Comparative painting of mammalian chromosomes

Reciprocal chromosome painting illuminates the history of genome evolution of the domestic cat, dog and human

Domestic cats and dogs are important companion animals and model animals in biomedical research. The cat has a highly conserved karyotype, closely resembling the ancestral karyotype of mammals, while the dog has one of the most extensively rearranged mammalian karyotypes investigated so far. We have constructed the first detailed comparative chromosome map of the domestic dog and cat by reciprocal chromosome painting. Dog paints specific for the 38 autosomes and the X chromosomes delineated 68 conserved chromosomal segments in the cat, while reverse painting of cat probes onto red fox and dog chromosomes revealed 65 conserved segments. Most conserved segments on cat chromosomes also show a high degree of conservation in G-banding patterns compared with their canine counterparts. At least 47 chromosomal fissions (breaks), 25 fusions and one inversion are needed to convert the cat karyotype to that of the dog, confirming that extensive chromosome rearrangements differentiate the karyotypes of the cat and dog. Comparative analysis of the distribution patterns of conserved segments defined by dog paints on cat and human chromosomes has refined the human/cat comparative genome map and, most importantly, has revealed 15 cryptic inversions in seven large chromosomal regions of conserved synteny between humans and cats.

Chromosome painting in farm, pet and wild animal species

Among the advanced karyotype analysis approaches embraced by animal cytogenetics during the past decade, chromosome painting has had the greatest impact. Generation of chromosome specific paints is considered pivotal to his development. Additionally, ability to use these paints across species (referred to as Zoo-FISH or comparative painting) is undisputedly the most important breakthrough that has contributed to our ability to compare karyotypes of a wide range of evolutionarily highly diverged chromosome painting, and makes them aware of the tools/resources available to carry out this research in a variety of animal species. An overview of the current status of comparative chromosome painting results across closely as well as distantly related species is presented. Findings from different studies show how some segmental syntenies are more conserved as compared to others. The comparisons provide insight into the likely constitution of a vertebrate/mammalian ancestral karyotype and help understand some of the intricacies about karyotype evolution. Importance of comparative painting in setting the stage for rapid development of gene maps in a number of economically important species is elaborated.

Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting

Cross-species reciprocal chromosome painting was used to determine homologous chromosomal regions between the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster. When mouse chromosome-specific paints were hybridized to Chinese hamster chromosomes, paints specific for mouse chromosomes 3, 4, 9, 14, 18, 19 and X each painted a single chromosomal region, whilst other mouse paints delineated multiple discrete chromosomal regions. The mouse Y paint produced non-specific signals on Chinese hamster chromosomes. Nineteen mouse autosome paints identified a total of 47 homologous chromosome regions in the genome of the Chinese hamster. Hybridization of Chinese hamster paints to mouse chromosomes not only confirmed the above results, but also identified which of the chromosomal regions of these two species were homologous. In total, 10 Chinese hamster autosomal paints detected 38 homologous autosomal segments in the mouse genome. A comparative chromosome map was established based on these reciprocal chromosome painting patterns. This map forms the basis for exchanging gene mapping information between the species and for studying genome evolution.

Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of lymphoblastoid and colon cancer cell lines from cotton-top tamarin (Sagiunus oedipus)

The cotton-top tamarin (CTT) (Sagiunus oedipus) has been used as an animal model to investigate the etiology and pathophysiology of several human diseases, including ulcerative colitis and its associated colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Little is known, however, about genetic synteny between CTT and humans, and about chromosome aberrations in CTT CRC. To address these issues, we have analyzed CTT lymphoblastoid and CRC cell lines using cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (Zoo-FISH), and direct sequencing. The CTT lymphocytes had pseudodiploid chromosomes of 46. The CTT CRC cells showed near-diploid chromosomes of 45. Several clonal structural aberrations were observed, including der(1), a marker chromosome, and double minutes. Zoo-FISH using human chromosome 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, and X paints identified homologous chromosomes and subchromosomal regions in the CTT genome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human telomeric probe also detected a homologous sequence in CTT genome. Direct sequencing of CTT genomic DNA using primers amplifying exons 4 and 15 of the human APC gene identified DNA sequences in CTT genome with 99% and 95% homology, respectively. These results provide a basis for further comparative studies of CTT and human genome.

Enhanced detection of chromosomal abnormalities with the use of RxFISH multicolor banding technique

Hematological disorders often have complex karyotypes with multiple markers. Proper assignment of chromosome number or aberration or both can be difficult. Specific identification of chromosomal abnormalities aids in the diagnosis and selection of treatment of patients. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been applied to the identification of translocations, markers, and other chromosomal abnormalities in clinical cytogenetics. However, the standard FISH technique is unable to detect the entire genome in a single experiment. This report presents the use of a cross-species comparative genomic hybridization color-banding technique (RxFISH) that permits examination of an entire karyotype at one time. Specimens from two patients, one with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and the other with multiple myeloma (MM), were studied. Metaphases were prepared by standard culture techniques. Conventional cytogenetic analysis (GTG banding) showed multiple clones in each of the cases. These clones were hyperdiploid metaphases with complex chromosomal abnormalities and multiple markers. The slides were then hybridized with FITC-, Cy-3-, and Cy-5-labeled RxFISH probes; the results were analyzed by a digital imaging system. The RxFISH color banding confirmed the hyperdiploid metaphases and identified multiple chromosomal abnormalities. In the specimen from the patient with ALL, several chromosomes, which had been classified as markers by G-banding, were found to be specific chromosomes. This study suggests that RxFISH can provide more accurate and specific identification of complex chromosomal abnormalities. RxFISH is a useful complement to the clinical cytogenetic laboratory armamentarium.

Conservation and evolution of microsatellite loci in primate taxa

Microsatellites are promising genetic markers for the study of demographic structure and phylogenetic history in populations. However, little information exists on the molecular nature of the repeats and their flanking sequences of a same microsatellite in a large range of species. In this study, we report polymorphism and consensus sequences of eight microsatellite loci using human primers in 20 primate species. The results show size polymorphism in almost all species and microsatellites. These loci are therefore useful markers for population genetic studies between populations of the same species. Insertion/deletion events are frequent in the flanking regions, the majority concerning several contiguous bases. This is in contrast with the more usual single base pair events in non-coding regions. The ranges of allele lengths in non-human primates often show no overlap with that of human, usually due to the deletion/insertion events in the flanking sequences, producing smaller allele lengths rather than smaller numbers of repeats. The use of length of PCR product will bias the inter-species interpretation reducing the number of observable alleles and treating as the same allele very divergent molecular sequences. Caution should be used when employing microsatellites in cross-species comparisons in which the species under study are separated by significant amounts of evolutionary time: in such cases allele comparison cannot be based on lengths alone.

HSA4 and GGA4: remarkable conservation despite 300-Myr divergence

The chicken (GGA) and human (HSA) genomes diverged around 300-350 Myr ago. Due to this large phylogenetic distance, significant synteny conservation has not been anticipated between the genomes of the two species. However, Zoo-FISH with HSA4 chromosome-specific paint on chicken metaphase chromosomes shows that the human chromosome corresponds largely to the GGA4cen-->q26 region. Comparative gene mapping data in the two species, though limited, provide strong support for these observations. The findings, together with the very recently published data on HSA9-GGAZ and HSA12-GGA1, show that some large chromosomal segments share conserved synteny in the two species. These syntenies are considerably disrupted in the mouse. This makes us believe that despite very early divergence, parts of the human and chicken genomes are more conserved than those of human and mouse, which radiated only 100-120 Myr ago. Moreover, the HSA4-GGA4q correspondence points to a "candidate" chromosome from the karyotype of a mammal-bird ancestor. The findings are thus a small but important step toward understanding the evolution of the two genomes.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) maps chromosomal homologies between the dusky titi and squirrel monkey

The Platyrrhini are one of the most karyologically derived groups of primates and the evolution of their karyotypes is far from understood. The identification of the origin and direction of chromosome rearrangements will contribute to a better understanding of New World monkey phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution. We mapped homology and identified translocations in the chromosomes of the dusky titi monkey (Callicebus moloch, 2n = 50) and the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus, 2n = 44) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of human chromosome paints. The hybridization results established chromosomal homologies between these New World primates, humans, other primates, and more distantly related mammalian species and show that both species have highly rearranged karyotypes. The total number of hybridization signals was 37 in C. moloch and 40 in S. sciureus, which is in the range of most comparisons of human chromosomes with phylogenetically more distant species outside of the primate order. Parsimony analyses of outgroup painting patterns allowed us to propose an ancestral karyotype for New World monkeys consisting of 2n = 56 with homologs to the following human chromosomes or chromosome segments: 1b; 1c; 2a; 2b; 3a; 3b; 3/21; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8a; 8/18; 9; 10a; 10/16; 11; 12; 13; 14/15; 15a; 16a; 17; 19; 20; 22; X; Y. Associations 8/18 and 10/16 are derived ancestral associations for all Platyrrhini. A 2/16 association found in S. sciureus and C. moloch was also seen in Ateles geoffroyi and Cebus capucinus; a 5/7 association in S. sciureus was present in A. geoffroyi, C. capucinus, and Alouatta belzebul. Other associations seen in the dusky titi monkey or the squirrel monkey are probably automorphisms. Comparison with chromosome phylogenies based on R-banding [Dutrillaux et al., 1986] showed that there were many errors in assigning homology with human chromosomes. The chromosomal phylogeny of New World monkeys based on banding patterns is in need of revision using modern molecular methods.

Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution

Chromosome painting in placental mammalians illustrates that genome evolution is marked by chromosomal synteny conservation and that the association of chromosomes 3 and 21 may be the largest widely conserved syntenic block known for mammals. We studied intrachromosomal rearrangements of the syntenic block 3/21 by using probes derived from chromosomal subregions with a resolution of up to 10-15 Mbp. We demonstrate that the rearrangements visualized by chromosome painting, mostly translocations, are only a fraction of the actual chromosomal changes that have occurred during evolution. The ancestral segment order for both primates and carnivores is still found in some species in both orders. From the ancestral primate/carnivore condition an inversion is needed to derive the pig homolog, and a fission of chromosome 21 and a pericentric inversion is needed to derive the Bornean orangutan condition. Two overlapping inversions in the chromosome 3 homolog then would lead to the chromosome form found in humans and African apes. This reconstruction of the origin of human chromosome 3 contrasts with the generally accepted scenario derived from chromosome banding in which it was proposed that only one pericentric inversion was needed. From the ancestral form for Old World primates (now found in the Bornean orangutan) a pericentric inversion and centromere shift leads to the chromosome ancestral for all Old World monkeys. Intrachromosomal rearrangements, as shown here, make up a set of potentially plentiful and informative markers that can be used for phylogenetic reconstruction and a more refined comparative mapping of the genome.

Comparative chromosome painting between marsupial orders: relationships with a 2n = 14 ancestral marsupial karyotype

A 2n = 14 karyotype is shared by some species in each of the marsupial orders in Australian and American superfamilies, suggesting that the ancestral marsupial chromosome complement was 2n = 14. We have used chromosome painting between distantly related marsupial species to discover whether genome arrangements in 2n = 14 species in two Australian orders support this hypothesis. Cross-species chromosome painting was used to investigate chromosome rearrangements between a macropodid species Macropus eugenii (2n = 16) and a wombat species in a different suborder (Lasiorhinus latifrons, 2n = 14), and a dasyurid species in a different order (Sminthopsis macroura, 2n = 14). We demonstrate that many chromosome regions are conserved between all three species, and deduce how the similar 2n = 14 karyotypes of species in the two orders are related to a common ancestral 2n = 14 karyotype.

Karyotype relationships between four distantly related marsupials revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting

Marsupial karyotypes have shown extensive conservation even between distantly related groups with a high diversity of life forms and reproductive biology. Banding analysis has been the main test for assessing their homologies and chromosome rearrangements. More recently, cross-species reciprocal chromosome painting has been developed and applied to several mammalian species and has shown homologies and rearrangements not revealed by banding analysis. Karyotype relationships between four marsupial species, Sminthopsis crassicaudata, Potorous tridactylus, Trichosurus vulpecula and Macropus eugenii, which are from different families in two orders, were investigated and presented in the form of comparative chromosome maps. These show that only a limited number of chromosomal rearrangements have occurred during their evolution. A karyotype phylogeny of the four marsupials was derived from these maps. A comparison between published gene location and the comparative chromosome maps for these species is presented and inconsistencies with previous gene mapping data indicated.

The promise of comparative genomics in mammals

Dense genetic maps of human, mouse, and rat genomes that are based on coding genes and on microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers have been complemented by precise gene homolog alignment with moderate-resolution maps of livestock, companion animals, and additional mammal species. Comparative genetic assessment expands the utility of these maps in gene discovery, in functional genomics, and in tracking the evolutionary forces that sculpted the genome organization of modern mammalian species.

A brief history of human autosomes

Comparative gene mapping and chromosome painting permit the tentative reconstruction of ancestral karyotypes. The modern human karyotype is proposed to differ from that of the most recent common ancestor of catarrhine primates by two major rearrangements. The first was the fission of an ancestral chromosome to produce the homologues of human chromosomes 14 and 15. This fission occurred before the divergence of gibbons from humans and other apes. The second was the fusion of two ancestral chromosomes to form human chromosome 2. This fusion occurred after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. Moving further back in time, homologues of human chromosomes 3 and 21 were formed by the fission of an ancestral linkage group that combined loci of both human chromosomes, whereas homologues of human chromosomes 12 and 22 were formed by a reciprocal translocation between two ancestral chromosomes. Both events occurred at some time after our most recent common ancestor with lemurs. Less direct evidence suggests that the short and long arms of human chromosomes 8, 16 and 19 were unlinked in this ancestor. Finally, the most recent common ancestor of primates and artiodactyls is proposed to have possessed a chromosome that combined loci from human chromosomes 4 and 8p, a chromosome that combined loci from human chromosomes 16q and 19q, and a chromosome that combined loci from human chromosomes 2p and 20.

Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting

A comparative karyotype of rat (Rattus norvegicus) and mouse (Mus musculus) based on chromosome G-banding morphology, heterologous chromosome painting results and available gene mapping data is proposed. Whole chromosome painting probes from both species were generated by PARM-PCR amplification of flow sorted chromosomes. Bidirectional chromosome painting identifies 36 segments of syntenic homology and allows us to propose a nearly complete comparative karyotype of mouse and rat (except for RNO 13 p and RNO 19 p12-13). Seven segments completely covered the RNO chromosomes 3, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15 and 18. Eight segments completely covered the MMU chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 18 and 19. The RNO chromosomes 5, 8, 18 show complete homology with the MMU chromosomes 4, 9 and 18, respectively. Bidirectional hybridization results clearly assign 16 segments to subchromosomal regions in both species. Interpretation of the results allows subchromosomal assignment of all the remaining segments apart from seven distributed on chromosomes MMU 15, MMU 10 B2-D3 and MMU 17 E3-E5. The proposed comparative karyotype shows overall agreement with available comparative mapping data. The proposed repartition of syntenic homologous segments between the two species provides useful data for gene-mapping studies. In addition, these results will enable the reconstruction of the karyotype of the Cricetidae and Muridae common ancestor and the definition of the precise rearrangements which have occurred in both mouse and rat lineages during evolution.

Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey

A pilot study comparing horse and donkey karyotypes on a molecular basis was initiated using the chromosomal microdissection approach. All equine meta- and submetacentric chromosomes, viz. ECA1 to ECA13 and the X and Y chromosomes, were microdissected. The DNA was PCR amplified, non-radioactively labelled and used as probes on equine metaphase chromosomes to confirm their origin. Once tested, the paints were used as probes on donkey metaphase chromosomes to detect homologous chromosomal segments between the two species. The results not only detected conservation of whole chromosome and/or arm synteny between the two karyotypes, but also highlighted varying degrees of rearrangements. The findings also enable deduction of homology between parts of donkey and human karyotypes. In light of the molecular evidence, this study examines the accuracy of the available comparative cytogenetic data between horse and donkey.

A genomic region encompassing a cluster of olfactory receptor genes and a myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) gene is duplicated on human chromosome regions 3q13-q21 and 3p13

The olfactory receptor (OR) multigene family is widely distributed in the human genome. We characterize here a new cluster of four OR genes (HGMW-approved symbols OR7E20P, OR7E6P, OR7E21P, and OR7E22P) on human chromosome 3p13 that is contained in an approximately 250-kb region. This region has been physically mapped, and a 106-kb portion containing the OR genes has been sequenced. All the OR sequences are disrupted by frameshifts and stop codons and appear to have arisen through local duplications. A myosin light chain kinase pseudogene (HGMW-approved symbol MYLKP) lies at one end of the OR gene cluster. Sequences spanning the entire region are also present at 3q13-q21, the site of the functional MYLK gene. This region duplicated locally before the divergence of primates, and the two paralogous copies were later separated to sites on either side of the centromere. This study increases our understanding of the evolution of the human genome. The 3p13 cluster is the first example of a tandem array of OR pseudogenes, and duplications of such clusters may account for the accumulation of a large number of pseudogenes in the human genome.

Comparative genomics and host resistance against infectious diseases

The large size and complexity of the human genome have limited the identification and functional characterization of components of the innate immune system that play a critical role in front-line defense against invading microorganisms. However, advances in genome analysis (including the development of comprehensive sets of informative genetic markers, improved physical mapping methods, and novel techniques for transcript identification) have reduced the obstacles to discovery of novel host resistance genes. Study of the genomic organization and content of widely divergent vertebrate species has shown a remarkable degree of evolutionary conservation and enables meaningful cross-species comparison and analysis of newly discovered genes. Application of comparative genomics to host resistance will rapidly expand our understanding of human immune defense by facilitating the translation of knowledge acquired through the study of model organisms. We review the rationale and resources for comparative genomic analysis and describe three examples of host resistance genes successfully identified by this approach.

Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH

Although gene maps for a variety of evolutionarily diverged mammalian species have expanded rapidly during the past few years, until recently it has been difficult to precisely define chromosomal segments that are homologous between species. A solution to this problem has come from the development of Zoo-FISH, also known as cross-species chromosome painting. The use of Zoo-FISH to identify regions of chromosomal homology has allowed the transfer of information from map-rich species such as human and mouse to a wide variety of other species. From a Zoo-FISH analysis spanning four mammalian orders (Primates, Artiodactyla, Carnivora, and Perissodactyla), and involving eight species (human, pig, cattle, Indian muntjac, cat, American mink, harbor seal, and horse), three distinct classes of synteny conservation have been designated: (1) conservation of whole chromosome synteny, (2) conservation of large chromosomal blocks, and (3) conservation of neighboring segment combinations. This analysis has also made it possible to identify a set of chromosome segments (based on human chromosome equivalents) that probably made up the karyotype of the common ancestor of the four orders. This approach provides a basis for developing a picture of the ancestral mammalian karyotype, but a full understanding will depend on studies encompassing more diverse combinations of mammalian orders.