Topographical analysis of ablation centration after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia

Eye movement during laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To measure eye motion in patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a video technique and determine centration and variance of the eye position during surgery.

SETTING

Laser refractive surgery center.

METHODS

The procedure was videotaped in 5 consecutive eyes having LASIK performed by a single surgeon with the VISX Star S2 excimer laser. Following surgery, video images of the eyes were digitized and stored in a computer for processing. Digitized images were obtained at a rate of 25 images per second during the laser procedure. The pupil margin and a visual landmark, such as a scleral blood vessel, were identified in the initial image of each eye. Custom software was used to track the location of the landmark and the pupil center in subsequent images.

RESULTS

Three of the 5 eyes were well centered on average. The remaining 2 eyes were decentered inferiorly by approximately 0.25 mm. The standard deviation in all eyes was approximately 0.10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

With these techniques, the position of the entrance pupil center relative to the excimer laser axis could be determined. Although the system is not fast enough to be used during surgery, it does allow quantification of centration and intraoperative motion after surgery.

Lower Intraoperative Flap Complication Rate With the Hansatome Microkeratome Compared to the Automated Corneal Shaper

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the incidence of intraoperative flap complications, such as partial flaps, donut-shaped flaps, central corneal cuts, and complete caps with the Hansatome and Automated Corneal Shaper (ACS) microkeratomes.

METHODS

All laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures performed by a single surgeon with the Hansatome or Automated Corneal Shaper in which intraocular pressure was verified with a pneumotonometer were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 90 eyes had LASIK with the ACS microkeratome. Six of the ACS eyes (6.7%) had intraoperative flap complications (4 partial flaps, 1 donut-shaped flap, 0 central corneal cuts, 1 complete cap). Partial flaps and donut-shaped flaps were replaced without laser application and the procedure repeated 2 to 3 months later. Two of these eyes lost 2 lines and one lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months after repeat LASIK. The eye with the donut-shaped flap was treated with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and had no change in spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months after PRK. The eye with the complete cap had no change in spectacle-corrected visual acuity after laser ablation. Five hundred ninety-eight (598) eyes had LASIK with the Hansatome microkeratome. Two of the Hansatome eyes (0.3%) had a flap complication (1 partial flap and 1 donut-shaped flap). The first eye retained spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months after repeat LASIK. The second eye had transepithelial PRK to eliminate the donut shaped flap with no loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months after surgery. The difference in flap complications between the two procedures was statistically significant (P < .01). There were no flap displacements following surgery in either group.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative flap complications are less likely to occur with the Hansatome microkeratome than with the ACS microkeratome.

Ablation centration after active eye-tracker-assisted photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ablation centration after active eye-tracker-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to investigate the effect of surgery, patient, and surgeon on the centration.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 177 eyes of 101 patients: 16 eyes had PRK and 161, LASIK. All laser treatments were performed with the aid of an eye tracker. The amount of decentration was analyzed by corneal topography. The factors influencing centration were divided into surgery related (PRK/LASIK), patient related (low/high myopia and effect of learning), and surgeon related (learning curve).

RESULTS

The mean decentration was 0.33 mm in PRK eyes and 0.35 mm in LASIK eyes. For the surgery-related factor, there was no significant difference between the PRK and LASIK eyes. For the patient-related factors, centration was better in the second eye (effect of learning) and decentration was more severe in eyes with high myopia (low/high myopia). For the surgeon-related factor, there was no significant difference between eyes that had the first 50 LASIK procedures and those that had the last 50 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

An eye tracker, which makes the laser beam follow the eye's movements, helps to avoid severe decentration. This study showed, however, that an active eye-tracking system alone cannot ensure good centration. Patient cooperation and fixation are important.

High incidence of cataract formation after implantation of a silicone posterior chamber lens in phakic, highly myopic eyes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of implantation of a negative, silicone, posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) in the ciliary sulcus of phakic, highly myopic eyes.

DESIGN

Noncomparative consecutive interventional series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen eyes of 10 patients suffering from high-degree myopia (spherical equivalent < -10 diopters) undergoing implantation of a Fyodorov 094M-1 IOL by the same surgeon (P.H.B.) were evaluated.

INTERVENTION

A standard surgical technique was used in all patients under peribulbar anesthesia. The IOL was implanted in the ciliary sulcus immediately in front of the natural lens under protection of a viscoelastic substance (Healon) through a 3.5-mm temporal or nasal clear-corneal tunnel. No sutures were necessary in any case. A peripheral iridectomy was performed intraoperatively in 14 eyes, whereas 4 additional eyes received a yttrium-aluminum-garnet peripheral iridectomy after surgery. At the end of surgery, gentamicin and dexamethasone were given both topically and subconjunctivally.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity and refraction were measured before surgery, as well as 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. Postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Best-corrected visual acuity remained unchanged (1 eye) or improved (6 eyes by 1, 5 eyes by 2, and 2 eyes by 3 Snellen lines, respectively) in 14 of 17 eyes, whereas 3 eyes experienced a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity by 1 Snellen line. Postoperative refraction approached the desired slight undercorrection at all times of examination. Cataract formation of the anterior subcapsular (8 eyes) or nuclear (only 1 eye) type was observed in overall 9 (52.9%) of 17 eyes. When considering only the patients with a follow-up of 2 years, the incidence of cataract formation was 81.9% (9 of 11 eyes).

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of cataract formation should discourage the implantation of the type of IOL used in this study in phakic eyes to correct high-degree myopia.

Corneal topography of small-beam tracking excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the topographic characteristic of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low myopia performed with a small-beam (0.9 mm) tracking excimer laser.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, LSU Eye Center, Louisiana State University Medical Center School of Medicine in New Orleans, and the Refractive Surgery Center of the South at the Eye, Ear, Nose, & Throat Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

METHODS

Sixty-seven eyes of 47 patients had PRK with a small-beam tracking laser. Of these, 49 eyes had data permitting evaluation of ablation centration; usable data for topographic analysis were available for 59 eyes preoperatively, 54 eyes at 1 month, 42 eyes at 3 months, and 25 eyes at 6 months, permitting measurement of various topographic parameters, including the cylinder (CYL), average corneal power (ACP), surface regularity index (SRI), surface asymmetry index (SAI), corneal eccentricity index (CEI), and coefficient of variation of corneal power (CVP).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, all eyes were topographically normal. Postoperatively, no eye exhibited a "central island" by even the least-restrictive definition, and all eyes had best spectacle-corrected visual acuities (BSCVAs) of 20/20 or better at all follow-ups. Mean decentration of the ablations from the pupil centers was 0.42 mm +/- 0.28 (SD) (n = 49). There was no correlation between measured decentration and BSCVA (P = .46). The central cornea was flattened (decreased ACP; P < .001) and made oblate (decreased CEI; P < .001) as expected. There was no increase in SRI or SAI (irregular astigmatism) at 6 months compared with preoperative values (P = .91); however, CYL and CVP (varifocality) increased slightly (P = .04 and .02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The absence of significant regular or irregular astigmatism 6 months after PRK with the small-beam laser is an improvement over published results achieved with wide-beam lasers and is consistent with the excellent visual acuity results in this cohort.