Gabapentin bioavailability: effect of dose and frequency of administration in adult patients with epilepsy

Effects of genetic variation in the novel organic cation transporter, OCTN1, on the renal clearance of gabapentin

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant that is widely prescribed for epilepsy and other neuropathic disorders. The pharmacokinetics, particularly the absorption and renal elimination, of gabapentin appear to involve membrane transporters. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that organic cation transporter 1 (OCTN1), a multispecific transporter expressed at the apical membrane in intestine and kidney, plays a role in gabapentin pharmacokinetics and that the common variant of OCTN1, OCTN1-L503F, contributes to variation in the pharmacokinetics of the drug. We observed that OCTN1 facilitates the Na+-independent transport of gabapentin, and that the OCTN1-L503F variant is deficient in gabapentin transport activity in stably transfected HEK-293 cells (fourfold enhanced uptake of gabapentin by OCTN1-503L vs twofold enhanced uptake by OCTN1-L503F, compared to mock-transfected cells). In clinical studies, we found that in subjects homozygous for the L503F variant, gabapentin renal clearance (CL(R)) approximates the glomerular filtration rate (mean+/-SE: 110+/-12 ml/min, n=9), whereas in subjects homozygous for the reference allele, gabapentin undergoes net secretion in the kidney (141+/-7.8 ml/min, n=11, P<0.05). Creatinine clearance and OCTN1 genotype accounted for 56% of the variation in CL(R) and were the only significant predictors of CL(R) (P<0.05). Importantly, OCTN1 genotype was the only significant predictor of net secretion of gabapentin (P<0.008). Oral bioavailability of gabapentin was not affected by OCTN1 genotype. We conclude that OCTN1 contributes to active tubular secretion of gabapentin, and that this effect may be diminished or absent in individuals carrying the OCTN1-L503F polymorphism. These results provide clinical evidence of the role of genetic variation in renal drug transporters in active drug secretion in vivo.

Multiple dose gabapentin attenuates cutaneous pain and central sensitisation but not muscle pain in healthy volunteers

Various muscle pains constitute a large clinical problem, both for patients and clinicians. Gabapentin is an established therapy in neuropathic pain and reduces cutaneous pain in healthy volunteers. Gabapentin in combination with other analgesics reduces post-operative pain. No data exist on the effect of gabapentin on muscle pain. This study investigates the effect of gabapentin on muscle and cutaneous pain in healthy volunteers. Sixteen healthy volunteers, 8 male/8 female, were included in this double-blind three-session crossover study comparing the effects of 0, 1200, 1800 and 2600 mg (pre-treatment, titrated over 4 doses) gabapentin and placebo. Muscle pain was induced by infusing 0.5 ml of hypertonic saline into the anterior tibial muscle. Simultaneously, subjects graded pain on a computerized visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Total (AUC, VAS*duration in s) and maximal pain (VAS(max)) were assessed. Areas of local and referred pain were measured. Further, continuous intracutaneous electrical stimulation was applied to the forearm. Current was increased until pain intensity 5/10 or until subjects reached a cut-off of 70 mA. Spontaneous pain (VAS 0-10), areas of secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick (cm2) and mechanical pain threshold (g) within this area were assessed. Gabapentin pre-treatment reduced sensitivity to electrical induction of skin pain by 14%, p=0.016. Secondary hyperalgesia was induced, but areas were reduced after pre-treatment, p<0.05. Mechanical pain thresholds were unaffected. Pain induced by intramuscular infusion of hypertonic saline was not affected by gabapentin. In conclusion, single or repeated dosing of gabapentin reduced cutaneous but not muscle pain in healthy volunteers.

Overtreatment in epilepsy: how it occurs and how it can be avoided

In pharmacotherapy, overtreatment may be defined as an excessive drug load (that is, excessive drug dosages or unnecessary polypharmacy) leading to a suboptimal risk-to-benefit ratio. The risk of overtreatment in the pharmacological management of epilepsy is substantial and may have serious consequences in terms of a greater incidence and severity of adverse effects. These effects can range from subtle CNS impairment to overt toxic effects, including teratogenicity. Overtreatment also causes increased treatment costs and may even lead to a paradoxical deterioration in seizure control. The prevention and correction of overtreatment requires a thorough understanding of the situations and mechanisms that lead to inappropriate prescribing of antiepileptic drugs. These include initiating treatment in conditions where it is not indicated (for example, long-term prophylaxis after head trauma or supratentorial surgery in seizure-free patients), use of excessively fast titration rates, prescription of excessively high initial target dosages, failure to consider conditions associated with reduced dosage requirements (for example, old age or comorbidities associated with impaired drug clearance), and failure to consider the dose-response characteristics of the selected drug. Many patients whose seizures do not respond to the initially prescribed medication can be optimally managed by switching to monotherapy with an alternative agent; premature use of combination therapy represents another common form of overtreatment. Overtreatment may also result from a failure to adjust the dosage to prevent or compensate for adverse pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions, and from a failure to reduce drug load in patients who have not benefited from high dosages or polypharmacy. While the measurement of drug concentrations can aid in minimising adverse effects, there is also a danger of overtreatment resulting from inappropriate interpretation of drug concentration data. Continuation of drug therapy in seizure-free patients in whom the risk-benefit ratio is in favour of gradual withdrawal may also be regarded as overtreatment. Tailoring therapy to the needs of the individual patient is the key to the successful management of epilepsy. Even though the importance of complete seizure control cannot be overemphasised, no patient should be made to suffer more from the adverse effects of treatment than from the manifestations of the seizure disorder.

XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid], a novel gabapentin prodrug: II. Improved oral bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with gabapentin in rats and monkeys

The absorption of gabapentin (Neurontin) is dose-dependent and variable between patients. Rapid clearance of the drug necessitates dosing three or more times per day to maintain therapeutic levels. These deficiencies appear to result from the low capacity, limited intestinal distribution, and variable expression of the solute transporter responsible for gabapentin absorption. Saturation of this transporter at doses used clinically leads to unpredictable drug exposure and potentially ineffective therapy in some patients. XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl]aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid] is a novel prodrug of gabapentin designed to be absorbed by high-capacity nutrient transporters located throughout the intestine. XP13512 was efficiently absorbed and rapidly converted to gabapentin after oral dosing in rats and monkeys. Exposure to gabapentin was proportional to prodrug dose, whereas exposure to intact XP13512 was low. In rats, >95% of an oral dose of (14)C-XP13512 was excreted in urine in 24 h as gabapentin. In monkeys, oral bioavailability of gabapentin from XP13512 capsules was 84.2% compared with 25.4% after a similar oral Neurontin dose. Compared with intracolonic gabapentin, intracolonic XP13512 gave a 17-fold higher gabapentin exposure in rats and 34-fold higher in monkeys. XP13512 may therefore be incorporated into a sustained release formulation to provide extended gabapentin exposure. XP13512 demonstrated improved gabapentin bioavailability, increased dose proportionality, and enhanced colonic absorption. In clinical use, XP13512 may improve the treatment of neuropathic pain, epilepsy, and numerous other conditions by increasing efficacy, reducing interpatient variability, and decreasing frequency of dosing.

XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid], a novel gabapentin prodrug: I. Design, synthesis, enzymatic conversion to gabapentin, and transport by intestinal solute transporters

Gabapentin is thought to be absorbed from the intestine of humans and animals by a low-capacity solute transporter localized in the upper small intestine. Saturation of this transporter at doses used clinically leads to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and high interpatient variability, potentially resulting in suboptimal drug exposure in some patients. XP13512 [(+/-)-1-([(alpha-isobutanoyloxyethoxy)carbonyl] aminomethyl)-1-cyclohexane acetic acid] is a novel prodrug of gabapentin designed to be absorbed throughout the intestine by high-capacity nutrient transporters. XP13512 was stable at physiological pH but rapidly converted to gabapentin in intestinal and liver tissue from rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans. XP13512 was not a substrate or inhibitor of major cytochrome P450 isoforms in transfected baculosomes or liver homogenates. The separated isomers of XP13512 showed similar cleavage in human tissues. The prodrug demonstrated active apical to basolateral transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers and pH-dependent passive permeability across artificial membranes. XP13512 inhibited uptake of (14)C-lactate by human embryonic kidney cells expressing monocarboxylate transporter type-1, and direct uptake of prodrug by these cells was confirmed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. XP13512 inhibited uptake of (3)H-biotin into Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing human sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter (SMVT). Specific transport by SMVT was confirmed by oocyte electrophysiology studies and direct uptake studies in human embryonic kidney cells after tetracycline-induced expression of SMVT. XP13512 is therefore a substrate for several high-capacity absorption pathways present throughout the intestine. Therefore, administration of the prodrug should result in improved gabapentin bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with administration of gabapentin.

Gabapentin dosing in the treatment of epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin is considered a safe and well-tolerated antipileptic drug (AED) with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and a broad therapeutic index. However, recent studies have used higher doses and faster titration schedules than those used in the pivotal trials that established the efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this review were to assess the gabapentin titration and dosing regimens that have been published in peer-reviewed journals, to develop dosing recommendations to maximize antiseizure efficacy without compromising tolerability, and to formulate guidelines for an adequate therapeutic assessment of gabapentin dosage efficacy.

METHODS

In the absence of sufficient placebo-controlled, double-blind studies, a formal evidence-based assessment could not be performed. However, a MEDLINE search using the search terms gabapentin and epilepsy, spanning back to the year 1986, produced numerous published reports from randomized, placebo-controlled and open-label trials, as well as case reports. These were reviewed to assess the range of dosing and titration schedules reported. Reports that employed gabapentin doses and titration schedules were selected for review.

RESULTS

Our review of this literature suggests improved seizure control at higher gabapentin maintenance dosages (< or =3600 mg/d) than are used today in clinical practice (1800 mg/d) without an increase in the incidence of adverse reactions. Most of the patients who received high dosages (eg, 3600 mg/d) or experienced fast titration rates tolerated gabapentin well. Side effects occurred around the onset of dosing and were reported in some studies to be transient.

CONCLUSIONS

Based in the literature here, in most adult patients, gabapentin may be initiated at a dosage of 900 mg/d and titrated to maintenance dosages > or = 3600 mg/d. Children may be treated with gabapentin 23 to 78 mg/kg per day. Based on controlled and open trials, the majority of patients will tolerate gabapentin well enough for an adequate therapeutic assessment. Titration to effect can be accomplished rapidly, if necessary; however, as with other AEDs, optimal seizure control may take months to achieve.

Novel anticonvulsant medications in development

Epilepsy is currently the most prevalent neurological disorder worldwide. Pharmacological therapy remains the cornerstone of epilepsy treatment, however, refractory epilepsy is still a significant clinical problem despite the release of the second generation of anticonvulsants. Anticonvulsant treatment failures may result from lack of efficacy and presence of significant side effects. One rationale for incomplete effectiveness of the currently available anticonvulsants is that they were identified using the same classical models and therefore work largely by the same actions. These mechanisms fail to consider variations in the pathophysiological process that results in epilepsy, nor have they been shown to prevent the process of developing epilepsy (epileptogenesis). The next generation of anticonvulsants has taken into account the shortcomings of existing agents and attempted to improve on the currently available treatments using rationale drug design. This group of investigational anticonvulsants may be broadly classified as possessing one or more of the following: 1) increased tolerability through improvement in drug chemical structure or better delivery to the site of action, 2) new mechanisms (or combinations of mechanisms) of action, 3) improved pharmacokinetic properties. This article will discuss the next generation of anticonvulsants (carabersat, CGX-1007, fluorofelbamate, harkoseride, losigamone, pregabalin, retigabine, safinamide, SPD-421, talampanel, valrocemide) and the possible populations in which they would be clinically useful.

New antiepileptic drugs

BACKGROUND

Eight novel anticonvulsant drugs have been introduced in the United States in the past 10 years, as well as two new intravenous preparations of anticonvulsant drugs. The role of each in the treatment of patients with epilepsy is being refined as experience and research data accumulate.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Gabapentin, tiagabine, and oxcarbazepine are effective for partial seizures, whereas felbamate, lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and zonisamide treat both partial and generalized seizure types. In general, these newer agents differ from older agents by relative lack of drug-drug interactions, and many show improved tolerability compared with phenytoin and carbamazepine. Each has distinguishing features that can prove useful in specific clinical situations. Despite limited Food and Drug Administration indications, all are useful in monotherapy under certain circumstances. Fosphenytoin avoids the adverse effects of intravenous phenytoin vehicle, and intravenous valproate represents a much needed option in patients who require rapid loading of this medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater number of antiseizure drugs available today makes it possible to tailor treatment to individual patient needs, allowing more patients to be free of debilitating adverse effects. Additionally, some patients can achieve complete seizure freedom even after failing one or more other antiepileptic drugs.

Gabapentin: a unique anti-epileptic agent

Gabapentin is an anti-epileptic drug (AED) that was approved in 1993 for the adjunct treatment of complex partial seizures (CPS) with and without generalization. Although the mechanism of action of gabapentin has not been fully elucidated, it has been shown to be effective not only as an adjunct AED in patients with CPS, but also in children with epilepsy, many pain syndromes (most notably neuropathic pain), and several other neurological diseases. The efficacy of the drug as an AED In both adults and children has been mostly seen when used as an adjunct with other AEDs. When used as monotherapy, it has been most effective for CPS in adults at higher doses. Gabapentin as monotherapy in children has not been shown to be as beneficial as in adults. Also, the dosing of the drug in children has been complicated by negative behavioral adverse effects. Overall, gabapentin has a low incidence of adverse effects, a pharmacokinetic profile that limits its drug interactions, and limited effects on cognition when compared to traditional AEDs. The dosing of the drug is dependent on the disease state targeted, the number of specific therapeutic drugs used, and the renal function of the patient.

Antiepileptic drugs in the 21st century

During the past 10 years, there has been a welcome influx of novel agents for the treatment of epilepsy. Many show advantages compared to older agents, including better adverse effect profiles and lack of drug-drug interactions. The sheer number of agents now available makes distinction among them confusing at times. Agents differ in spectrum of action, pharmacokinetic profile (affecting dosing schedule and drug interactions), and titration time. This review highlights the differences between the various new agents and the more traditional antiseizure drugs. Evidence for the widespread use of these compounds outside their indication, particularly for diseases other than epilepsy, is reviewed as well.

Pharmacologic management of epilepsy in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To review the epidemiology and pharmacologic management of epilepsy in elderly patients.

DATA SOURCES

Controlled trials, case studies, and review articles identified via MEDLINE using the search terms epilepsy, seizures, elderly, phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide. Recently published standard textbooks on epilepsy were also consulted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Epilepsy is a common neurologic disorder in the elderly. Cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases are the most common causes of new-onset seizures in these patients. Alterations in protein binding, distribution, elimination, and increased sensitivity to the pharmacodynamic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are relatively frequent, and these factors should be assessed at the initiation, and during adjustment, of treatment. Drug-drug interactions are also an important issue in elderly patients, because multiple drug use is common and AEDs are susceptible to many interactions. In addition to understanding age-related changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs, clinicians should know the common seizure types in the elderly and the spectrum of AED activity for these seizure types. AEDs with activity against both partial-onset and generalized seizures include felbamate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, valproic acid, and zonisamide. Other AEDs discussed in this review (carbamazepine, gabapentin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and tiagabine) are most useful for partial-onset seizures.

CONCLUSION

The provision of safe and effective drug therapy to elderly patients requires an understanding of the unique age-related changes' in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs as well as an appreciation of common seizure types and the drugs that are effective for the specific types seen in the elderly.

Antiepileptic drug interactions

This article reviews the potential interactions of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles involved. It describes the absorptive and distributive properties of AEDs and the effects on protein binding, hepatic metabolism, and elimination resulting from co-administration of AEDs with food or other drugs. Drug behavior is a function of absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination. Administration of either multiple AEDs or a combination of AEDs plus drugs for other conditions can modify any of these physiologic processes, possibly resulting in complex interactions. These may include alterations in the bio-availability and absorption of a drug and changes in half-life and serum level through induction or inhibition of hepatic metabolism. In most cases, increases or decreases in serum concentrations will signal a drug interaction. In other cases, clinically significant drug interactions remain undetected owing to apparently stable serum concentrations. Co-administration of drugs may affect the rate of clearance of one or both drugs. The effect on clearance varies, owing to genetic factors, patient characteristics (age and presence of co-morbidities), and individual responses. AEDs that induce hepatic metabolism can also influence the metabolism of concomitantly administered non-epilepsy medications and can interfere with oral contraceptives, as well as vitamins D and K. Patients with renal insufficiency or advanced age may experience incomplete renal excretion and should receive reduced dosages of drug. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties of AEDs and the route of metabolism of all competing drugs is important for optimal management of patients with epilepsy and for prevention of avoidable drug interactions.

Inter- and intra-subject variability in gabapentin absorption and absolute bioavailability

Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-metabolized, non-plasma protein bound, renally excreted antiepileptic drug that is actively absorbed via the system L amino acid transporter. Previous studies have demonstrated that gabapentin displays dose-dependent absorption.

OBJECTIVES

These studies were conducted to determine inter- and intra-subject variability of gabapentin absorption. Two prospective clinical studies in healthy adult volunteers were conducted. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to express variability of gabapentin absorption.

METHODS

Study A: 400-mg single dose, randomized, cross-over study to assess bioavailability of four different gabapentin formulations (n=20, 9 males, 11 females; mean age and weight 41 years, 75.1 kg). Plasma was serially collected up to 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated post-dose to determine concentration-time curves (AUC). All four formulations were bioequivalent, thus repeated measures analysis was performed to assess inter-and intra-subject variability. Study B: 600-mg single dose study (n=50, 15 males, 35 females; mean age and weight 31.1 years, 72.7 kg) was conducted to determine inter-subject variability in gabapentin F. Urine was collected over 48 h and bioavailability (F) calculated. Urine and plasma gabapentin concentrations were measured by HPLC-UV.

RESULTS

Study A: Overall mean (CV) of GBP AUC values was 34.1+/-24 ug/h per ml. Inter-subject CV for AUC was 22.5% and intra-subject CV was 12.1%. Study B: Overall mean (SD) GBP F was 49.3+/-13.6%. Inter-subject CV of F was 27.6%.

DISCUSSION

The inter-subject variability in gabapentin absorption is substantially less than that of the inter-subject variability. This indicates that one would expect a wide range in gabapentin absorption between subjects; however, a much smaller variability within a subject. The within subject variability of gabapentin is small enough that plasma drug monitoring may be used to assess gabapentin absorption for a given subject and the benefit of dose individualization.

Effects of gabapentin on brain GABA, homocarnosine, and pyrrolidinone in epilepsy patients

PURPOSE

Gabapentin (GBP) was introduced as an antiepileptic drug (AED) and has been used in the management of neuropathic pain. We reported that daily dosing increased brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in patients with epilepsy. This study was designed to determine how rapidly brain GABA and the GABA metabolites, homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone, increase in response to the first dose of GBP.

METHODS

In vivo measurements of GABA, homocarnosine, and pyrrolidinone were made of a 14-cc volume in the occipital cortex by using a 1H spectroscopy with a 2.1-Tesla magnetic resonance spectrometer and an 8-cm surface coil. Six patients (four women) were studied serially after the first oral dose (1,200 mg) of GBP. Five patients (three women) taking a standard daily dose (range, 1,200-2,000 mg) of GBP were rechallenged with a single high dose (2,400 mg).

RESULTS

The first dose of GBP increased median brain GABA by 1.3 mM (range, 0.4-1.8 mM) within 1 h. Homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone did not change significantly by 5 h. Daily GBP therapy increased GABA (0.5 mM; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9), homocarnosine (0.3 mM; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), and pyrrolidinone (0.10 mM; 95% CI, 0.06-0.14). Rechallenging patients taking GBP daily increased median brain GABA by 0.4 mM (range, 0.3-0.5) within 1 h.

CONCLUSIONS

GBP promptly elevates brain GABA and presumably offers partial protection against further seizures within hours of the first oral dose. Patients may expect to experience the anticonvulsant effects of increased homocarnosine and pyrrolidinone with daily therapy.

New antiepileptic drugs in children: which ones for which seizures?

Until 1993, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA) accounted for the great majority of the prescriptions written for the treatment of epilepsy. Since 1993, five antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been released in the United States, and at least three additional drugs are expected to be released by the end of the year 2000. As a group, these newer drugs differ from the established drugs in terms of their pharmacokinetics, interaction potential, and adverse effects. In addition, any one of the newer drugs may achieve seizure control in situations in which an established drug had not. The newer drugs certainly represent a welcome addition to the existing options for the treatment of epilepsy in children. However, the availability of several new AEDs represents a therapeutic dilemma for the clinician because optimal use of these drugs has not yet been established. This is particularly true in children because (i) newer drugs are often studied less frequently in children, (ii) pharmacokinetics in children differ from those in adults, (iii) children may have different adverse effects, and (iv) children have a broader spectrum of various seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. In the first part of this review, the clinical pharmacology of the currently available newer AEDs is discussed individually, with special emphasis on data in children. In particular, pharmacokinetics, interactions, dosage and titration, efficacy spectrum, and adverse effect profile is discussed for each drug. In the second part, an attempt is made to determine the place for the newer drugs in the treatment of the different pediatric seizures and epilepsy syndromes.

Gabapentin in the management of convulsive disorders

Gabapentin, in clinical use since 1993, is indicated as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug (AED) for treatment of complex partial seizures, with or without secondary generalization, in patients over 12 years of age. Although several cellular actions have been described in the literature, the molecular mechanism(s) of action responsible for the anticonvulsant effect of gabapentin has not been conclusively determined. It is likely that gabapentin has multiple concentration-dependent actions that combine in a unique manner to produce antiepileptic efficacy. The pharmacokinetic properties of this water-soluble, amino-acid AED are generally favorable. Absorption appears to be dependent on transport by the L-system amino acid transporter. Elimination of unmetabolized drug occurs by the renal route. Although its therapeutic range is not well characterized, gabapentin has a broad therapeutic index. This implies that a wide range of doses can be used, based on individual patient needs, without significant limitation due to dose-dependent side effects. Gabapentin has few drug-drug interactions, none of which is clinically limiting. Several studies have demonstrated the long-term efficacy of gabapentin with no systematic evidence of tachyphylaxis. In addition, there is increasing evidence to support the use of gabapentin as monotherapy. Gabapentin is safe and is generally well tolerated. To date, nearly 3 million patients have been treated in studies and in open use without causal relationship to a specific life-threatening organ toxicity. Seizure control superior to that observed in well-controlled trials has been reported at higher doses used in clinical practice and in studies. Therefore, gabapentin dosing must be optimized on an individual basis to achieve an adequate trial of the drug and obtain the best seizure control.