </= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score </= 6, and a 1997 AJCC clinical stage T1bN0-T2bN0. Eleven (21%) patients received radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles; the remaining patients were treated to the prostate only. The 3D-CRT treatment planning guidelines in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406 were followed after 1994 (similar treatment planning was used before the protocol became available). Typically, 4 oblique and 2 lateral fields were treated. All patients were seen at least weekly while under treatment, 1 month postirradiation and then every 3 months. Total radiation doses ranged from 66.0-79.2 Gy, with a median dose of 73.8 Gy in 41 fractions over 8 weeks. Acute toxicity is described according to the RTOG acute toxicity scoring system.

RESULTS

Overall, 3D-CRT was well-tolerated: 29% of patients experienced RTOG Grade 1 and 27% experienced Grade 2 acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Forty percent and 33% of patients experienced Grade 1 and 2 acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, respectively. As expected, more acute morbidity, especially GI, was observed with a larger clinical target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles versus prostate only; p = 0. 05). Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not increase the incidence or severity of radiation-induced side effects. No acute toxicity >/= Grade 3, e.g., hourly nocturia, gross hematuria, diarrhea requiring parenteral support, narcotics for pain control, or catheterization for acute urinary retention, was observed.

CONCLUSION

Although relatively high doses of radiation are delivered to prostate cancers with 3D-CRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT is surprisingly well-tolerated. No patients in the cohort eligible for implant monotherapy experienced acute toxicity >/= Grade 3.

Palladium-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

A report of biochemical outcomes for patients treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy over a fixed time interval.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred thirty patients with clinical stage T1-T2 prostate cancer were treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and followed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical failure on the basis of two consecutive elevations of PSA were utilized. Multivariate risk groups were constructed. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed.

RESULTS

The overall biochemical control rate achieved at 9 years was 83.5%. Failures were local 3.0%; distant 6.1%; PSA progression only 4.3%. Significant risk factors contributing to failure were serum PSA greater than 10 ng/ml and Gleason sum of 7 or greater. Five-year biochemical control for those exhibiting neither risk factor was 94%; one risk factor, 82%; both risk factors, 65%. When all 1354 PSA determinations obtained for this cohort were considered, the patients with a proportion of PSAs < or = 0.5 ng/ml continued to increase until at least 48 months post-therapy. These data conformed to a median PSA half-life of 96.2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate brachytherapy with Pd-103 achieves a high rate of biochemical and clinical control in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. PSA response following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes is protracted.

Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies

PURPOSE

To better define the appropriate dose for individual prostate cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six hundred eighteen patients treated with 3D CRT between 4/89 and 4/97 with a median follow-up of 53 months are the subject of this study. The bNED outcomes were assessed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition. The patients were grouped into three groups by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (<10 ng/ml, 10-19.9 ng/ml, and 20+ ng/ml) and further subgrouped into six subgroups by favorable (T1, 2A and Gleason score < or =6 and no perineural invasion) and unfavorable characteristics (one or more of T2B, T3, Gleason 7-10, perineural invasion). Dose comparisons for bNED studies were made for each of the six subgroups by dividing patients at 76 Gy for all subgroups except the favorable <10 ng/ml subgroup, which was divided at 72.5 Gy. Five-year bNED rates were compared for the median dose of each dose comparison subgroup. Dose response functions were plotted based on 5-year bNED rates for the six patient groupings, with the data from each of the six subgroups divided into three dose groups. The 5-year bNED rate was also estimated using the dose response function and compares 73 Gy with 78 Gy.

RESULTS

Dose comparisons show a significant difference in 5-year bNED rates for three of the six subgroups but not for the favorable <10 ng/ml, the favorable 10-19.9 ng/ml, or the unfavorable > or =20 ng/ml subgroups. The significant differences ranged from 22% to 40% improvement in 5-year bNED with higher dose. Dose response functions show significant differences in 5-year bNED rates comparing 73 Gy and 78 Gy for four of the six subgroups. Again, no difference was observed for the favorable <10 ng/ml group or the unfavorable > or =20 ng/ml group. The significant differences observed in 5-year bNED ranged from 15% to 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose response varies by patient subgroup, and appropriate dose can be estimated for up to six subdivisions of prostate cancer patients. The appropriate use of high dose with 3D CRT results in 5-year cure rates that equal or exceed other treatments. The national practice must be upgraded to allow the safe administration of 75-80 Gy with 3D CRT.

Conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

This review presents the contribution conformal treatment has made to the external beam treatment of prostate cancer drawing on 10 years of experience with three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment in 1500 patients with prostate cancer at our institution. Major contributions from other institutions and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials group are also noted. Patient immobilization, computed tomography (CT) scan identification of the target in three dimensions and beams-eye-view conformal treatment portals are critical to the process. Higher doses of radiation are associated with a marked increase in cure rates as the dose-response curve is extremely steep. The advantage given by the high dose depending on prognostic group ranges from 14% to 35% in 5-year cures. Conformal techniques protect normal tissues so that late complications are rare and in fact fewer than those observed with standard radiation technique at standard radiation doses. Educational efforts are underway in the USA to assist practising radiation oncologists to deliver the required radiation doses of 75-80 Gy safely. Conformal therapy cures more prostate cancers causing fewer complications than standard treatment technique and standard dose. It must therefore be disseminated into the practice of radiation oncology worldwide.

Imaging and radiotherapy of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in men. Over the past 10 to 20 years, advances in screening and diagnostic and management paradigms have led to improved treatment outcomes. This article offers an overview of the evolution of the role and nature of diagnostic imaging techniques in the management of prostate cancer.

Post-treatment PSA < or = 0.2 ng/mL defines disease freedom after radiotherapy for prostate cancer using modern techniques

OBJECTIVES

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) definition of disease freedom after radiotherapy for prostate cancer is still in dispute. This report focuses on the PSA nadir achieved in men treated by modern radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

From 1984 to 1994, 489 consecutive men with clinical Stage T1 -T2 prostate cancer were treated by simultaneous radiation: prostate iodine-125 implant followed by external beam radiation. A transperineal implant was performed on 143 men with Stage T1-T2NX, the focus of this study; 346 men with Stage T1-T2N0 had a retropubic implant. The median pretreatment PSA was 8.3 ng/mL (range 0.3 to 188). A rising PSA was defined as one that rose on three consecutive occasions above whatever nadir was achieved. A minimum 5-year follow-up (range 5 to 15) was reached by 453 men.

RESULTS

After a minimum 5-year follow-up, 336 men had a nonrising PSA, and of this group, 107 had undergone simultaneous radiation by the transperineal implant technique. A PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less was achieved by 97% of the transperineally implanted men, and 3% had a nadir of 0.3 to 1.0 ng/mL. Of the 489 men, those who had a nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less had a 92% nonrising PSA rate (P = 0.001) 10 years after treatment compared with a 41% rate for men who had a nadir of 0.3 to 1.0 ng/mL. All men whose nadir was greater than 1.0 ng/mL had recurrence. The median time to achieve the PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL was 27 months (range 3 to 102).

CONCLUSIONS

Primarily on the basis of the results from men treated with simultaneous radiation using the transperineal technique, the definition of disease freedom for radiotherapy should be men who achieve and maintain a PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less.

The cost effectiveness of 3D conformal radiation therapy compared with conventional techniques for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in improved rates of biochemical (bNED) control in certain subsets of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, in this era of cost consciousness and limited resources, the cost effectiveness of 3DCRT compared with conventional external beam irradiation (CRT) remains unexamined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between October 1, 1987 and November 30, 1991, 193 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received definitive external beam irradiation at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The 1998 Medicare fee schedule was used to determine treatment charges and to provide a reference for a national comparison. Complete charges for pretreatment work-up, treatment, and follow-up were tabulated for each patient. The mean total charges (MTC) using the Lin method of estimating medical costs was used to analyze and compare costs between groups. A matched case/control analysis was performed to further evaluate the effect of cost between techniques. The median follow-up was 72 months (range 3-118).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year actuarial rate of bNED control was 41% and 53%, respectively, for the CRT and 3DCRT patients (p = 0.03). The MTC for the CRT patients was $10,544.53. For the 3DCRT patients, the MTC was $8,955.48. The sample mean of the total costs from the observed deaths for the two patient groups by follow-up interval ranged from $9,800.63 to $59,635.01 for the CRT patients to $17,259.00 to $24,250.38 for the 3DCRT patients. No statistically significant difference in cost was observed between groups using the matched case/control analysis.

CONCLUSION

Initial work-up and treatment costs were greater for patients treated with 3DCRT compared with patients treated with conventional techniques. However, with longer follow-up, the mean total cost of treatment was not statistically different between the two treatment groups. Because of improved rates of bNED control for these patients and the increased costs associated with the treatment of a greater fraction of patients with recurrent disease following CRT, 3DCRT was cost effective for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Association of prostate size with urinary morbidity following mixed conformal neutron and photon irradiation

PURPOSE

This study was designed to characterize the relationship between the observed rate of postradiation genitourinary (GU) complications and the prostate gland size.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred seventy-three patients received conformal neutron and photon irradiation to the prostate seminal vesicles. Data on post-treatment urinary morbidity were collected and examined in relationship to a number of clinical and technical factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-61), the 4-year rate of Grade 2 or higher GU complications was 21%. On univariate analysis, the risk of complications was significantly associated with prostate size and neutron beam arrangement. On multivariate analysis, only the prostate size was significantly associated with the risk of GU morbidity. Patients with a preradiation prostate volume more than 74 cc had a two and a half fold increase in the risk of complications compared to patients with smaller glands.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an enlarged prostate have a significantly higher risk of chronic GU complications. Although these data were obtained for patients receiving combined neutron and photon irradiation, it is likely that these data would also be applicable for those patients receiving photon irradiation as well. These observations may add an additional rationale for the study of preirradiation hormonal treatment.

Is there a role for short-term hormone use in the treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer?

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with prostate cancer with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and short-term adjuvant hormonal therapy to determine biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) and clinical outcome compared with patients treated with 3DCRT alone. Between 4/1/89 and 11/30/94, 558 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received treatment at Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, Pa.); 484 patients were treated with 3DCRT alone (Group I); 74 patients were treated with 3DCRT and hormones (Group II). Five-year actuarial rates of bNED control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated for pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, use of hormones, treatment field size, age, and dose. A matched case/control analysis was performed to further evaluate the effect of hormones on treatment with 3DCRT. Median follow-up was 47 months (range: 2-97 months). The 5-year actuarial rates of bNED control, DMFS, CSS, and OS were 66%, 93%, 98%, and 86%, respectively, for Group I patients and 68%, 93%, 98%, and 89%, respectively, for Group II patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that hormone use was an independent predictor of bNED control only. A significant difference in bNED control was observed between Group I and II (43% vs. 71%) using the matched case/control analysis (P = 0.02). A trend towards significance was observed for different rates of DMFS between Group I and II (79% vs. 94%, P = 0.09). Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with poor prognostic features (pretreatment PSA > or = 10 ng/ml, Gleason score > or = 7, and/or T2c or greater palpation stage) show improved rates of bNED control and a trend towards improved DMFS when treated with 3DCRT and short-term adjuvant hormones compared with 3DCRT alone. Long-term observation will be necessary to see if improvements in bNED control will translate into improvements in overall survival.

Impact of collimator leaf width on stereotactic radiosurgery and 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans

PURPOSE

The authors undertook a study to analyze the impact of collimator leaf width on stereotactic radiosurgery and 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twelve cases involving primary brain tumors, metastases, or arteriovenous malformations that had been planned with BrainLAB's conventional circular collimator-based radiosurgery system were re-planned using a beta-version of BrainLAB's treatment planning software that is compatible with MRC Systems' and BrainLAB's micro-multileaf collimators. These collimators have a minimum leaf width of 1.7 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively, at isocenter. The clinical target volumes ranged from 2.7-26.1 cc and the number of static fields ranged from 3-5. In addition, for 4 prostate cancer cases, 2 separate clinical target volumes were planned using MRC Systems' and BrainLAB's micro-multileaf collimators and Varian's multileaf collimator: the smaller clinical target volume consisted of the prostate gland and the larger clinical target volume consisted of the prostate and seminal vesicles. For the prostate cancer cases, treatment plans were generated using either 6 or 7 static fields. A "PITV ratio," which the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group defines as the volume encompassed by the prescription isodose surface divided by the clinical target volume, was used as a measure of the quality of treatment plans (a PITV ratio of 1.0-2.0 is desirable). Bladder and rectal volumes encompassed by the prescription isodose surface, isodose distributions and dose volume histograms were also analyzed for the prostate cancer patients.

RESULTS

In 75% of the cases treated with radiosurgery, a PITV ratio between 1.0-2.0 could be achieved using a micro-multileaf collimator with a leaf width of 1.7-3.0 mm at isocenter and 3-5 static fields. When the clinical target volume consisted of the prostate gland, the micro-multileaf collimator with a minimum leaf width of 3.0 mm allowed one to decrease the median volume of bladder and rectum within the prescription isodose surface by 26% and 17%, respectively, compared to the multileaf collimator with a leaf width of 10 mm. Use of the 1.7 mm leaf width micro-multileaf collimator allowed one to decrease the median volume of bladder and rectum within the prescription isodose surface by 48% and 39%, respectively, compared to the multileaf collimator with a leaf width of 10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

For most lesions treated with radiosurgery, the use of a micro-multileaf collimator with a leaf width of 1.7-3.0 mm at isocenter and 3-5 static fields allows one to meet the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines for treatment planning. Both planning and treatment are relatively straightforward with a micro-multileaf collimator, allowing for efficient treatment of non-spherical targets with either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. When the clinical target volume consists of the prostate gland, micro-multileaf collimators with a minimum leaf width of 1.7-3.0 mm allow one to spare more bladder and rectum than one can with a multileaf collimator that has a 10-mm leaf width based on an analysis of PITV ratios, isodose distributions, and dose volume histograms.

Three dimensional conformal photon radiotherapy at a moderate dose level of 66 Gy for prostate carcinoma: early results

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic outcome and toxicity of 3-D conformal photon external beam therapy of prostate cancer is well documented in the literature. Progress is still in work for optimization of treatment strategies by risk-adapted dose escalation studies to improve local tumor control without increase of radiation side effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present our experience of 291 patients treated between January 1994 and August 1997 with a 3-D planned four-field box technique and a central dose of 66 Gy. Biochemical response of patients with radiotherapy alone (group 1, n = 72 pts.) has been analyzed in detail. Acute radiation side effects are given for all patients (n = 291), late radiation side effects are given for patients treated between Jan 1994 and Jan 1996 with a median follow-up of 22 months (n = 115 pts.).

RESULTS

We have observed a biochemical response (nadir PSA < 1 after 12 months, < 2 after 6 months) for patients treated with radiotherapy alone without hormone manipulation in 67%. Incidence of late rectal and bladder morbidity (grade 2 and 3) was 9.4% and 4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other reports our results indicate a high rate of local tumor control (early biochemical response) and a low rate of late morbidity. Nevertheless, we will start a risk-adapted dose escalation study up to 74 Gy for unfavorable subgroups (G2-3, Gleason Score > 7, PSA > 10) to improve treatment outcome.

Conformal proton beam therapy of prostate cancer--update on the Loma Linda University medical center experience

BACKGROUND

The ability to eradicate localized prostate cancer is dependent upon the radiation dose which can be delivered to the prostate. This dose is often limited by the tolerance of normal organs (rectum, bladder). Conformal beam therapy takes advantage of the unique depth dose characteristics of heavy charged particles (the Bragg Peak) to escalate the radiation dose delivered to the prostate while minimizing treatment-related toxicity.

METHOD

643 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with protons alone or a combination of protons and photons. All treatment was planned on a 3-D planning system and all received doses between 74-75 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) at 1.8-2.0 CGE/day. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response to treatment.

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates for the entire group are 89 and 79% respectively. A statistically significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival was seen between patients in the "early" (T1b-2b, PSA < 15) and "advanced" (T1b-2b, PSA > 15 or T2c-T4, PSA < 50) subgroups (89% vs. 68% at 4.5 years, p < 0.001). A PSA nadir of less than 0.51 ng/ml predicted for the highest chance of freedom from biochemical recurrence. Minimal radiation proctitis was seen in 21% of patients; toxicity of greater severity was seen in less than 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Conformal proton beams therapy produced high rates of response and minimal toxicity. A phase III dose escalation trial is in progress to help define the optimum radiation dose for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

Follow-up costs after external radiation for low risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Some routine follow-up costs for external radiation for prostate cancer might not be justifiable. To study this possibility, we reviewed the follow-up costs and clinical course of 36 consecutive, unselected patients treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) for low-risk prostate cancer at the University of Washington.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with Stage T1/T2 prostate cancer and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml were treated with EBRT with curative intent at the University of Washington from 1990 through 1996. All follow-up visits with each patient's urologist and radiation oncologist, and all laboratory tests were tabulated. Charges quoted in this report are based on University of Washington billing.

RESULTS

A total of 8 patients demonstrated biochemical evidence of tumor progression/persistence, none of whom has had any therapeutic intervention for progressive cancer. No patient had local disease progression by physical examination. One patient experienced a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 bowel complication (obstruction), not detected on routine follow-up. The average combined PSA and physician follow-up charges for the first 2 years after therapy was $1,013.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here suggests that for low-risk prostate cancer (PSA < 10 ng/ml), frequent follow-up by physical examinations and PSAs during the first 2 years after therapy is not warranted.

The role of androgen deprivation in the definitive management of clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Multiple studies exploring the use of androgen deprivation given in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer have reported significant improvements in the rates of local, regional, and biochemical control (BC). The impact of this therapeutic strategy on overall and cancer specific survival (CSS) has not been established, however. We performed a MEDLINE search of all available studies on this topic to determine if any conclusions could be reached on the efficacy of this treatment approach and the patients most suitable for its application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in the English language on the use of androgen deprivation in combination with RT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The medical subject headings (MeSH) used to search the MEDLINE database included: a) prostatic neoplasms; b) prostatic neoplasms/radiotherapy; c) prostatic neoplasms/androgen deprivation; d) hormone therapy; e) English; and f) 1980 to 1998.

RESULTS

A total of 14 retrospective studies were identified that compared some form of androgen deprivation given in combination with RT. Most studies showed significant improvements in various measures of local/regional control and disease-free survival (DFS). Three of four studies that analyzed BC rates showed significant improvements in this endpoint but conflicting results were obtained for overall survival (OS). No study showed an improvement in CSS. Six prospective randomized trials were identified that directly compared RT with or without androgen deprivation. Again, all six studies showed improvements in some measure of local/regional control or DFS but only two studies showed an improvement in OS. One study reported a statistically significant improvement in CSS and another study showed an improvement in the rate of negative biopsies with combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

When all available literature on androgen withdrawal given in combination with RT for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer was reviewed, no definite conclusions could be reached on the impact of this treatment approach on OS and CSS. However, local/regional control, DFS, and BC were almost uniformly improved with the use of androgen withdrawal suggesting that these impressive early results may translate into improved cure rates. Data from recently initiated and completed randomized trials will be needed, however, to define the impact of this approach on cancer specific mortality and the patients most suitable for it's use.

Prostate-specific antigen to predict outcome of external beam radiation for prostate cancer: Walter Reed Army Medical Center experience, 1988-1995

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of pretreatment and post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, clinical tumor stage, tumor grade, Gleason sum, race, age, and radiation dose to predict the recurrence of prostate cancer following external beam radiation therapy (XRT) since the introduction of PSA as a tumor marker at one tertiary care center.

METHODS

The recurrence of prostate cancer among 371 evaluable patients of 389 patients treated with XRT at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methodology and Cox multivariable regression models. Serologic (PSA) recurrence was determined using three consecutive rises in PSA after a nadir value. Clinical recurrence was defined as local recurrence (palpable or positive biopsy) and/or distant (radiographically evident) recurrence. Mean and median follow-up is 40.2 and 39.4 months, respectively (range 3.0 to 89.5), and minimum follow-up is 18 months for patients who were alive at the time of analysis. No patient received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Potential prognostic factors evaluated are pretreatment PSA, PSA nadir, age, race, clinical tumor stage, tumor grade, Gleason sum, and radiation dose.

RESULTS

Of the 371 evaluable patients, 125 had disease recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for significant pretreatment variables in univariate analyses are as follows: pretreatment PSA less than 4 (79%), 4.1 to 10 (67%), 10.1 to 20 (57%), 20.1 to 50 (27%), and more than 50 (0%); for clinical tumor Stage T1a-T1c (84%), T2a-T2c (51 %), and T3-T4 (29%); for tumor grade well (58%), moderate (58%), and poor (30%). Four-year DFS rates for Gleason sum are 2 to 4 (82%), 5 (72%), 6 (56%), and 7 to 10 (48%). In multivariable Cox regression analysis with backward elimination of nonsignificant variables, age, race, tumor grade, and radiation dose were eliminated, leaving pretreatment PSA, clinical tumor stage, and Gleason sum as significant prognostic factors. Analysis of a Cox model that included nadir PSA as a time-dependent variable showed it to be the strongest prognostic factor variable in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

XRT remains a suitable treatment modality for patients with pretreatment PSA less than 20.0, clinical tumor Stages T1-T2, and Gleason sum 2 to 6 prostate cancer. Patients achieving a nadir value less than 0.5 have more durable treatment outcomes.

Update on the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam irradiation

BACKGROUND

We review the recent changes in the radiotherapeutic management of clinically localized prostate cancer, including the implementation of three-dimensional (3-D) conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), biochemical disease-free survival (bNED control) using conventional and 3DCRT techniques, and the morbidity of these treatment strategies.

METHODS

The components of 3DCRT are discussed, including patient immobilization, 3-D treatment planning, multileaf collimation, and electronic portal imaging. bNED control rates from institutions using conventional and 3DCRT techniques are compared. The gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity from prospective trials using conventional doses of radiation are compared to data from 3DCRT series. bNED control rates stratified by pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) are compared between surgical and radiation series.

RESULTS

bNED control rates (3-5 years) for patients treated with conventional and 3DCRT techniques ranged from 44-70% and 30-72% with pretreatment PSA levels 4-10 and 10-20, respectively. Although direct comparisons are difficult between treatment modalities, no difference in bNED control stratified by pretreatment PSA was observed between surgical and radiation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with 3DCRT demonstrate durable bNED control at 5 years. Conformal radiation techniques, multileaf collimation, electronic portal imaging, and patient immobilization have reduced acute and chronic GI and GU morbidity while allowing safe dose escalation in an effort to further improve local control and overall survival.

[Probability of seminal vesicle involvement in localized prostatic carcinoma. Significance in conformal radiotherapy]

PURPOSE

The development of objective criteria for selecting patients for seminal vesicle irradiation on radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer will be important for successful planning of 3D conformal radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on morphometric studies from radical prostatectomy specimens, new imaging modalities with potential in the investigation of patients with gross seminal vesicle involvement and clinical factors with potential in the identification of patients with subclinical disease the development of objective guidelines is possible.

RESULTS

Clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, diagnostic tumor biopsy (Gleason Score), and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value were significant factors for the probability of involvement of seminal vesicles. Studies show that seminal vesicle involvement is unlikely if the PSA is < 4 ng/ml or 4 to 10 ng/ml and Gleason Score < 7 and stage < or = T2b. In contrast, involvement of seminal vesicles is highly likely with levels above 20 ng/ml. In patients with PSA levels between 10 and 20 ng/ml and Gleason Score < 7 ultrasonographic findings with regard to tumor volume and localization will be useful to determine the extent of the target volume. For treatment planning a significant reduction in the volumes of irradiation to the rectum and bladder is evident when seminal vesicles were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Prospective use of the objective criteria will be useful in the selection of patients for seminal vesicle involvement and should be an integral part in 3D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Fast neutrons in prostatic adenocarcinomas: worldwide clinical experience

Primary tumor control remains a major problem in the treatment of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Clinical local failure rates approach 30-40% and may be significantly higher when results of prostatic biopsy or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are considered. The low growth rate and cycling fraction of prostate adenocarcinoma suggest potential therapeutic advantage for the high linear energy transfer (LET) of neutrons. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) performed a multi-institutional randomized trial (RTOG 77-04) comparing mixed beam (neutron plus photon) irradiation to conventional photon irradiation for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. A subsequent trial by the Neutron Therapy Collaborative Working Group (NTCWG 85-23) compared pure neutron irradiation to standard photon irradiation. Both randomized trials demonstrate significant improvement in locoregional control with neutron irradiation compared to conventional photon irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. To date, only the mixed beam trial has shown a significant survival benefit. Future analysis of the larger NTCWG trial at the 10-year point should confirm whether or not improved locoregional control translates into a survival advantage. These findings have significant implications for all local treatment strategies including dose-escalated conformal photon irradiation, prostate implantation, and neutron radiation. Given the large numbers of patients afflicted with this disease, a positive survival advantage for neutrons or mixed beam therapy would provide a strong incentive for the development of economically feasible clinical neutron facilities.

Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions

PURPOSE

To report the 5-year outcomes of dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment (3DCRT) of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients were treated with 3DCRT alone between 6/89 and 10/92 with ICRU reporting point dose that increased from 63 to 79 Gy. The median follow-up was 60 months, and any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed bNED. Biochemical failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rising on two consecutive recordings and exceeding 1.5 ng/ml. Morbidity was reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale, the Late Effects Normal Tissue (LENT) scale, and a Fox Chase modification of the latter (FC-LENT). All patients were treated with a four-field technique with a 1 cm clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin to the prostate or prostate boost; the CTV and gross tumor volume (GTV) were the same. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence methods and compared using the log rank and Gray's test statistic, respectively. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors predictive of the various measures of outcome. Five-year Kaplan-Meier bNED rates were utilized by dose group to estimate logit response models for bNED and late morbidity.

RESULTS

PSA <10 ng/ml: No dose response was demonstrated using estimated bNED rates or by analysis of PSA nadir vs. dose. PSA 10-19.9 ng/ml: A bNED dose response was demonstrated (p = 0.02) using the log rank test. The logit response model showed 5-year bNED rates of 35% at 70 Gy and 75% at 76 Gy (p = 0.0049) and illustrated the relative ineffectiveness of conventional dose treatment. PSA 20+ ng/ml: A bNED dose response was demonstrated (p = 0.02) using the log rank test. The logit response model indicated a 5-year bNED rate of 10% at 70 Gy and 32% at 76 Gy (p = 0.10). Morbidity: Dose response was demonstrated for FC-LENT grade 2 and grade 3,4 GI morbidity and for LENT grade 2 GU sequelae. RTOG grade 3,4 GI morbidity at 5 years was <1%. Factors associated with bNED, cause-specific survival, and metastasis were studied using Cox multivariate analysis. Pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0001), Gleason score 7-10 (p = 0.0001), and dose (p = 0.017) were significantly predictive of bNED. For each 1 Gy increase in dose, the hazard of bNED failure decreased by 8%. Palpation stage was associated with cause-specific survival (p = 0.002) and distant metastasis (p = 0.0004). Gleason score was also predictive of distant metastasis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A dose response was observed for patients with pretreatment PSA >10 ng/ml based on 5-year bNED results. No dose response was observed for patients with pretreatment PSA < 10 ng/ml. Dose response was observed for FC-LENT grade 2 and grade 3,4 GI sequelae and for LENT grade 2 GU sequelae. Optimization of treatment was made possible by the results in this report. The improvement in 5-year bNED rates for patients with PSA levels > 10 ng/ml strongly suggests that clinical trials employing radiation should investigate the use of 3DCRT and prostate doses of 76-80 Gy.

Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is a technique designed to deliver prescribed radiation doses to localized tumors with high precision, while effectively excluding the surrounding normal tissues. It facilitates tumor dose escalation which should overcome the relative resistance of tumor clonogens to conventional radiation dose levels. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 743 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT. As part of a phase I study, the tumor target dose was increased from 64.8 to 81 Gy in increments of 5.4 Gy. Tumor response was evaluated by post-treatment decrease of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to levels of < or = 1.0 ng/ml and by sextant prostate biopsies performed > or = 2.5 years after completion of 3D-CRT. PSA relapse-free survival was used to evaluate long-term outcome. The median follow-up was 3 years (range: 1-7.6 years).

RESULTS

Induction of an initial clinical response was dose-dependent, with 90% of patients receiving 75.6 or 81.0 Gy achieving a PSA nadir < or = 1.0 ng compared with 76% and 56% for those treated with 70.2 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival for patients with favorable prognostic indicators (stage T1-2, pretreatment PSA < or = 10.0 ng/ml and Gleason score < or = 6) was 85%, compared to 65% for those with intermediate prognosis (one of the prognostic indicators with a higher value) and 35% for the group with unfavorable prognosis (two or more indicators with higher values) (p < 0.001). PSA relapse-free survival was significantly improved in patients with intermediate and unfavorable prognosis receiving > or = 75.6 Gy (p < 0.05). A positive biopsy at > or = 2.5 years after 3D-CRT was observed in only 1/15 (7%) of patients receiving 81.0 Gy, compared with 12/25 (48%) after 75.6 Gy, 19/42 (45%) after 70.2 Gy, and 13/23 (57%) after 64.8 Gy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The data provide evidence for a significant effect of dose escalation on the response of human prostate cancer to irradiation and defines new standards for curative radiotherapy in this disease.

[Practice of virtual simulation at the Saint-André hospital]

PURPOSE

Prospective evaluation of a virtual simulation technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1993 to February 1997, 343 patients underwent radiation therapy using this technique. Treated sites were mostly: brain (132), rectum (59), lung (43), and prostate (28). A CT-scan was performed on a patient in treatment position. Twenty-five to 70 jointive slices widely encompassed the treated volume. The target volume (CTV according to ICRU 50) and often critical organs were controured, slice by slice, by the radiation oncologist. Beams covering the CTV plus a security margin (PTV) were placed on the "virtual patient". Digital radiographs were reconstructed (DRR) as simulator radiographs for each field. Thus, the good coverage of PTV was assessed. Fields and beam arrangements were further optimized. Definitive isocenter was then placed using a classical simulator. Perfect matching of DRR and actual simulator radiographs had to be obtained.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients presented grade 3, and 1 grade 4 acute radiation effects. With a median follow-up of 18 months, five patients suffered from grade 3, and one from grade 4 complications. Fifty-five patients had tumor recurrence in the treated volume, and 19 had marginal relapse.

CONCLUSION

In our department, virtual simulation has become a routine technique of treatment planning for deep-seated tumors. This technique remains time-consuming for radiation oncologists: about 2 hours. But it stimulates reflexion on anatomy, tumor extension pathways, target volumes; and is becoming an excellent pedagogical tool.

The correlation between the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure and clinical outcome for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure (BF) following radiation therapy correlates with clinical distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1/1/87 and 12/31/92, 568 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital (median total dose 66.6 Gy; range: 60-70.4 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive increases in post-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) after achieving a nadir. Biochemical failure was recorded as the time midway between the nadir and the first rising PSA. Five-year actuarial rates of clinical DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were calculated for patients who were biochemically controlled (BC) versus those who failed biochemically. Median follow-up was 56 months (range: 24-118 months).

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were significantly greater in patients who were biochemically controlled versus those who were not (p < 0.001). In patients who were BC, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 99%, 99%, 98%, and 99% respectively. For patients who failed biochemically, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 74%, 64%, 89%, and 86% respectively. When stratifying by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage these differences remained significant for DMFS, DFS, and CSS. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that BC was the single most important predictor of clinical outcome for DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were also independent predictors of outcome for DMFS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF following radiation therapy correlates well with clinical DMFS, DFS, and CSS. These findings suggest that the Consensus Panel definition may be a surrogate for clinical progression and survival and should be considered a valid endpoint for separating successful versus unsuccessful treatment. Additional studies with longer follow-up will be needed to corroborate these findings.

Particle beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer: is there an advantage?

Hadron therapy uses heavy particles to deliver therapeutic ionizing energy. Each particle's inherent attributes determine the pattern of energy deposited by its beam, expressed in macro (conformability to a three-dimensional target volume) and micro (radiobiologic properties) distributions. Mass and charge regulate the inherent properties; beam energy provides a controllable, variable characteristic. Generally, heavy charged particles provide superior macrodosimetric properties; heavy particles (charged or not) have microdosimetric characteristics that produce high linear energy transfer (LET). Neutron macrodosimetry is similar to that of photons. Protons and helium ions possess superior macrodosimetric properties, plus microdosimetric characteristics resulting in low LET, yielding beam characteristics that approach the ideal for clinical radiotherapy. Hadron therapy for prostate cancer has been limited by the availability of appropriate treatment facilities. Nonetheless, encouraging results have been obtained. Neutron therapy demonstrated improved overall survival in a multi-institutional randomized trial, and improved local disease control in a subsequent trial. Proton radiation forms the boost component of several conformal dose-escalation studies. A Loma Linda University study demonstrated low treatment-related morbidity despite a prostate dose of 75 CGE; late-morbidity data were superior to published reports from multi-field, conformal photon therapy. A Phase III dose-escalation study of protons for early prostate cancer is proceeding.

Radiation therapy or prostatectomy: an old conflict revisited in the PSA era. A radiation oncologist's viewpoint

A close examination of the outcomes for the radical treatment of prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era shows no clear advantage to radical prostatectomy over external-beam radiation. Both modalities are highly effective against small impalpable tumors of low Gleason grade and with PSA values less than 10 ng/mL. Both modalities struggle against all other stages of prostate cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently in states of rapid evolution, and the results emerging become quickly outdated. It is hoped that the newer, more aggressive approaches will help a significant number of patients, perhaps the majority, not currently being cured by radical therapy.